Ex-Trump lawyer Eastman loses round in fight to keep California law license
June 16 (Reuters) - A California judicial panel has upheld a recommendation that attorney John Eastman should be stripped of his law license for his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 U.S. presidential election on behalf of Donald Trump.
The Friday ruling, opens new tab from the State Bar Court of California's appeals division tees up Eastman's case for final review by the California Supreme Court, which has the final say on attorney disciplinary matters in the state.
Eastman violated California attorney ethics rules against misleading courts and making false public statements, the bar court's Review Department found in a 103-page ruling.
"Whether in the courts, to former Vice-President Pence and his staff, or to the public, Eastman consistently failed to be honest," the Review Department said.
Randall Miller, a lawyer for Eastman, said they would appeal Friday's decision to the state's high court. Eastman had argued to the bar court's Review Department that his rights to free speech and due process were violated by state bar prosecutors, and complained that he was singled out for punishment by the judge who heard his case.
George Cardona, the State Bar of California's chief trial counsel, praised the ruling in a statement on Friday night, calling it "a powerful and timely reminder that whoever they are and whoever they represent, attorneys must remain true to the ethical rules that govern their conduct and respect the rule of law."
A judge on California's State Bar Court recommended Eastman's disbarment in a March 2024 decision that said his plan to derail Democrat Joe Biden's 2020 election victory "was unlawful and lacked any factual or legal support." Eastman's license was suspended after he was recommended for disbarment.
Eastman separately has been indicted in Arizona and Georgia state courts for his efforts to overturn Biden's election victory in those states. He has pleaded not guilty in both cases.
A former law professor at Chapman University in California, Eastman drafted legal memos suggesting then-Vice President Mike Pence could refuse to accept electoral votes from several swing states when Congress convened to certify the 2020 vote count. Pence rebuffed his arguments, saying he did not have legal authority to do so under the Constitution.
Trump was also represented by Eastman in a long-shot lawsuit at the U.S. Supreme Court that sought to invalidate votes in four states where the Republican former president had falsely claimed evidence of widespread voter fraud.
Eastman repeated many of those claims at a rally outside the White House on Jan. 6, 2021, after which a mob of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol and delayed congressional certification of the election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
The ‘inappropriate' post over Iran that led the LA County Sheriff's Department to apologize
The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) apologized for an "offensive and inappropriate" social media post regarding recent U.S. strikes in Iran. The initial post, published hours after U.S. bombings, referenced "victims and families impacted" despite no reported fatalities. The LASD faced significant public backlash, with social media users criticizing the statement as a "slap in the face" to the U.S. military. The department first edited the post, then issued a formal apology, stating the original message was "unacceptable, made in error, and does not reflect the views of Sheriff Robert G. Luna or the Department." The LASD is conducting an internal review into the post's creation and publication, and is reviewing its social media oversight protocols.
Daily Mirror
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'Trump let Iran make nukes he's mad about - he's at war for a Nobel Peace Prize'
If there is one disease which lies behind the constant spasms of horror with which our days our currently blighted, it is the human race's inability to remember what happened five minutes ago. Once upon a time, journalists would go to the pub, and then bed. Sometimes they'd go to bed with each other, because they'd been to the pub. But they'd wake up in the morning and go "blimey, an earthquake in Japan. I had better find a good story of my own about this". And they would have to go deeper into a story and its origins. Today they don't drink, barely know their colleagues, and wake up to emails from a 24-rolling news ecosystem that demands constant feeding. Journalists think "blimey, everyone else is ahead of me" and scramble to catch up. No-one has time to think, which is why no-one has told you that Donald Trump just bombed Iran for making nuclear weapons that Donald Trump let them make. I wish I was making this stuff up, but no-one's got time for that. It's imperative people start remembering how we got to the cliff edge, because we did it by skipping about blindfold and if we don't stop soon we're going to go right over. America gave Iran nuclear technology in 1957. The aim was 'atoms for peace', to create wealth, and allies in the Middle East. After years of the world's greatest democracy propping up a cruel monarchy, the shah fell, the mullahs arose, and Iran was in less-friendly hands. The 1980s was taken up with a war against Iraq, but in the 1990s two Gulf Wars and continued US tinkering led the mullahs to the not-entirely-mad opinion that a nuclear weapon was the best way of keeping the Great Satan at bay. Israel, quite reasonably, was less than chuffed. And as technology sped up it became imperative to find ways of stopping Iran getting a weapon that apocalyptic fundamentalists would see very little reason not to detonate, slap-bang in the middle of a resource-rich, conflict-heavy trade route. And so in 2015, six countries signed a deal with Iran. In return for checks that it wasn't building The Bomb, everyone was open for business. And for three years the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action worked. Germany, China, Russia, France, the UK, China and the US lifted economic sanctions, and every 90 days would ratify everything was non-nuclear and tickety-boo. But such a vague agreement could not withstand the arrival of Donald Trump, whose tiny hands happily dismantled everything that made Barack Obama look good. In 2018 when Benjamin Netanyahu - yes it really is all the same people - gave a speech claiming his spy agency Mossad had stolen 100,000 documents showing Iran had lied and was enriching uranium, Trump saw a 30-second clip and decided it must be true. It might have been. The other nations in the deal didn't think so. But rather than renegotiate, send in inspectors, react as any sane human might, Trump just went "nah", and pulled out of the deal. The other countries tried to keep it going. The International Atomic Energy Authority said there was no enrichment. But the US whacked the regime with sanctions, and Iran said it too would pull out unless they were lifted. They were not. In 2020 the IAEA said Iran had tripled its uranium stockpile, a year later it blocked access to inspectors, and by 2023 it had weapons-grade material. Over the same period, Iran's population suffered. A third were ground into poverty. The economic woes weakened the regime just enough to make it lash out. Iran was behind terror attacks worldwide, former Republican Guards were linked to planned assassinations of ex-Trump officials, and it faced internal protests too. Then Iran funded the October 7 massacre by Hamas. Cue Netanyahu, who was leading a rickety coalition and facing jail the moment it fell, cue the war in Gaza, cue pro-Palestine protests, and cue a lot of blaming Iran. This isn't hard to figure out or remember. It's just that the constant churn of new things to hold our attention never scrolls back to the start of the liveblog, or delves into the third page of search results. Iran is definitely run by a bunch of rotten eggs who could well have been pulling the radioactive wool over the world's eyes in return for a financial boost to stabilise their rule. But the best way of fixing that wasn't walking away from the only half-arsed deal anyone had. It was making a better deal, and if Trump had actually written his own biography rather than paying someone else to make him look good, he might have known how to do it. Trump's withdrawal was supported by Israel and Saudi Arabia, with 63% of US voters, most of the planet and his own advisers screaming at him not to. It was "a horrible one-sided deal that should have never, ever been made", he insisted. "It didn't bring peace and it never will." And so he destabilised and raised the oil price with sanctions, screwed regional trade which meant the price of wheat rose and people starved across several countries, and gave fresh targets to jihadis. Back in office for a second time, Trump wants a legacy and more than anything he wants the Nobel Peace Prize that Obama got, largely for diplomatic efforts with the Muslim world. Trump pledged to end the war in Ukraine "on day one" and it only got worse; he suggested building a golden beachside golf club in Gaza, and got laughed at. So his eye turned to Ayatollah Khameini, and the country which the US has done so much to make worse, for so long. Anyone with an ounce of realism in their body might wonder at the convenience with which the B-2 bombers and their bunker-busting payload were able to fly in unmolested, after the Israelis had suddenly switched attention from Gaza to take out the Iranian air defences a week earlier. It does seem odd that the imminent threat Netanyahu had predicted in 2018 bloomed 7 years later, 6 months after Trump returned to office and only after his other draft entries for the peace prize had evaporated. We might also ponder why the US president with the worst personal polls in history at this point in his leadership might be in want of some surgical strikes to appease his Muslim-hating base, and whether it would do him any harm if there were a couple of small terror attacks on US bases that would give an excuse to bomb the mullahs to the table. And having thought this far, we could ask ourselves how close to the edge of nuclear catastrophe Trump will allow the world to careen before he picks up the phone to "make a deal" which will be the bigliest, most beautiful peace deal of all time. And whether it will be worse than the one we used to have, before he ripped it to shreds out of petulance and exploited the disastrous consequences for the sake of vanity. With Iran alone, Trump has cost the world trillions. Now he is about to march an entire planet to the gates of hell, just so he can look good for marching everyone back again. And this plan works if he is a diplomatic genius able to unpick decades of crapola, and capable of remembering why and how it happened in the first place. But when all he watches is 24-hour rolling news, with constant updates about new stuff that isn't new at all, the best we can hope for is that the Nobel Committee gives him the prize now, just to make him stop.
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
WNBA commentator Rebecca Lobo forced into bizarre on-air U-turn after praising Donald Trump
WNBA legend and ESPN commentator Rebecca Lobo issued a bizarre apology on air for calling America 'great' during the Las Vegas Aces' win over the Indiana Fever. Lobo, who was named a WNBA All-Star back in 1999, was debating a foul call in Sunday's game with play-by-play announcer Pam Ward when she used a term vaguely similar to Donald Trump 's MAGA catchphrase. 'So they disagree with you?' Ward asked her colleague about the decision made by officials on court. 'They do, and I disagree with them. And that's fine,' Lobo responded before adding, 'that's what makes America great, right Pam Ward?' After seemingly being left uncomfortable with her choice of wording, Ward stayed silent before Lobo backtracked on the comment in strange fashion. 'I should rephrase that,' the former New York Liberty star said. Ward then replied: 'Yeah, I did think differences of opinion are perfectly fine.' WNBA legend and ESPN commentator Rebecca Lobo (left) issued a bizarre apology on air for calling America 'great' during the Las Vegas Aces' win over the Indiana Fever (right) "I should rephrase that" — CJ Fogler 🫡 (@cjzero) June 22, 2025 'Yes, that's a better way to say it. Sorry about that,' Lobo added. Fans quickly took to social media to slam Lobo, Ward and ESPN over the awkward moment, which many felt was unnecessary. 'Clearly not political. Just a general statement,' one user posted on X. 'Disgraceful! There is too long a pause after Rebecca said it. Someone in the booth told her rephrase it. There is nothing wrong with what she said, get over yourself woke ESPN. Not everything is political,' wrote another. A third put: 'Imagine being offended about saying America is great. F***in losers'. While another simply commented: 'Pathetic moment.' Lobo has spent over two decades as a commentator for ESPN after joining the network back in 2004, a year after she retired from basketball. As well as playing for the Liberty, Houston Comets, Springfield Spirit and the Connecticut Sun, the iconic center also won a gold medal at the 1996 Olympic Games in Atlanta with Team USA.
