Minnesotans with Middle East ties react with hope, fear over Iran strikes
How some Minnesotans are reacting to U.S. launching strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities
How some Minnesotans are reacting to U.S. launching strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities
How some Minnesotans are reacting to U.S. launching strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities
Minnesotans with ties to the Middle East are reacting after President Trump's announcement that the United States launched strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities.
Pentagon officials are calling the actions "the largest B-2 operational strike in U.S. history." The president described the strikes as a "spectacular military success" in a televised address Saturday night.
Steve Hunegs, executive director for the Jewish Community Relations Council in St. Louis Park, Minnesota, said the attacks are justified.
"We're hopefully headed towards a more secure and safe Middle East," said Hunegs. "Democrats and Republicans agree on this. They all are deeply concerned about the proliferation of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, starting with Iran.
The airstrikes hit home for Fazy Kowsari, one of the founders of Minnesota Committee in Support of a Democratic Iran. Kowsari said his feelings on military action are mixed.
"Mixture of hope and kind of scared the same time," said Kowsari. "We knew that it's going to happen one day, sooner or later."
Kowsari was last in Iran 20 years ago. He now lives with his wife in Maple Grove. Between the two of them, they have several family members, including Kowsari's dad Ahmad Kowsari, who live in Iran. So far, all family are safe, Kowsari said.
Kowsari said the Islamic Republic of Iran frequently cuts the country's internet service, stifling communications with loved ones.
While Kowsari said war is not the solution, he's hoping the recent military action sparks some sort of change, remaining hopeful, someday, for an overthrow of an oppressive Islamic regime.
"We want to send this message to Iranian people to the greater community that this is not our war, we are victims of this war," said Kowsari. "We are prisoner in that country."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
28 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Four Scenarios Facing a Trump-Rattled World Economy
With his decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities and join Israel's war on Iran, President Donald Trump has injected new geopolitical risks into an already fragile global economy. It also makes what comes next in his trade and economic conflicts all the more important. It should be causing some recalculations. And perhaps deleting a popular meme.
Forbes
36 minutes ago
- Forbes
Oil Price To $150?
SEALY, TEXAS - JUNE 19: In an aerial view, oil storage tanks are seen at the Enterprise Sealy ... More Station on June 19, 2025 in Sealy, Texas. (Photo by) Oil prices have surged approximately 25% in just one month, with WTI climbing to $75 per barrel as the Israel-Iran conflict escalates. The situation has taken a critical turn with the United States entering the fray, launching attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities. This military escalation has sent shockwaves through global energy markets, but historical precedents suggest the current price surge may be just the beginning. Historical Pattern: U.S. Military Actions Drive Sustained Oil Price Increases Over the past two decades, U.S. military interventions in oil-producing regions have consistently triggered significant and sustained increases in crude oil prices. The pattern reveals that initial market reactions often pale in comparison to the prolonged price elevation that follows. The 2011 U.S.-led NATO intervention in Libya provides a relevant historical parallel to current events. Libya's oil production of 1.6 million barrels per day was effectively eliminated from global markets, creating an immediate supply shock. Price Impact: During the Iraq War's intensification period, oil prices experienced their most severe sustained increase in modern history. While multiple factors contributed to this surge, U.S. military operations in Iraq were central to market psychology and supply concerns. Price Impact: Notably, this doubling of oil prices played a significant role in aggravating the 2008 economic Situation: Warning Signs Point to Further Escalation Iran's leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has stated their refusal to surrender. In retaliation for the U.S. attack on its nuclear sites, Iran has ordered the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. This action threatens to block roughly 20% of the world's oil supply, valued at approximately $1 billion per day, and is poised to drive oil prices higher. Forbes Daily: Join over 1 million Forbes Daily subscribers and get our best stories, exclusive reporting and essential analysis of the day's news in your inbox every all set! Enjoy the Daily! You're all set! Enjoy the Daily! The current crisis resembles the 2011 Libya intervention, and several factors indicate that oil prices are likely to keep climbing. From a supply risk perspective, Iran's daily oil output of approximately 3.2 million barrels is double what Libya produced in 2011. The direct military involvement of the United States significantly raises the chances of a prolonged conflict, and there's also the potential for the conflict to spread, involving other oil-producing nations in the region. Regarding market psychology, the rapid 25% price increase in just one month shows how sensitive the market is right now. History teaches us that initial price spikes often don't fully capture the eventual peak, as geopolitical risk premiums typically build up over months, not just days. Market Implications History shows that U.S. military actions in the Middle East can result in oil prices spiking over time. Based on these historical trends, we can consider a few scenarios for market implications: Overall, the current 25% surge in oil prices is likely just the beginning of a more significant and prolonged increase. Historical evidence from U.S. military interventions in the Middle East consistently shows that oil markets tend to underestimate how long and how much prices will be affected. Given that Iran is a larger oil producer than Libya and the conflict appears to be escalating rather than de-escalating, investors and policymakers should be ready for oil prices to continue climbing. The historical precedent is clear: when the U.S. launches military attacks in major oil-producing regions, prices don't just spike; they can double. Rising oil prices typically signal trouble for the markets, potentially leading to a stock market correction. This is precisely why a diversified portfolio is crucial for investments, especially given geopolitical and macroeconomic risks. Our Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio, which is a collection of 30 stocks, is developed using a rigorous risk assessment framework, and it has consistently outperformed the S&P 500 over the past four years. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance Roasted For Line That Inadvertently Seemed To Insult Donald Trump
Vice President JD Vance faced ridicule on Sunday over what critics mockingly suggested was an inadvertent insult of Donald Trump. Appearing on NBC's 'Meet The Press,' Vance was defending U.S. strikes on Iran as he told anchor Kristen Welker that he could 'certainly empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East.' 'I understand the concern, but the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents,' Vance said. 'And now we have a president who actually knows how to accomplish America's national security objectives.' Vance: I empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East. I understand the concern, but the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents — Acyn (@Acyn) June 22, 2025 The comment raised eyebrows, especially given how Trump was president for four years during the quarter-century period Vance referred to, alongside George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden. Vance also promised the current strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities wouldn't turn into 'some long, drawn-out thing,' saying: 'We've got in, we've done the job of setting their nuclear program back.' But moments later, he appeared to contradict that assurance by adding: 'We're going to now work to permanently dismantle that nuclear program over the coming years, and that is what the president has set out to do.' This is insane behavior from a vice president. This administration has lost all amount of decency. — bleezy 🔮 (@bleezy_eth) June 22, 2025 🚨 BREAKING: Trump was president for four years during that time Vance is talking about. — SatoshEh (@SatoshEh) June 22, 2025 Dumb presidents? The current president thinks windmills cause cancer and can't spell parade correctly but go off couch boi — Colin Gubbins (@RitleySammich) June 22, 2025 Absolute piece of shit. — Kristen Schaal (@kristenschaaled) June 23, 2025 Does he really think his audience is this 'dumb'!? — Lib Dunk (@libdunkmedia) June 22, 2025 Donald was one of them. Now he is again. — Art Candee 🍿🥤 (@ArtCandee) June 22, 2025 It has become completely normal for Trump and Vance to refer to their predecessors as stupid and dumb. Doing it once would have been scandalously uncouth in any other administration. Yet another subtle sign of America's decline. — William Alfred Pawson (@wilfredpawson) June 22, 2025 Vance: It's not gonna be some long drawn out thingVance 5 seconds later: And we're going to continue dismantling it over the coming years — Akoshic Revival (@AkoshicMutiny) June 22, 2025 Dumb presidents? Really. Crude and ignorant language coming from one of the country's "leaders." He'll probably be praised by Fox News and right-wing social media. — Holy Bullies (@holybullies) June 22, 2025 He's saying Trump is a smart president?Is he serious? 🧐 — Ryca (@_oRyca_) June 22, 2025 If we're calling 'then' presidents dumb, what are we calling this one? — Karly Kingsley (@karlykingsley) June 22, 2025 Trump not being the dumbest president isn't gonna fly. — Outspoken™️ (@Out5p0ken) June 22, 2025 Huh? We have the dumbest motherfucker on the planet as our current president. — Fookin Chookay 🎗️🇺🇸🦅🇳🇴🇮🇪🏳️🌈🌊🇺🇦🇮🇱 (@slayergoddess69) June 22, 2025 As opposed to the guy who hosted a reality game show and thinks BleachBit is a bathroom cleaner? — Warren (@swd2) June 22, 2025 Kayleigh McEnany's 'Every Dictator' Take On Trump Iran Strike Draws Online Fire Critics Point Out Glaring Contradiction In Trump's Iran 'Regime Change' Post Trump Rages At Reporter Who Refuses To Stick To 'Positive' Questions
