Row after Takht Patna Sahib Panj Pyaras declare Akal Takht jathedar ‘tankhaiya'
Amritsar
Amritsar: A row has erupted after the Panj Pyare (five beloved ones) of Takht Patna Sahib defied a decree issued by the Akal Takht, the highest temporal seat of Sikhism, and declared its acting jathedar Giani Kuldeep Singh Gargaj and Takht Damdama Sahib head Tek Singh Dhanaula 'tankhaiya' (guilty of religious misconduct) for actions that allegedly hurt the sanctity and dignity of the Takht Patna Sahib.
The confrontation escalated on Wednesday when Sikh clergy at the Akal Takht took serious note of the Takht Patna Sahib management's non-compliance with a 2022 directive which ordered an assessment of Patna Sahib jathedar Baldev Singh's Gurbani recitation skills and the transfer of granthi Gurdial Singh.
Following continued disregard, both were barred from performing any 'Panthic' (religious) duties, and the management was summoned to appear before the Akal Takht immediately.
In a counteraction just hours later, the Panj Pyare of Takht Patna Sahib, led by jathedar Baldev Singh, rejected the Akal Takht's decree and issued their own. They accused the Amritsar-based clergy of overreach and declared that decisions made by other Takhts would neither apply to nor be recognised at Takht Patna Sahib.
Experts, however, say as the Akal Takht is the supreme authority, and no one can challenge it.
Sukhbir told to appear before Takht Patna Sahib
The Panj Pyare also claimed that the controversy was politically motivated, accusing Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) president Sukhbir Singh Badal of engineering the interference. Sukhbir has been summoned to appear before Takht Patna Sahib within 10 days or face action 'as per Panthic traditions'.
Further, the Patna Sahib decree labelled Giani Kuldeep Singh Gargaj and Tek Singh Dhanaula as 'self-styled jathedars', and rejected the Akal Takht's recent exoneration of former Patna Sahib jathedar Giani Ranjit Singh Gauhar. According to Patna Sahib authorities, their earlier decision declaring Gauhar 'tankhaiya' and excommunicating him still stands.
This open defiance by Takht Patna Sahib has triggered a crisis in the Sikh religious sphere, potentially threatening the long-standing centralised authority of the Akal Takht over Sikh matters globally. Religious scholars and Panthic leaders have expressed concern over the implications of such disunity within the Sikh temporal institutions.
Dr Amarjit Singh, professor, Centre on Studies in Sri Guru Granth Sahib, Guru Nanak Dev University (GNDU), said: 'Such instance was never witnessed in the recent history that Takht Patna Sahib Panj Pyare challenged Akal Takht decree. This has hurt Sikh traditions and the community is upset over this.'
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) member and its former general secretary Gurcharan Singh Grewal said: 'The Akal Takht took action against those at the helm of Takht Patna Sahib as per the probe report. The Akal Takht is supreme authority. Other Takhts come under it. So, its order cannot be challenged as per the Sikh traditions.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
DeepSeek Aids China's Military And Evaded Export Controls: US Official
Washington: AI firm DeepSeek is aiding China's military and intelligence operations, a senior U.S. official told Reuters, adding that the Chinese tech startup sought to use Southeast Asian shell companies to access high-end semiconductors that cannot be shipped to China under U.S. rules. Hangzhou-based DeepSeek sent shockwaves through the technology world in January, claiming its artificial intelligence reasoning models were on par with or better than U.S. industry-leading models at a fraction of the cost. "We understand that DeepSeek has willingly provided and will likely continue to provide support to China's military and intelligence operations," a senior State Department official told Reuters in an interview. "This effort goes above and beyond open-source access to DeepSeek's AI models," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity in order to speak about U.S. government information. The U.S. government's assessment of DeepSeek's activities and links to the Chinese government have not been previously reported and come amid a wide-scale U.S.-China trade war. Among the allegations, the official said DeepSeek is sharing user information and statistics with Beijing's surveillance apparatus. Chinese law requires companies operating in China to provide data to the government when requested. But the suggestion that DeepSeek is already doing so is likely to raise privacy and other concerns for the firm's tens of millions of daily global users. The U.S. also maintains restrictions on companies it believes are linked to China's military-industrial complex. U.S. lawmakers have previously said that DeepSeek, based on its privacy disclosure statements, transmits American users' data to China through "backend infrastructure" connected to China Mobile, a Chinese state-owned telecommunications giant. DeepSeek did not respond to questions about its privacy practices. The company is also referenced more than 150 times in procurement records for China's People's Liberation Army and other entities affiliated with the Chinese defense industrial base, said the official, adding that DeepSeek had provided technology services to PLA research institutions. Reuters could not independently verify the procurement data. The official also said the company was employing workarounds to U.S. export controls to gain access to advanced U.S.-made chips. The U.S. conclusions reflect a growing skepticism in Washington that the capabilities behind the rapid rise of one of China's flagship AI enterprises may have been exaggerated and relied heavily on U.S. technology. DeepSeek has access to "large volumes" of U.S. firm Nvidia's high-end H100 chips, said the official. Since 2022 those chips have been under U.S. export restrictions due to Washington's concerns that China could use them to advance its military capabilities or jump ahead in the AI race. "DeepSeek sought to use shell companies in Southeast Asia to evade export controls, and DeepSeek is seeking to access data centers in Southeast Asia to remotely access U.S. chips," the official said. The official declined to say if DeepSeek had successfully evaded export controls or offer further details about the shell companies. DeepSeek also did not respond to questions about its acquisition of Nvidia chips or the alleged use of shell companies. When asked if the U.S. would implement further export controls or sanctions against DeepSeek, the official said the department had "nothing to announce at this time." China's foreign ministry and commerce ministry did not respond to a Reuters request for comment. "We do not support parties that have violated U.S. export controls or are on the U.S. entity lists," an Nvidia spokesman said in a prepared statement, adding that "with the current export controls, we are effectively out of the China data center market, which is now served only by competitors such as Huawei." ACCESS TO RESTRICTED CHIPS DeepSeek has said two of its AI models that Silicon Valley executives and U.S. tech company engineers have showered with praise - DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1 - are on par with OpenAI and Meta's most advanced models. AI experts, however, have expressed skepticism, arguing the true costs of training the models were likely much higher than the $5.58 million the startup said was spent on computing power. Reuters has previously reported that U.S. officials were investigating whether DeepSeek had access to restricted AI chips. DeepSeek has H100 chips that it procured after the U.S. banned Nvidia from selling those chips to China, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters, adding that the number was far smaller than the 50,000 H100s that the CEO of another AI startup had claimed DeepSeek possesses in a January interview with CNBC. Reuters was unable to verify the number of H100 chips DeepSeek has. "Our review indicates that DeepSeek used lawfully acquired H800 products, not H100," an Nvidia spokesman said, responding to a Reuters query about DeepSeek's alleged usage of H100 chips. In February, Singapore charged three men with fraud in a case domestic media have linked to the movement of Nvidia's advanced chips from the city state to DeepSeek. China has also been suspected of finding ways to use advanced U.S. chips remotely. While importing advanced Nvidia chips into China without a license violates U.S. export rules, Chinese companies are still allowed to access those same chips remotely in data centers in non-restricted countries. The exceptions are when a Chinese company is on a U.S. trade blacklist or the chip exporter has knowledge that the Chinese firm is using its chips to help develop weapons of mass destruction. U.S. officials have not placed DeepSeek on any U.S. trade blacklists yet and have not alleged that Nvidia had any knowledge of DeepSeek's work with the Chinese military. Malaysia's trade ministry said last week that it was investigating whether an unnamed Chinese company in the country was using servers equipped with Nvidia chips for large language model training and that it was examining whether any domestic law or regulation had been breached.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court to consider question of issuance of OBC certificates for children of single mothers
The Supreme Court on Monday (June 23, 2025) decided to examine the 'important' issue of amending extant rules to provide Other Backward Class (OBC) certificates to the children of single mothers who belong to the backward sections of the society. 'The present writ petition raises an important issue about issuance of OBC certificates to children of single mothers wherein the mothers belong to OBC… This has to be heard,' a Bench headed by Justice K.V. Viswanathan observed. The case was filed by a Delhi-based woman, and the apex court had sought responses from the Centre and the Delhi government in January. The Centre had argued that the matter required extended consideration, and States need to be arraigned as parties in the case before the top court. The Centre said the court ought to be frame guidelines on the question. The Bench fixed the case for further hearing on July 22. It referred to a 2012 verdict, which had dealt with the question surrounding the status of a person one of whose parents belonged to the Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes. The petition filed by Santosh Kumari, represented by advocate Dawneesh Shaktivats, said OBC certificates were not given on the basis of the caste identity of the mother. The applicant for an OBC certificate were compelled to produce the certificate of a relative on the paternal side. 'The inaction on the part of respondents to issue OBC certificates to children of single mothers on the basis of the latter's OBC certificates was in contravention of the rights of the children who belong to the OBC category,' the plea said. The petition also called it violative of the provisions of the Constitution as children of a single mother belonging to the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe category were granted caste certificates on the basis of her certificate. The petition referred to the Delhi guidelines for issuance of OBC certificates, requiring the production of OBC certificates of any paternal blood relative, including father, grandfather or uncle.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
MEA rebukes OIC for 'factually incorrect' comments, says Pakistan misusing platform to deflect scrutiny; 'J&K integral part of India, no locus standi'
NEW DELHI: India on Monday strongly rejected 'unwarranted and factually incorrect references' made about the country during the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Council of foreign ministers' meeting. 'These statements, driven by Pakistan, which has turned terrorism into statecraft, reflect the continued misuse of the OIC platform for narrow political ends,' the ministry of external affairs (MEA) said in a detailed statement. OIC silent on Pakistan-based terror, says India The MEA criticised the OIC for its continued failure to acknowledge the 'real and documented threat of terrorism emanating from Pakistan,' citing the recent terror attack in Pahalgam as a recent example. 'This reflects a wilful disregard for facts and the global consensus on the fight against terrorism,' the ministry added. Jammu & Kashmir is India's internal matter India firmly reiterated that the OIC has 'no locus standi to comment on India's internal affairs, including Jammu & Kashmir,' which the ministry described as 'an integral and sovereign part of India, a fact enshrined in the Indian Constitution and irreversibly settled.' Warning to OIC on allowing Pakistani propaganda Calling the OIC's silence and actions troubling, the MEA warned the organisation of the 'perils of allowing Pakistan's propaganda to hijack and politicise its agenda,' and said that continuing on this path would 'undermine the OIC's credibility and relevance.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 Most Gorgeous Women, Ranked BigGlobalTravel Undo Pakistan deflecting attention from its own failures Responding to comments made by Pakistan at the OIC meeting, India said they were nothing more than a desperate attempt to distract from Islamabad's 'appalling record of state-sponsored terrorism, minority persecution, sectarian violence, and governance failure.' India defends Operation Sindoor India also rejected Pakistan's allegation of 'unprovoked and unjustified military aggression' and defended its counter-terror operation post-Pahalgam. 'Operation Sindoor was a precise and legitimate act of self-defence against terrorist camps operating from Pakistani territory,' the MEA said, adding that Pakistan's retaliatory efforts were reckless, endangered civilians, and resulted in multiple civilian casualties. 'Ironic for Pakistan to talk about human rights' In its closing remarks, the ministry said it was 'ironic' for Pakistan, a country with an 'abysmal human rights record' and a 'history of sheltering, breeding and empowering terrorists', to lecture others on counter-terrorism and human rights.
