No limits, no trust: China mounts secret cyberwar on Russia, says report

Experts believe that while China is far wealthier than Russia, it feels its armed forces lack battlefield experience. Now, Beijing is likely seeking intelligence on Russia's activities in Ukraine read more
In this pool photograph distributed by the Russian state agency Sputnik, Russia's President Vladimir Putin and China's President Xi Jinping attend a concert marking the 75th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between Russia and China and opening of China-Russia Years of Culture at the National Centre for the Performing Arts in Beijing on May 16, 2024. (Photo via AFP)
China-backed groups have intensified hacking attempts on Russian companies and government agencies since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, the New York Times has reported, citing 'cyberanalysts'. This cyber warfare has persisted despite both leaders, Russia's Vladimir Putin and China's Xi Jinping, publicly hailing their 'no limits' ties.
Just last year, TeamT5, a Taiwan-based cybersecurity research firm, established that one of China-backed groups was behind a cyberattack on a major Russian engineering firm in the hunt for information on nuclear submarines.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Experts believe that while China is far wealthier than Russia, it feels its armed forces lack battlefield experience. Now, it might be hoping to plug some holes using Russia's experience in the Ukraine war.
'China likely seeks to gather intelligence on Russia's activities, including on its military operation in Ukraine, defence developments and other geopolitical manoeuvres,' the Times quoted TeamT5's Che Chang as saying.
'Leaked' Russian document dubs China as an 'enemy'
The Times cites a classified counterintelligence document from Russia's domestic security agency, known as the FSB, to throw light on how the Russia-China partnership is plagued with deep mistrust.
The document refers to China as an ' enemy ' and says that Beijing was actively looking for defence expertise and technology and is trying to learn from Russia's military experience in Ukraine.
Notably, Russia has never acknowledged these concerns in public.
'Rostec targeted'
The Times report says that even Rostec, which is Russia's state-owned powerful defence conglomerate, was targeted by one of China's state-backed group to seek information on satellite communications, radar and electronic warfare. Citing Palo Alto Networks, the paper notes that some groups use malicious files, intended to exploit vulnerabilities in Microsoft Word, to penetrate Russian aviation industry targets.
In 2023, Positive Technologies, a Russian cybersecurity company, reported that multiple Russian entities, including those in the aerospace, private security, and defence sectors, were targeted by cyberattacks. The attacks utilised Deed RAT, a tool commonly associated with Chinese state-sponsored hackers.
According to cybersecurity experts, Deed RAT is a 'proprietary' malware, exclusive to these groups and not available for purchase on the dark web, unlike other malicious tools.
Notably, the reports of China-backed cyberattacks on Russian companies had emerged before the Ukraine war too. For example, Beijing hackers carried out a cyberattack on Russian submarine designers in 2021.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Hindu

28 minutes ago

• The Hindu

Enforcement Directorate files third supplementary prosecution complaint in case linked to former Jharkhand Minister Alamgir Alam

The Enforcement Directorate (ED), Ranchi Zonal Office, has filed its third Supplementary Prosecution Complaint on Thursday (June 19, 2025) against Suresh Prasad Verma, a former Junior Engineer, in a major money-laundering case. The complaint is part of an ongoing investigation into a massive bribery and tender-related corruption racket in Jharkhand, which has led to the arrest of then State Minister Alamgir Alam. The federal agency on Friday (June 20,2025) in its official press statement said it has initiated its money-laundering investigation based on a 2019 FIR registered by the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB), Jamshedpur, in which Suresh Prasad Verma was trapped while accepting a bribe. Subsequent searches by the ACB had led to a seizure of ₹2.67 Crore in unexplained cash from a property linked to a chief engineer Veerendra Kumar Ram. ED's probe revealed a deep-rooted conspiracy where senior government officials and political figures allegedly received around 3% commission on government tenders. 'The investigation established that a significant portion of this commission was collected on behalf of then-Rural Development Minister Alamgir Alam, allegedly managed through his Personal Secretary, Sanjeev Kumar Lal, 'ED stated in the press statement. It also asserted that this network was unearthed following an extensive investigation, which included the seizure of over ₹35 Crore in cash from premises linked to the Minister's aides. The probe has also established a sophisticated money-laundering nexus involving Delhi-based Chartered Accountants and entry operators who were funneling the illicit cash through shell companies. ED had previously arrested Mr. Alam and has filed charge sheets against him, senior officials, and the money-laundering syndicate. The latest complaint formally charges Suresh Prasad Verma for his role in the acquisition of Proceeds of Crime and for knowingly assisting in the concealment of illicit cash linked to the larger racket. According to ED, till date, four Prosecution Complaints against 14 accused persons, three provisional attachment orders (PAOs) have been issued whereby assets to the tune of ₹44 crore have been attached, cash of around ₹38 crore (approx.) have been seized, jewellery worth ₹1.65 Crore, eight luxury vehicles have been seized, and nine persons have been arrested in the case.

Hindustan Times

34 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Russia expects peace talks date with Ukraine to be set next week: Kremlin

Russia expects to agree with Ukraine next week on a date for a third round of peace talks, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Friday. Kremlin aide Vladimir Medinsky, who heads the Russian delegation, is in contact with his Ukrainian counterpart, Peskov said. Resuming negotiations after a gap of more than three years, the two sides held face-to-face talks in Istanbul on May 16 and June 2 that led to a series of prisoner exchanges and the return of the bodies of dead soldiers. But they have made no progress towards a ceasefire which Ukraine, with Western backing, has been pressing for. Russia says it wants a final settlement, not just a pause in the fighting, and is insisting on territorial and other demands that Ukraine says would be tantamount to capitulation. The conflict has intensified in recent weeks, with Russia carrying out some of its heaviest air attacks of the war and Ukraine mounting surprise drone strikes on airfields on June 1 that inflicted serious damage on Russia's nuclear-capable bomber fleet.

Time of India

38 minutes ago

• Time of India

Israel hammers Iran: Trump mulls bunker busters-will Xi rescue Ayatollah?

AI image for representation only. As Israel rains missiles on Iranian military and nuclear targets and President Donald Trump weighs direct US intervention with bunker-busting bombs, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei finds himself increasingly isolated. But the one power many hoped - or feared - might come to Tehran's aid, China, has stayed conspicuously cautious. Not that China has totally abandoned Iran, it has drawn a red line: But only on paper. Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi called the Israeli strikes on Iran 'unacceptable.' President Xi Jinping issued a condemnation through the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. China even offered rhetorical support for Iran's 'sovereignty and security.' But beyond the statements, one thing was conspicuously absent: Action. Chinese President Xi Jinping has condemned Israel's assault, emphasized dialogue, and backed Iran's sovereignty. Yet he has shown no signs of rushing to deliver weapons, military intelligence, or any other support that might change the battlefield calculus in Iran's favor. 'China may be offering economic relief and rhetorical support to Iran, but actual military intervention is not anywhere near the table yet,' Wen-Ti Sung, nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council's Global China Hub, told Bloomberg. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Why it matters Iran is facing its most serious external threat since the 1979 revolution. Israel has killed over 600 Iranians, including top generals and nuclear scientists. Trump has demanded Iran's 'unconditional surrender' and is weighing military options. And yet, China - a supposed strategic partner - has stuck to statements and sidestepped commitments. The lack of meaningful action from Beijing signals two crucial realities: 1. China's support for Iran is driven more by economic self-interest and strategic restraint than ideological alignment. 2. Beijing's Middle East strategy is transactional and risk-averse, prioritizing energy security and economic ties over alliances. Between the lines: Rhetoric without risk Beijing's pattern is clear. As in Ukraine, it prefers moral positioning to material involvement. 'China may be offering economic relief and rhetorical support to Iran, but actual military intervention is not anywhere near the table yet,' Wen-Ti Sung, a nonresident fellow with the Atlantic Council's Global China Hub, told Bloomberg. The calculus is both ideological and pragmatic. Xi's doctrine of non-interference-rooted in Deng-era realism-has become a trademark of China's global posture. That principle allows Beijing to project neutrality in foreign conflicts, appeal to the Global South, and avoid the pitfalls of overextension that have ensnared the US for decades. In this case, the risks are exceptionally high. Iran is being directly targeted not just by Israel but potentially by an emboldened United States. President Donald Trump has floated the possibility of using 'bunker buster' bombs to strike Iran's deeply buried nuclear sites. Open conflict with a US-backed adversary in the Middle East is a trap China has no interest in walking into. 'China does not want to risk getting entrapped by Iran's war with an Israel that has the Trump administration behind it,' Sung explained. Zoom in Oil calculus: Over 90% of Iran's oil exports go to China, mostly via sanction-evading methods using yuan and shadow fleets. Yet Iran accounts for less than 1% of China's total trade. It's significant for Tehran, not Beijing. 'If Iranian oil disappears, China has other options,' noted Fitch Ratings. 'OPEC+ spare capacity could fill the gap.' Beijing's diversified energy strategy is designed precisely for this scenario-an unstable supplier becomes expendable. Energy risk: If the conflict disrupts the Strait of Hormuz, the fallout for China could be massive. Nearly half of its crude oil passes through the narrow waterway. Weapon supply: Iran needs advanced air defense and fighter jets to match Israel. But China has not signed a new arms deal with Iran since 2005. US sanctions have disincentivized such transactions. Public mood: Some Chinese nationalist voices want Beijing to back Iran militarily. But most state messaging focuses on stability, and social media commentary is mixed. 'If Islamic countries such as Pakistan intervene, it will indirectly drag China in, because the weapons they use are from China,' Pan Guang of the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences told the South China Morning Post. The big picture China and Iran have deepened ties in recent years. Xi oversaw Iran's entry into BRICS and the SCO. They signed a 25-year strategic deal in 2021, reportedly worth $400 billion in investments. But implementation has been slow, and sanctions have chilled enthusiasm among Chinese firms. Iran is a 'strategic partner' for Beijing only insofar as it fits broader geopolitical aims - challenging US dominance, securing oil, and building influence. Iran is not central to China's Middle East blueprint. Meanwhile, China has kept relations warm with Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. When Beijing brokered a diplomatic thaw between Tehran and Riyadh in 2023, it celebrated the moment but quickly stepped back as new conflicts erupted. 'China's strategy in the Middle East is to stay on good terms with everyone to maximize its economic gains and geopolitical influence,' Neil Thomas of the Asia Society Policy Institute told the Bloomberg. And if conflict between the US and Iran escalates, Beijing may even benefit. Greater US involvement in the Middle East would 'distract Washington from strategic competition with China,' Bloomberg analysts noted. What they're saying 'Xi has expressed willingness to help. But what can he or China do?' asked Zhiqun Zhu, professor at Bucknell University. 'Mediating is a tall order that's hard to reach without cooperation of other key players, especially the United States.' 'Further escalation of tensions in the Middle East is not in the interests of any party,' said China's foreign ministry, urging countries with 'special influence on Israel' - a nod to the US - to play a constructive role. 'If Trump takes some action on the Israel-Iran issue, he can divert attention from other troublesome issues,' said Pan Guang, implying that China sees US threats as partly political theater. What's next If the conflict deepens and Trump orders US strikes, China will likely double down on diplomacy, perhaps via the UN Security Council, where it can flex soft power without real costs. But don't expect Beijing to: Deploy military assets Sell weapons to Tehran Mediate alone between Israel and Iran That's not how Xi operates. China has neither the appetite nor the leverage to act as a wartime ally. And with global oil prices, Chinese economic recovery, and domestic woes in play - including youth unemployment and a real estate slump - the risks of deeper entanglement far outweigh the potential gains. The bottom line Xi Jinping is not coming to the Ayatollah's rescue. China may speak out against Israeli strikes and back Iran in the abstract. But when it comes to real power - arms, troops, strategic shielding - Tehran is on its own. Xi's priority remains crystal clear: avoid chaos, avoid sanctions, and avoid war.