Pak a rogue nation with nukes, must be under IAEA scanner: Rajnath Singh
NEW DELHI: Calling Pakistan a rogue nation with nukes, defence minister
said Thursday its nuclear arsenal should be placed under the watch of International Atomic Energy Agency (
IAEA
), and stressed that Islamabad's nuclear blackmail failed to deter India's response to terrorism under
.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
'PM Modi has redefined India's policy against terrorism which now says that any attack on Indian soil will be considered as an act of war,' said Singh, addressing troops at Badami Bagh Cantonment in Srinagar on his first visit to J&K since Op Sindoor was launched May 7. Singh's comments come soon after the PM drew a new red line, stressing that Pakistan's nuclear blackmail will no longer work and India would continue to give cross-border kinetic responses to terror attacks.
Pak's been deceiving India for long: Rajnath
India has a clearly stated 'no first-use' nuclear weapons policy but Pakistan has deliberately left it ambiguous and often indulges in nuclear sabre-rattling. It brandishes, for instance, its short-range Nasr (Hatf-IX) and other missiles as a counter to India's conventional military superiority.
Pakistan, of course, has steadily built up its nuclear arsenal due to its well-documented proliferation nexus with China and North Korea.
This nuclear option as a leverage against India came to the fore even last week when Islamabad first announced a meeting of its nuclear National Command Authority but then subsequently backed down amid global concern.
At Srinagar, noting that the world has witnessed how irresponsibly Islamabad has issued nuclear threats to New Delhi several times, Singh said, 'I raise this question before the world: Are nuclear weapons safe in the hands of such an irresponsible and rogue nation? Pakistan's nuclear weapons should be taken under the supervision of the IAEA.'
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The defence minister called Operation Sindoor the 'biggest action' taken by India against terrorism in history, and a testament to the nation's commitment to go to any extent to eliminate the menace. 'Our forces have shown to the world that their aim is precise and pinpointed, and the task of counting (the body bags) is left to the enemies,' he said.
Terrorists targeted tourists in Pahalgam based on their 'dharma' (religion), but the Indian forces killed terrorists based on their 'karma' (deeds) in the long-range strikes conducted in Pakistan and PoK on May 7, Rajnath said.
'It was the dream of every soldier that we will reach terrorist hideouts and destroy them. It was our dharma to eliminate the terrorists.' Addressing the troops, chief minister Omar Abdullah and Army chief Gen Upendra Dwivedi, Singh said India has always prioritised peace and never supported war but when its sovereignty is attacked, it is necessary to respond. 'If Pakistan continues to support terrorism, it will pay a heavier price,' he said.
Recalling Pakistan's declaration about 21 years ago in front of then PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee that terrorism will no longer be exported from its land, Singh said Pakistan has been 'deceiving India' for long. Pakistan must stop sheltering anti-India terrorist organisations and not allow its land to be used against India, he said.
Pakistan has reached an abysmal state where it seeks loans from the IMF, while India falls in the category of those countries which provide funds to the IMF so that they can help poor countries, he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
15 minutes ago
- Hans India
Shah's take on English has serious repercussions
This is with reference to the news items "Those who speak English in India will soon feel ashamed: Shah'. India's strength lies in its linguistic diversity. By framing English as a foreign language and linking it to shame, Shah's statement fuels the flames of linguistic chauvinism. This spells danger, especially in a country like India where language has been the flashpoint that triggered regional and communal violence in almost every nook and corner. One must forget that English serves as a bridge language in India, including in higher education, business and inter-state communication. Non-Hindi speaking states are likely to see Shah's statement as one more attempt to establish a Hindi-centric identity in the entire country. Shah's controversial statement carries deep political and global implications. P Victor Selvaraj, Tirunelveli- 627002 Unbecoming of Shah A new controversy is likely to start following the statement of Union Hoe Minister Amit Shah on languages, which is a sensitive issue in India where states have come into existence based on language. This is evident from Maharashtra, where a controversy is underway over adoption of Hindi. Shah warned of a day when speakers of English in India would feel ashamed, but the question is why make such a damaging statement, in the firstplace. By all accounts, it is a shameful remark from a leader of Shah's stature. It reeks of prejudice and myopia, elements that knowledgeable politicians ought to shun. English's centrality to the Indian context is undeniable. To make matters worse, he said 'our culture, our history, and our religion cannot be understood in foreign languages. We will run our country in our own languages and lead the world too.' Earlier this month, Shah launched the Bharatiya Bhasha Anubhag (BBA), or Indian Languages Section, to provide an organised platform for all Indian languages to move towards 'freeing the administration from the influence of foreign languages'. States like Tamil Nadu and Karnataka have witnessed protests on the imposition of Hindi. The Tamil Nadu government has opposed the three-language formula in the National Educational Policy (NEP) tooth and nail, claiming it was an attempt to bring Hindi to the State 'through the backdoor'. In a country that speaks in many tongues and where linguistic tensions are quite common, English has served as the veritable lingua franca, bridging segments of the population. In this globalised world, English is the bridge that connects India to the world and its economy. Shah's demonisation of English needs to be located within a broader ideological and epistemic thrust. But the spirit of the idea of India - linguistically or otherwise - is a celebration of pluralism and accommodation: English, with its many virtues and uses, has a firm place in the Indian ethos. It is expected that the government will see the pros and cons before implementing ill-conceived initiatives. Yash Pal Ralhan, Jalandhar-144003 Shah's shameful statement It was a shameful statement that the Union Home Minister Amit Shah made during a book launch event in Delhi where he spoke of a time "when those speaking English in the country would feel ashamed". English is one of the global languages and helps to understand our living world, especially in the AI era. When we study in our mother tongue, we understand well. But when we need to exchange what we learned, English is the tool. It may help unite the world but not to lead. Unnikrishnan Mangalasseri, Manjeri PO, Kerala-676121 Union Minister should eat his words Ourministers and senior politicians should always talk using measured words and not in an irresponsible manner (Those who speak English will soon feel ashamed: Shah). English (the lingua franca) is an international language. Undermining its importance in our country is like cutting one's nose to spite one's face. It is widely used in businesses, education and judiciary and provides ample opportunities for global communication as well as career advancements. A good command over English boosts our students' prospects not only in India but also abroad. Amit Shah should eat his own words. Dr Sunil Chopra,Ludhiana Shah's gaffe is regrettable AmitShah's statement that "those who speak English in this country would soon feel ashamed" deserves to be taken with a fistful of salt. English, as we all know, is the aspirational language of India's rising middle class. On that count, regional languages, even Hindi, serve a limited purpose. English is the sine qua non of today's India that has set out to claim its place on the global high table. Even the Prime Minister with his RSS/Hindi background, thought it fit to give English a brief hug while driving home a point about terrorism, and that too in Bihar. Mignon McLaughlin, American journalist and author, had said, "Every American child should grow up knowing a second language, preferably English." And that perhaps holds water for every Indian child living in these times. Amitji, are you listening? Avinash Godboley, Dewas (MP)
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
US joins Israeli offensive against Iran as Trump announces strikes on 3 nuclear sites in Tehran
US President Donald Trump on Saturday announced that America has struck three nuclear sites in Iran, directly joining the Israeli offensive against the Islamic country to decapitate its nuclear programme and threatening a possible Iranian retaliation that could spark a wider regional conflict. Iran's state run news agency IRNA reported early on Sunday that the attacks targeted the country's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites without elaborating. In a major escalation of conflict, Trump joined the Israeli offensive against Iran after days of deliberation and more than a week after Israel launched its strikes on Iran that aimed to systematically destroy the country's air defences and offensive missile capabilities, while damaging its nuclear enrichment facilities. Trump said: 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan…Iran must agree to end this war.' The US President added that he would address the country on Saturday night at the White House and give out details about the US military's operation in Iran. The strikes by US on three nuclear sites in Iran is a perilous decision as Tehran had pledged to retaliate if Washington joined the Israeli offensive. The US strikes also goes against Trump's electoral promise where he had said to keep America out of costly foreign conflicts. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home.… — The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 21, 2025 The United States struck three key nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz — hubs of Iran's nuclear ambitions. The International Atomic Energy Agency had confirmed that Iran was producing highly enriched uranium at Fordow, which raised the possibility of the nuclear material to be released in the area. Earlier strikes by Israel on Natanz nuclear site's centrifuge had only caused contamination at the site itself, not the surrounding area, the IAEA had said. The Fordow nuclear site is located near the city of Qom and is surrounded by mountains. Not much was known about this nuclear site until the Israeli intelligence was able to steal a trove of Iranian documents related to the site years ago. The main hall of the nuclear site is located about 80 to 90 metres beneath the ground. A recent IAEA report had stated that Iran had ramped up production of enriched uranium to a level of 60% at Fordow and the facility contains about 2,700 centrifuges. The Isfahan nuclear site is the largest nuclear research complex in the country and is located in central Iran. It was opened in 1984 and was built with the help of China, non-profit organisation NTI stated. According to NTI, about 3,000 scientists work at the facility which is 'suspected of being the center' of Iran's nuclear programme. President Donald Trump's direct military intervention in Iran, by joining the Israeli offensive, comes after his administration pushed for a nuclear deal with the Islamic country and held several high-level talks, direct negotiations in the past couple of months. However, the Trump administration's attempts to persuade Tehran to curb its nuclear programme failed and no agreement was reached. It was then that Israel launched its strike against Tehran last Friday. Trump, while issuing a warning to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had said: 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.' The US's military conflict with Iran comes after seven years when Trump withdrew from a deal signed between Tehran and then US President Barack Obama's administration, calling it the 'worst deal ever'.
The Hindu
31 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Are foreign university campuses in India truly beneficial?
Every year, thousands of Indian students pursue higher education abroad, with the U.S., Canada, the U.K., and Australia being among the top choices. According to data from the Ministry of Education, the number of Indian students studying overseas increased by 52.2% over five years; from 586,337 in 2019 to 892,989 in 2023. This is due to several factors: the perception of receiving a globally recognised, high-quality education at top-ranked universities; access to cutting-edge research facilities; improved career prospects; international exposure; better job opportunities and higher salaries; a superior quality of life; and relatively smoother immigration processes. Studies indicate that over 75% of Indian students who study abroad intend to work and settle in their host countries, with only a small fraction planning to return to India. This suggests that such students have already considered critical questions such as: What are the advantages of earning a degree from a foreign university? What career opportunities will it open up? New questions Now, with some foreign universities setting up campuses in India, aspiring students are beginning to ask a new set of questions: What are the benefits of earning a degree from an international university's Indian campus? Is it as valuable as studying at the main campus abroad? Will it offer the same academic experience and career prospects? The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 supports the establishment of independent campuses by foreign universities in India and Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan recently announced that 15 international universities will set up campuses in the country during the current academic year. The University Grants Commission (UGC) has already issued Letters of Intent (LoI) to some institutions, including the University of Liverpool and to the University of Aberdeen to set up branch campuses in Bangalore and Mumbai respectively. According to the specified guidelines, foreign universities seeking entry into India must rank among the top 500 globally, demonstrate subject-specific expertise, and be duly recognised in their home countries to offer academic and research programmes. They will have autonomy in designing their curriculum, managing admissions, setting fee structures and are authorised to award internationally recognised degrees. Foreign universities stand to gain significantly by entering the Indian education sector as they can expand their global footprint, enjoy academic and administrative autonomy, and offer international degrees within India. The presence of top-ranked foreign university campuses in India is also expected to bring several advantages to the country. It can introduce world-class education; help raise domestic academic standards to global levels and promote knowledge exchange. Participation in conferences organised by these institutions can provide Indian scholars with valuable exposure and enriching learning experiences. Moreover, Indian students will be able to earn foreign degrees without going abroad, thereby helping retain talent within the country. Local needs and priorities But one must also ask: who are the actual beneficiaries? Will these branch campuses cater exclusively to the elite? Will academically gifted students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds have an opportunity to gain admission? In a country where millions of young people struggle to access higher education — or are unable to pursue it due to financial constraints — this initiative risks neglecting local needs and priorities. With regard to bringing world-class education to India, any foreign university setting up a campus here is primarily driven by monetary interests, and the focus is likely to be on profit rather than academic excellence. This opens the door to the commercialisation of education, reducing it to a commodity rather than upholding it as a service. Foreign university branch campuses in India risk becoming symbols of elitism rather than instruments of equality or social justice. A truly vibrant campus is one that embraces equality, upholds social justice, and celebrates diversity and inclusiveness. On a typical Indian campus, students from diverse socio-economic and cultural backgrounds come together, interact, and learn from one another. This environment helps everyone become sensitive to the needs of one another and empathetic. A foreign campus in India is unlikely to foster or reflect this kind of inclusive environment. Introducing foreign university campuses should lead to reforms in the education sector, not widen inequality. It is misguided to claim that graduates from foreign university campuses in India will help reduce brain drain. On the contrary, a degree from a foreign university can serve as a stepping stone and increase the chances for those who aspire to work abroad. If the purpose of inviting foreign universities to set up branch campuses in India is to bring world-class education, develop global citizens, and transform the country into a 'Viksit Bharat' (Developed India) by 2047, the focus must be on addressing local needs, particularly by enabling economically and socially disadvantaged groups to access higher education and by improving the overall quality of education. That is what will lead to true transformation. Let us not forget: all that glitters is not gold. The writer is an ELT resource person and education columnist. Email: rayanal@
