England squad full of ‘winners' ahead of Euros defence
The England squad have gathered at St George's Park ahead of their Euros quest and will open their campaign on July 5 against France in Zurich.
Chelsea secured a domestic treble as they failed to lose a single game in the Women's Super League last season, while Arsenal stunned Barcelona to lift the Champions League and nine players from the current England squad played for those two clubs last term.
#WEURO2025 media day ✅ pic.twitter.com/Maqq3nNV59
— Lionesses (@Lionesses) June 18, 2025
Despite the high-profile changes in the England squad – they defend their title without Mary Earps, Fran Kirby and Millie Bright – the travelling squad includes 13 players who lifted the trophy back in 2022.
Bronze underlined the amount of talent England have at their disposal this summer, saying: 'I think mentally, we've got a lot of winners on the team.
'We did fantastic (at the 2023 World Cup), but I think now we've got a group of players who (for them), their mentality is to win.
'The fact that Arsenal won the Champions League this year. The fact that so many Chelsea players have accomplished so many things this year. (Manchester) United players get in the (FA Cup) final.
'We've got players who want to win, can win, have shown that they can win and we bring that all together in the England team. We want to win and d that on a consistent basis.'
An estimated 574,865 fans attended the 2022 tournament in England across all 31 matches including 87,192 in the final at Wembley Stadium.
By March this year, 500,000 fans had already snapped up tickets, which indicates the growing popularity of women's football.
It's time.
This is your #Lionesses squad for #WEURO2025! 🏴 pic.twitter.com/WN28tHLago
— Lionesses (@Lionesses) June 5, 2025
Bronze thinks this year could prove to be the best in Europe yet and added: 'It could potentially be the biggest tournament that we've had in Europe.
'The World Cup was huge, but it was halfway around the world, I think it missed out on so many fans and our families as well.
'The Euros in England was fantastic for us here, but I think we've got an opportunity to grow even bigger, so the distinct thing will be the size of it.'
England will be boosted by the return of forward Lauren James, who trained this week for the first time since she suffered a hamstring injury in April.
Bronze added: 'I think if she'd been fit all season. Chelsea could have had an even better season and England results as well, probably, because we all know that she's that good.
'She's always been focused on coming back and being 100 per cent, but it's important that we're all aware that she's coming back from injury.
'She doesn't need to put pressure on herself to win an England a game because we have some of the best forwards in the world playing. LJ is one of them.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Leeds 'interested in former Arsenal star with £20m release clause but face competition from shock Champions League club'
Leeds United are considering a move for a former Arsenal star this summer. The player has a £20million release clause but a potential move is unlikely to be straightforward. There is interest in the individual from other high-profile teams, including a surprise Champions League club. Although he suffered relegation from the Premier League last season, the player is still very highly rated. Leeds are looking to strengthen their squad following their return to the top flight. Daniel Farke 's side have already made one signing this summer, bringing in forward Lucas Nmecha from Wolfsburg. As reported by The Times, Leeds are pursuing a potential move for Southampton goalkeeper Aaron Ramsdale. Ramsdale made 30 appearances in the Premier League for the Saints last season following his move from Arsenal. The 27-year-old's relegation release clause has now come into effect, which has also alerted Galatasaray. With the Turkish club having secured their place in the Champions League league phase for next season they could be an attractive option for Ramsdale. Galatasaray won the Turkish Super Lig last campaign, finishing eleven points ahead of their closest challengers Fenerbahce. Fernando Muslera, 39, is leaving Galatasaray this summer, with Ramsdale one of the candidates to replace him. Ramsdale joined Arsenal in 2021 having previously played for Sheffield United and Bournemouth. There have been suggestions that Ilan Meslier could leave Leeds this summer, which could explain their interest in Ramsdale. Ramsdale has five caps for England, although he wasn't included in Thomas Tuchel's most recent squad.
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Ruben Amorim sends message to Man Utd over Emiliano Martinez transfer
Ruben Amorim is 'not ruling out' a move for Emiliano Martinez as the Aston Villa goalkeeper 'desperately' tries to push through a summer transfer to Old Trafford. Martinez, 32, is believed to be keen on a move to United despite theirwoeful 2024-25 campaign. Under Amorim and Erik ten Hag, Manchester United finished just 15th in the Premier League, closer to the relegation zone than the Champions League places. Aston Villa, in contrast, finished sixth in the Premier League – missing out on Champions League qualification on the final day – and went deep in both Europe's top club competition and the FA Cup. Given the fortunes of both clubs, Martinez's desire to leave Villa Park for Old Trafford may come as a surprise but he is said to still view United as one of the biggest clubs in the world and wants to help take them back to the top. Wake up to find news on your club in your inbox every morning with Metro's Football Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your team in the link so we can send you football news tailored to you. The Argentine World Cup winner also backs himself to dislodge Andre Onana as Amorim's No. 1 following the Cameroonian's underwhelming spell in the team. As a result, The Sun say Martinez is 'desperately' trying to force through a 'dream' move to Manchester United. It is claimed Red Devils boss Amorim has 'not ruled out' a move and has been a long-term admirer of Martinez. Amorim wants to bring 'captains and leaders' to Manchester United this summer and views Martinez as a player capable of getting the club back to where they belong. 'Emi is big pals with Argentina team-mate Lisandro Martinez and is keen to move,' a source told The Sun. 'He has already knocked back a couple of big hitters in the hope of joining United. Unai Emery was quizzed on Emiliano Martinez's Aston Villa future ahead of the club's final Premier League game against Manchester United. TNT Sports reporter Jules Breach said: 'Will today potentially be the final time we see Emiliano Martinez play for Aston Villa?' 'No way,' Emery replied. Breach continued: 'Definitely not? He's staying at the club?' before Emery said 'see you later' before thanking her for the interview and walking off. Read more here. 'Amorim is a huge admirer of his. He tried to sign him for Sporting in 2020 but lost out to Villa. He wants to fill the squad with captains and leaders and Emi fits the bill perfectly.' Amorim has already welcomed Wolves' best player Matheus Cunha to Old Trafford in a deal worth £62.5m and is currently pursuing Brentford's Bryan Mbeumo. The former Sporting Lisbon boss is said to be open to signing a replacement for Onana, who has been linked with a move to Monaco. Onana is keen to stay in Manchester, however, and prove his doubters wrong following a difficult season between the posts. Martinez, who joined Aston Villa from Arsenal in 2020, has also attracted interest from multiple Saudi Pro League clubs and La Liga side Atletico Madrid. He appeared to wave goodbye to Villa fans following their final home game of the season before being sent off on the final day against the club he is keen to join, Manchester United. More Trending Unai Emery insisted at the time that Martinez would be staying put but Aston Villa are open to a sale giving their difficult financial situation. Martinez remained tight-lipped when asked about his future earlier this month while on international duty with Argentina. 'My future? I don't know, I come here to play for the national team, and that's the only thing that matters to me right now,' he said. 'Do I want to move to a new club? The transfer window just opened, so there's still a long way to go.' For more stories like this, check our sport page. Follow Metro Sport for the latest news on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. MORE: Chelsea set Nicolas Jackson asking price as Premier League club join transfer race MORE: Napoli respond to transfer offer for Scott McTominay after dream debut season MORE: £50m star told to reject Chelsea transfer and join Manchester United
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Haunted Harry Brook treads the fine line between greatness and sporting tragedy, writes OLIVER HOLT
In the corridors of the stand above the Kirkstall Lane End, Stuart Broad managed a wry smile when I told him I was trying to find Michael Atherton to ask him about the time he was run out on 99 against Australia at Lord's in 1993. 'I'm sure he'd be delighted to be reminded about that again,' Broad said. Atherton is a reluctant expert on the subject. He was also dismissed for 99, caught and bowled by South Africa 's Brian McMillan, here at Headingley, in August 1994. Only he and MJK Smith, among England players, have achieved the unwanted distinction of twice being dismissed one run short in a Test. I tracked Atherton down in the end. He was sitting on the back row of the press box, welcoming Harry Brook in print to the list of unfortunates who have fallen one short of cricket's magic number. Atherton was phlegmatic. 'You are consumed by the one you missed rather than the 99 you scored,' he said. It will be like that for Brook, whose batting had lit up a grey, blustery third day of this first Test. His crestfallen, horrified visage when he pulled a short ball from Prasidh Krishna straight into the clutches of Shardul Thakur at deep backward square, dismissed one run adrift of his century, testified to that. Suddenly, it did not seem to matter that he had just played an innings of savage beauty, that he had smoked the India attack all around the ground, clubbing its bowlers into submission with 11 fours and two towering sixes, dragging England back into this match. All that mattered was that he was out for 99. His dismissal made him the 81st player dismissed for 99 in Test cricket, the 14th Englishman and the first anywhere for three years since Travis Head fell for Australia against the West Indies in Perth. Jonny Bairstow had been the last England player to meet that fate, trapped lbw against South Africa at Old Trafford in August 2017. Brook's removal, by such an obvious, familiar old bowling trap, was part of a pattern of England players giving away their wickets unwisely here, and was made worse by the fact Headingley is his home ground. Maybe the chance to score a Test century here in front of fans that adore him will come again to a player as prodigiously talented as he is. Maybe it won't. A century is such a random target in so many ways. And yet the difference between three figures and two bestows greatness on an innings and falling one short confers sporting tragedy upon it, as if it would have been better to have fallen far earlier than to have just missed the mark. But cricket loves numbers. It obsesses about them. Not just in its statistics and its averages but in its staging posts. They say 111, a Nelson, is unlucky because it resembles three stumps. The Australians regard 87 with unease because it is 13 short of a century. Zero is never good, either. Ninety-nine, though, is cricket's number of the beast. Perhaps it is also because it gives an opponent so much succour. It is almost better than getting someone out cheaply. Getting a batsman out for 99 is a cause for unrestrained glee in the ranks of the opposition. It is as if there is great sustenance to be had from feasting on a player's crushing disappointment. It is as if a humiliation has been visited upon the batsman, even though he has just spent several hours getting the better of a group of bowlers. It is wrapped up in the idea that when the prize that is coveted so much was there for the taking, the batsman lost his nerve and showed weakness. Some find dark humour in the unfortunate's fate. When Shane Warne slog-swept a ball from Daniel Vettori into the air and into the hands of Mark Richardson at the WACA in 2001, Richardson bowed theatrically to the crowd and Ricky Ponting admitted some of the Aussies were 'laughing into their lockers'. Warne never did score a Test century. It is too early for Brook to see the light side of what happened at Headingley, though he may reflect that things could have been worse. It seemed briefly on Saturday that he had been caught in the deep for a duck before it became clear the umpire had ruled Jasprit Bumrah's delivery a no-ball. He rode his luck on Sunday, too. He was dropped twice. His aberration on 99 levelled things up, though Brook may not have thought of it that way as India's players rushed to congratulate Krishna and Thakur sprinted in from the boundary to join the celebrations. Brook's face was a mask of incredulity at the shot he had just played. He had watched the ball, first with trepidation and then despair, as he tracked its flight. When the catch was taken, he looked as if he could barely walk back to the pavilion. It is probably cricket's longest walk, the walk of the man dismissed for 99, and Brook's seemed to last an eternity. The word 'trudge' was made for Brook's walk. He looked like the embarrassed duck that Australian broadcasters flash up when a batsman is dismissed without scoring. At one point he even dropped his bat as he walked, as if he were losing his senses. Rishabh Pant, India's wicketkeeper, gave him a consoling pat as he ran to join his team-mates but Brook did not notice. Brydon Carse, the next batsman in, crossed with him near the boundary rope and half put an arm round him in consolation. Brook did not notice that, either. He is in the club now, like it or not. Clem Hill, the first man to be dismissed for 99 in a Test against England at Melbourne in 1902, scored 98 and 97 in the next Test at Adelaide. Good for the average, good for the team, but poison to that pursuit of three figures that consumes Brook and every batsman who has followed Hill to the crease since.
