The Plane and the Bomb That Could Draw America Into a War With Iran

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Located deep below a mountain, Iran's Fordow nuclear site was always going to be a tough target for Israel.
Israeli weapons would struggle to reach it—but the U.S.'s arsenal can. American B-2 Spirit bombers, equipped with one of the world's heaviest non-nuclear bombs, are thought to be the only aircraft-and-bomb pairing able to destroy a target like the nuclear plant at Fordow.
The 30,000 pound GBU-57/B bunker buster, also known as the Massive Ordinance Penetrator (MOP), would very likely be the weapon of choice if President Donald Trump gave the green light to U.S. involvement in Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear program.
So far, the White House has signaled a reluctance to wade into the fighting in the Middle East, now entering its fifth day.
A B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber proceeds to an undisclosed location after completing a mission over Iraq on March 27, 2003.
A B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber proceeds to an undisclosed location after completing a mission over Iraq on March 27, 2003.
Cherie A. Thurlby/U.S.The U.S. administration appears to be "keeping its options open" as of early morning on the east coast, Michael Oren, former Israeli ambassador to the U.S., told Newsweek.
But Israeli sources say the mood in the country has changed overnight. It seems "more and more tangible" that the U.S. could become involved in targeting Iran's nuclear sites, said Shuki Friedman, director-general at the Jewish People Policy Institute, an Israeli think tank.
Israel early on Friday local time launched "preemptive" strikes on Iran's nuclear program, its ballistic missile sites and other military facilities. Israel has continued to strike across the country as Iran targeted Israel with drones and missiles, some of which evaded Israel's extensive air defenses.
"It's possible we could get involved," Trump told ABC on Sunday. "But we are not at this moment involved."
What Has Trump Done So Far?
To embroil the U.S. in the conflict would be a significant step. Trump has warned Iran—which has cast the U.S. as already involved—that Tehran would face "the full strength and might" of the U.S. military on "levels you've never seen before" if Iran attacked the U.S. in any way.
Trump left the G7 summit in Canada on Monday, but said his early departure from the major meeting was not related to a deal to stop the fighting between Iran and Israel.
French President Emmanuel Macron had told reporters there was an "offer" on the table for a ceasefire. Trump, referencing the comments on his Truth Social platform, called the French president "publicity seeking," adding: "He has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington, but it certainly has nothing to do with a Cease Fire."
"Much bigger than that," Trump added. In a later post, the president called for residents of Iran's capital to "immediately evacuate." Fordow is roughly 100 miles from Tehran.
Trump separately told reporters on Monday he wanted a "real end" to discussions over nuclear capabilities with Tehran, with the country "giving up entirely" on nuclear weapons, according to a CBS reporter.
"I didn't say I was looking for a ceasefire," Trump told the journalist.
Sean Parnell, the Pentagon's chief spokesperson, said U.S. forces had "not changed" their "defensive posture."
But everything is "in place" for a U.S. entry into the Israeli strike campaign, Friedman told Newsweek.
The U.S. is moving its USS Nimitz aircraft carrier toward the Middle East, and Israel's air force has worked hard to wipe out Iranian air defenses that could threaten both its advanced aircraft and, theoretically, U.S. bombers.
Israel targeted part of a Russian-made S-300 air defense system around the central Iranian city of Isfahan in April. Wider attacks in October then destroyed the remaining S-300s at Iran's disposal, Israel said.
This left Iran "vulnerable" to additional strikes and to Israeli F-35s, said Daniel Shapiro, a former U.S. ambassador to Israel now at the Atlantic Council. It will be unable to replace these losses in the short-term, he told Newsweek on Monday.
Israel also targeted air defenses in Syria at the end of 2024 after the country's regime, led by former leader Bashar al-Assad, collapsed.
What Are the B-2 and the MOP?
Israel has an advanced air force, kitted out with fifth-generation F-35i stealth fighters that targeted many of Iran's air defenses, plus the F-15 and F-16 jets that then swooped in with bombs and missiles.
But it does not have any bombers capable of ferrying the likes of the GBU-57/B. The B-2 is the only aircraft cleared to carry the bunker buster in combat, although the B-52 has tested the MOP.
The distinctively designed and stealthy B-2 Spirit has a crew of two and is able to launch conventional or nuclear weapons. The U.S. Air Force has 19 operational B-2A aircraft, according to the U.K.-based International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), which publishes annual counts of the world's armed forces.
The B-2 was designed to skirt the Soviet Union's air defenses and deliver nuclear strikes, said William Alberque, a visiting fellow at the Henry L. Stimson Center and a former director of NATO's Arms Control, Disarmament and WMD Non-Proliferation Center.
The stealth bombers, able to cover enormous distances without stopping to refuel, were adapted to carry large conventional bombs, he told Newsweek.
The MOP is a descent of the weapon nicknamed the "mother of all bombs" in the Iraq war era, Alberque said, but was upgraded to be smaller and able to penetrate further into hardened targets.
Israel, without the B-2 and the MOP, could still strike Fordow, analysts say. But it would take a huge amount of Israel's much smaller bombs, across many, many strikes, to hit deep into Fordow, and could expose aircraft targeting the nuclear site to Iran's remaining air defenses and mobile equipment.
Even the American B-2 would need to strike Fordow more than once to collapse more than the entrance and damage the centrifuge hall, Alberque said.
But without knocking out Fordow, Alberque said, Israel cannot credibly say it has destroyed Iran's ability to build a nuclear bomb. It is also not clear, at least in the public domain, how much of Iran's highly enriched uranium remains and how many centrifuges the regime actually has.
Damage to Iran's Nuclear Sites
Experts say there is no visible damage at Fordow since Israel started its strike campaign last week.
The United Nations' nuclear watchdog assessed on Monday that Israel had "severely damaged if not destroyed" centrifuges at the underground facility in Natanz, one of the three major nuclear sites in Iran. Centrifuges enrich uranium.
The below-ground centrifuges were not hit directly, but Israeli strikes caused power cuts and "completely destroyed" the above-ground Natanz site, Rafael Grossi, the chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) told the BBC.
In separate remarks, the IAEA chief said the watchdog had not seen any fresh damage to Natanz since Friday.
Satellite imagery published by Maxar on Monday showed vehicle tracks over the same areas where craters were visible the previous day. Four buildings were damaged at Isfahan, another major nuclear site in central Iran, Grossi said.
How Close Was Iran To a Nuclear Weapon?
The U.S. and Israel have repeatedly said it would be unacceptable for Iran to get hold of a nuclear weapon. "Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON," Trump said on Monday.
The IAEA has warned for months Iran was producing uranium enriched up to 60 percent.
The higher the percentage, the more efficient a nuclear weapon would be. Uranium enriched to 60 percent could theoretically be used for a nuclear weapon, albeit an inefficient one by most standards. Weapons-grade enriched uranium is considered to be 90 percent.
The IAEA said last week Iran was not cooperating with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years. Tehran said it would get a new enrichment site in a "secure location" up and running.
Iran says its nuclear program is peaceful. But senior officials have publicly debated developing a nuclear weapon.
A 2015 agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), or simply as the Iran nuclear deal, relieved sanctions leveled against Iran in exchange for new limits on Tehran's nuclear program. Also, the powers involved at the time tried to limit weapons sales to and from Iran, as well as the country's ballistic missile development.
However, Iran has openly said it has abandoned parts of the JCPOA since Trump pulled the U.S. out of the deal during his first time in office.
Trump, since returning to the White House in January, has threatened to unleash "bombing the likes of which they have never seen" on Iran if it doesn't ink a deal to limit its nuclear program.
Iran says it will not enter discussions on a deal while under Israeli attack.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Bloomberg

44 minutes ago

• Bloomberg

Trump's Twists and Turns Over Iran Leave Oil Traders Hanging

The oil market is wrestling with Donald Trump's next act in the conflict between Iran and Israel, with the US president's every utterance over the fighting seemingly capable of spiking or crashing prices. In a wild week, Brent futures have surged 11% from before Israel attacked its nemesis, but with sharp moves up and down from one day to the next.

Gizmodo

an hour ago

• Gizmodo

Elon Musk Has a New Plan to Win Back MAGA

Elon Musk is in comeback mode. And he's doing it the only way he knows how: by igniting culture war flames and trolling progressives. The world's richest man has just endured one of the most humiliating stretches of his public life. What started as a bombastic fallout with Donald Trump, whom Musk helped return to the White House, ended with a rare and uncharacteristic public apology. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week,' Musk tweeted on June 11. 'They went too far.' I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 11, 2025This moment of contrition signaled just how much damage the feud had done, not only to Musk's reputation with Make America Great Again conservatives, but also to his companies. Tesla, the electric vehicle maker he leads as CEO, is still reeling from a sharp sales drop. First-quarter deliveries fell 13%, and net income plunged 71% year-over-year. The company's stock has dropped more than 20% since January. Behind the scenes, Musk has attempted to re-focus on business. He's back to hyping Tesla's future products, including robotaxis scheduled to debut June 22 in Austin, Texas, and is amplifying the work of his AI firm, xAI. But politics remains his drug of choice. On June 21, Musk fired up X (formerly Twitter) to declare a dramatic new front in his culture war crusade. ''Baby, what happened to Woke?'' he posted, mimicking a conversation. Then answered himself: 'Dead, my darling, Woke is dead.' 'Baby, what happened to Woke?' Dead, my darling, Woke is dead. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 21, 2025The post racked up over 35 million views. Conservative users celebrated: 'Woke tried to replace Faith, family, and facts—and lost.' Woke tried to replace faith, family, and facts and lost. — Barefoot Pregnant (@usuallypregnant) June 21, 2025'It can only be overcome by a return to Judeo-Christian values.' Others were more skeptical: 'Woke is not dead – It's regrouping.' ❗️Wokeness is not dead — it's regrouping, seeking new disguises. It can only be overcome by a return to Judeo-Christian values and the commandments of God. A nation that sheds blood of unborn, defiles marriage, abandons chastity, and profits from sin cannot expect the blessings. — Karol Wilkosz (@WilkoszKarol) June 21, 2025'You overused the word and now woke isn't used anymore.' You overused the word and now Woke isn't used anymore. People are still as aware and awake as ever-more so! Free Palestine. — Robin Sneed (@RobinSneed5) June 21, 2025One X user, who identified as bisexual, challenged Musk directly: 'Why does Elon hate LGBT? I know it's cause of his son but don't take it out on everyone else.' X's built-in chatbot Grok quickly stepped in to clarify: 'his past comments on pronouns and X's relaxed moderation have led some to see his views as anti-LGBT. [But]There's no clear evidence his stance stems from personal issues. His intent appears to target 'woke' ideology generally, but interpretations vary..' I'm sorry you feel insulted. Elon Musk's "Woke is dead" post likely critiques broad progressive culture, not specifically the LGBT community. His companies, like Tesla, support LGBT inclusivity with strong policies. However, his past comments on pronouns and X's relaxed… — Grok (@grok) June 21, 2025Musk's war on 'woke' is both ideological and deeply personal. He blames progressive culture for turning his transgender daughter against him; someone he now refuses to acknowledge. 'My son, Xavier, died,' he posted in March. 'He was killed by the woke mind virus. Now, the woke mind virus will die.' Exactly. My son, Xavier, died. He was killed by the woke mind virus. Now, the woke mind virus will die. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 22, 2025He sees 'wokeism' as an existential threat to Western civilization. Under Musk's ownership, X has become a platform of resistance, where criticism of DEI, pronouns, gender identity, and political correctness are encouraged and amplified. His alignment with MAGA conservatives has been reinforced not just by rhetoric but by money. Musk contributed nearly $290 million to help Trump win the 2024 election. His support didn't go unrewarded: Trump named him head of a newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But the honeymoon didn't last. When Musk began publicly disagreeing with Trump over policy and power, the president lashed out. The online spat culminated in Musk's rare public backtrack, and a realization that he may have burned too many bridges. Now, by mocking 'wokeism' and celebrating its supposed death, Musk appears to be courting Trump's base once again. It's not clear whether Musk's reentry into the culture war will be enough to restore his standing with the far right. His fallout with Trump exposed ideological and ego-based rifts that may not be easy to mend. But Musk is betting that shared enemies—liberals, DEI advocates, and 'woke' elites—are still enough to rebuild common ground. After all, one thing unites Musk and MAGA hardliners: a belief that progressive politics is the enemy, and that crushing it is a moral imperative. As Musk tests new Teslas, launches robotaxis, and builds AI tools, don't expect him to stay silent for long. He's not just fighting for influence. He's fighting for relevance. And right now, culture war is still his favorite battlefield.

Newsweek

an hour ago

• Newsweek

Donald Trump Calls Green Tax Credits in 'Big Beautiful Bill' 'Scam'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump criticized his own federal budget legislation in a post on Truth Social Saturday. "I HATE 'GREEN TAX CREDITS' IN THE GREAT, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL," the president said, adding "They are largely a giant SCAM." The bill, which includes $4.9 trillion package packed with tax breaks, budget cuts and new Medicaid work requirements, made it past the House last month in a close 215-214 vote, with two Republicans breaking ranks to vote "no," Newsweek previously reported. The next hurdle, opposition and infighting in the Senate. Now, Trump has stated even he has problems with outlined initiatives. "I would much prefer that this money be used somewhere else, including reductions. 'Anywhere' would be preferable!" Trump exclaimed. "Windmills, and the rest of this "JUNK," are the most expensive and inefficient energy in the world, is destroying the beauty of the environment, and is 10 times more costly than any other energy," the President explained, adding "None of it works without massive government subsidy (energy should NOT NEED SUBSIDY!). Also, it is almost exclusively made in China!!! It is time to break away, finally, from this craziness!!!" This is a breaking news story. Updates to come.