Auckland's new housing density plans, Wayne Brown's big scheme and more speed limit silliness: Simon Wilson

Remember 2021? That was the year the Labour Government and National Opposition announced a cross-party housing accord. It had a noble goal: to take politics out of the planning for greater density in our big cities.
It also had a controversial result: the Medium Density Residential Standards (MDRS), which for many people allowed far too much density, especially when it might be right next to their own villas.
Properties could be divided in three, and on each third, a three-storey dwelling could be built.
The cross-party accord didn't make it to the next election, with National walking away from it in 2023, but in the way of statutory regulations, the MDRS have lingered on.
That's all over now. Bishop and Brown have jointly announced that the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill is back from select committee hearings. A boring name, but this is big. The bill is 'significantly changed' from its original draft and will become law within a month or two.
Although the MDRS will be gone, greater density is still coming to Auckland. The ministers call it 'city shaping' and say their aim is to 'fully harness the economic growth benefits of the new City Rail Link'.
With more trains and faster journeys, the City Rail Link will make homes and workplaces along all parts of the rail network more attractive, so that's where the Government and council are focusing their density planning.
So, instead of allowing three-storey townhouses almost everywhere that wasn't designated 'special character' or 'heritage', the focus will be on transit corridors.
Bishop has been working closely on this with Mayor Wayne Brown and his Policy and Planning Committee chair, councillor Richard Hills.
The idea driving the minister has always been plain. 'It doesn't make sense that we have single-storey houses on quarter-acre sections a stone's throw away from stations that, in a year or so, will see trains every few minutes,' he said on Wednesday.
The Character Coalition, which lobbies to preserve villa suburbs, has responded to this today, saying there are almost no 'quarter-acre' of the kind Bishop describes.
Fair point, he exaggerates. But his basic point remains. 'The Government and the [Auckland] Council are investing billions in CRL and have a shared vision for stations that become hubs for public transport, mixed-use development and new housing.'
It's not just single-storey houses that could give way to medium-rise development. Low-rise commercial properties are also targeted. Six-storey development will be permitted within walkable distances of train stations and other transit stations such as those on the Northern and Eastern Busways.
The revised bill makes specific reference to three railway stations on the Western Line: Maungawhau (Mt Eden), Kingsland and Morningside.
'Successive governments and councils have failed to grasp this opportunity for economic growth in New Zealand's largest city,' Bishop said. 'This is how modern, growing cities all around the world operate, and now it's Auckland's turn.'
In my view, Bishop is largely right about all this.
The whole process is kind of technical, but bear with me. Since 2022, the council has been working through a long and extremely bureaucratic review called Plan Change 78 (PC78), to identify which parts of the city would be open to the greater density set out in the MDRS.
As Bishop says, 'Progress has been slow for many reasons, including the Auckland floods. The intensification plan change process does not allow Auckland to 'downzone' certain areas due to natural hazard risk – only to 'upzone' them – and the council wrote to the Government asking them to fix this problem.'
That is, after the 2023 floods it became worrying clear that the planning rules could not prevent development on flood plains. This should now change.
The Government will allow the council to withdraw PC78, although not entirely, and not so it can revert to its old ways.
Bishop told the council earlier in the year to get its PC78 decision-making done for the central city, and that has now happened. Higher buildings will be permitted, although not everywhere (more on this soon). This aspect of PC78 is not being withdrawn.
The precinct around the Morningside train station is top of Minister Bishop's list for more housing density. Photo / Janna Dixon
But for the rest of the city, Bishop has instructed Mayor Brown to process a new plan change urgently. They have until October 10 to do it, and the resulting housing capacity must not be less than was going to be permitted under the PC78 and the MDRS.
This means that if the council wants to limit density in some areas, like flood plains, it will have to increase the capacity in others. And if the council wants to continue preserving the villa suburbs, it will need to find a way to do that while still allowing medium-rise along the railway lines.
And do it inside the next four months. Which, as it happens, is the exact same period in which we will be electing a new council. The last day for voting is October 12.
In several parts of the city, this is going to be a very hot election topic.
Not least among them, an enormous swathe of suburbia that runs from Kingsland and Sandringham, down through Balmoral and Mt Roskill to Onehunga. This was exempted from planning rules under PC78, pending a decision on the exact route through those suburbs of the Labour Government's ill-fated Auckland Light Rail line to the airport.
That exemption will not survive and greater density is likely for these suburbs sooner rather than later.
Bishop's intent seems clear: he wants the council to pull finger. 'The government is also considering whether further amendments to the bill to fully maximise development opportunities around other CRL stations are necessary,' he said on Wednesday, 'and I will have more to say in due course.'
Anyone for bird bollards?
Mayor Brown has instructed Auckland Transport to come up with 'innovative, value for money' ways to create cycleways.
Got one!
In London, a company has invented Tulip Wands: Tulip bulbs made from recycled plastic that sit atop flexible sticks to warn drivers not to stray into the cycle lane.
Tulip cycle wands helping to keep traffic out of a cycleway in London.
Cheap and surely guaranteed to bring a smile to your face.
But why should London have all the fun? If we did that here, tulips might be a bit odd, and we don't have flowers of our own that could function in a similar way. Kowhai don't really stick up in the same way. Flax caddies would be good, although possibly too complicated.
So what about birds? Kiwi, kōtare, kea, kākā, imagine riding along and coming across a kākāpo! Even the ones that don't start with k would work. We could call them Bird Bollards. Or Kiwi Krash Wardens. Or Magic Manu.
Hey, Auckland Transport, or Mr Mayor, or absolutely any entrepreneur with an eye for opportunity: you can have this idea for free.
What Wayne Brown really wants from this election
Why did Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown and his deputy, Desley Simpson, bury the hatchet ahead of the council election in October?
They don't get on – even in their joint announcement they said things that annoyed each other. They were going to battle each other for the mayoralty.
Simpson explained that when it came down to it, there weren't any big policy differences between the two, which is probably true.
But what Brown said pointed to a much stronger purpose for the pair. They're setting up a ticket.
Wayne Brown and Desley Simpson announcing they are running together, for mayor and deputy, on a Fix Auckland ticket. Photo / New Zealand Herald
Under the name Fix Auckland, which was Brown's slogan in 2022, they are inviting candidates for council to apply to join them.
This isn't just to give them a reliable voting bloc, because Brown pretty much has that already. Councillors who might join them, like Greg Sayers in Rodney, Andy Baker in Franklin and Daniel Newman in Manurewa-Papakura, already vote with Brown most of the time.
The real value of the ticket is that it will allow Brown to campaign against some of the councillors he believes play obstructive and damaging roles.
Top of his list are the two he calls 'the Albanians': Wayne Walker and John Watson, who represent the Albany ward. Both cheered Brown's election in 2022 but they've fallen out badly with him since. The mayor makes no secret of his frustration at their strident opposition to most things he wants to do.
That frustration extends to others, most notably Mike Lee from Waitematā and Gulf, who was also a cheerleader for Brown until he wasn't, and Lotu Fuli from Manukau.
Lee's seat is highly marginal, but Walker, Watson and Fuli have big majorities and in ordinary circumstances would be unlikely to lose. But if Brown can find credible Fix Auckland candidates to stand against them, it could make quite a difference.
The councillors Mayor Brown calls "the Albanians": Albany ward's John Watson, left, and Wayne Walker.
He will also want to find credible candidates to replace four other councillors who have often opposed him and are now retiring: Angela Dalton in Manurewa-Papakura, Chris Darby in North Shore, Alf Filipaina in Manukau and Kerrin Leoni in Whau (who is standing for the mayoralty but not the ward).
However, talk of political tickets on council should not be overstated. The track record is less than reassuring.
For example, there are currently two councillors who were elected in 2022 on the National Party-aligned Communities and Residents (C&R) ticket: Christine Fletcher and Simpson herself.
But they have never worked as a team and often don't vote the same way. Simpson left C&R last year in circumstances that remain unexplained.
The National Party has other members on council too, including the former cabinet minister Maurice Williamson, but none of them stood as a party candidate and they are not organised as a team.
On the Labour side of politics it's much the same. Six councillors belong to the party and four of them (Josephine Bartley, Filipaina, Fuli and Leoni) even stood under the Labour name. But the other two (Shane Henderson and Richard Hills) didn't.
The six don't always vote together and they were bitterly split by Brown's proposal to sell the council's airport shares. Similar splits in party allegiances have happened in the Wellington City Council.
In short, having a ticket will enhance Brown's chances of getting his chosen candidates elected to council while removing some he doesn't want. But if he wants his ticket to vote consistently as a team, he'll need someone to help him build caucus discipline.
And that is something the more people-oriented Desley Simpson is likely to be better at than him. This is the strength of their union. What we don't yet know is what she'll get out of it.
Wrangling in the Waitematā
The existence of a Fix Auckland ticket may be especially influential in the Waitematā and Gulf ward, which covers the inner city plus Waiheke and Aotea/Great Barrier islands.
Incumbent Mike Lee, an independent, will be opposed by Patrick Reynolds, a transport expert and deputy chair of the City Centre Advisory Panel. He's the candidate for City Vision, an umbrella group for Labour, the Greens and progressive independents.
At least two members of the local board are also expected to join the race: Sarah Trotman, of C&R, and Genevieve Sage, who was elected on the C&R ticket in 2022 but forced out when she accepted City Vision support to become chair of the board.
Sage and Trotman may both be keen on a Fix Auckland endorsement.
Meanwhile, the election for the Waitematā local board itself has attracted a couple of extremely notable candidates.
One is Anne Batley Burton, who was once one of TV's Real Housewives of Auckland. She calls herself the Champagne Lady, because she imports champagne and is often photographed holding a glass of the stuff. She also calls herself the Pussy Cat Lady, because her 'main passion in life is looking after stray and abandoned cats'. She's on the C&R ticket.
Anne Batley Burton, who is running for the Waitematā Local Board. Photo / Supplied
The other is Connor Sharp, on the City Vision ticket. Sharp has become one of the leading advocates of 'density done well' in a functional, thriving and less car-dependent city. He writes for the Greater Auckland website, most recently about ways for the Karangahape Rd precinct to fulfil its potential once the City Rail Link opens.
Sharp likes to quote the Danish urban planner Jan Gehl: 'A good city is like a good party – people stay longer than really necessary because they are enjoying themselves. If you see a city with many children and many old people using the city's public spaces, it's a sign that it's a good quality place for people.'
Sharp says the city centre waterfront is perhaps the best example.
'People flock to Te Komititanga square every day, drawn there not only by the central train station, ferries, express buses, and bike paths, but also attracted by the new shops, seating and trees to sit under, and places to gather, pause, and enjoy the show.
'We do this because it is somewhere we feel safe and comfortable to relax and have fun. Yet only a decade ago Te Komititanga was a road, filled with buses. Now, it is a place to go to, rather than go through. It's emblematic of a general buzz – more people shopping and visiting businesses, boosting the economy while securing jobs and creating opportunities to connect.'
Batley Burton, for her part, says she wants to 'take back Auckland's Viaduct' for Super City socialites.
That's two very different Aucklands represented right there.
The ongoing oddities of the new speed rules
As the July 1 deadline for implementing the Government's badly written new Speed Rule draws close, more silliness unfolds.
Speed warnings still dominate our billboards - despite the reversal of lowered speed limits on many highway corridors. Photo / Mark Story
One example: At Hatfields Beach, on the Hibiscus Coast Highway north of Ōrewa, motorists can now drive at 70km through the area populated by beachgoers and other pedestrians but must then shift down to 60km through open farmland before being allowed to speed up to 80km.
Auckland Transport chair Richard Leggat wrote to the Minister of Transport, Chris Bishop, seeking clarification, but an OIA request I made on the correspondence shows the response he received was not heartening.
Bishop has confirmed that whatever the anomalies and oddities, the higher speed limits mandated by the new rule will be in place by July 1. Most are already in place.
When AT met with the council in early June, speed limits were on the agenda. So was temporary traffic management, better known as the curse of the road cones.
Councillor Julie Fairey asked AT's chief executive Dean Kimpton about the relationship between the two.
Julie Fairey. Photo / Supplied
Everyone wants fewer cones, she pointed out, but once all the higher speed limits are in, won't that mean any new temporary traffic management on those roads will have to be more intense, because the risks are greater?
'Will higher speeds mean more road cones?' she asked.
'It could do,' replied Kimpton, 'it could do.'
Unintended consequences, eh. Kimpton also said that now lower speed limits had been removed as a tool to improve road safety, 'we're looking at a system-wide approach'.
This led to a peculiar observation. 'One outcome could be that we put in more safety infrastructure,' he said, 'and that makes the roads safer.'
He kept a straight face while he said it. In reality, the 'safety infrastructure' he's talking about is more pedestrian crossings and raised crossings on urban roads, more median barriers and wide shoulders on rural roads, and more expensive intersection redesigns.
All of which will cost a lot more and not be popular with the drivers the higher speed limits are designed to appease.
Unintended consequences, again? It would be if it happened. But it won't, because there's no budget to replace cheap and effective lower speed zones with expensive road redesigns.
Auckland Transport's chief executive, Dean Kimpton. Photo / Jason Oxenham
In the same meeting, councillor Richard Hills had a question for the AT executives.
'We know raising speeds will increase deaths and serious injuries. It's not a guesstimate, it's data. So who is responsible under the Health and Safety Act for those extra deaths and injuries? Is it just the minister? Is it you? Is it us?'
AT's general counsel Gavin Scott replied, 'We're comfortable that we have fulfilled our duties in regard to safety.'
Really? AT is designated under statute as the road-controlling authority (RCA) for non-highway roads in Auckland. Precisely because road use is inherently dangerous, RCAs are legally responsible to maintain roads, and the rules for their use, to a standard the public can rely on with a reasonable expectation of safety.
But Scott then said, 'People in the public realm are beyond our obligations.' What?
To sign up to Simon Wilson's weekly newsletter click here, select Love this City and save your preferences. For a step-by-step guide, click here.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

1News

19 hours ago

• 1News

Mayor rejects dog taskforce amid calls for action from residents

Auckland Mayor Wayne Brown has rejected requests to establish a mayoral taskforce on dogs, saying it would duplicate initiatives already in place. The decision comes despite increased pressure from Manurewa residents, who feel that roaming dogs were making their neighbourhoods unsafe. Brown acknowledged the rising concerns about roaming dogs, especially in South Auckland. But he insisted that the council was addressing the issue through existing programmes. Brown supports the work of the Regulatory and Safety Committee, chaired by Councillor Josephine Bartley and supported Councillor Daniel Newman from Manurewa and the local board. The committee focused on improving public safety and managing dangerous dogs. ADVERTISEMENT Brown and Bartley had also communicated with relevant government ministers, advocating for legislative changes to strengthen enforcement powers. The council's Long-Term Plan has allocated further funding to hire more animal control officers, improve enforcement, trial desexing programmes in high-risk areas, and seek reforms to the Dog Control Act. Brown said a data-led approach to targeting areas in need, including free desexing services in south and west Auckland, is key. He also recognised the Manurewa Local Board's efforts to fund more animal control staff and is looking for ways to expand the capacity of local shelters. Residents report ongoing issues Despite these efforts, Manurewa residents contend that the problem remains unresolved. At a public meeting hosted by MP Arena Williams, several locals shared alarming stories about dangerous, roaming dogs in their streets and parks. Brendan, a concerned resident, recounted, 'I was fixing up my boat, and from around the corner a huge dog suddenly advanced on me. Lucky, I was able to drive it back using a rope." ADVERTISEMENT Victoria, a local dog owner, is frustrated, saying the issue has forced her to stop walking in her neighbourhood. "I'm afraid to go to my local park. I bought a house here and want to make it my home, but I'm driving to other suburbs to walk my dog. It's holding me back from making friends and putting down roots." Another resident Ryan says response times from the council have worsened. "I've been calling the Council, but response times have gotten worse. I wonder if, after a certain time, traps could be used in problematic places." Williams continues to advocate for a mayoral taskforce on dogs and is working closely with central government. "Central Government are holding local Government back. They need to legislate for change, fund frontline Council services, and back the communities carrying the burden of inaction," she said. She also thanked the SPCA, Brown, and Bartley for supporting a new initiative that offers free dog desexing, microchipping, and vaccinations in high-need areas like Manurewa. Auckland Council says desexing is one of the core requirements of responsible dog ownership. (Source: Frontline groups seek urgent support ADVERTISEMENT Jo Coulam, a volunteer with the Saving Hope Foundation, said they were overwhelmed and have seen little change since the council's pilot programme began. She said the system is not reaching the right whānau early enough and lacks meaningful follow-up. Her team continues to use donations to fund desexing when they can. "As far as the dog crisis goes, to us nothing has changed," she said. "We still see roaming dogs everywhere, and we're still getting calls every day about puppies being born. We've had over probably nearly 300 requests this month alone for us to take people's dogs. "People are scared their dogs will be taken. They want help, but they're scared because their dog isn't registered or desexed." Coulam said a recent event at Rawirit Community House brought dog owners together, providing support, flea treatments, deworming, and information on council-funded desexing. "We've met thousands of families desperate to have their dogs de-sexed to end the cycle of unwanted puppies," she said. In one remarkable case, she shared that a dog was finally desexed after having 26 puppies in just seven months. ADVERTISEMENT On the pilot programme's efficacy, Coulam said, 'They need to get the people like the people that come to our food drops and our desexing talks, those are the ones you want to get because their dog, while they're not problems yet, they will become problems and they'll become the roamers. 'That's the scale of the problem if you don't act early.' Council outlines comprehensive plan Auckland Council's General Manager of Licensing and Compliance, Robert Irvine, emphasises the seriousness with which the council treats the issue, especially in high-risk areas like Manurewa. "Dogs can make wonderful additions to our whānau, but they come with commitments," he said. "Desexing is one of the core requirements of responsible dog ownership." He said the council has invested about $5 million in additional funding for animal management. This includes hiring new staff, implementing public education campaigns, targeted desexing, proactive enforcement, and developing a new animal shelter. The council continues to collaborate with the SPCA and community groups, and advocates for reforms to the Dog Control Act. ADVERTISEMENT Irvine said desexing vouchers are not available for public application. Instead, officers issue them during engagements or when releasing impounded dogs. He said there was no formal follow-up process for voucher use. "The focus of this initiative is on support and prevention, not punishment," he said. "Our goal is to ensure residents feel safe and supported when accessing services. "The onus is on the recipient to book and attend the appointment. We've not been made aware of any issues regarding a lack of follow-up." LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air

NZ Herald

a day ago

• NZ Herald

Letters: Absence of economic evaluation of commercial GMO raises concerns

Photo / Food HQ Letter of the week Gene technology - at what cost? The Government is hypocritical in claiming it is over-riding local government powers for economic reasons when it is already doing so in the Gene Technology Bill without any economic risk-benefit analysis. The absence of an economic evaluation of the

NZ Herald

a day ago

• NZ Herald

The real cost of Government retreat on gender equity

Dellwyn Stuart is critical of the Government for halting pay equity claims and gutting the Equal Pay Amendment Act. Photo / Marty Melville There's a reason The Emperor's New Clothes is an enduring story. It's not just a children's tale – it's a sharp allegory for political vanity, wilful blindness and the cost of silence. In the story, the emperor is convinced to parade through town in invisible garments, woven only for