Russia Faces Struggle To Replace Bombers Lost In Ukrainian Drone Strikes

London:
Russia will take years to replace nuclear-capable bomber planes that were hit in Ukrainian drone strikes last weekend, according to Western military aviation experts, straining a modernization programme that is already delayed.
Satellite photos of airfields in Siberia and Russia's far north show extensive damage from the attacks, with several aircraft completely burnt out, although there are conflicting versions of the total number destroyed or damaged.
The United States assesses that up to 20 warplanes were hit - around half the number estimated by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky - and around 10 were destroyed, two U.S. officials told Reuters.
The Russian government on Thursday denied that any planes were destroyed and said the damage would be repaired, but Russian military bloggers have spoken of loss or serious damage to about a dozen planes, accusing commanders of negligence.
The strikes - prepared over 18 months in a Ukrainian intelligence operation dubbed "Spider's Web", and conducted by drones that were smuggled close to the bases in trucks - dealt a powerful symbolic blow to a country that, throughout the Ukraine war, has frequently reminded the world of its nuclear might.
In practice, experts said, they will not seriously affect Russia's nuclear strike capability which is largely comprised of ground- and submarine-based missiles.
However, the Tu-95MS Bear-H and Tu-22M3 Backfire bombers that were hit were part of a long-range aviation fleet that Russia has used throughout the war to fire conventional missiles at Ukrainian cities, defense plants, military bases, power infrastructure and other targets, said Justin Bronk, an aviation expert at the RUSI think tank in London.
The same fleet had also been carrying out periodic patrol flights into the Arctic, North Atlantic and northern Pacific as a show of strength to deter Russia's Western adversaries.
Bronk said that at the outset of its 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Russia was operating a fleet of 50-60 Bear-Hs and around 60 Backfires, alongside around 20 Tu-160M nuclear-capable Blackjack heavy bombers.
He estimated that Russia has now lost more than 10% of the combined Bear-H and Backfire fleet, taking into account last weekend's attacks and the loss of several planes earlier in the war - one shot down and the others struck while on the ground.
These losses "will put major pressure on a key Russian force that was already operating at maximum capacity," Bronk told Reuters.
Russia's defense ministry did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
Project Delays
Replacing the planes will be challenging. Both the Bear H and the Backfire are aircraft that were designed in the Soviet era and have been out of production for decades, said Douglas Barrie, aerospace expert at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London, although existing planes have been upgraded over the years.
Barrie said that building new ones like-for-like was therefore very unlikely, and it was unclear whether Russia had any useable spare airframes of either type.
Western sanctions against Russia have aimed to restrict the import of components such as microprocessors that are vital to avionics systems, although Moscow has so far been comparatively successful at finding alternative sources, Barrie added.
Russia has been modernizing its Blackjack bomber fleet, and Putin sent a pointed signal to the West last year by taking a 30-minute flight in one such aircraft and pronouncing it ready for service.
But production of new Blackjacks is slow - one Russian military blogger this week put it at four per year - and Western experts say progress in developing Russia's next-generation PAK DA bomber has also been moving at a crawl.
The Federation of American Scientists (FAS) said in a report last month that Russia had signed a contract with manufacturer Tupolev in 2013 to build the PAK DA, but cited Russian media reports as saying state test flights are not scheduled until next year, with initial production to begin in 2027.
While it would be logical for Russia to try to speed up its PAK DA plans, it may not have the capacity, said Hans Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the FAS. He said in a telephone interview that Russia is facing delays with a range of other big defense projects including its new Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile.
RUSI's Bronk was also skeptical of Moscow's chances of accelerating the timeline for the next-generation bomber.
"Russia will struggle to deliver the PAK DA programme at all in the coming five years, let alone accelerate it, due to budgetary shortfalls and materials and technology constraints on industry due to sanctions," he said.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

34 minutes ago

• Business Standard

With Trump involved, wartime Nato summit may shift focus from Ukraine

At its first summits after Russia began its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Nato gave President Volodymyr Zelenskyy pride of place at its table. It won't be the same this time. Europe's biggest land conflict since World War II is now in its fourth year and still poses an existential threat to the continent. Ukraine continues to fight a war so that Europeans don't have to. Just last week, Russia launched one of the biggest drone attacks of the invasion on Kyiv. But things have changed. The Trump administration insists that it must preserve maneuvering space to entice Russian President Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table, so Ukraine must not be allowed steal the limelight. In Washington last year, the military alliance's weighty summit communique included a vow to supply long-term security assistance to Ukraine, and a commitment to back the country on its irreversible path" to Nato membership. The year before, a statement more than twice as long was published in the Lithuanian capital Vilnius. A new Nato-Ukraine Council was set up, and Kyiv's membership path fast-tracked. Zelenskyy received a hero's welcome at a concert downtown. It will be very different at a two-day summit in the Netherlands that starts Tuesday. Nato's most powerful member, the United States, is vetoing Ukraine's membership. It's unclear how long for. Zelenskyy is invited again, but will not be seated at Nato's table. The summit statement is likely to run to around five paragraphs, on a single page, Nato diplomats and experts say. Ukraine will only get a passing mention. If the G7 summit is anything to go by Recent developments do not augur well for Ukraine. Earlier this month, frustrated by the lack of a ceasefire agreement, US President Donald Trump said it might be best to let Ukraine and Russia fight for a while before pulling them apart and pursuing peace. Last weekend, he and Putin spoke by phone, mostly about Israel and Iran, but a little about Ukraine, too, Trump said. America has warned its allies that it has other security priorities, including in the Indo-Pacific and on its own borders. Then at the Group of Seven summit in Canada, Trump called for Russia to be allowed back into the group; a move that would rehabilitate Putin on the global stage. The next day, Russia launched its mass drone attack on Kyiv. Putin is doing this simply because he can afford to continue the war. He wants the war to go on. It is troubling when the powerful of this world turn a blind eye to it, Zelenskyy said. Trump left the G7 gathering early to focus on the conflict between Israel and Iran. Zelenskyy had travelled to Canada to meet with him. No meeting happened, and no statement on Russia or the war was agreed. Lacking unanimity, other leaders met with Zelenskyy to reassure him of their support. Questions about US support for Ukraine Trump wants to broker a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. He said he could do it within 100 days, but that target has come and gone. Things are not going well, as a very public bust up with Zelenskyy at the White House demonstrated. Trump froze military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine's armed forces for a week. The US has stepped back from the Ukraine Defence Contact Group that was set up under the Biden administration and helped to drum up weapons and ammunition. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth skipped its last meeting; the first time a Pentagon chief has been absent since Russian forces invaded in February 2022. Addressing Congress on June 10, Hegseth also acknowledged that funding for Ukraine military assistance, which has been robust for the past two years, will be reduced in the upcoming defense budget. It means Kyiv will receive fewer of the weapons systems that have been key to countering Russia's attack. Indeed, no new aid packages have been approved for Ukraine since Trump took office again in January. The message from the administration is clear: Far from guaranteed, future U.S. support for Ukraine may be in jeopardy, said Riley McCabe, Associate Fellow at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a US-based policy research organization. Cutting aid, McCabe warned, could make the Kremlin believe that US resolve is fleeting, and that time is on Russia's side. Putin has less incentive to negotiate if he believes that US disengagement is inevitable and that Russia will soon gain an advantage on the battlefield, he said. What the summit might mean for Kyiv Trump wants the summit to focus on defence spending. The 32 allies are expected to agree on an investment pledge that should meet his demands. Still, the Europeans and Canada are determined to keep a spotlight on the war, wary that Russia could set its sights on one of them next. They back Trump's ceasefire efforts with Putin but also worry that the two men are cozying up. Also, some governments may struggle to convince their citizens of the need to boost defense spending at the expense of other budget demands without a strong show of support for Ukraine and acknowledgement that Russia remains Nato's biggest security threat. The summit is highly symbolic for Ukraine in other ways. Zelenskyy wants to prevent his country from being sidelined from international diplomacy, but both he and his allies rely on Trump for US military backup against Russia. Concretely, Trump and his counterparts will dine with the Dutch King on Tuesday evening. Zelenskyy could take part. Elsewhere, foreign ministers will hold a Nato-Ukraine Council, the forum where Kyiv sits among the 32 allies as an equal to discuss its security concerns and needs. What is clear is that the summit will be short. One working session on Wednesday. It was set up that way to prevent the meeting from derailing. If the G7 is anything to go by, Trump's focus on his new security priorities right now, the conflict between Israel and Iran might make it even shorter.

Hindustan Times

38 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Donald Trump gave Iran two weeks, struck in two days. Here's why the US President didn't wait

US President Donald Trump warned Iran on Friday that it had up to two weeks to avoid possible military action. But just two days later, on Sunday, the US military hit key nuclear sites in Iran, dealing a major blow to the country's nuclear programme. U.S. President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation accompanied by U.S. Vice President JD Vance, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S. June 21, 2025, following U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/Pool(REUTERS) However, a report by Axios said Trump was exploring the option of talks between US and Iranian officials before deciding to send ground troops. Follow Israel-Iran conflict live updates. The proposal was from Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who gave a call to Trump earlier this week when the US President was meeting with G7 leaders in Canada. Trump also reportedly received 'signals' for back-channel talks from Iran. Not only was Trump willing to send Vice President JD Vance and White House envoy Steve Witkoff to Turkey for the talks, according to Axios, he even offered to attend the talks himself if need be. This proposal for talks was conveyed to Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi by Erdogan. Both Iranian officials reportedly tried reaching Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei with the proposal but couldn't. Khamenei went into hiding into a secure underground bunker, fearing an assassination attempt. After the Iranian officials failed to reach him, they informed Turkey, who then told the US that talks would not happen. Days after the meeting was called off, Erdogan reportedly met Araghchi in Istanbul and urged him to hold talks with the US, assuring that Turkey was willing to arrange it. The same day, B-2 stealth bombers departed from the US airbase in Missouri, and later struck three key nuclear sites – Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan, in Iran. Using the B-2 stealth bombers and bunker-buster bombs, the US joined its ally Israel in the fight against Iran's nuclear ambitions. Ever since the Iran-Israel conflict began on June 13, Trump had been warning Tehran to back down and 'come to their senses' about their nuclear plans. As he announced the US military operation in Iran, Trump said a full payload of bombs were dropped on Fordow, a nuclear site very important to Iran, and considered impenetrable by Israeli bombs. 'There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!" Trump said in a Truth Social post. Even as Trump asked "Middle East bully" Iran to come to peace following the strikes, Iran has said it reserves the right to defend itself against the "grave violation".

News18

42 minutes ago

• News18

Several Countries Ready To Give Iran Their Nuclear Warheads After US Strikes: Putin's Top Aide

Last Updated: Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev claimed on Sunday that a "number of countries" are ready to supply Iran with nuclear warheads Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev claimed on Sunday that a 'number of countries" are ready to supply Iran with nuclear warheads after the US joined Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities earlier on Sunday. The US forces on Sunday struck Iran's key nuclear sites—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan—in the first such attack since the 1979 Iranian Revolution. The US joining the ongoing Israeli attacks have further escalated tensions in West Asia, with Tehran vowing 'strong response.' First Published: June 22, 2025, 16:08 IST