As Iowa Farmers Plant, They Consider Rain, Rates, Tariffs and Trump
It was time for Beau Hanson to lay down his bets.
Like other farmers in western Iowa, in early April Mr. Hanson was preparing for spring planting. The decisions he made then could determine whether he would be in the red or the black come fall harvest.
In farming, there are always uncertainties, and all around Monona County, where Mr. Hanson lives, farmers are weighing them. It has been a tough few years. A wet spring in 2024 meant some farmers had to replant three times. This year, it's too dry. The price of soybeans has been going down, while the cost of seed and fertilizer has remained high, as have the interest rates on the loans that farmers take out to buy those things. Rates have reached 9 percent, more than double what they were three years ago.
And now, there is an extra variable: a trade war.
The 145 percent tariff that President Trump imposed on Chinese imports in April was met with a retaliatory 125 percent tax on U.S. goods going into China. In practice, that means a hefty tax on Midwestern crops. China is the largest importer of U.S. soybeans, buying some $12.8 billion worth last year. The new tariffs, along with various taxes, bring the effective tariff for the crop to 155 percent, according to the American Soybean Association.
Even before Mr. Trump set off the current tariff war, some farmers in Iowa were looking at the possibility of a third consecutive year of losses. Everything is slowing down. Lenders are becoming more cautious. Machinery and heavy equipment sellers feel the mood shift, too, as farmers eke out another year from aging tractors, planters and other big machinery, rather than buy new ones.
'Every year is uncertain,' Mr. Hanson said. 'But this year, it's especially tough.'
Mr. Hanson grew up in Castana, Iowa, and played football at the local high school. After attending Iowa Central Community College, where he was an offensive lineman, Mr. Hanson, 35, returned home and bought the farm next to the house he grew up in. Unlike many of his peers who left farm life for jobs in bigger cities, he is trying to build his future on the fertile soil tilled by four generations of his family.
He farms 700 acres with some combination of soy and corn, and he hedges his bets with 400 head of cattle. His three children, involved in 4-H, care for a few newborn British White Park calves in the barn.
Like many rural Iowa communities, Monona County voted heavily for Mr. Trump, 72 percent, in the election. Mr. Hanson won't discuss his vote and notes that he sits on the county fair board and sells seed to customers all around the area.
'I don't want to be political,' Mr. Hanson said, kicking the dirt with his tan work boots and choosing his words carefully. 'But a trade war is not likely to help grain prices here.'
An Echo of the 1980s
Over five days in early April, I crisscrossed rural communities in western Iowa, talking to farmers. The roads were familiar to me. I grew up driving tractors and working the fields on my family's small corn and soybean farm in Blencoe, about 20 miles southwest of Mr. Hanson's house.
In my teens in the 1980s, I poured coffee for farmers who sat at long tables at Helen's Cafe in Onawa. I eavesdropped as they compared rain amounts, crop yields and the size of the fish they caught. I knew we had a good year when Dad bought a new pickup. During a particularly bad year, my birthday present was a clock radio, purchased from the local farm supply store, most likely so my parents could claim it as a farm expense.
The concerns that farmers voice these days are reminiscent of my teenage years. 'The '80s, the '80s, the '80s,' said Gary Jensen, who farms land in the Loess Hills, a rugged terrain that juts up abruptly from the Iowa plains. 'It comes up all the time.'
The 1980s were a dark time for American farmers. A trade embargo against the Soviet Union led to plummeting grain prices just as the Federal Reserve boosted interest rates to as much as 20 percent in an effort to rein in inflation. Land prices plunged, decreasing the value of the collateral that farmers had used to obtain loans. By some estimates, 300,000 farmers defaulted on loans, resulting in the largest number of bank failures since the Great Depression. The Farm Crisis crushed many a small town.
At 33, Mr. Jensen is too young to have experienced that time, but he has heard enough to know that things can go south fast, and he needs to be careful. When we met, he was preparing his red Case tractor for planting season. When I asked how old the tractor was, he laughed. It was manufactured in 1989, three years before he was born. He's not planning to replace it. 'There's not going to be any new equipment anytime soon,' he said.
Farmers are tightening their belts, said Barry Benson, a senior vice president of agribusiness banking at FNBO, the First National Bank of Omaha. 'They're going to run the combine one more year or run the tractor another year,' he said.
In the months before spring planting, Mr. Benson and other lenders typically meet with farmers to talk about the size of operating loans they will need for the coming season. Someone with a relatively small farm, around 400 acres, may take out a $250,000 loan to pay for seed, fertilizer and leasing the land, and repay the loan after harvest.
But Mr. Benson estimated that a third of last year's loans couldn't be repaid and had to be restructured, which, for some farmers, meant taking out another loan. Others had to sell equipment or land.
Dan Dotzler, the president and chief executive of the United Bank of Iowa in Ida Grove, said his bank had had 'some hard and long' conversations with farmers.
'We really try to work things out, do everything we can, because these are longstanding relationships,' he said. 'But we also recommend farmers look for ways to get additional income to supplement living costs. You've got to go to town and get a job to support yourself and your family. It's a different environment now than it was a few years ago.'
Mr. Dotzler remains optimistic, believing that if farmers keep expenses down, they will, for the most part, be fine. But he is also worried about high interest rates, costly machinery repairs and the lack of a Farm Bill in Congress. And, of course, tariffs.
'There's so much unknown about what's going to happen with the tariffs and how it's going to affect everything,' Mr. Dotzler said. 'There is just a lot of wait and see on that front, which leads to anxiousness.'
'Exports, Exports, Exports'
One way the farm economy recovered from the 1980s was through exports, particularly with an emerging market: China.
China was booming and in need of soy and other feed for its own livestock industries. From a starting point of zero in the 1990s, China became a critical market for U.S. agricultural goods, hitting a peak in 2022, when it imported $36.4 billion worth of products, including soybeans, corn, sorghum, poultry and pork, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Export markets like China are essential because American farmers produce way more than U.S. customers can buy. The industrialized farms that cover the Midwestern landscape use modern planters that practically drive themselves using GPS technology and drop seeds at the perfect depth and width, all in a small fraction of the time it takes farmers using older equipment. In addition, the seed itself not only generates more crop per acre, but is better at protecting the young plants against pests and diseases.
The result is ever-increasing yields. Corn, which is used in animal feed and ethanol production, has a larger domestic market, with exports accounting for about 15 percent of the harvest.
Soybeans, however, are much more sensitive to trade wars. Roughly 40 percent of the soybean crop is exported.
'Exports, exports, exports — that's where the market is,' said Milo Ruffcorn, 66, a farmer from Mondamin, Iowa. 'We have to have someone to sell our corn and soybeans to.'
Concerned that a drawn-out trade war between the United States and a major agricultural buyer like China could stifle soybean prices, Mr. Hanson and many other farmers are betting big on corn this year.
Prices for both crops have fallen around 40 percent since May 2022. For farmers, eyeing prices at dismal, potentially money-losing levels, the math is simple: Go for yield. That means corn, which produces more per acre.
Mr. Hanson decided to plant corn on 90 percent of his acres. This year, farmers are expected to plant 95 million acres of corn, the highest amount in five years, according to the U.S.D.A.
On paper, Mr. Hanson calculates that after paying rent on his 700 acres, buying crop insurance, seed and various chemicals and paying back his operating loan, he can make a profit of $60,000, or about $85 an acre, on corn. With soybeans, his calculations come out to a loss.
'It doesn't make any sense to go into the field and plant a crop, expecting a loss,' Mr. Hanson said, shaking his head.
The Trump Safety Net
Karol King tucked into a pork tenderloin sandwich with a side of macaroni salad at Frannie's Cafe on Main Street in downtown Onawa. My father worked for Mr. King in the 1990s and 2000s, putting up irrigation systems.
A lifelong Republican who voted for Mr. Trump, Mr. King, 78, gives the president high marks for his tough stance on tariffs, particularly against China, even if it causes some pain for farmers like himself.
'It's going to be tough, but they are weaker than we think,' he said, 'and we are their biggest customer.'
But even if there is a standoff with China on trade and grain prices remain low, Mr. King and other farmers believe Mr. Trump will bail them out.
'For some reason, he likes farmers — and blue-collar workers,' Mr. King said. 'We're not going to be hung out to dry.'
Mr. Trump has not discouraged that belief. In mid-April on his social media platform, Truth Social, he posted that American farmers were on the 'front line' of a trade war with China, adding, 'The USA will PROTECT OUR FARMERS!!!'
During Mr. Trump's first term, he imposed tariffs on China that were met with Chinese retaliatory duties on soybeans, corn, wheat and other American products. The U.S. government provided an emergency rescue package of about $23 billion to farmers to ease the pain.
President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Congress continued some of the subsidies, including a $10 billion payout last year to make up for low commodity prices. Mr. Hanson said the money he had received from the government helped him break even on some land and squeeze out a small profit on other fields.
All of the farmers I chatted with in Iowa said they would like to sell their corn, soybeans and other commodities at a good price in the market. And almost all of them said they would take the taxpayer money if it was offered.
'I would prefer to have corn above $5 a bushel and $11 beans,' Mr. Hanson said. 'Without that, we'll need a safety net to protect family farms like mine.'
Still, Mr. Hanson isn't betting on a handout.
'Are we going to get a government payment to help us out this year?' Mr. Hanson shrugged. Another uncertainty.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
Trump admin live updates: Trump to meet with national security team on Monday
The president has warned Iran not to retaliate after Saturday's U.S. strikes. President Donald Trump on Sunday pushed Republicans to get behind his taxation bill that will fund his agenda as the self-imposed Fourth of July deadline approaches. "Great unity in the Republican Party, perhaps unity like we have never seen before. Now let's get the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill done," Trump wrote on social media. Trump addressed the nation on Saturday night after the U.S. carried out airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facility, which he called "a spectacular military success." 9 minutes ago Trump to meet with national security team on Monday President Donald Trump is scheduled to host a closed meeting with his national security team on Monday as the administration prepares for possible Iranian retaliation following this weekend's U.S. attacks on Tehran's nuclear network. The meeting will take place in the Oval Office at 1 p.m. ET, according to the president's public schedule. -ABC News Michelle Stoddart After Iran strike, Trump sets sights on his 'big, beautiful bill' Following the U.S. military strike on Iran, Trump publicly praised what he called "great unity" within the Republican Party and shifted his focus to the administration's next legislative priority. 'Great unity in the Republican Party, perhaps unity like we have never seen before. Now let's get the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill done,' Trump wrote on social media. 'Our Country is doing GREAT. MAGA!' The post was the president's first public comment since his address to the nation about the Iran attack on Saturday evening. The administration is aiming to pass the president's tax legislation ahead of the self-imposed July Fourth deadline. -ABC News' Kelsey Walsh
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Declining Stock and Solid Fundamentals: Is The Market Wrong About CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA (ETR:EVD)?
With its stock down 3.8% over the past month, it is easy to disregard CTS Eventim KGaA (ETR:EVD). However, a closer look at its sound financials might cause you to think again. Given that fundamentals usually drive long-term market outcomes, the company is worth looking at. Specifically, we decided to study CTS Eventim KGaA's ROE in this article. Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. The formula for return on equity is: Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity So, based on the above formula, the ROE for CTS Eventim KGaA is: 26% = €331m ÷ €1.3b (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2025). The 'return' is the income the business earned over the last year. One way to conceptualize this is that for each €1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made €0.26 in profit. Check out our latest analysis for CTS Eventim KGaA We have already established that ROE serves as an efficient profit-generating gauge for a company's future earnings. Based on how much of its profits the company chooses to reinvest or "retain", we are then able to evaluate a company's future ability to generate profits. Assuming everything else remains unchanged, the higher the ROE and profit retention, the higher the growth rate of a company compared to companies that don't necessarily bear these characteristics. To begin with, CTS Eventim KGaA has a pretty high ROE which is interesting. Second, a comparison with the average ROE reported by the industry of 3.6% also doesn't go unnoticed by us. So, the substantial 45% net income growth seen by CTS Eventim KGaA over the past five years isn't overly surprising. We then performed a comparison between CTS Eventim KGaA's net income growth with the industry, which revealed that the company's growth is similar to the average industry growth of 39% in the same 5-year period. Earnings growth is a huge factor in stock valuation. The investor should try to establish if the expected growth or decline in earnings, whichever the case may be, is priced in. By doing so, they will have an idea if the stock is headed into clear blue waters or if swampy waters await. Has the market priced in the future outlook for EVD? You can find out in our latest intrinsic value infographic research report. CTS Eventim KGaA has a three-year median payout ratio of 48% (where it is retaining 52% of its income) which is not too low or not too high. This suggests that its dividend is well covered, and given the high growth we discussed above, it looks like CTS Eventim KGaA is reinvesting its earnings efficiently. Moreover, CTS Eventim KGaA is determined to keep sharing its profits with shareholders which we infer from its long history of paying a dividend for at least ten years. Upon studying the latest analysts' consensus data, we found that the company is expected to keep paying out approximately 48% of its profits over the next three years. Accordingly, forecasts suggest that CTS Eventim KGaA's future ROE will be 25% which is again, similar to the current ROE. In total, we are pretty happy with CTS Eventim KGaA's performance. Particularly, we like that the company is reinvesting heavily into its business, and at a high rate of return. Unsurprisingly, this has led to an impressive earnings growth. Having said that, the company's earnings growth is expected to slow down, as forecasted in the current analyst estimates. Are these analysts expectations based on the broad expectations for the industry, or on the company's fundamentals? Click here to be taken to our analyst's forecasts page for the company. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: Trump followed up on his threat to strike Iran — will this help or harm his credibility?
The United States conducted airstrikes on three of Iran's nuclear sites on Saturday, entering Israel's war against Tehran. The timing was unexpected. On Thursday, U.S. President Donald Trump said he was still considering U.S. involvement and would arrive at a decision "within the next two weeks." Financial and political analysts had largely taken that phrase as code word for inaction. "There is also skepticism that the 'two-week' timetable is a too familiar saying used by the President to delay making any major decision," wrote Jay Woods, chief global strategist at Freedom Capital Markets. Indeed, Trump has commonly neglected to follow up after giving a "two week" timeframe on major actions, according to NBC News. And who can forget the TACO trade? It's an acronym that stands for "Trump Always Chickens Out" — which describes a pattern of the U.S. president threatening heavy tariffs, weighing down markets, but pausing or reducing their severity later on, helping stocks to rebound. "Trump has to bury the TACO before the TACO buries him ... he's been forced to stand down on many occasion, and that has cost him a lot of credibility," said David WOO, CEO of David Woo Unbound. And so Trump followed up on his threat, and ahead of the proposed two-week timeline. "There will be either peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days," Trump said on Saturday evening. But given Trump's criticism of U.S. getting involved in wars under other presidents, does America bombing Iran add to his credibility, or erode it further? The U.S. strikes Iran U.S. President Donald Trump on Saturday said the United States had attacked Iranian nuclear sites, pushing America into Israel's war with its longtime rival. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said Sunday that "Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated," a sentiment echoed by Trump, who stressed that "Obliteration is an accurate term." The decision to attack Iran engages the American military in active warfare in the Middle East — something Trump had vowed to avoid. Iran calls attacks 'outrageous'Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Sunday said Tehran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty and people after the "outrageous" U.S. attacks on three of its major nuclear enrichment facilities. Iranian state-owned media, meanwhile, reported that Iran's parliament backed closing the Strait of Hormuz, citing a senior lawmaker. The U.S. on Sunday called on China to prevent Iran from doing so. Investors assess U.S. attacksU.S. futures slid Sunday evening stateside as investors reacted to Washington's strikes on Iran. Futures tied to the S&P 500 lost 0.17%, Dow Jones Industrial Average futures fell 0.24% and Nasdaq 100 futures dropped 0.21%. On Monday, Asia-Pacific markets mostly fell at 1:45 p.m. Singapore time. Japan's Nikkei 225 slipped 0.15% and South Korea's Kospi Index retreated 0.3%. However, Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index bucked the trend to climb 0.29%. Oil prices pare gainsU.S. crude oil were up 1.1% to $74.65 per barrel, while global benchmark Brent climbed 1.12% to $77.88 per barrel early afternoon Singapore time. The commodity pared gains from earlier in the day, when prices jumped more than 2% in oil's first trading session after Saturday's events. That said, multiple analysts raised the prospect of oil hitting $100 per barrel, especially if exports through the Strait of Hormuz are affected. [PRO] Eyes on inflation reading Where markets go this week will depend on whether the conflict in the Middle East escalates after the U.S.' involvement. Investors should also keep an eye on economic data. May's personal consumption expenditures price index, the Federal Reserve's preferred gauge of inflation, comes out Friday, and will tell if tariffs are starting to heat up inflation. Why global markets are brushing off U.S. strikes on Iran The U.S. joining the war between Israel and Iran might seem like a geopolitical flash point that would send markets tumbling. Instead, investors are largely shrugging off the escalation, with many strategists believing the conflict to be contained — and even bullish for some risk assets. "The markets view the attack on Iran as a relief with the nuclear threat now gone for the region," said Dan Ives, managing director at Wedbush, adding that he sees minimal risks of the Iran-Israel conflict spreading to the rest of the region and consequently more "isolated." Furthermore, rhetoric around the idea of shutting down the Hormuz waterway has been recurring from Iran, but it has never been acted upon, with experts highlighting that it is improbable.
