Judge shuts down Blake Lively's request for Wayfarer docs in legal feud with Justin Baldoni
In a plot twist messier than a reality show finale, Blake Lively's request to peek into Wayfarer Studios' internal investigation files just got a firm nope from the judge. According to court docs filed on Monday, June 12, Judge Lewis J. Liman ruled that the studio's paperwork is protected under attorney-client privilege and cannot be handed over to Lively. Major ouch.
Blake Lively denied access to Wayfarer docs
Wayfarer, co-founded by Jane the Virgin star Justin Baldoni, is at the centre of this legal storm, and they, along with Baldoni, fought tooth and nail to keep those documents under lock and key.
So, what is Blake actually suing for?
Lively has accused Baldoni of sexual harassment, creating a toxic work vibe on the It Ends With Us set, and allegedly masterminding a smear campaign against her. But that is not all. She also claims Wayfarer failed to properly investigate her complaints back in May 2023, and she is suing them for that too. A whole side plot of its own.
Her legal team argued that Wayfarer only bothered launching an investigation after slapping Lively with a $400 million lawsuit, calling the move 'belated' and legally pointless now.
They added that since Wayfarer delayed the investigation, they cannot use that move as a defence anymore. Translation? You snooze, you lose.
Blake vs. Justin: The legal saga
This celeb feud went full soap opera in December 2024 when Baldoni clapped back with a lawsuit of his own — aiming it not just at Lively but also at her husband Ryan Reynolds and publicist Leslie Sloane. The claims? Defamation, civil extortion, and other spicy accusations with a $400 million price tag.
Earlier this month, the judge swiped left on Baldoni's lawsuit and dismissed it — but allowed him to edit and refile parts of it before the June 23 deadline.
It Ends With Us drama is not over yet
Blake flexed her legal win on Instagram, saying she stood strong for women's right to speak up. Meanwhile, Baldoni's lawyer hit back, calling Lively's victory lap 'predictable' and 'false.' He said the new version of their case will bring more tea and 'refined allegations.'
So yeah, stay tuned, this Hollywood legal drama is far from over.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Taylor Swift vs Blake Lively? Feud explodes as Justin Baldoni's legal win drags pop queen into court drama
Well, well, well... looks like Hollywood's latest drama is not a Netflix limited series but real-life legal warfare, and yes, Taylor Swift is officially involved. The once-inseparable blonde duo—Blake Lively and Taylor Swift—are now the centre of a spiralling court case that has every corner of the internet gagged. The Swift-Lively friendship is hanging by a text thread Thanks to actor-director Justin Baldoni's ongoing legal beef with Blake Lively (yes, this all started on the set of It Ends With Us), a federal judge has just approved his team's request to access private texts between Blake and Taylor. The court says it is relevant to Lively's claims of harassment and retaliation. From explicit content accusations to text subpoenas Blake originally sued Baldoni, alleging sexual harassment on set and a post-drama smear campaign involving her husband, Ryan Reynolds. Baldoni clapped back hard with a defamation countersuit, dragging in not only Lively and Reynolds but even The New York Times. While some of Baldoni's claims got tossed (including defamation), the green light to dig into Swift's DMs? That is a major win. Trouble in pop paradise Sources close to the scene claim Taylor is livid. She reportedly feels used and blindsided, especially after Blake allegedly referred to her as one of her 'dragons,' a term that Swift supposedly found deeply manipulative. 'She wishes she had never even met Blake,' said an insider. Ouch. And Swift's inner circle is not staying quiet. Travis Kelce, a.k.a. Mr. Super Bowl and Taylor's boyfriend, has unfollowed Reynolds on Instagram. The couples' friendship? Currently on ice. Meanwhile, Swift's team is furiously trying to distance her from the entire chaos, insisting she had zero creative role in the film and was merely attached via one song. No set visits. No editing notes. Just vibes, and now, legal fire. Trial set for 2026, brace yourselves With court dates looming and friendships combusting, one thing's for sure: Hollywood's favourite squad just became its messiest storyline. And with Swift's texts under legal review, this drama is only heating up.
Time of India
19 hours ago
- Time of India
Taylor Swift breaks from Blake Lively after shocking betrayal as Travis Kelce becomes her emotional shield
Once hailed as one of the most charming celebrity friendships, the bond between and Blake Lively is now fractured beyond repair. The fallout stems from a $400 million lawsuit involving actor-director Justin Baldoni and Lively, where unexpected court revelations have dragged Swift's name into the legal storm. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now According to sources close to the matter, the pop star is "deeply wounded" by how the situation has unfolded. Text messages and court drama reveal a hidden strain in the friendship The friendship, often displayed publicly at NFL games and star-studded events, came under scrutiny when Page Six reported that private text messages from Blake Lively were presented in court. In those messages, Lively referred to Swift as one of her 'dragons'—a reference to Game of Thrones, but interpreted by many as dismissive or even manipulative. Though Swift is not a party to the lawsuit, her indirect association has sparked media frenzy, with insiders claiming, 'even if she heals, the scar will remain.' The messages reportedly exposed a side of Lively that Swift never anticipated, casting doubt on the authenticity of their bond. 'The friendship Lively portrayed with Swift wasn't entirely accurate,' the source added, stating it was rooted more in lifestyle camaraderie than genuine personal connection. Travis Kelce stands by Taylor Swift as she distances herself from Lively Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce, Swift's current boyfriend, has reportedly pledged to protect her emotionally during the turmoil. The lawsuit's public nature has added stress to Swift's otherwise private life, especially as she balances her global Eras Tour with ongoing personal challenges. Their last public appearance together was during Super Bowl LVIII, cheering Kelce on from a VIP suite. But given the emotional toll of recent events, future public moments between the two women seem increasingly unlikely. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now This friendship unraveling shows how celebrity relationships can collapse under the weight of legal disputes and unwanted publicity. Taylor Swift's unintentional entanglement in Lively's legal issues offers a sobering reminder: in the world of fame and billion-dollar lawsuits, even the strongest bonds can be tested—and sometimes broken—without warning. Also Read: As the legal battle continues, fans are left asking: Can any Hollywood friendship truly survive the spotlight when the stakes get this high?
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Taylor Swift's texts exposed in Blake Lively court loss — will this strain the popstar's relationship with Travis Kelce?
In a dramatic legal twist involving the upcoming film It Ends With Us, a judge has denied 's motion to keep her private messages with pop icon out of reach from 's legal team. The decision, handed down by Judge Lewis J. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Liman on June 18, 2025, underscores how deeply celebrity communications are becoming entangled in this high-profile legal showdown. Judge rejects Blake Lively's request to keep Taylor Swift texts private in explosive 'It Ends With Us' legal battle While Justin Baldoni initially subpoenaed Taylor Swift in connection with the harassment and retaliation lawsuit surrounding the production, the subpoena was later withdrawn. However, his team continued pressing for access to Blake Lively's conversations with Swift, arguing they were vital to understanding the environment on set and could potentially validate or refute Lively's allegations. Judge Liman ruled against both Lively's protective order and Baldoni's own cross-motion, stating, 'Lively's motion is rooted in the broader concern that the Wayfarer Parties are using demands for communications with Swift not 'to obtain information relevant to claims and defenses in court, but to prop up a public relations narrative outside of court.'' Lively's representative issued a strongly worded statement in response: 'We will continue to call out Baldoni's relentless efforts to exploit Ms. Swift's popularity, which from day one has been nothing more than a distraction from the serious sexual harassment and retaliation accusations he and the Wayfarer parties are facing.' The same representative pointed to earlier attempts by Baldoni's team to manipulate Swift's massive fan base, referencing a crisis PR strategy document that allegedly called her a 'bully' and encouraged a plan to sway public opinion by weaponizing her image. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Despite the judge's rejection of both motions, the legal tension remains high. The court acknowledged that Lively had represented Swift as having knowledge of conversations around the film's work environment, making the request for messages 'reasonably tailored.' Also Read: Swift, who contributed her song 'My Tears Ricochet' to the film's soundtrack but held no production role, has yet to comment on the controversy. What began as a literary adaptation has now evolved into a legal drama of its own—one involving pop royalty, Hollywood power players, and a courtroom spotlight none of them likely anticipated.
