Between Agreement and War: Israel's Strategic Dilemma over a Possible US-Iran Nuclear Deal
Israel harbours deeper concerns over US President Donald Trump's potential nuclear deal with Iran than it ever did regarding the agreement negotiated under Barack Obama. According to Tel Aviv, the imminent accord would leave Iran merely months away from acquiring a nuclear weapon while severely limiting Israel's ability to deliver a decisive military strike against Tehran's nuclear infrastructure. In this scenario, Iran would preserve its controversial program, and Israel would lose what it perceives as a historic opportunity to dismantle Tehran's nuclear ambitions.
Over a month ago, Trump unexpectedly announced the beginning of direct negotiations with Tehran, aiming to curtail Iran's nuclear program in exchange for the easing of economic sanctions. His declaration came in the presence of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had traveled to Washington seeking American approval for pre-emptive strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Over the past two years, Israel has weakened Iran's regional influence through sustained military operations against its allies—Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon—and by the removal of its key ally, former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. At the same time, severe Western sanctions have crippled Iran's oil-dependent economy.
Upon finalizing the deal, Trump is expected to assert that he has extracted greater concessions from Iran than his predecessors, Obama and Joe Biden. His claim would hinge on two major factors: the inclusion of US nuclear inspectors alongside IAEA monitors in Iran's nuclear sites and a complete halt to uranium enrichment—even at low levels—for a symbolic period that may last a year. However, Israeli officials remain deeply concerned, viewing this agreement as even riskier than the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) of 2015, which they largely dismissed as flawed.
Dr. Hatem Sadek
President Biden's most significant diplomatic achievement was persuading Tehran to freeze its 60% uranium enrichment—a feat achieved in 2023 through a US agreement releasing $6 billion of Iran's frozen assets. Obama, on the other hand, succeeded in reducing Iran's medium-enriched uranium stockpile to 3.67% but failed to halt enrichment entirely or secure Tehran's consent for American inspectors to participate in monitoring.
There are several additional concessions Trump may secure that neither Biden nor Obama could—such as guarantees against attacks on US forces or a temporary moratorium on Iran's ballistic missile tests, which have both conventional and nuclear applications. If accomplished, why does this alarm Israeli officials?
Israeli intelligence leaders, including the Mossad Director and the head of military intelligence, have spent substantial diplomatic capital lobbying the Trump administration and its envoy, Steve Witkoff, in numerous meetings across the Middle East, Europe, and the US Their objective was to push negotiations toward two extreme outcomes: Tehran's submission or a decisive military strike. However, these efforts clashed with Trump's transactional style, which prioritizes immediate gains over long-term strategy. While Israeli officials believe they made some progress, fears persist that Trump's main goal is securing a deal—regardless of whether it aligns with Israel's stringent security concerns.
Additionally, if Trump pressures Israel to abandon military action, it might not only prevent overt strikes but also hinder covert operations, such as Mossad-led sabotage missions that have delayed Iran's nuclear weapons program in recent years.
In 2015, Iran relied on about 20,000 aging IR-1 centrifuges, requiring roughly a year to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a bomb. By 2025, however, Iran possesses thousands of advanced IR-4 and IR-6 centrifuges, a fraction of which could be concealed in undisclosed facilities much smaller than the known sites at Natanz and Fordow. This would allow Tehran to achieve weapons-grade uranium within months. Reports indicate Iran's current enrichment levels reach 60%—a threshold demonstrating mastery of nuclear science, making bomb acquisition more a matter of timing than technical capability.
From Israel's perspective, any agreement at this stage would consolidate Iran's nuclear potential while lifting international sanctions, enabling Tehran to accelerate its program. By contrast, Israeli leadership sees the current moment as an unparalleled strategic opportunity: with Hamas and Hezbollah weakened, no time is more suitable for a pre-emptive strike.
In conclusion, whatever restrictions and safeguards Trump's team negotiates, at best they would leave Iran just months from a nuclear breakout while denying Israel its clearest chance in decades to strike. Tehran may be open to a deal but remains wary of Trump's unpredictable leadership and sceptical of any non-binding agreement that a future US administration might discard. The most it would likely accept is a temporary enrichment suspension in exchange for the release of frozen funds and recognition of its right to civilian nuclear energy—an outcome Israel would see as disastrous.
Meanwhile, Gulf states and regional actors, while wary of Iran's ambitions, increasingly prefer uneasy coexistence over a catastrophic war that could disrupt economies and stall development plans. The negotiation landscape remains murky and fraught with uncertainty for all involved.
Dr. Hatem Sadek – Professor at Helwan University
The post Opinion | Between Agreement and War: Israel's Strategic Dilemma over a Possible US-Iran Nuclear Deal appeared first on Dailynewsegypt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
See - Sada Elbalad
4 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Panama Shuts Down Internet, Mobile Services amid Violent Protests in Bocas del Toro
Taarek Refaat Panama's president José Raúl Molinar declared a state of emergency on Friday, suspending the rights to assemble and move freely in the province of Bocas del Toro, after demonstrators set up roadblocks, damaged the local airport, and caused significant disruptions to businesses and offices. In a statement released on X, the National Public Services Authority confirmed that, under the emergency decree, "temporary suspension of mobile phone and home internet services will be implemented in the province of Bocas del Toro until June 25." The authority clarified that internet access will still be available for healthcare institutions, businesses, and government agencies. The unrest in Bocas del Toro, a key banana-producing region, erupted nearly two months ago in opposition to government pension reforms. The protests escalated into violence on Thursday in the town of Changuinola, where masked groups looted several stores and set part of a baseball field on fire while police officers were inside. According to authorities, the violence resulted in one fatality, more than 100 arrests, and dozens of injuries, including 13 police officers. The protests initially began in late April with workers from the American banana giant, Chiquita, striking against pension reforms they argued would force them to work longer before retiring. In response, Chiquita terminated thousands of workers, which led to further unrest. Although banana farmer unions called off their protest last week in an attempt to prevent more layoffs, other groups and unions have continued their blockades and sit-ins. President Molinar is facing growing discontent on multiple fronts. In addition to the pension reform protests, Panamanians have also taken to the streets in opposition to a controversial agreement signed between the Panamanian government and U.S. President Donald Trump in April, which allows U.S. forces to deploy at U.S. military bases along the Panama Canal. In response to the increasing instability, the U.S. Embassy in Panama issued a security warning on Friday, advising American government employees against traveling to the protest epicenter in Bocas del Toro "until further notice." read more CBE: Deposits in Local Currency Hit EGP 5.25 Trillion Morocco Plans to Spend $1 Billion to Mitigate Drought Effect Gov't Approves Final Version of State Ownership Policy Document Egypt's Economy Expected to Grow 5% by the end of 2022/23- Minister Qatar Agrees to Supply Germany with LNG for 15 Years Business Oil Prices Descend amid Anticipation of Additional US Strategic Petroleum Reserves Business Suez Canal Records $704 Million, Historically Highest Monthly Revenue Business Egypt's Stock Exchange Earns EGP 4.9 Billion on Tuesday Business Wheat delivery season commences on April 15 News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War Arts & Culture Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean
See - Sada Elbalad
5 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
FM Holds Phone Talks with Saudi, Bahraini Counterparts
Nada Mustafa Minister of Foreign Affairs and Migration, Badr Abdelatty, held two separate phone calls on Saturday with Prince Faisal bin Farhan, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and Dr. Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Bahrain. The calls were part of ongoing consultation and coordination in light of the rapidly escalating situation in the region, particularly the military confrontation between Israel and Iran and its serious implications for regional peace and security. The three ministers emphasized the urgent need to halt military escalation and establish a ceasefire, stressing that political and diplomatic solutions are the only viable paths out of the current crisis to preserve the region's security and stability. They also underlined the importance of avoiding a slide into further chaos and tension, and reiterated the need to respect the sovereignty of states, international law, and the principles of the United Nations Charter. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War Arts & Culture Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean
Al-Ahram Weekly
5 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
UN Security Council condemns US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites but avoids naming Washington - Region
The United Nations Security Council has condemned US strikes on nuclear facilities in Iran, warning they pose a 'grave threat' to international peace and security and undermine the global nuclear safeguards regime – but stopped short of naming the United States. In a statement issued after an emergency session requested by Iran, the Council said it 'condemns in the strongest terms the attacks against peaceful nuclear sites and facilities under the IAEA safeguards in the Islamic Republic of Iran,' calling them a serious threat to the International Atomic Energy Agency's oversight system. The move follows US bombings of Iran's Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear sites amid rising regional tensions over the Israel–Iran war. It marks the Council's third meeting since Israel launched strikes on Iranian territory on 13 June. The Council cited Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, which prohibits the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. It also recalled Resolution 487, adopted in 1981 after Israel bombed Iraq's Osirak reactor, claiming the strike was a pre-emptive move to prevent Iraq from developing nuclear weapons. It called for an 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire' and urged all parties to avoid further escalation. The Council also stressed the need to protect civilians and civilian infrastructure, and reminded all sides of their obligations under international humanitarian and human rights law. On the nuclear issue, it urged a diplomatic agreement 'acceptable to all parties' that guarantees the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for the lifting of multilateral and unilateral sanctions. The UN secretary general has been asked to report back within seven days on implementation and developments on the ground. The Council said it would remain 'actively seized' of the matter. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
