A small window on peace may still be open
Dr Jagdish Batra is a senior academic, currently working as Professor of English at O.P. Jindal Global University, India. He has nearly four decades of teaching and research experience. His area of specialization is Indian English Fiction on which he has presented papers at many international conferences in Europe and South East Asia. A Rotary Study Exchange Scholar to USA, Dr Batra has published eight books besides some sixty research papers and a number of general articles/blogs etc. LESS ... MORE
There is hardly any doubt that the dastardly act committed by terrorists at Pahalgam has the backing of Pakistan. If any iota of doubt remained, it was laid to rest by the Pakistani Defence Minister Khwaja Asif when he admitted that for the past three decades, his country had been backing, training and funding terrorists – doing the 'dirty work'.
Despite this acknowledgement by the Defence Minister, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has self-appraised his country as the 'world's frontline state against terrorism' which has 'endured immense loss'.
The plain reality is what age-old wisdom tells us – if you dig a ditch for others, you fall into it. Pakistan nourished terrorists who are now bleeding it in some cases. And yet it won't forsake that path! It would be naivety of the utmost order if anyone believes Pakistan's belated posture of innocence.
India is totally justified in aiming to defang the terror apparatus in its vicinity. In this, India has rightly got the support of an overwhelming majority of countries in the world which will definitely help her to deal with Pakistan with an iron hand which has become necessary considering that over decades, umpteen peaceful overtures by India have failed to bring Pakistan on to the right path. The spectre of war, therefore, is very real.
There is no doubt that the war will make a dent in the development efforts of both countries, more so in case of Pakistan due to its doddering economy. Besides, in a war, it is not merely the army men and women who lose their lives, but even the ordinary people staying away from the border suffer as the daily visuals of the two war zones in the world show us presently.
The non-invasive treatment of Pakistan in the form of suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty is already causing anxiety to Pakistan. It is a big, big blow as the three rivers course through entire landmass of Pakistan before merging with the Indus and then on with the Arabian sea. With water from the biggest river unavailable, agriculture activities will be hit, leading to famines and collapse of agro-based industries, etc. Even drinking water will become scarce for the people. How long will Pakistan be able to exist? The government and the army there have to seriously consider this scenario.
The people of Pakistan have been suffering due to economic problems and have been admiring India as a model of development. There is frustration in almost all parts of Pakistan — not only in Pak-occupied Kashmir and Baluchistan but also in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Sindh. A small push by India can create existential problem for Pakistan. Therefore, it is in Pakistan's interest to seek peace and not conflict with India.
The ball is in Pakistan's court and time is running short. There is, however, a small window which offers hope. It must think of wiping off the blot of being a 'Terroristan', to use late Sushma Swaraj's term used for that country. For this, it needs to shun terror as the state policy and dismantle terror structure – training camps, launching pads, etc. – on its land. It must hand over terrorists wanted by India for their misdeeds directed at the people and state of India.
That will surely help defuse the highly tense situation prevailing now. Only that gesture will help Pakistan to prove its claim of fighting terrorism and be a respectable member of the comity of nations. India will then surely help Pakistan as an equal and worthy neighbour and assist it come out of the morass into which it has fallen.
This is easily said than done, considering the Pakistan army's vested interest in fomenting terror acts to keep its control over state finances and power. When the army generals there look at the peace and progress happening in Kashmir this side of the border, they fear a pushback.
But the Pakistani people, who are at the receiving end, recognise now the gameplan and have been voicing their distrust of the army. It is democratic countries that garner respect in the world.
Ultimately, it is the people's voice that will force the army to capitulate sooner than later.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pakistan will go to war if India denies water under IWT, says Bilawal Bhutto
Pakistan's former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari on Monday said his country will go to war if India denies Islamabad its fair share of water under the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT). India put in abeyance the 1960 agreement soon after the April 22 Pahalgam terrorist attack that killed 26 people. Home Minister Amit Shah last week announced to never restore the historic accord. Bilawal's comments came two days after Pakistan's Foreign Ministry criticised Shah's "brazen disregard" for international agreements. Bilawal, in a speech in parliament, rejected the Indian decision to suspend the agreement and threatened to get Pakistan's share of water. "India has two options: share water fairly, or we will deliver water to us from all six rivers," he said referring to the six rivers of the Indus basin. Live Events He said that the IWT was still in vogue as the agreement cannot be held in abeyance. "The attack on Sindhu (Indus River) and India's claim that the IWT has ended and it's in abeyance. Firstly, this is illegal, as the IWT is not in abeyance, it is binding on Pakistan and India, but the threat itself of stopping water is illegal according to the UN charter," he said. Bilawal, who is head of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), also threatened that if India decides to follow through on the threat, "we will have to wage war again". The former foreign minister also highlighted the importance of talks and cooperation, especially in counterterrorism efforts. "If India and Pakistan refuse to talk, and if there is no coordination on terrorism, then violence will only intensify in both countries," he said. Bilawal also accused India of "weaponising terrorism for political purposes". He claimed that during his diplomatic visits to the UK and European nations as foreign minister, it was evident that India had lobbied hard to reverse Pakistan's progress on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) front. "At a time when Pakistan had successfully moved from the FATF grey list to the white list, India made every effort to drag us back to the grey list using false narratives and diplomatic pressure," he claimed. Bilawal also said that Pakistan succeeded in raising the issue of Kashmir on the world stage and President Donald Trump had spoken in favour of mediation on Kashmir. Apart from immediate steps such as putting the IWT in abeyance and stopping all trade with Pakistan, India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terrorist infrastructure in territories controlled by Pakistan in response to the Pahalgam terror attack. The strikes triggered four days of intense clashes that ended with an understanding on stopping the military actions on May 10.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Pak politicians urge government to reconsider Trump's Nobel Prize nomination
Several Pakistani politicians and notable figures have asked the government to reconsider its decision to recommend President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize after the US bombed Iran's three nuclear government, in a surprise move on Friday, announced that it would nominate Trump for the prestigious award due to his peacemaking efforts during the recent India-Pakistan letter of recommendation, signed by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, has already been sent to the Nobel Peace Prize Committee in Norway. But the decision came under scrutiny after the US bombed Iran's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites, joining Israel to dent Tehran's nuclear Dawn newspaper reported that some leading politicians demanded the government review its decision in light of the latest development. Veteran politician Maulana Fazlur Rehman, who heads the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam (JUI-F), demanded that the government rescind its decision.'President Trump's claim of peace has proven to be false; the proposal for the Nobel Prize should be withdrawn,' Fazl told workers at a party meeting in Murree on said that Trump's recent meeting and lunch with Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Field Marshal Asim Munir 'pleased Pakistani rulers so much' that they recommended nominating the US president for the Nobel has supported the Israeli attacks on Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and Iran. How can this be a sign of peace?' Fazl questioned.'With the blood of Afghans and Palestinians on America's hands, how can he claim to be a proponent of peace?'Trump had campaigned for office as a 'peacemaker' who would use his negotiating skills to quickly end wars in Ukraine and Gaza, but both conflicts are still raging five months into his senator Mushahid Hussain wrote on X: 'Since Trump is no longer a potential peacemaker, but a leader who has willfully unleashed an illegal war, Pakistan government must now review, rescind and revoke his Nobel nomination!'He said Trump had been 'trapped by (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin )Netanyahu and the Israeli war lobby, committing (the" biggest blunder of his presidency'. 'Trump will now end up presiding over the decline of America!'Trump 'engaged in deception and betrayed his own promise not to start new wars', Mushahid said in another post, strongly condemning the US attacks on Iran. Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) lawmaker Ali Muhammad Khan wrote 'reconsider' on his X account, highlighting the 'US attack on Iran and continuous US support of Israeli killings in Gaza'.In a separate post, the Opposition PTI condemned the 'unprovoked' US strikes and voiced 'total support' for Iran's Hasan, head of PTI's political think-tank, said the government's decision was now a 'cause of unmitigated shame and embarrassment for those who were instrumental in making the choice'.'That's why it is said that legitimacy can neither be bought nor gifted,' said Hasan, as he took a jibe at the also denounced the US' 'total disregard for international covenants' through attacks on senator Afrasiab Khattak said, 'The sycophancy adopted by the Pakistani ruling elite in nominating President Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize is not part of normative conduct in international diplomacy.''It was most embarrassing to announce the nomination hours before Trump ordered to bomb Iranian nuclear sites,' the veteran politician noted. Jamaat-i-Islami chief Naeemur Rehman has said the decision 'undermines our national dignity and grace'.Maleeha Lodhi, Pakistan's former ambassador to the US, termed the move 'unfortunate' and said it did not reflect the public's journalist Mariana Baabar, in a post on X, said that 'today Pakistan does not look too good either', sharing the government's post announcing its intention to nominate Trump for the and activist Fatima Bhutto asked: 'Will Pakistan withdraw its nomination for him to receive the Nobel Peace Prize?'Tune InMust Watch
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Chokepoints and crises: Strait of Hormuz and the age of water wars
This isn't new. Water has been at the heart of treaties, territorial disputes, and even regional conflicts. It doesn't come as a surprise to us that predictions of the next world war could be triggered by water scarcity as the global climate crisis intensifies and freshwater resources oil has traditionally dominated strategic calculations in the Middle East, the growing weaponisation of water and the vulnerability of critical maritime chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz are now central to discussions about future WATER WARS PREDICTIONS: LOOMING GLOBAL THREATFor decades, world leaders and experts have warned that water, not oil, may be the flashpoint for the next major global conflict. Three successive UN Secretary Generals have sounded the alarm, with Kofi Annan famously stating in 2001, 'Fierce competition for fresh water may well become a source of conflict and wars in the future.'Recent World Bank and UN reports confirm that water scarcity, exacerbated by climate change and population growth, is already fuelling regional instability, migration, and violence across the now estimate a 75-95% chance of water wars in the next 50 to 100 years, with nearly 300 potential conflict hotspots identified violence has surged in the 21st century, with combatants increasingly targeting water infrastructure and using access to water as a tool of war, as seen in conflicts in Iraq, Syria, Ukraine, and Gaza. THE WEAPONISATION OF WATER AND THE STRAIT OF HORMUZadvertisementThe Strait of Hormuz is best known as the world's most vital oil chokepoint, with roughly a fifth of global oil and petroleum products and a significant share of liquefied natural gas (LNG) passing through its narrow waters daily. However, its strategic importance extends beyond hydrocarbons. The strait is also a critical maritime link for the Gulf region's limited freshwater resources, which are heavily reliant on energy-intensive desalination plants scattered along the Persian Gulf waterway has long served as a critical chokepoint in global trade, especially for oil and gas. Control over such passages gives regional powers significant leverage to influence not only military outcomes but also global economic stability. In the aftermath of recent escalations, Iran has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, underscoring how water access is now being used as a direct bargaining chip in international conflict and India also used the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) as a strategic tool during and after Operation Sindoor to exert pressure on Pakistan. Following the terrorist attack in Pahalgam in April 2025, India launched Operation Sindoor, a series of missile strikes on terror infrastructure in another recent conflict, Israel has restricted access to water infrastructure in Gaza, including freshwater and water-treatment plants, as a means of exerting pressure. Water access and control have become central to the humanitarian situation and are used strategically in the ongoing conflict. HOW REAL IS THE THREAT?advertisementWhile Iran has never fully blocked the Strait of Hormuz, it has repeatedly threatened to do so in response to Western pressure and military action. The current escalation, following US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, has renewed fears that Iran might use the strait as leverage, not just to disrupt oil flows but also possibly as a pressure point in the broader context of water and energy warn that any prolonged closure or disruption would have catastrophic consequences for both energy and water supplies in the Gulf, with ripple effects across Europe, Asia, and beyond. The vulnerability of the strait underscores how closely intertwined water and energy security have become—and how easily a conflict over one can trigger a crisis in the IN FUTURE WATER WARSThe prediction that World War III could be fought over water is no longer a distant climate change accelerates and water scarcity intensifies, critical chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz are at the intersection of energy and water security, and thus at the heart of potential future vulnerability highlights the urgent need for global cooperation on water management and conflict prevention, lest the world's next great war be fought not for oil, but for the very water that sustains life.
