Trump's lawsuit against CBS News takes stunning turn as president demands more money

The parent company of CBS News has balked at settling a lawsuit with Donald Trump for $35 million, leading the president to demand even more money, a bombshell report claims.
CBS News parent Paramount was hesitant to settle the $20 billion suit - which claimed that a 2024 interview with Kamala Harris on 60 Minutes was deceptively edited - over fears of facing legal backlash for bowing to the president, the New York Post reported.
Paramount brass believes any large settlement could be considered a bribe, since the the company's $8 billion merger with Skydance must be approved by the Trump administration.
The decision led Trump's team to demand even more money, after a $35 million settlement was 'recently' offered and considered by both sides, the Post reported.
The two sides remain in negotiations.
Trump's legal team reportedly rejected a $15 million offer to settle the suit in May.
The holdup threatens to upend Paramount heiress Shari Redstone's plans to sell the company.
The deal could be voided come October if still not inked by that point.
CBS News parent Paramount was hesitant to settle the $20 billion suit over fears of facing legal backlash for bowing to the president
Trump's team 'appeared to be willing to settle for less, but even that amount worries the Paramount people,' one source told the Post.
Trump's team continues to deny that his administration's approval of the Skydance deal is not contingent on settling the suit, while Paramount staffers say the deal has yet to be closed because of the ongoing litigation.
An insider close to Trump's team told the Post the two sides were not close on a settlement.
'We have a strong case,' the source said.
Several Congressional Democrats have raised the question of bribery in the deal.
With midterm elections approaching, Paramount executives reportedly fear that any gains made by Democrats could open the company up to criminal investigation.
Redstone, 71, has recused herself from the talks, since she could personally benefit.
If the deal goes through, she stands to make more than $1 billion as Paramount's primary shareholder, after reportedly offering to pay as much as $50 million to make the suit go away.
Paramount - once a preeminent presence in Hollywood and broadcast TV - was worth close to $40 billion just few years ago.
Today, it's worth around $8 billion - less than half the sum Trump is suing for.
The lawsuit filed last October accuses CBS, Paramount and 60 Minutes of deceptively editing an interview with then–Democratic presidential nominee Harris just weeks before the election.
Trump alleges the footage was manipulated to 'tip the scales' in Harris's favor.
CBS has denied the claim, slamming the allegations as coming 'completely without merit.'
A federal judge overseeing the case is expected to grant discovery in the coming weeks if there is no settlement, the Post reported.
Former CBS CEO Wendy McMahon and longtime 60 Minutes boss Bill Owens have both left their respective roles in protest of Paramount's willingness to settle. Stipulations set by the president require CBS to also issue a formal apology.
Skydance - run by David Ellison, the son of Trump ally Larry Ellison - has named former NBCU chief Jeff Shell as the prospective boss of CBS News if and when the deal goes through.
Shell is likely to downsize and address the alleged political biases in the network's news programming since it operates on public airwaves, the Post reported.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Leader Live

32 minutes ago

• Leader Live

David Lammy arrives in Geneva to meet Iran's foreign minister for peace push

The Foreign Secretary is meeting Abbas Araghchi on Friday alongside his counterparts from France, Germany and the EU as he seeks to negotiate a settlement before US President Donald Trump decides on whether to take military action against Tehran. In a statement read by his press secretary on Thursday, Mr Trump said there was still 'a substantial chance of negotiations' and said he would make a decision on deploying US forces 'within the next two weeks'. Mr Trump had previously said he 'may' join Israeli strikes against Iran and its nuclear programme, but added: 'I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Friday's meeting with the so-called E3 countries follows Mr Lammy's visit to Washington, where he met US secretary of state Marco Rubio in the White House on Thursday evening to discuss 'how a deal could avoid a deepening conflict'. The Foreign Secretary said: 'The situation in the Middle East remains perilous. We are determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon.' Adding that a 'window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution', Mr Lammy said: 'Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no-one.' Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said on Friday morning the White House had provided a 'very clear timescale now' for the UK and its allies as they push for de-escalation in the Middle East. The situation in the Middle East remains perilous. We are determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon. Meeting with @SecRubio and @SteveWitkoff in the White House today, we discussed how a deal could avoid a deepening conflict. A window now exists within the next two… — David Lammy (@DavidLammy) June 19, 2025 She also told Times Radio: 'There is this two-week window where the US is offering diplomatic talks. And my counterpart, David Lammy, is over in Geneva today with leading European figures meeting with the Iranian foreign minister. 'We appreciate the seriousness of the situation, but we are hopeful that we will be able to achieve de-escalation and a diplomatic solution. And all of our efforts continue towards that end.' Israeli air strikes reached into the city of Rasht on the Caspian Sea early on Friday, Iranian media reported. Since the conflict erupted last week, at least 657 people, including 263 civilians, have been killed in Iran and more than 2,000 wounded, according to a Washington-based Iranian human rights group. Meanwhile, at least 24 people in Israel have been killed and hundreds wounded. It remains unclear whether the UK would join any military action, although there has been speculation that US involvement could require using the British-controlled base on Diego Garcia in the Chagos Islands. The B-2 stealth bombers based there are capable of carrying specialised 'bunker buster' bombs which could be used against Iran's underground nuclear facility at Fordo. Attorney General Lord Hermer is reported to have raised legal concerns about any British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies, which could limit the extent of any support for the US if Mr Trump decides to act militarily. Meanwhile, two Labour backbenchers pushed for a 'fresh, tough approach' to Tehran. Jon Pearce and Mike Tapp, chairman and vice-chairman respectively of Labour Friends of Israel, said the UK urgently needed 'a multifaceted diplomatic, economic and national security plan to guard against the Iranian threat and force the regime to change course'. Writing in The Daily Telegraph, the pair called for tighter sanctions on Iran, the proscription of the country's Revolutionary Guard Corps and a 'comprehensive diplomatic solution' that 'eliminates once and for all' Iran's nuclear threat.

North Wales Chronicle

32 minutes ago

• North Wales Chronicle

David Lammy arrives in Geneva to meet Iran's foreign minister for peace push

The Foreign Secretary is meeting Abbas Araghchi on Friday alongside his counterparts from France, Germany and the EU as he seeks to negotiate a settlement before US President Donald Trump decides on whether to take military action against Tehran. In a statement read by his press secretary on Thursday, Mr Trump said there was still 'a substantial chance of negotiations' and said he would make a decision on deploying US forces 'within the next two weeks'. Mr Trump had previously said he 'may' join Israeli strikes against Iran and its nuclear programme, but added: 'I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Friday's meeting with the so-called E3 countries follows Mr Lammy's visit to Washington, where he met US secretary of state Marco Rubio in the White House on Thursday evening to discuss 'how a deal could avoid a deepening conflict'. The Foreign Secretary said: 'The situation in the Middle East remains perilous. We are determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon.' Adding that a 'window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution', Mr Lammy said: 'Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no-one.' Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said on Friday morning the White House had provided a 'very clear timescale now' for the UK and its allies as they push for de-escalation in the Middle East. The situation in the Middle East remains perilous. We are determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon. Meeting with @SecRubio and @SteveWitkoff in the White House today, we discussed how a deal could avoid a deepening conflict. A window now exists within the next two… — David Lammy (@DavidLammy) June 19, 2025 She also told Times Radio: 'There is this two-week window where the US is offering diplomatic talks. And my counterpart, David Lammy, is over in Geneva today with leading European figures meeting with the Iranian foreign minister. 'We appreciate the seriousness of the situation, but we are hopeful that we will be able to achieve de-escalation and a diplomatic solution. And all of our efforts continue towards that end.' Israeli air strikes reached into the city of Rasht on the Caspian Sea early on Friday, Iranian media reported. Since the conflict erupted last week, at least 657 people, including 263 civilians, have been killed in Iran and more than 2,000 wounded, according to a Washington-based Iranian human rights group. Meanwhile, at least 24 people in Israel have been killed and hundreds wounded. It remains unclear whether the UK would join any military action, although there has been speculation that US involvement could require using the British-controlled base on Diego Garcia in the Chagos Islands. The B-2 stealth bombers based there are capable of carrying specialised 'bunker buster' bombs which could be used against Iran's underground nuclear facility at Fordo. Attorney General Lord Hermer is reported to have raised legal concerns about any British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies, which could limit the extent of any support for the US if Mr Trump decides to act militarily. Meanwhile, two Labour backbenchers pushed for a 'fresh, tough approach' to Tehran. Jon Pearce and Mike Tapp, chairman and vice-chairman respectively of Labour Friends of Israel, said the UK urgently needed 'a multifaceted diplomatic, economic and national security plan to guard against the Iranian threat and force the regime to change course'. Writing in The Daily Telegraph, the pair called for tighter sanctions on Iran, the proscription of the country's Revolutionary Guard Corps and a 'comprehensive diplomatic solution' that 'eliminates once and for all' Iran's nuclear threat.

Telegraph

39 minutes ago

• Telegraph

Democrats will not side with Israel against Iran, poll shows

Democrats cannot bring themselves to side with Israel against Iran's authoritarian regime and pursuit of nuclear weapons, according to a new poll shared with The Telegraph. The polling found that a little more than a third sided with Israel in the Middle East, with only eight per cent saying Iran. But some 52 per cent of Democrats in the survey of 1039 registered voters said they could not pick sides between a Jewish democracy or an Islamic theocracy. The issue illustrates how the party is struggling for clear leadership in the wake of their presidential election defeat, with their base shifting far to the left, said James Johnson, co-founder of JL Partners, which conducted the poll. 'It doesn't take much to shock me any more but I was genuinely gobsmacked by this finding,' he said. 'We know that Democrats have tended to oppose arming Israel, and have expressed concern about Israel's foreign policy. But this poll steps into a totally different order of magnitude: Democrat voters are so coloured by their view of Israel, that they cannot bring themselves to wholly condemn Iran. Instead they opt to sit on the fence.' Kamala Harris, the party's 2024 presidential candidate, lost support among Arab-Americans last year because of the Biden administration's support for Israel's war in Gaza. And the poll results could explain why so many potential 2028 candidates have steered clear of the Israel-Iran conflict and avoided offering their thoughts as they try to work out where Democratic voters stand. The poll was conducted at the start of this week after Israel launched strikes on Iran, prompting a barrage of missiles fired in return. The escalation has taken the Middle East to the brink of a regional war and Donald Trump, US president, is w eighing whether to send heavy bombers to obliterate Tehran's nuclear ambitions. A majority of Americans (59 per cent) said they backed Israel. That figure rose to 80 per cent among Trump voters and to 80 per cent among Republicans more broadly. Democrats said they were unsure. Only 36 per cent said they backed Israel. At the same time, Mr Trump is under intense pressure from many of his allies not to intervene in the conflict. Populists such as Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News anchor, have accused him of allowing 'warmongers' to get in his ear, after campaigning last year to avoid any future foreign entanglements. The result is the threat of a fracture within the Maga coalition, between its 'America First' wing and more traditionally hawkish Republicans. The new poll suggests there is a reckoning on the other side of the political spectrum as Democrats weigh whether to back Israel in its quest to end Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons. The party has already struggled with splits over the US role in Gaza, where almost 50,000 have been killed since Israel launched its response to the October 7 Hamas attacks. While Joe Biden's administration backed the Israeli government, progressives including Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib, the only Palestinian-American congresswoman, described it as a genocide. And the Israeli strikes on Iran triggered opposing responses from senior figures. Jackie Rosen, a Democratic senator from Nevada who sits on the armed services committee, said: 'Israel acted in self-defence against an attack from Iran, and the US must continue to stand with Israel, as it has for decades, at this dangerous moment.' But others condemned the strikes for disrupting negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme. Pramila Jayapal, a congresswoman from the progressive wing of the party, said: 'Netanyahu must not be allowed to pull America into another forever war. Instead, we must immediately push for negotiated de-escalation.' It could prove a particularly tricky needle to thread for some of the party's 'big beasts' who have an eye on the 2028 presidential race. Ms Harris, the former vice-president, Pete Buttigieg, who was Joe Biden's US transportation secretary, and Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, have all stayed silent. Mr Johnson added: 'This, coupled with other findings in the poll, suggest that put simply, Democrat voters have a serious problem with the Jewish state of Israel. 'Such a position is so wildly out of step with the American people as a whole that it could cripple Democrat candidates in their campaigns next year - and should be a central concern as Democratic primary seasons get under way.'