EDITORIAL: Let Diet members vote freely on married couple surname system
Members of the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan submit a bill to the Lower House in late April for a new surname system for married couples. (Takeshi Iwashita)
One part of Hikaru Utada's latest song created a buzz on social media over the Golden Week of national holidays in early May because of lyrics that asked, 'In what year of the Reiwa Era (2019-present) will it be OK in this nation for married couples to use separate surnames?'
While the lyrics can be interpreted in a number of ways, there is no doubt it shows the high interest in how surnames should be used by married couples.
The proposed system for choosing separate surnames upon marriage gave couples the freedom to choose either using one of their surnames by both or continuing to use separate surnames that each used until marriage.
The Justice Ministry's Legislative Council issued its recommendations about the surname system in 1996, so all the major points of debate have been placed on the table in the ensuing 29 years.
Under current law, couples can choose between the surnames of the husband and wife, but in actual practice wives in 95 percent of the cases change their surname.
The U.N.'s Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women has issued recommendations to the Japanese government on four occasions calling for legal revisions because the current provision forcing couples to use the same surname is 'discriminatory.'
In 2024, Keidanren (Japan Business Federation) called for legal revisions as soon as possible.
Above all, the sudden breach of the achievements and assessment built up through work before marriage is severe.
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has said in the Diet that there was no good reason for delaying reaching a conclusion to the issue.
The legislative branch will be seen as negligent if the situation of the Diet not doing anything should continue.
But the ruling Liberal Democratic Party has already decided not to summarize opinions among members in the current Diet session.
The opposition parties that appeared to be more in favor of a new surname system are also not on the same page.
In late April, the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan submitted a bill in the Lower House that proposed having the couple choose a surname at marriage and using the same surname for all their children.
The proposal more closely followed the recommendations of the Legislative Council because of concerns raised about the 2022 proposal compiled by five opposition parties that said the surname of children could be decided at their birth. There were concerns that proposal would lead to the possibility of siblings having different surnames.
But support for the proposals has not spread.
The Democratic Party for the People included a plank in its platform for the Lower House election last October that called for introducing a new surname system. But party leaders have made comments that are more cautious about pushing forward.
While junior coalition partner Komeito's stance is that any legislation should be submitted by the government, it has not been aggressive in encouraging discussions within the LDP.
Serious discussions should be held in the Diet on the proposals submitted by the opposition. And it would be preferable if parties allowed members to vote according to their conscience when the bill came up for a vote rather than forcing them to toe the party line.
That would more appropriately reflect the views held by society as a whole.
It is Diet members who are the representatives of the people and it has been pointed out that excessively forcing all party members to vote the same way interferes with active discussions in the Diet.
There have been past cases in which parties allowed members to vote however they chose, particularly on legislation that was closely tied to the views of values and ethics held by lawmakers, including the bill on organ transplantation.
Delaying Diet discussions just because the LDP cannot come up with an internal consensus is inexcusable.
Each individual lawmaker will be asked to choose between overlooking the entrenchment of inequality or showing greater respect for the individual.
--The Asahi Shimbun, May 17
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
33 minutes ago
- Nikkei Asia
Trump seeks Japan, Australia, New Zealand leaders meeting at NATO summit
U.S. President Donald Trump might demand more defense spending from Japan and South Korea during a meeting alongside the NATO summit in the Netherlands. © AP TAKASHI TSUJI BRUSSELS -- U.S. President Donald Trump wants to hold a meeting with leaders from Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand during the NATO summit set for Tuesday and Wednesday in the Netherlands, sources related to the military alliance revealed to Nikkei. The meeting, provisionally to be held in The Hague, would include Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte.
Yomiuri Shimbun
37 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
U.S. Strikes on Iran: Concerns Grow over War Spreading, Becoming Quagmire
The United States, Israel's supporter, has taken steps to intervene militarily in the ongoing hostilities between Israel and Iran. The situation in the Middle East has entered a new phase. It is feared that the fighting will spin out of control and turn into a quagmire. One can only be deeply concerned over the situation. The United States has announced it attacked three nuclear-related facilities in central Iran. The latest model of GBU-57 bunker-buster bomb, which is capable of burying itself underground before detonating, was reportedly used on the uranium enrichment facility in Fordo. This is believed to be the first time this type of bomb has been used in actual military operations. U.S. President Donald Trump declared the strikes 'a spectacular military success.' He asserted that the objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and putting a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the country, adding that the United States 'will go after those other targets,' depending on how Iran responds. Israel launched airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in mid-June and requested U.S. intervention. Trump was initially against military intervention. However, as soon as the view that Israel's strikes had achieved something began gaining traction, he quickly shifted gears toward attacking Iran. There were no prospects of a ceasefire in Ukraine or the Palestinian territory of Gaza, and nuclear negotiations with Iran have reached an impasse. With little in the way of diplomatic achievements, Trump may have hastily decided to attack Iran out of a desire for quick results. The United States proceeded with a war on terrorism in Afghanistan and Iraq following the 2001 terrorist attacks, but the battles turned into a quagmire, leaving the United States with bitter experiences. The war continued through 2021, when the U.S. military withdrew from Afghanistan, costing the United States many lives and a heavy financial burden. Trump has long maintained the stance that the United States should not intervene in other countries' conflicts and has been regarded as cautious about the use of military force. However, this time, he recognized Israel's right to self-defense and has himself become involved. He should avoid getting embroiled in wars in the Middle East like previous administrations. Iran's Foreign Ministry has issued a statement that condemned the United States, saying it 'has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter [and] international law,' hinting at retaliation. However, if that happens, further attacks will be inevitable. Retaliation should be avoided, and a solution through dialogue should be sought. Over 100 Japanese nationals and their family members left Israel and Iran by bus for neighboring countries. Many of them are reportedly heading to Japan by commercial aircraft. The government dispatched two large C-2 transport aircraft of the Air Self-Defense Force to Djibouti in eastern Africa, where the Self-Defense Forces have a base, in case commercial aircraft become unavailable. It is hoped that the government will smoothly carry out its duties. (From The Yomiuri Shimbun, June 23, 2025)
Nikkei Asia
an hour ago
- Nikkei Asia
Japan's PM Ishiba considering skipping NATO summit
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba could miss an upcoming NATO summit in the Netherlands. © Kyodo TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Monday he is considering canceling his attendance at a NATO summit following U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites that have heightened tensions in the Middle East. Ishiba had been scheduled to make a three-day trip starting Tuesday to attend the meeting in The Hague, Netherlands, before the United States struck three nuclear sites in Iran early Sunday.
