As the Ukrainians give a masterclass in modern war, our Government rehashes old plans

On Sunday one of the most successful attacks so far on Russia by Ukraine took place. Thousands of miles from the front line a trucks pulled up for what the drivers believed were innocent rendezvous with customers. Not long after the trucks stopped the roofs of the trailers slid open and swarms of small drones took off to attack nearby Russian strategic bomber bases.
Within minutes these little drones, that cost no more than a few hundred dollars each, had obliterated $7bn dollars worth of aircraft. Five bases were hit, one of them over 6,000 miles away from Kyiv. By the end of the day 30 per cent of Russia's strategic bomber fleet was destroyed. These same aircraft had until recently been bombing civilian areas in Ukraine from safely out of reach of the Ukrainian military – or so Russia thought.
These bombers – mostly Russian Tu-95 Bears and Tu-22 Backfires – are also a key part of Russia's nuclear strike force. We should rejoice that these aircraft were hit. We should salute the bravery and ingenuity of Ukraine's SBU – its secret service. I'd bet that the whole operation was done without foreign (including US) assistance. It didn't use western equipment: no Himars, Storm Shadow or ATACMS. It was arguably one of the most important and successful strikes of the war. No country can suffer such a strategic loss and not be knocked backwards. I learnt long before the war never to underestimate the Ukrainians. The Russians didn't learn and they are rightly paying for it.
It is ironic that on the same day as this innovative strike the Labour Government was trumpeting (well actually re-announcing to be honest) billions of pounds of submarines to be delivered in the 2040-2050s. The threat is the here and now. The next decade will be the most challenging of our generation. Now is the time to re-arm. But that isn't going to happen under Rachel Reeves.
Yesterday's Strategic Defence Review was only part one of a three-part plan by this Government to modernise defence. We have waited nearly a year for what was originally billed as a big reset, designed to re-establish Labour's defence credentials after the disaster that was Jeremy Corbyn. It was also supposed to answer Nato and US demands for the UK to up our game on securing Europe. And it was supposed to embrace further the lessons of Ukraine.
But despite numerous statements from Keir Starmer and John Healey that we are in a very dangerous world and we need to face down the threat, the Secretary of State failed to get the money he needed from the Treasury. And it shows. Spin has replaced substance. In a sad attempt to paper over the fact he didn't get what he asked for John Healey and his team have had to resort to re-announcing programmes and capabilities put in place by the last Conservative Government.
I had to pinch myself as announcement after announcement simply rehashed what was already being done. The Complex weapons announcement, cyber, the nuclear warhead program, integrated targeting – all were part of the last defence review refresh. And in some desperate effort to try and persuade the US that we really are serious the Prime Minister confirmed that the UK would build four more submarines than already planned – in the late 2040s! Even Putin will be dead by then. It's hardly a message destined to strike fear into anyone's heart.
From the start this review has had a huge flaw. I am sure Labour thought it was a clever wheeze to outsource it to two respected but out of date individuals but it alienated the serving Chiefs of the armed forces and robbed the review of the most up to date knowledge of the new way of warfare.
At times the review seemed to be a battle between the retired and the serving. If you haven't been involved in Ukraine, you simply cannot grasp the depth of the threat and reforms required. Add to that constant interfering by the Treasury and you get a review that is devoid of answers or even money to fund the here and now. Take for example the 'Nato first pledge' – it sounds good but we have tumbled to 9 th in the Nato funding tables.
As many of us suspected this review was all about buying time for Rachel Reeves and still Labour are stalling on the decisions needed. The review itself has some good things in it – but it also lacks detail whenever a spending commitment is made, with an obvious example being UK air defence. If at the outset of this review the team had been given a proper year-by-year spending profile climbing to 3 per cent of GDP by 2030 then it would have, I am sure, been more specific and more bold.
In the end we can all argue over defence equipment. Are tanks are better than drones? Are aircraft carriers necessary in today's world? Each Secretary of State will have their own priorities informed by the serving personnel of the day. But in the end the only thing that matters to the men and women of the Armed forces is whether the Secretary of State fought their corner and got the funds to protect them and equip them, and that whatever ambition the Government has for defence it is properly funded, not hollow.
Sadly, despite the spin it didn't happen. Maybe Donald Trump will do John Healey's job for him at the Nato summit this month and insist on 3 per cent by 2030. Trump to the rescue? Not something you usually hear from me!

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Reuters

an hour ago

• Reuters

Putin says Russia plans to deepen military-technical ties with 'friendly countries'

ST PETERSBURG, Russia, June 20 (Reuters) - President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that Russia intends to develop military and technical cooperation with "friendly countries" with whom Moscow wants to jointly produce arms and train military personnel. In a speech at Russia's showcase economic forum in St Petersburg, Putin said Moscow also planned to modernise its own armed forces and their bases by equipping them with the latest weapons and technology. "We will harness new technology to improve the combat capabilities of the Russian armed forces, modernise military infrastructure facilities, (and) equip them with the latest technology and weapons and equipment," he said. "At the same time, we intend to develop military-technical co-operation with friendly countries. And we are talking not only about supplies or the modernisation of equipment and weapons, but also about joint development, personnel training, and the creation of turn-key enterprises and production facilities," he said. Talking about global trade, Putin said Russia planned to develop trade ties with its partners by removing barriers, opening up market niches and deepening investment cooperation.

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

Cannibal Russian soldier 'ATE his dead comrade and lived off his remains for two weeks' on frontline, phone call intercepted by Ukrainian spies reveal

A Russian soldier fighting on the frontlines of Ukraine killed his colleague and lived off his remains for two weeks, Ukraine's military intelligence directorate (HUR) has claimed. HUR released what it said was an intercepted call between two of Vladimir Putin 's troops in which they were heard discussing an alleged case of cannibalism among the ranks. One soldier was heard telling his stunned comrade in an expletive-laden rant how a soldier nicknamed Brelok - or 'keychain' - killed his fellow infantryman 'Foma' and began eating him. 'F***ing hell... Brelok f***ing ate him, f*** me... nobody went anywhere. Brelok whacked him and then ate him for f***ing two weeks,' the first caller says. 'No f***ing way… holy sh*t… f*** my bald skull. Was Brelok really found as a 200?' the other responds. The term 200 refers to someone who is found killed in action. 'Yeah, they say he was a 200. He ate his comrade. So yeah… something to think about. I was shocked myself,' the first caller concluded. Ukraine's HUR has intermittently shared snippets of phone calls it says are genuine interceptions of Russian communications since the full-scale invasion in February 2022, though there is no way to verify whether they are genuine. But several Russian units engaged in frontline combat in Ukraine are made up of hardened criminals who agreed to sign up for the so-called 'special military operation' in exchange for a commutation of their sentences. In May 2024, it emerged that a convicted cannibal and a murderer-rapist were among the men freed by the Russian defence ministry before heading to the frontlines. Dmitry Malyshev, 36, was jailed after frying the heart of one of three men he killed. He was hit with a 25-year sentence for 'murder of two people with particular cruelty as part of a criminal gang, banditry, theft and illegal trafficking of weapons and ammunition, preparation for the murder of police officers, robbery and eating the heart of the last victim', Russian media reported. Meanwhile, rapist and killer Alexander Maslennikov, 38, used an axe and a meat grinder to cut up and mince the bodies of two women he invited to his flat for a pizza, before 'feeding human flesh to the dogs'. The pair were pictured grinning together in military fatigues after being freed from jail in late 2023. Sickening rapist and killer Alexander Maslennikov, 38, used an axe and a meat grinder to cut up and mince the bodies of two women he invited to his flat Malyshev told Russia's V1 outlet that he and Maslennikov wanted 'to preserve the traditional values of Russia' in fighting for Putin. 'Alexander and I were serving sentences together and we both signed contracts with the Ministry of Defence in October 2023.' In his confession, Malyshev - pardoned and released 17 years early by Russian courts in coordination with the Defence Ministry - told police about his cannibalism. 'I caught up with a man there, and killed him. 'I hit him several times in the head with a nail gun and cut out his heart,' he said, adding that he took the heart home. In a crime reconstruction, he said: 'I reached in with my hand and pulled out the heart… I sliced it here, the heart's on the table, I just sliced it. Then I put it in a frying pan and started frying it… Then I ate it. 'Well, well, well, we're frying human flesh. Here we have a heart.' He said he 'added the onions and the seasoning… Now I'm gonna stir it in. It's going to be ******* awesome.' Maslennikov, a convicted rapist, was jailed for 23 years for double murder, but released from jail by Putin 18-and-a-half years early Maslennikov, a convicted rapist, was jailed for 23 years for double murder, but released from jail by Putin 18-and-a-half years early. He killed two sales assistants, Daria Labutina, 29, and Olga Shaposhnikova, 28, after meeting them at a karaoke bar and inviting them to his flat for pizza. He testified that he had sex with Daria - and then killed her in the bathroom. Maslennikov then went to eat pizza and smoke with Olga, who was initially unaware her friend had been murdered. After she refused to have sex with him, he tied her up and gagged her - smoking and drinking next to her as she pleaded in vain for her life. Forensic evidence showed Olga died from strangulation. Maslennikov stabbed her repeatedly after death. He then went to buy an axe, file, spade, and plastic bin bags. Prosecutors told the court the DNA of both women was found on a meat grinder in his kitchen.

Daily Mail​

an hour ago

• Daily Mail​

Report: Trump's four key advisers on bombing Iran

President Donald Trump has been coached through the Iran and Israel war by four crucial confidants, but they are surprisingly not all top military brass. Though Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has played a public role in the Trump administration's defense strategy, he is not among the advisors closest to the president on the Iran matter, current and former White House sources say. Neither is Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, the sources told the Washington Post. Though sources close to the intelligence director push back, saying she's been in regular contact with the president this week and at important meetings. The most influential figures in Trump's orbit as he weighs a U.S. strikes to take out Iran's nuclear technology are Vice President J.D. Vance , Secretary of State Marco Rubio, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine, an outside White House advisor told the outlet. The group of four is referred to as the 'Tier one' group of decision makers, the advisor shared. These are the men making critical decisions on whether to get involved in the war. These sour advisors are now helping the president sort through contingency plans for U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities that are buried deep under mountains. Israeli military officials have called on the U.S. to use GB-57 'bunker buster' bombs on the nuclear sites - a weapon that can only be delivered by U.S.-made planes that are captained by American pilots - a move that risks escalating the conflict further. The Pentagon pushed back on the Post report, telling the Daily Mail that Hegseth has not been sidelined amid Caine's rising influence. 'This claim is completely false,' Pentagon chief spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement. 'The Secretary is speaking with the President multiple times a day each day and has been with the President in the Situation Room this week. The DNI has been in critical meetings with the president on Iran this week, a senior intelligence official told the Daily Mail on Thursday, saying she's taking part in National Security Council meetings and impromptu White House sessions. The Gorilla vs. The Gram Trump has also been consulting with General Michael Erik Kurilla, the four-star head of U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) who has earned the imposing nickname 'The Gorilla.' Multiple U.S. officials have said Kurilla has been a more influential voice than the defense secretary and he routinely gets his requests for additional resources approved, making CENTCOM one of the most fortified commands. Meanwhile, at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), several longtime staffers expressed concern over Gabbard's priorities. Sources inside the ODNI accuse Trump's spy chief of focusing on her appearance rather than her intelligence work, CNN reports. These staffers pointed to her polished Instagram making her appear more like a fitness influencer than a Cabinet member.