Tennessee court upholds law from Republican legislators to cut blue Nashville's council in half

A Tennessee appeals court on Tuesday upheld the constitutionality of a law passed by the state's Republican-controlled legislature to punish the Democratic-leaning city of Nashville by slashing the size of its council.
The 2023 law aims to cut Nashville's consolidated city-county governing council in half, from 40 members to 20. Although it was written to apply broadly statewide to both city and consolidated city-county governments, Nashville is the only Tennessee city meeting that definition with a council of more than 20 members.
The law was one of several targeting Nashville after the council's rejection of efforts to host the 2024 Republican National Convention in Music City.
The Tennessee Court of Appeals 2-1 ruling on Tuesday overturns an earlier split decision by a panel of judges at the trial court level that ruled in favor of the city. The law has been on hold pending appeals.
Nashville attorneys argued that the law is unconstitutional because a provision of the Tennessee Constitution that limits local legislative bodies to 25 members explicitly exempts municipalities organized under a consolidated city-county government. The city also argued the law violates another section of the Tennessee Constitution known as the Home Rule Amendment that prevents the General Assembly from making laws that apply to a single county or municipality.
In ruling against the city, the majority wrote that nothing in the Constitution explicitly prevents the General Assembly from 'imposing its own limit on the voting membership of a metropolitan council.' Given the fact that the judges must start from the assumption that state statutes are constitutional 'we cannot condone interpreting the Tennessee Constitution's silence such that the legislature's power is curtailed in this manner."
In his dissent, Judge Kenny Armstrong argued his colleagues are misinterpreting the word 'exempt."
'While the Article contains no language to enjoin the General Assembly from limiting Metro's legislative body to any number over 25, the Article clearly precludes the General Assembly from limiting Metro's membership to any number less than 25,' he wrote.
Armstrong did not address the Home Rule Amendment. The majority there found that even though Nashville is the only city that the law actually effects, it was written as a law of general application.
Nashville has been mostly successful in challenging some of the other state laws taking aim at the city, although many of the cases are still in appeals.
In one, a judicial panel ruled the state cannot enforce a law making it easier to pass changes through the metro council to the local fairgrounds speedway, which is being considered for upgrades in hopes of drawing a NASCAR race.
A court panel likewise ruled it was unconstitutional for Tennessee lawmakers to pass a state takeover of Nashville International Airport's board.
Judges also temporarily blocked a law that would reconfigure the group overseeing professional sports facilities in Nashville by letting state leaders pick six of its 13 board members.
Republcan House Majority Leader William Lamberth issued a statement on Tuesday praising the court's ruling on the size of Nashville's council.
'I applaud the court's decision today affirming the constitutionality of the Small Government Efficiency Act. This action reins in excessive government growth while ensuring local municipalities across the Volunteer State remain accountable and responsive to their constituents," he wrote.
Nashville Vice Mayor Angie E. Henderson said in a statement that the decision fails to respect the will of Nashville voters, who created a 'highly representative, local legislative branch.' Henderson said they will discuss next steps with the city's attorneys.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Times

18 minutes ago

• Times

What does striking Iran mean for Trump foreign policy — and his voters?

A Republican president enters a faraway war, despite questions about the intelligence underpinning the attack. America has been here before. President Trump's rise was, in part, the response of US voters to political leaders embroiling the military in unpopular foreign conflicts, especially the lengthy deployment to Iraq launched by a Republican predecessor, George W Bush, based on flimsy accounts of weapons of mass destruction. 'My proudest legacy will be that of a peacemaker and unifier,' Trump concluded in his inaugural address. 'We will measure our success not only by the battles we win but also by the wars that we end — and perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into.' These words, combined with his emphasis on America First and 'peace through strength', were hailed by Trump's base as proof that here was a president who would reverse the neocon drive to impose democracy around the world and resist the 'military-industrial complex' President Eisenhower warned against.

Telegraph

24 minutes ago

• Telegraph

The anniversary of the Nicene Creed offers us an opportunity to reflect

Every Sunday, in churches across the country, worshippers stand to affirm that they believe in 'one God, the Father, the Almighty, maker of heaven and earth.' For many, these words are as familiar as the Lord's Prayer – part of the shared rhythm of worship and memory that shapes Christian life across generations. They are found in the Book of Common Prayer and in the contemporary language of services like Common Worship. They have been translated into nearly every language, and set to music by William Byrd, John Merbecke, and countless others. They echo in the cadences of Cathedral Choirs and the steady voice of Radio 4's Sunday Worship. Yet their roots lie far deeper, in an extraordinary moment of theological clarity 1,700 years ago. The Nicene Creed – as it is still commonly known – emerged from the Council of Nicaea in AD 325, the first gathering of Christian bishops from across the Roman Empire. It was a defining act of unity for a faith newly emerging from persecution and grappling with questions of identity. Was Jesus fully divine, or somehow less than God? The answer, forged through prayer, argument and no small courage, was clear and emphatic: Jesus Christ is 'God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God … of one Being with the Father'. The words mattered then, and they matter still. The Creed was later expanded at the Council of Constantinople in 381 to take fuller account of the Holy Spirit. This revised text – the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed, to give it its full title – remains the most widely recognised summary of Christian faith in the world today. Recited by Roman Catholics, Orthodox Christians, Anglicans and many Protestant churches alike, it remains a touchstone of what it means to be part of the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church. What's remarkable is that these ancient words have not only endured, but remained instantly recognisable. That's due in part to the continuity of liturgical tradition, but also to something less tangible – a kind of collective memory. We know them not just in our minds, but in our whole being. For many, they inhabit the same world as the worn pages of a prayer book, the scent of wood polish on pews, or the familiar strains of a well-loved hymn. Different versions exist, with small variations of language – but the core text remains the same. For many, the Nicene Creed is inseparable from the melodies to which it has been sung. It has become part of the fabric of our ecclesial and cultural memory – words held in the heart, even if we've not paused to reflect on them for years. And yet – as with all things familiar – there is a risk we stop hearing what we are saying. The words of the Creed can become a well-worn path our minds wander along, rather than a statement that stirs our hearts or arrests our thinking. That's why, in this 1,700th anniversary year, we have an opportunity. A moment to pause, to listen afresh, and to reflect on the extraordinary depth and beauty of what the Creed has to say to us about God. The Nicene Creed is not a list of abstract propositions. It is a living confession of faith, hope and love. It tells the story of a world created in love, broken by sin, and redeemed through the self-giving of God in Christ. It speaks of incarnation, of suffering, of resurrection and of eternal hope. It tells us not only who God is, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, but also who we are: people formed for relationship, for worship, for belonging. That's why this anniversary year presents such a valuable opportunity to revisit the Nicene Creed with fresh attention. One way churches and individuals are doing this is through a new set of reflections published by the Church of England, which take the Creed line by line as a prompt for prayer and theological reflection. Whether used in parish groups or private devotion, they offer a gentle invitation to sit with familiar words and explore their depth anew. In an age where public discourse can often seem thin and fragmented, the Creed offers a depth of meaning that holds firm. It does not reduce faith to sentiment or certainty, nor does it shy away from mystery. Instead, it offers a robust yet gracious framework for belief: a faith shared, inherited, and spoken together. Amid the dissonance of modern life the Creed does not offer easy answers. Instead, it provides a deep and steady orientation, a way of seeing ourselves and our world held within the story of God's enduring faithfulness. The words of the Nicene Creed have been said by emperors and exiles, in grand cathedrals and tiny chapels, in moments of triumph and of suffering. As we mark 1,700 years since they were first agreed, we have the chance not only to remember them – but to recover them. To let these ancient words speak again, and to rediscover the faith that lies at their heart.

Daily Mail​

25 minutes ago

• Daily Mail​

Keir Starmer backs strike by Trump's US on Iran saying its nuclear weapons are 'a grave threat to international security'

Keir Starmer this morning gave British backing to strikes on Iran 's nuclear capabilities by Donald Trump 's America. The Prime Minister said that Tehran's atomic programme was 'a grave threat to international security' after bombers dropped 30,000-pound 'bunker buster' bombs on the Fordow nuclear facility. Sir Keir added that the US had taken action to 'alleviate that threat', having previously urged Trump to use diplomacy instead, warning that military action could cause wider ramifications. Trump last night claimed the attack using B2 steal bombers had been 'a spectacular military success,' something Tehran denied. Reports from the US suggested that the bombers flew direct from the US rather than using the joint UK/US base at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. In a statement this morning Sir Keir said: 'Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat. 'The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority. 'We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis.'