UK tax rises: The five steps that could lead to increases

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has set out her plans for the UK economy in her Spring Statement and is on track to meet her self-imposed rules on the public finances, which she has said are "non-negotiable".On the face of it, that sounds like a good thing. So why are people saying that she may struggle to meet them and the only way she may do so is by raising taxes?It's a complicated picture.
1. Not much spare money
Ahead of the Spring Statement, the chancellor had been under pressure, with speculation over how she would be able to meet her self-imposed financial rules, one of which is to not borrow to fund day-to-day spending.In October, the government's official economic forecaster, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), said that Reeves would be able to meet that rule with £9.9bn to spare.An increase in government borrowing costs since then meant that that room to spare had disappeared. Now big welfare cuts and spending reductions in the Spring Statement have restored it.Almost £10bn may sound like a lot, but it's a relatively small amount in an economy that spends £1 trillion a year, and raises around the same in tax.In fact it is the third lowest margin a chancellor has left themselves since 2010. The average headroom over that time is three times bigger at £30bn.
"It is a tiny fraction of the risks to the outlook," Richard Hughes from the OBR told the BBC.He said there were many factors that could "wipe out" the chancellor's headroom, including an escalating trade war, any small downgrade to growth forecasts or a rise in interest rates.
2. Predicting the future is difficult
Which brings us on to the precarious nature of making economic forecasts."All forecasts turn out to be wrong. Weather forecasts also turn out to be wrong," says Hughes.Predicting what will happen in the future, especially in five years' time is hard, and is subject to revisions. You could be forgiven for not predicting a war or a pandemic, for instance.The respected think tank, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), has already said there is "a good chance that economic and fiscal forecasts will deteriorate significantly between now and an Autumn Budget".A case in point, only hours after Reeves delivered her statement in parliament, US President Donald Trump announced new 25% tariffs on cars and car parts coming into the US.
3. Car tariffs a sign worse could come
Reeves admitted the car tariffs would be "bad for the UK" but insisted the government was in "extensive" talks to avoid them being imposed here.According to the OBR, these import taxes would have a direct effect on goods totalling around 0.2% of GDP.Before Trump's announcement, the OBR had warned of the risk of an escalating trade war, and while the proposals do not exactly match the watchdog's worst-case scenario, which would see the UK retaliate, Hughes said it had elements of it.Although 0.2% is a tiny amount, nevertheless it will affect the economy. And in the OBR's worst-case scenario, 1% would be knocked off ecomic growth.
Live: Follow the latest reaction to the Spring StatementKey points from the Spring Statement at a glanceThree ways the changes could affect you and your moneyWatch: Henry Zeffman on what you need to know... in 58 seconds
4. Uncertainty means firms and people don't spend
Trump's trade policies and the fact that nobody seems to know whether he will follow through with his threats, U-turn on them, or how he will react to others is just one way his presidency is making the world so uncertain at the moment.The war in Ukraine continues, despite Trump's pledge to end it. The UK, along with Germany, has said it will increase defence spending. Trump has long called for European members of Nato to spend more on defence, and there are also fears that if the US does make a deal with Russia to end the war, that could leave Europe vulnerable.Domestically, businesses are also facing a worrying time as they brace for a rise in costs in April as employers' National Insurance contributions, the National Living wage and business rates are all set to go up.Some firms have said they have put off investment decisions as a result, and many have warned of price rises or job cuts. If these materialise, then that will knock growth.
5. Break the rules or raise taxes
Given all of the above, if the chancellor's headroom were to disappear, why would that matter?Reeves has staked her reputation on meeting her fiscal rules, pledging to bring "iron discipline" and provide stability and reassurance to financial markets, in contrast to former Prime Minister Liz Truss, whose unfunded tax cuts spooked the markets and raised interest rates.So if she is still to meet her rules and not borrow to fund day-to-day spending, that would mean either more spending cuts or tax rises.The government has already announced big cuts to the welfare bill as well as plans to cut the civil service and abolish several quangos including NHS England.But as Paul Dale, chief UK economist at Capital Economics, puts it: "Non-defence spending can only be cut so far."By leaving herself so little wiggle room and with such a precarious economic outlook, "we can surely now expect six or seven months of speculation about what taxes might or might not be increased in the autumn," says Paul Johnson from the IFS.That speculation itself can cause economic harm, he says.Reeves has not ruled out tax rises but told the BBC there were "opportunities" as well as "risks" for the UK economy.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Guardian

3 hours ago

• The Guardian

Labour scraps £950m EV rapid charging fund first announced by Conservatives

Labour ministers have scrapped a promise by the previous government for a £950m fund for installing electric car chargers near motorways, instead setting aside a smaller sum mainly for on-street charging points. The rapid charging fund (RCF) was first announced in 2020 by Rishi Sunak, then Conservative chancellor, with the aim of supporting upgrades to the grid so that more electric vehicles could be rapidly charged at the same time. However, it was mired in delays amid concerns it could unfairly benefit some motorway service companies. The Department for Transport said the RCF had never formally been included in budget plans, so the promise was unfunded. The Guardian revealed in March that ministers were considering directing proposed funding away from motorway services, amid criticisms of the fund's design from industry. The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has committed £400m over the next five years 'to support the rollout of charging infrastructure' in this month's spending review, after announcing £200m for charging at the autumn budget. It is understood much of the spending will support on-street charge points in poorer areas, where private-sector investment has lagged behind. However, some people in the charging industry said the government should have honoured the £950m pledge in full, even if the money was redirected towards other incentives for people to switch to EVs. John Lewis, the chief executive at which operates on-street chargers, welcomed the £400m pledge. However, he said: 'The key question now is: couldn't the full amount have been directed towards the EV effort – whether through the continued rollout of on-street charging or other consumer incentives – to give people greater confidence to make the switch to electric?' The number of electric car chargers in the UK is rising rapidly, passing 80,000 in May, according to data company Zap Map. That represented a 29% increase compared with a year earlier, while the number of rapid chargers with power above 50kW rose by a third. Not all chargers are created equal More and more people are buying electric cars, and are having to grapple with charging for the first time. However, not all chargers are created equal, and the profusion of units can cause confusion. Charging speeds are measured by power output in kilowatts (kW), while battery capacity is measured in kilowatt hours (kWh). For example, a Nissan Leaf has 39kWh of battery capacity, while a Tesla Model Y has 60kWh. Recharge times vary depending on battery size: divide the battery size by the power to get a very rough idea of how many hours it will take to charge. (E.g., a 60kWh battery at a 22kW charger would take about three hours.) The quicker the charge, the more it tends to cost. Slow: up to 8kW Common at homes, on-street chargers and places cars hang around like car parks or hotels. Suitable for charging overnight. Plugging in with a UK three-pin plug to the mains at home will deliver about 2.3kW – although it is not recommended. Fast: 8kW to 49kW Found at urban sites like supermarkets, shopping centres or car parks. Capable of charging a smaller battery in a few hours. Rapid: 50kW to 150kW Typically found close to big roads for journey charging, but also increasingly found in locations such as supermarkets or gyms with short dwell times. 50kW could give 80% charge in less than an hour. Ultra-rapid: 150kW and above Most chargers being installed at motorway services or dedicated charging hubs are now at least 150kW. Many newer cars can now handle 150kW, and several can charge at speeds of over 300kW, adding hundreds of miles of range in around 10 minutes. Increasing the number of public chargers is seen as crucial to persuading people to switch to electric cars. However, the focus has shifted from rapid chargers, which can allay 'range anxiety' on longer journeys, to the slower on-street chargers needed for car owners who do not have private parking spaces. Ian Johnston, the chief executive of Osprey Charging, said: 'New funding should be more effectively deployed on projects in prime locations where the grid connection costs render the site unviable – whether A roads, underserved regions or the small number of motorway locations with unviable grid – rather than gifted to all motorway sites regardless of the costs, as was envisaged under the RCF.' Johnston also called for changes to road signage permissions to allow charge points to be easily advertised to drivers. Quentin Willson, the founder of FairCharge, a group campaigning for cheaper charging, said the full £950m should have been spent on accelerating the switch to electric cars. 'Withholding unused RCF funds and not diverting them towards other EV charging initiatives isn't a great look for government,' he said. 'It opens them to the obvious questions about their commitment to the EV transition.' Willson, a former presenter of the Top Gear TV programme, said the government should also cut VAT on public charging to match the lower rates available on home electricity. A Department for Transport spokesperson said: 'The rapid charging fund was designed to support the rollout of charging infrastructure on motorways and major A roads – but the previous government did not set out detailed plans to deliver this. 'Since the fund was announced in 2020, the market has changed significantly, with the number of open-access rapid and ultra-rapid charge points within one mile of the strategic road network almost quadrupling in the last three years alone.'

Telegraph

3 hours ago

• Telegraph

Raising capital gains tax again will backfire, Reeves warned

Another capital gains tax raid in the next Budget would 'backfire' on Rachel Reeves and cost the Treasury money, experts have warned. The Chancellor is under pressure to launch a fresh round of tax hikes after raising the top rate of capital gains by four percentage points last year. However, if capital gains rates rise again, anyone selling assets for a profit may choose to delay crystallising their gains or find ways around the tax, which would lead to a loss of revenue for the Exchequer. Tax advisers have warned that a large proportion of capital gains revenues derive from a small number of taxpayers, meaning a significant increase in the rate could 'distort their behaviour', and reduce tax receipts. HMRC estimates suggest that just 2,000 individuals with gains of £5m or more accounted for 37pc of the capital gains subject to tax in 2022-23. Chris Etherington, of accountancy firm RSM, said: 'Given that a significant amount of annual capital gains derive from such a small tranche of the population, it is far from guaranteed that a significant increase in the rate would translate to a windfall of additional tax receipts. 'The Chancellor will no doubt be mindful of the potential risks presented by a further capital gains tax rate rise and may be wary of tax policy changes that could backfire.' In last year's October Budget, Ms Reeves raised the main rates of capital gains tax from 10pc to 18pc for basic rate taxpayers, and from 20pc to 24pc for higher rate taxpayers. She also stripped back relief offered to those selling companies or shares. In March, the Office for Budget Responsibility, the fiscal watchdog, warned that the decision would leave a £23bn hole in the public purse as investors hold off from crystallising gains. Speculation mounted in the lead-up to the Budget that capital gains would be aligned much more closely with income tax, with rates as high as 39pc being modelled by Treasury officials. Households are bracing for a slew of tax rises after the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) halved the country's growth forecast for this year to 1pc. Low growth and high borrowing costs could force Ms Reeves to raise taxes again in what the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank has warned could be a 'blockbuster Budget'. Capital gains tax receipts fell to £13bn in the year to March 2025, down 10pc from £14.5bn in the same period last year, according to HM Revenue & Customs data. The tax accounts for less than 2pc of all government revenue. Nimesh Shah, of accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg, said: 'Capital gains tax revenue comes from a narrow pool of people, so it doesn't take much for that distortion to make an impact – a small change can make a big difference. 'It's an optional tax. You only pay when you dispose of an asset, so people may simply choose to hold on to things like houses, so as not to crystallise the tax bill – or they may simply leave the UK and crystallise the gains abroad. 'Like all taxes, there's a Laffer Curve point with capital gains tax where revenue starts to fall as rates rise.'

Reuters

4 hours ago

• Reuters

UK could boost growth by radically reshaping the Treasury: Peacock

LONDON, June 20 (Reuters) - UK finance minister Rachel Reeves insists higher economic growth is her top priority, but the government's current plan to address the country's chronically low investment is unlikely to be ambitious enough. What may be needed is a structural rethink of the finance ministry itself. Reeves has adjusted her fiscal rules to allow for an extra 113 billion pounds of investment over five years, while remaining committed to ensuring debt falls as a proportion of national income within five years. In the UK government's latest spending plan unveiled last week, she started to allocate the extra capital to areas including defence, housing, transport infrastructure and a new nuclear power plant. Even so, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility, an independent fiscal watchdog, UK capital spending will climb to a peak of 3.9% of GDP in 2027/2028 but then fall back in the following two years, continuing a limp public investment record stretching back to the global financial crisis. Reeves is searching for other growth levers, including deregulation and increased UK investment by British pension funds. Additionally, the government is seeking to streamline planning laws and taking steps – albeit small ones – to rebuild trade relations with the European Union. But the government is fundamentally hamstrung by its fiscal rules. Departments are currently required to go cap in hand to the finance ministry to learn what they can spend and then undergo frequent check-ins to see if the fiscal position has deteriorated, which could lead to spending cuts or tax rises. This is not a system that will produce a viable long-term growth strategy. The International Monetary Fund – not known for being a fan of unfettered state spending – said last month that the UK should consider taking a more pragmatic approach to avoid having to change policy too often. The IMF suggested minor breaches should not require instant corrective action and that assessment of the rules should be done no more than once a year. But something more radical is likely required for Britain to break out of the low growth, low productivity loop it has been trapped in for almost two decades. Over this period, debt as a proportion of GDP has almost tripled while the national tax take has held steady, suggesting that part of the problem might be with the way the finance ministry operates. The machinery of government needs recalibration to focus more systematically on productive investment that can ultimately help to drive debt down over time. Reeves is trying on this score. She has asked the OBR to assess the long-term impact of capital spending decisions to determine whether they could improve public finances. She is also changing the Treasury's "Green Book" rules that dictate approval of capital projects, shifting from a narrow cost-benefit analysis to an assessment of the impact on broader strategic goals such as lifting poorer regions of the UK. However, a fundamental issue remains. The Treasury still wields huge influence within the UK government, and when growth falls short, the impulse is typically to tighten the fiscal screws, thereby worsening growth prospects. The Institute for Government, a UK-based think tank, has argued that the economic heft of the prime minister's team needs strengthening as a counterbalance. EU nations – Germany, Spain and the Netherlands among others – have both a finance ministry and a separate, growth-focused economy ministry at the heart of government. Calls for a dramatic change in the Finance Ministry are growing. Maurice Glasman, who heads "Blue Labour", a campaign to reverse what it says is the Labour Party's abandonment of working-class communities, advocates abolishing the Treasury, scrapping fiscal rules and pursuing heavy infrastructure investment. While Glasman's prescription has little chance of being implemented in full, his ideas could gain influence within a government threatened by the rise of Nigel Farage's populist Reform UK party, which is targeting traditional Labour voters. Recent opinion polls have given Reform UK 27%-32% public support compared with 22%-24% for Labour. Ensuring public finances do not spiral out of control is, of course, critical for any government. And less oversight by the Treasury could result in wasted taxpayer money spent on unproductive investments that appeal to the political base. Moreover, the bond market has not reacted well to perceived UK fiscal imprudence in recent years, as demonstrated by the rapid demise of Liz Truss's premiership of 2022. But bond investors are apt to respond more positively to a long-term, investment-led approach to reducing public borrowing, even if it involves some upfront spending. It helps that the UK currently faces less political uncertainty than some of its peers and is in the middle of the pack in terms of developed market debt burdens. Reeves appears to understand that an investment-led structural reset is required to jump-start the UK growth engine. But to make that a reality, the first change may need to be rethinking the relationship between the Treasury and the prime minister's office. The opinions expressed here are those of Mike Peacock, the former head of communications at the Bank of England and a former senior editor at Reuters. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), opens new tab, opens new tab, your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI, opens new tab, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab, opens new tab and X., opens new tab