Starlink's proposed deal ‘wrong in principle and practice'
Critics question the legality of exempting Starlink from B-BBEE rules, citing unfair treatment of other foreign firms.
If Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet service is exempted from local rules on broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE), it would be 'surrendering South Africa's sovereignty' to the American tycoon.
This is the view of political economist Dale McKinle, who added: 'It's wrong in principle, it's wrong in practice. The reason is that it sets a precedent for bending the rules simply because someone is wealthy.'
Starlink's proposed deal 'wrong in principle'
He said the fact that it involved a high-profile individual like Musk, who has a close relationship with US President Donald Trump, was itself a problem.
'It smacks of bullying. It's basically bending over backwards because we've been threatened, because people involved have lots of political and economic power,' McKinley said.
He said the move would 'please some racists and bullies', and open an opportunity for a rethink on the B-BBEE itself.
ALSO READ: MK party threatens Malatsi with court action if Starlink gazette not scrapped
McKinley said the proposed change to the B-BBEE approach 'would fundamentally change the B-BBEE situation'.
He said the policy itself was not wrong per se, but there were some problems with its applications. He suggested rethinking B-BBEE so that it benefits ordinary people rather than the elite.
The debate around Starlink's possible exemption from adhering to B-BBEE rules is set to intensify as Communications and Digital Technologies Minister Solly Malatsi was summoned by the portfolio committee on communications and digital technologies to appear before it today.
Minister summoned by committee
The committee believed Malatsi's approach was in contravention of the Electronic Communications Act, which required B-BBEE to be applied by licensees in the sector.
Several organisations promised to challenge the plan to allow Starlink to operate outside the B-BBEE policy in court, based on contravention of the law, including constitutional provisions on equality. Starlink was envisaged to roll-out connectivity, particularly in rural areas of South Africa.
ALSO READ: Malatsi's move 'a shameless sellout to American oligarchs Musk and Trump'
Malatsi proposed alternative empowerment strategies for investments in the information and communication technology sector, including equity equivalent investment programmes (EEIPs) which could mean investment in local infrastructure or small black-owned businesses.
Independent political analyst Sandile Swana said B-BBEE was a law in South Africa that could only be changed or abolished by parliament.
'You can say B-BBEE will end if you are confident that 51% of parliamentarians want it abolished,' said Swana.
Law can only be changed by parliament
'Right now, the ANC is the only party that can end B-BBEE in South Africa. But if you are sure that the ANC is ready to end B-BBEE before 2029, that is fine; B-BBEE will then end.'
Swana said at least 22 American companies, including Microsoft, Amazon and Ford – that had invested in South Africa for many years – complied with the country's B-BBEE laws without any qualms. He said those firms would be envious of Starlink being given preferential treatment by the government.
ALSO READ: Chance for people to really benefit
The telecommunications sector is bound by the Electronic Communications Act – under which the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (Icasa) was established – which states there must be B-BBEE shareholding for any licence issued.
'So, if you are going to hold a licence in that space, you must have black shareholders, whether you are a broadcaster or a telecommunications company,' said Swana.
'Since Starlink fell under the Icasa ambit, it should make a deal with Icasa that conforms with the Act.'
Sector bound by Electronic Communications Act
However, specialist website TechFinancials reported last week that EEIPs have been activated in major investments in this country by US companies IBM, Microsoft and Amazon.
The website said foreign companies often cannot transfer direct ownership, so the EEIPs would be approved by the department of trade, industry and competition to earn B-BBEE points. Firms earn full ownership points for approved initiatives.
NOW READ: Malatsi summoned to Parliament to explain Starlink policy directive
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Iran strike: Another fuel crisis looming?
Sharp curbs on exports reminiscent of 1973 may follow. Participants shout slogans during an anti-war demonstration in Boston, Massachusetts, on 22 June 2025, protesting US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Picture: Joseph Prezioso / AFP Will the history of just over 50 years ago repeat itself in the form of another Middle East oil boycott or shortage, following the US intervention in the war between Israel and Iran? That's the question consumers – and especially motorists – as well as experts are pondering in the wake of the weekend air strikes by American bombers of Iran's nuclear facilities. In 1973, the Arab-Israeli war saw the Arab-dominated Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries putting in place sharp curbs on exports. This not only forced a massive rise in fuel prices, but saw many countries in the West hit by sudden fuel shortages. Drastic steps taken in SA during fuel shortage In South Africa, the government took drastic steps, including lowering the national speed limit from 120km/h to 80km/h and banning fuel sales after hours and over weekends. The trauma of that fuel shortage led directly to the then National Party government establishing a Strategic Fuel Reserve for the country. ALSO READ: Did the US strikes succeed, and how will Iran respond? Economist Dawie Roodt said SA can expect some more clarity on what exactly to expect in the days to come. 'We will have to wait and see,' he said, adding it might affect petrol prices and inflation rate and weaken the rand. 'This could be quite a thing for South Africa. It just depends on how long it goes on and how serious it is,' he said. Senior political lecturer at North-West University Dr Benjamin Rapanyane said conflicts like this one have a way of disrupting international peace and the flow of trade. 'The worst-case scenario would be the disruptions of shipments in the Strait of Hormuz. This may have a devastating impact on Africa in general and South Africa in particular,' he said. ALSO READ: US joins Israel-Iran conflict with overnight bombing campaign Political analyst Piet Croucamp said it could mean nothing or something. 'Nothing in the sense of let's stay out of it, which is hardly possible given the court case SA has against Israel,' he said. 'There's a universal condemnation of Israel for what they have been doing in Gaza and also the attack on Iran, which is against the United Nations resolutions.' Croucamp said it might be hard for SA to stay out of it. 'So many people around the world are concerned about the consequences of what is being done to Iran, but we are also concerned about Gaza,' he said. 'We dare not shut up. We have to say something. Not from a moral high ground because we cannot afford that, too, but it doesn't mean that we don't get to say something.' ALSO READ: What Israel–Iran conflict means for South African economy Political analyst Roland Henwood said there were no immediate implications. 'Indirectly, it will depend on how the situation develops. Politically, the reaction from SA, Brics and other international organisations and governments will be important to follow,' he said. 'If SA reacts very strongly against America and in favour of Iran, it may have negative political consequences. Other outcomes will include the effects of increased oil prices.' Henwood said this may have short-term or long-term implications for the country. 'So far, the reactions from the rest of the world have been rather muted. We will have to see how this situation develops,' he added.
TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Airlines weigh Middle East cancellations after US strikes in Iran strand thousands
Commercial airlines around the world on Monday were weighing how long to suspend Middle East flights after the US struck Iran. Singapore Airlines, one of the highest-profile in Asia, called the situation 'fluid' on Sunday as it cancelled flights from Singapore to Dubai after a security assessment. The Middle East route has become more important for flights between Europe and Asia since Russian and Ukrainian airspace closed due to war, but flight tracking website FlightRadar24 showed empty space over Iran, Iraq, Syria and Israel. Air France KLM said on Sunday it cancelled flights to and from Dubai and Riyadh on Sunday and Monday. British Airways, owned by IAG ICAG.L, also cancelled flights to and from Dubai and Doha for Sunday. It was reviewing the situation, it said in a statement on Sunday night when asked about later flights. Missile and drone barrages in a growing number of conflict zones represent a high risk to airline traffic, and an organisation that monitors flight risks, Safe Airspace, a website run by Opsgroup, warned on Sunday that US attacks on Iran's nuclear sites could heighten the threat to American operators in the region. In the days before the US strikes, American Airlines suspended flights to Qatar and United Airlines did the same with flights to Dubai. Airlines are also concerned about a potential spike in oil prices after the US attacks, which will increase the cost of jet fuel. Israel is ramping up flights to help stranded travellers at home and abroad. The country's airports authority said rescue flights to the country would expand on Monday with 24 a day, though each flight would be limited to 50 passengers. Israeli airline El Al on Sunday said it had received applications to leave the country from about 25,000 people in about a day.
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Floyd Shivambu party‘unlikely to take wings'
Analysts say Floyd Shivambu's party is unlikely to gain the popularity of the EFF and MK party. Former uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party secretary-general Floyd Shivambu's plan to launch a new political party may bring him some support, but it won't have the mass appeal of the EFF, let alone MK, according to experts. They believe Shivambu is not as populist or charismatic as EFF leader Julius Malema or former president and MK leader Jacob Zuma, whose parties are the fourth- and third-largest parties in the country, respectively. Rather, they say, Shivambu is a thinker and strategist who is skilled at working behind the scenes, but not a front-line leader. Shivambu, was removed as secretary-general by Zuma on the pretext that he would be redeployed to the National Assembly, but was subsequently excluded from the list of nine party members to be sworn in as MPs this week. ALSO READ: Floyd Shivambu not on list of MK party members going to parliament Some regard his removal as 'constructive dismissal' and part of Zuma's revenge after Shivambu led an EFF campaign against state capture in which Zuma was a prime suspect. They said his sidelining indicates that in the ongoing public spat between Shivambu and Duduzile Zuma-Sambudla, Zuma has chosen his daughter's side because 'blood is thicker than water'. This is despite the fact that Zuma had earlier condemned Zuma-Sambudla's behaviour towards Shivambu and forced her to make a public apology to him or face disciplinary action. ALSO READ: Shivambu makes public appeal for progressive volunteers Independent political analyst Sandile Swana said: 'I don't see Shivambu's party becoming bigger than the EFF. Of course, there will be people who will move from MK and elsewhere to join Floyd. 'He will get a measure of support, but probably his ambition is to lead the country. That is not going to happen,' Swana said. Another independent analyst Goodenough Mashego said as someone who is not a populist or a great orator, Shivambu would not be able to attract members. 'To put it bluntly, there is no space for whatever Floyd is trying to start. There is no vacuum that Floyd is going to fill,' he said. ALSO READ: Shivambu says money stolen from MK party – and he won't resign Shivambu announced last week that he would establish a political party although he remained an MK member. He said he would undertake a consultation process, including listening to different stakeholders before launching the party. Mashego said Shivambu might face an ideological dilemma as a leftist in trying to appeal to a cross-section of the audience as many South Africans are centrist and want centrist policies. In light of the global outlook, such an approach would make him unpopular with investors and the international community. Shivambu is also an avowed Lennist-Marxist scholar. NOW READ: Does South Africa need a political party led by Floyd Shivambu?
