I review mini PCs for a living and this Mac mini M4 deal is an absolute steal at $100 off
There's never been a better time to ditch your laptop or downsize from a big bulky desktop and pick up one of the best mini PCs instead.
While there are plenty of great mini PCs that run Windows, there's only one that runs macOS though and after using it for the past six months, I have to admit the Mac mini M4 is almost perfect.
Thanks to Apple's powerful M4 chips and the fact that the base model now comes with 16GB of RAM as standard, the Mac mini M4 is a powerful mini PC that's perfect if you don't want to shell out extra cash for one of the best MacBooks.
Right now you can get the Mac mini M4 for just $499 at Amazon, $100 off its normal price. Need even more power? The Mac mini M4 Pro is also $100 off and comes with 24GB of memory and even more storage.
The base model Mac mini M4 is a big step up from its predecessor and likely enough for most people without any expensive upgrades. It comes with Apple's powerful M4 chip, 16GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. You also get plenty of ports in a tiny package with three Thunderbolt 4 ports, two USB-C ports, HDMI and Ethernet.
This pro model of the smallest Mac yet takes things up a notch with even more power and extra storage. It comes with Apple's M4 Pro chip, 24GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD. Likewise, instead of Thunderbolt 4, this upgraded model comes with faster Thunderbolt 5 ports.
Compared to its predecessor, the Mac mini M4 is a big step up. Not only does it feature Apple's M4 chips but the case has been redesigned from the ground up to be smaller and more compact at just 5 x 5 x 2 inches.
Likewise, you now get two USB-C ports and a headphone jack on the front, which means you don't have to reach around back to plug in a pair of wired headphones or to connect accessories to your Mac mini M4.
Around back, you now get three Thunderbolt ports, an HDMI port and a gigabit Ethernet port. It's worth noting that while the standard Mac mini M4 has three Thunderbolt 4 ports, the pro version features even faster Thunderbolt 5 ports instead.
One of my favorite things about the Mac mini M4 when compared to other mini PCs I reviewed is that it features an internal power supply. This makes cable management just as easy as bringing this PC with you on a trip since you don't have to lug around a bulky power adapter with you. It also uses a standard power cord, so it's easy to replace or get a longer one if you need to.The Mac mini M4 is an excellent all-around mini PC that's great for both work and play. It's also very easy to set up and use which makes it a fantastic choice for older users as well as younger ones.
At $100 off its normal price, this is a deal you won't want to miss, especially if you're looking for a new Mac. Check out my article on reasons to buy or skip the Mac mini M4 if you're still on the fence!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
23 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Roborock Q5 Max+ Robot Vacuum Hits Its Lowest Price, 53% Off Deal Live Now as an Early Prime Day Offer
Amazon Prime members get all the best deals right now, with a massive 53% off of this incredible robot vacuum. You've had enough with vacuuming, and you should say it. In an ideal world, none of us would have to vacuum at all, but we're not there yet. The good news though, is that those of us who can afford it can escape the slog of vacuuming daily, and instead palm it off on an adorable disc-shaped friend in the form of a robot vacuum. They can be pricey though, so you'll generally want to make the most of deals when you can find them. See at Amazon Speaking of which, if you're an Amazon Prime member, you can currently get your hands on the exceptional Roborock Q5 Max+ robot vacuum and dock for just $280. That's a massive 53% off the normal price, and that's one heck of an early Prime Day deal. If you're not an Amazon Prime member, you can still save $100 on it right now too, but the difference in price is notable. Suck It Up There's a lot to love about this robot vacuum. The most obvious thing is the pure power of it. It has a 5500 Pa suction rating, which means it can not only handle all manner of floors, but also do so with aplomb, even managing to get out pet hair and other tough bits of small debris. It's just nice to know it can get the job done. It also uses LiDAR navigation to create a full 3D map of your home and then learn where it needs to go the most often to be as efficient as possible. The dock means it can self-empty too, which means you don't even need to do maintenance all that often, making it feel like an even bigger help compared to many other robot vacuums. That's the kind of off-hand greatness you need in a good robot vacuum. The battery life is impressive as well, lasting up to 240 minutes at once. You can even control it with your voice if you need to, or use the app if you'd rather. It just does everything you could want from a high-end robot vacuum, but for just $280. The discount is one of the big draws here, because saving yourself $320 (-53%) on a vacuum of this quality is a chance you shouldn't miss out on. Make sure you're quick if you do want it though, because there's no way of knowing how long the deal will last, and you'll be annoyed if you miss it. See at Amazon
CNET
28 minutes ago
- CNET
iPhone 16E Specs vs. Google Pixel 8A: How Apple and Google's Lower-Cost Phones Match Up
Google's A-series Pixel handsets are typically budget-friendly, but currently the cheapest Google goes is $499 for the Pixel 9A. If you do want all of Google's flagship features and are comfortable with getting a used or refurbished device, you could check out last year's Pixel 8A which is going for under $300 in the secondary market. Strangely, Google is currently selling the Pixel 8A for the same price as the Pixel 9A, so it doesn't make sense to buy a new version of the Pixel 8A. A sub-$300 Pixel 8A is an especially good deal when compared to the entry-level $599 iPhone 16E. Sure, the iPhone 16E offers a lot of features for its price and is certainly the most affordable iPhone you can get at retail. Yet, that price isn't exactly affordable when compared to the Pixel 8A. If you prefer to buy new, we'll point you to the comparison of the Pixel 9A vs the iPhone 16E. But if you're open to getting a used Pixel 8A for an even lower price, we've compared the iPhone 16E and the Pixel 8A below. The iPhone 16E. James Martin/CNET Design and display The most obvious difference between the two phones is that the iPhone 16E has a notch at the top of the screen (The iPhone 16, on the other hand, has a Dynamic Island instead), while the Pixel 8A just has a single dot for the front-facing camera. Size-wise, however, they're both pretty comparable. They both roughly measure around 6 by 3 by 0.3 inches (you can find more exact measurements in the chart below), plus both have a 6.1-inch OLED screen. The iPhone 16E, however, has a fixed refresh rate of 60Hz, while the Pixel 8A can switch between 60 and 120Hz for smoother scrolling and a more immersive gaming experience. That said, the iPhone 16E's A18 processor does run more intensive games like Death Stranding and Resident Evil 4 Remake. While those more console-level games are not yet available on the Google Play Store, the Pixel 8A's Tensor G3 should still be able to run most Android games at medium to low graphics settings. Google's Pixel 8A. James Martin/CNET Cameras One of the biggest limitations of the iPhone 16E is that it just has a single rear 48-megapixel camera. The Pixel 8A, on the other hand, has two rear cameras placed within a camera bar on the back: a 64-megapixel lens plus a 13-megapixel ultrawide lens. Even when it comes to the front-facing selfie camera, the Pixel 8A's version is better. It has a 12-megapixel front-facing lens while the iPhone 16E has a 7-megapixel one. The Pixel 8A's cameras. James Martin/CNET AI features The iPhone 16E might be an entry-level handset, but it does support Apple Intelligence, a feature that was previously only in higher-end models like the 15 Pro and the iPhone 16. Apple Intelligence isn't fully fleshed out yet, but it currently offers some benefits including a Clean Up tool for removing obstacles in photos, text summarization plus writing tools that help correct editing errors. An improved Siri is also apparently on its way, but it has been delayed. The Pixel 8A, on the other hand, has all the features of Google's Gemini that are also on the higher-end Pixel handsets. It can run Google's Gemini Nano AI model, use photo-editing tools such as Best Take and Magic Eraser, and more. Gemini will eventually be the default assistant on all Android phones, and for now you can switch between the Google Assistant and Gemini. A home screen on the iPhone 16E. Celso Bulgatti/CNET Software support Both the Pixel 8A and the iPhone 16E have relatively lengthy software support. The Pixel 8A gets a total of seven years of major Android OS upgrades and security updates from its launch last year, which means you'll get six years if you buy one now that it's a year old. That's in line with the six years of support Samsung provides its new Galaxy A phones in the $200 to $300 range, and is double the support Motorola provides to its Moto G line. While Apple doesn't publish software and security support timelines, the iPhone 16E will likely get between five and seven years of software updates based on what has been provided to prior iPhone models. Security updates could be even longer, as even the original iPhone SE from 2016 received a security update earlier this year. Check out more differences between the iPhone 16E and the Google Pixel 8A in the chart below. Apple iPhone 16E vs. Google Pixel 8A Apple iPhone 16E Google Pixel 8A Display size, resolution 6.1-inch OLED display; 2,532x1,170 pixels; 60Hz refresh rate 6.1-inch OLED; 2,400x1,080 pixels, 60-120Hz adaptive refresh rate Pixel density 460 ppi 430 ppi Dimensions (inches) 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.31 in. 6 x 2.9 x 0.4 in. Dimensions (millimeters) 146.7 x 71.5 x 7.8 mm 152 x 74 x 10.2 mm Weight (ounces, grams) 167g (5.88 oz.) 193 g (6.8 oz.) Mobile software iOS 18 Android 14 Camera 48-megapixel (wide) 64-megapixel (main), 13-megapixel (ultrawide) Front-facing camera 12-megapixel 13-megapixel Video capture 4K 4K at 30/60 FPS Processor Apple A18 Google Tensor G3 RAM/Storage RAM unknown + 128GB, 256GB, 512GB 8GB + 128GB or 256GB Expandable storage None None Battery/Charger Up to 26 hours video playback, 21 hours streamed video playback, 90 hours of audio playback. 20W wired charging, 7.5W Qi wireless charging 4,492 mAh (18W fast charging, 7.5W wireless charging) Fingerprint sensor None, Face ID Under-display Connector USB-C USB-C Headphone jack None None Special features Action button, Apple C1 5G modem, Apple Intelligence, Ceramic Shield, Emergency SOS, satellite connectivity, IP68 resistance 5G (5G sub6 / mmWave), IP67 rating, VPN by Google One, Circle to Search, 7 years Android OS updates, 7 years security updates, Best Take, Audio Magic Eraser Price off-contract (USD) $599 (128GB) $499 Price (GBP) £599 (128GB) £499 Price (AUD) AU$999 (128GB) AU$849
CNET
28 minutes ago
- CNET
The iPad Is Almost a Mac Now. Time to Finish the Job
What's a computer? It's whatever helps me get my work done. I love new ideas for what computers can be, but traditional work tools still win out. For my job, it's generally a PC or Mac. When I travel, an iPad is often convenient, but it's not the same, so I often bring both. The "why not both" approach is exactly what Apple has been pitching with iPads and Macs for years, but Apple has also been adamant that these platforms will never merge. I remember the stage announcement that said as much back in 2018. And back then, I said MacOS and iOS needed to combine. I'm willing to take the long game here, a game Apple is often playing with its tech. And I'm ready to step a few years down the path and wait for this merge moment to happen. But really, this moment should be happening right now. And it is: I thought the latest iPad Pro was the Mac I wanted in another form, minus the software I was looking for. That software is coming now, but things need to go even further. Watch this: The One Thing Keeping iPads from Killing the Mac 04:35 iPadOS 26 is a strong sign that the merge is already underway. Lo and behold, the more Mac-like experience is already here if you explore the developer beta. (A public beta is coming this summer, ahead of a fall release, I'd suggest you wait for before downloading.) While Apple always kept conversations about Macs and iPads very separate, this WWDC, Apple described iPad OS 26 as Mac-like quite a few times. Added support for more windows, a mouse pointer that's now an arrow and not a large circle, menu bars, a Preview app that shows files just like a Mac does, and folders that can be organized like a Mac — mostly — are some of features that already have me nodding my head in appreciation. With a trackpad/keyboard attached, the iPad can now start feeling even more flexible, able to multitask, and possibly, able to get serious work done efficiently. What concerns me, though, is it's still not a Mac. The closer anything gets to an expectation point without fully getting there is a zone that's ripe for uncanny valley disappointment. When will I use the latest iPadOS 26, get into a flow, and suddenly realize there's a part of the OS that's not quite the same as a Mac, and it throws me off? I don't know yet. Maybe it'll never happen. But my suspicion is that this new almost-Mac-like iPadOS will still, in some important ways, not be a Mac. The iPad Pro with the developer beta of iPadOS 26 is already getting so much closer to being a Mac. Scott Stein/CNET It's so close now. You can finish the job, Apple! Most iPads and Macs share the same M-series hardware and work with similar-feeling keyboards and trackpads. There's absolutely no reason I can see why an iPad couldn't also be a Mac, other than Apple deciding the software should be functionally different. (As for a Mac being an iPad, well, you'd need a touchscreen for that, and you'd need Pencil support, so it would be more complicated.) Getting all the Mac and iPad apps to be truly cross-compatible across an OS that would recognize both wouldn't be easy, but Apple can do it. Mac apps had to transition from Intel to ARM-based hardware, and before that from PowerPC to Intel. This time, at least, the hardware is the same…but the goals of the apps are different. Yet, the missions are converging. Macs and iPads and iPhones and everything else are getting similar visual designs with Liquid Glass and increasingly similar notifications and widgets. I don't want every single Apple device to work exactly the same, but when it comes to iPads and MacBooks — two product lines designed to be carried around and put in a bag — I feel their overlaps are getting pretty heavy now. iPad Pro vs MacBook Air side by side in 2024. The convergence is clearly already here. Numi Prasarn/CNET I don't think iPads should stop being simple. I agree with Apple: Let the basic iPad flow be the same, and trigger the multi-windowed work mode with the press of a button. But I don't want that multi-windowed mode to just approach being a Mac. I want it to absolutely, positively become a Mac. Let me leave my laptop behind. Let the Pro models and a certain line of MacBooks converge. This convergence is going to be necessary for another reason beyond just budget and packing convenience. If Apple really wants to make future Vision headsets or lighter-weight connected glasses that become essential devices, then it should compress its product line to make room. I could see myself carrying an iPad-slash-MacBook in my bag and a lightweight pair of Vision glasses that work with it. I don't ever see myself carrying a Vision, an iPad, and a Mac. Something has to give. As I said, I'm patient. In fact, I've waited for these changes — and written about them over and over — for over a decade. I can wait another year, maybe even two, for the next moves. I'm glad the ones I've waited forever for have finally arrived, but I still don't understand why iPad Pros can't also be Macs. Apple's latest moves make me more confident of my feelings than ever, but once again, I'm probably going to have to get used to waiting a bit longer one more time.
