Farmers Still Rushing To Convert Land To Forestry

, Producer/Presenter
Whole farm-to-forest conversions continue, according to a new report released by Beef and Lamb New Zealand.
The research, carried out by Orme and Associates on behalf of Beef and Lamb, found close to 40,000 hectares of sheep and beef farms had been sold for forestry since September last year.
The report also confirmed 29,518ha had sold in 2023 and 30,483ha in 2024.
It brings the total amount of farm-to-forestry conversions since January 2017 to more than 300,000-ha. Beef and Lamb estimates this has resulted in the loss of more than 2 million stock units since 2017.
Chair Kate Acland said the data underpinned longstanding concerns about whole farm-to-forestry conversions.
"The numbers show whole-farm sales for conversion to forestry for carbon credits are continuing at pace," she said. "What we're really concerned about is whole farms, really good productive land getting planted into trees."
The research showed Hawke's Bay, Wellington and Wairarapa remained preferred locations, while Southland had also seen a notable increase.
There was a significant slowdown in the Gisborne region, likely due to the environmental impacts of adverse weather events such as Cyclone Gabrielle and tightened harvesting conditions being set by regional councils.
Acland said they were not against incorporating forestry within farms, adding if most farmers planted 10 percent of their least productive land in trees, they could still maintain production.
"We're very supportive of incorporating trees within farms. and I think there's a real opportunity here for farmers to be part of the solution."
This week the government introduced new legislation to restrict farm-to-forest conversions on Land Use Classification (LUC) 1-6 land.
Under the changes, which will retroactively take effect from December last year when the policy was originally announced, up to a quarter of farms can be planted in forestry for the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).
There will also be a ban on full farm-to-forest conversions entering the ETS for actively farmed land and an annual cap of 15,000ha for forestry entering the ETS for lower quality farmland.
Acland said while the government putting restrictions around whole farm to forest conversions was positive, she wasn't sure it went far enough.
"Anecdotally we're still hearing of a significant number of farms being sold this year, despite the government announcing the limits last year.
"We're concerned that some sales are continuing on the basis of intent to purchase land before the limits were announced. We urgently need the government to tighten the criteria around proof of intent to purchase."
Additionally, she was particularly concerned about class 6 land, which she said was "some of the most productive sheep and beef breeding country".
Acland said carbon forestry had a comparatively "short-term return" when compared to sheep and beef.
"I think we need to recognise the importance of the red meat sector for the economy of this country."
Federated Farmers national president Wayne Langford echoed some of these concerns, saying the country was approaching critical mass for sheep production.
He said the new forestry conversion rules were moving "slowly".
"We're gonna see more processing plants close, we're gonna see a lot more communities close down unless we do something about this issue across the country."
The legislation is now before Parliament and is to come into force October 2025.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Scoop

2 days ago

• Scoop

Flexibilities In 2040 Target Risk Breaking The EU Carbon Market

The EU's Emissions Trading System is essential to meeting the European Union's 2040 climate target. Watering the EU ETS down with international carbon credits or carbon removals will prove fatal, concludes a study commissioned by Carbon Market Watch. Under pressure from industry and pro-business stakeholders, the European Commission has been toying with ways to water down the EU's long-delayed 2040 climate target, which is due for release in July, without officially diluting it. Among the options being considered is to allow the use of international carbon credits generated under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement for use towards the 2040 climate target or the European climate goal in the nationally determined contribution (NDC). These Article 6 credits, just like carbon removal credits, could be considered for use in the EU ETS. However, a new study commissioned by Carbon Market Watch through the LIFE Effect project and conducted by the Oeko Institute, which considers the contribution of the EU ETS to the 2040 climate target, reveals that not only are such adjustments unnecessary, they would likely be counterproductive. 'The EU ETS has only recently reached a meaningful carbon price that, while not perfect, made the carbon market a more powerful climate tool. This latest research confirms that the ETS is well-equipped for its mission of reducing emissions for at least another decade,' says Sam Van den plas, CMW's policy director. 'Boosting ETS market liquidity can't come at the cost of the climate. Reforms must build trust in the ETS and keep the EU on track for its 2040 and 2050 climate goals.' Quick fix or in a fix? The Oeko Institute study models various climate scenarios and strategies for calibrating the Emissions Trading System to the new reality of the 2040 climate target, including enabling polluters to use international credits or carbon removals on the EU ETS. These risky options could undermine the environmental effectiveness of the ETS, the analysis concludes. The current configuration provides a cost-effective means for the European economy to decarbonise by both putting a price on emissions and channeling that revenue into climate action and investment in Europe. Meddling with the scheme runs the risk of slowing or scuppering efforts to reduce the carbon footprint of the sectors covered by the ETS s and reducing investment within the EU through the purchase of credits abroad. For international credits, the EU has been here before. In the early years of the EU ETS, polluters were allowed to use carbon credits generated by the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) to offset part of their emissions. This practice led to the depression of carbon prices and delayed the decarbonisation of the bloc's heavy industry. The fact that some CDM credits will migrate to the new Article 6 carbon market raises the spectre of dilution and delay once again. Moreover, using international credits enables the EU to renege on part of its obligation, enshrined in the European Climate Law, to reduce domestically its carbon footprint, removing the responsibility of large European polluters to decarbonise instead of offsetting. The study also finds that it would be misguided to introduce carbon removals into the EU ETS, as the price on the ETS for industrial installations will not be high enough to incentivise the development of the high quality, permanent carbon removals needed to reach net zero by 2050. As recommended by the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change (ESABCC) and as long advocated by Carbon Market Watch and its allies, setting separate targets for gross emissions reductions, permanent removals and land-based removals within the EU's 2040 climate target is the first step to ensuring emissions reductions occur alongside the development of high-quality carbon removals. Any integration of carbon removals in the ETS poses the risk that efforts to slash emissions today will be scaled back in favour of carbon removals tomorrow. This would, in turn, increase pressure to allow cheap and volatile natural sequestration, with its doubtful climate impact, in the future. When it comes to the EU ETS for road transport and buildings (ETS2), the report concludes that uncertainties surrounding how the new market will function and how fast emissions will fall from these two sectors means that ETS2 should be left to function and observed for several years before any changes are considered to avoid unnecessarily weakening the system. The existing safeguards in place to prevent high ETS2 prices must be accompanied by strong social climate plans under the Social Climate Fund and the dedication of all ETS2 revenue to socially targeted investments and income support to help people to decarbonise. Stability, not liquidity Two mechanisms govern the liquidity of the EU ETS: the Linear Reduction Factor (LRF), which sets the annual rate at which the cap or maximum emissions are reduced, while the Market Stability Reserve (MSR) is designed to temporarily hold excess pollution permits which are cancelled if oversupply continues or are injected back into the market if the carbon price spins out of control. The study concludes that both mechanisms are performing their roles satisfactorily and do not need any adjustments until at least 2035. Any premature watering down of either risks depressing the carbon prices and stalling decarbonisation. Don't break it Based on the findings of the study, CMW has produced an accompanying briefing which makes a number of recommendations. These can be summed up in a few words: don't break the EU ETS. This involves excluding international carbon offsets and carbon removals from the scheme. It also involves not tampering with the MSR or LRF until at least 2035. About LIFE Effect Led by Carbon Market Watch, LIFE Effect puts civil society across the EU in the driver's seat to help national policymakers navigate the design of socially fair and environmentally effective carbon pricing and revenue use for buildings and road transport

Scoop

3 days ago

• Scoop

Council Connects With Landowners At Planting For Profit Field Day

Council was on the ground on 10 June at Porangahau Station in Te Karaka, sharing practical insights and supporting landowners at Beef + Lamb NZ and Te Uru Rākau's 'Planting for Profit Field Day'. The event brought together farmers, land managers, and forestry advisors for a farm tour and a series of workshops focused on land management. Sessions covered practical topics such as carbon forestry 101, how to navigate the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), strategies for erosion control, riparian planting and building farm resilience through proper planning. Bryce McLoughlin, Senior Land Management Advisor, was a key speaker presenting how Council is working alongside the community to support sustainable land use across Tairāwhiti. 'Every property is different - and that's why we have our land management advisors out there, working directly with landowners to provide tailored support.' 'We're helping farmers, land managers and landowners make informed decisions using the latest science and planning tools.' Mr McLoughlin also shared how Council is using science and powerful technology to better understand the landscape and support long-term change. 'We now have access to technology and modelling we've never had before.' 'It's helping us understand the land in much more detail and that means we can give more precise advice and support to landowners.' This includes access to high-resolution LiDAR data, a landslide susceptibility and connectivity model, gully assessments, and field verification - which are all tools Council is using to guide smarter land use. The farm tour also provided a space for farmers and advisors to share their observations, suggestions and lessons learned from their own properties. There were various discussions ranging from where to focus erosion control to how planting could complement existing land use. Speakers also included forestry advisor Tim Petro, who gave a practical overview of carbon farming, and Danielle Castles from Te Uru Rākau, who led a workshop on the ETS. Mr McLoughlin said events like these are a valuable opportunity to connect with locals and strengthen relationships. 'Having these conversations are incredibly valuable for our team,' he said. 'It helps us ensure Council's work reflects what's happening on the ground and the priorities of the people who work and live here.' For more information on Council's sustainable land use work programme, visit

RNZ News

4 days ago

• RNZ News

Inland Revenue finds $45 million of undeclared tax in horticulture industry from last 10 months

Inland Revenue was pursuing the contracting firms through audits and prosecutions with nearly 100 such audits active at the moment. Photo: Supplied Inland Revenue has found $45 million of undeclared tax in the horticulture industry in just the last 10 months. Spokesperson Tony Morris said they were seeing concerning practices in the sector, that included people being paid under the table. He said some in the sector were still recovering from Cyclone Gabrielle, and dealt with increasing compliance costs and labour shortages, so paying tax could become an afterthought. Morris said Inland Revenue was also seeing cash sales not being reported correctly and withholding tax not being deducted on payments made, deducted at incorrect rates or not being reported. Growers typically hire labour through contracting fims and Morris said it's these firms that try and hide payments. Photo: 123rf Inland Revenue was pursuing the contracting firms through audits and prosecutions with nearly 100 such audits active at the moment. "While many growers are doing things right, they typically hire labour through a contracting firm, which then frequently pays the labourers in cash. Some of these contracting firms then use convoluted business structures to try and hide those payments," Morris said. "Not only does this mean they could avoid their tax, but it also means the labourers can get benefit payments they aren't entitled to or avoid their child support or student loan payments. "Inland Revenue is cracking down on this by requiring many contracting firms to withhold tax from their labourers payments, and pay that directly to IR. Where Inland Revenue identifies growers and other payers not correctly deducting or accounting for the tax, we are also following these up." Morris also said due to the high use of cash and migrant labour in the horticulture industry, it was a sector open to the abuse of workers. He said Inland Revenue worked with other government agencies to address such issues. "Alongside Hort NZ and Zespri, we work hard to ensure growers and contracting firms are aware of what they need to do to get things right, and appreciate the efforts of the many who do get it right." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.