
Musk makes big move amid rift with Trump, decides to open…, India set to benefit due to….
Earlier this month, Elon Musk's Starlink received a licence from the telecom department for providing satellite internet services in India, a key milestone that will take it closer towards launching commercial operations in the country.
COO of Elon Musk's SpaceX, Gwynne Shotwell, on Tuesday called on Communications Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia, a meeting that comes just days after Starlink secured a licence from the Telecom Department. Scindia said discussions centred around various opportunities for collaboration in satellite communications to power Digital India.
Elon Musk's recent initiatives in India shows his increasing focus on the country. These developments come at a time when Musk's tensions with the U.S. President Donald Trump has been growing in recent times. Tesla's Entry In India
After the Starlink launch, now Tesla is set to open its first showroom in India by July in Mumbai. The company is importing its Model Y SUVs from its factory in China.
Tesla's first batch of vehicles, comprising five Model Y rear-wheel drive SUVs, has already arrived in India. These vehicles were shipped from Tesla's Shanghai factory. According to Bloomberg News, based on official documents, the Model Y is currently the world's best-selling electric vehicle.
Tesla's first showroom will open in Mumbai, likely by mid-July after which another in New Delhi. The company has also imported parts for superchargers, car accessories, and other equipment from the U.S., China, and the Netherlands to support its operations. Tesla Car Pricing
The five Model Y SUVs that arrived in Mumbai are priced at Rs 27.7 lakh each. However, due to India's high import duties, over Rs 21 lakh in tariffs have been added to the cost. Fully built imported cars priced under $40,000 are subject to a 70% tariff in India, along with additional charges. Starlink In India
Starlink is a satellite internet service developed by SpaceX the American aerospace manufacturer and space transportation company founded in 2002 by the world's richest man Musk. It provides high-speed, low-latency broadband internet worldwide using satellite technology and is aptly described by some as broadband beamed from the skies.
Unlike conventional satellite services that rely on distant geostationary satellites, Starlink utilises the world's largest low Earth orbit or LEO constellation (550 km above Earth).
This constellation of LEO satellites (7,000 now but eventually set to grow to over 40,000) and its mesh delivers broadband internet capable of supporting streaming, online gaming, and video calls.
Starlink, which had been vying for an India licence for some time now, recently signed pacts with Ambani's Reliance Jio and Mittal's Bharti Airtel, which together control more than 70 per cent of the country's telecom market, to bring the US satellite internet giant's services to India.
(With Inputs From PTI)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC rejects plea by IAS officer, kin seeking quashing of CBI probe into graft charge
1 2 Cuttack : The Orissa high court on Friday dismissed a writ petition filed by senior IAS officer Bishnupada Sethi, his wife and daughter seeking to quash a CBI investigation into alleged corruption. The court ruled that the petition was "premature and not maintainable", as the investigation was still at a nascent stage. The case stems from the arrest of a PSU executive on Dec 8 last year for allegedly accepting a Rs 10 lakh bribe from a Bhubaneswar-based real estate firm. During interrogation, Sethi's name emerged, prompting a CBI search at his residence on Feb 18 this year. The petitioners alleged procedural violations and harassment, and sought the return of seized materials. Justice S K Panigrahi, however, rejected these claims, emphasising that the extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution cannot be misused to derail legitimate investigations. "Higher the office, greater the responsibility," he observed, noting that Sethi, as a senior bureaucrat, is expected to uphold legal integrity, not evade scrutiny. The court stressed that no chargesheet had been filed yet, and interference at this point would undermine both investigative processes and public interest. It criticised the petitioners' approach as "forum-shopping" and warned against setting a precedent that powerful individuals can shield themselves from legal accountability. The court clarified that its refusal to intervene does not equate to a presumption of guilt, and the petitioners retain full rights to defend themselves during trial. However, it maintained that mere status or reputation cannot justify halting a probe into serious allegations of public corruption. On Feb 25, Justice Panigrahi had ordered, "As an interim measure, it is directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners till the next date." The interim restriction was extended from time to time and was in force till the petition was dismissed on Friday.


Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
K'taka moots 10yr jail for fake news, misinformation
Bengaluru: The Karnataka govt has resolved to crack down on fake news and misinformation by constituting a six-member social-media regulatory authority to ban promotion and spread of fake news on social media, prohibit posting of content insulting to women, ban publication of content that disrespects Sanatana Dharma, its symbols, beliefs and content which promotes superstition. U nder Karnataka Misinformation and Fake News (Prohibition) Bill 2025, accessed by TOI, the govt has proposed up to seven years in prison or Rs 10 lakh fine or both if social-media users are found guilty of sharing unverified information. It has also suggested a two- to five-year jail term and fine for misinformation on social media or in publications. These offences will be considered cognizable but non-bailable. The social-media regulatory authority will ensure content posted on social media should be based on authentic research on subjects related to science, history, religion, philosophy and literature. To fasten accountability, the bill states special courts will be set up with Karnataka high court's concurrence, with a sessions judge presiding over one or more districts. The special courts will issue directions to intermediaries, publishers, broadcasters, or any other persons exercising control over communication medium disseminating misinformation to persons in Karnataka. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice Grammarly Install Now Undo The proposal It gives the aggrieved parties 30 days to respond to notices. If directions are ignored, then the court can issue punishment of simple imprisonment of up to 2 years and a fine of Rs 25,000 a day, subject to a maximum of Rs 25 lakh. The bill suggests action against directors of companies and employees, who were present during the violation of the laws if their company is found guilty. It suggests special public prosecutors for every special court for fake news and misinformation, besides proposing punitive action under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita against persons posting fake news. Ends GFX What is fake news? Misquotation, false, inaccurate report of one's statement, editing audio or video resulting in distortion of facts, context, or purely fabricated content. What is misinformation? Knowingly, recklessly making false or inaccurate statement of fact -- wholly or in part -- in the context in which it appears, excluding opinions, religious or philosophical sermons, satire, comedy or parody, or any other form of artistic expression if a reasonable man of ordinary prudence does not pursue such communications as statements of facts. Punishment: For fake news: 7 years imprisonment and Rs 10 lakh fine For misinformation: 2 to 5 years; for those who abet, punishment up to 2 years For those who fail to abide by court directive: Up to 2 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs 25,000 per day up to Rs 25 lakh .................................................................................................. 3-yr jail, 5k fine for hate speech, crime Bengaluru: A bill on prohibition of hate speech and hate crimes is on the table, mooting punitive action of up to three years imprisonment and a fine of up to Rs 5,000 against those found guilty. Karnataka Hate Speech and Hate Crime (Prevention and Control) Bill of 2025 has listed 11kinds of offences of hate speech and hate crime: Religion, race, caste or community, sex, gender, sexual orientation, place of birth, residence, language, disability, or tribe. It exempts those who are "bona fide artistic, creativity, performance or other forms of expression or academic or scientific inquiry, fair and accurate reporting or commentary in the public interest or in the publication of information, commentary, advertisement or notice or espousing of any religious tenet, belief, teaching, doctrine or writings that do not advocate hatred". ++++ Explainer What is hate crime? Any person who harms or incites harm or promotes hatred out of prejudice against or intolerance towards any other person because of victim's perceived characteristics, his or her family member or victim's association with, or support for, a group of persons who share any one or more such characteristics. What is hate speech? One who intentionally publishes, propagates, advocates anything or communicates to one or more persons that could reasonably be construed to demonstrate a clear intention to harm or incite harm or promote or propagate hatred.


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Judge orders release of Mahmoud Khalil, ex-Columbia student held over protests
A federal judge on Friday ordered the release of former Columbia University graduate student Mahmoud Khalil from immigration detention, criticizing the US government for holding him without clear justification for months amid an effort to deport him for his involvement in pro-Palestinian a strongly worded ruling from the bench, US District Judge Michael Farbiarz said the government had "clearly not met" the legal standards for detention and found no reason to believe Khalil posed a danger or flight is not a danger to the community. Period, full stop,' Farbiarz said. 'It would be highly, highly unusual for the government to continue to detain a legal US resident who was unlikely to flee and hadn't been accused of any violence,' the judge had been held at an immigration facility in rural Louisiana since early March as the Trump administration pursued deportation proceedings against him. Farbiarz ordered that Khalil be released immediately following the judge's decision comes after several other scholars targeted for their activism have been released from custody, including another former Palestinian student at Columbia, Mohsen Mahdawi; a Tufts University student, Rumeysa Ozturk; and a Georgetown University scholar, Badar Khan was the first arrest under President Donald Trump 's crackdown on students who joined campus protests against Israel's devastating war in Gaza. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said Khalil must be expelled from the country because his continued presence could harm American foreign wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla, said following the ruling that she can finally 'breathe a sigh of relief' after her husband was detained for three months.'We know this ruling does not begin to address the injustices the Trump administration has brought upon our family, and so many others,' she said in a statement provided by Khalil's lawyers. 'But today we are celebrating Mahmoud coming back to New York to be reunited with our little family.'Khalil was detained on March 8 at his apartment building in Manhattan over his participation in pro-Palestinian inputs from Associated Press