Pakistan secretly drone-attacking its own territories as it battles Islamist groups, says report

For years, Pakistan has used drones to target suspected terrorists in tribal and border areas, but the strikes have reportedly caused significant collateral damage, including civilian casualties, according to a report read more
A drone on display at a military exhibition in Karachi in November. Reuters File
During a recent brief military confrontation with India, Pakistan deployed drones to target civilian areas in Jammu and Kashmir, showing off their high-tech weapons.
However, this show of force is just the surface of a much deeper and long-running drone campaign within Pakistan's own borders, according to a report by The New York Times.
For years, Pakistan has been using drones to monitor and strike suspected terrorist targets in its tribal and border regions. While these operations are aimed at neutralising militant threats, they have reportedly resulted in significant collateral damage, including civilian casualties, added the report.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Although Pakistani officials maintain that drone operations have become more effective and precise in recent years, a growing number of incidents suggest a starkly different reality on the ground.
Earlier this year, Pakistani Security Forces launched a drone strike on what they described as a terrorist hideout in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, reportedly eliminating several 'high-value' targets. Yet, the attack also claimed civilian lives, with provincial authorities indicating that women and children were among the casualties.
Just weeks later, a suspected drone strike injured at least 20 people gathered to watch a volleyball match in Lower South Waziristan, a volatile district bordering Afghanistan. The incident raised renewed concerns about the risks to non-combatants in the region.
In a separate incident last month, four children were reportedly killed in a drone strike in North Waziristan, further fueling criticism over the human cost of Pakistan's domestic counterterrorism campaign, reported NYT.
Officials blamed the Pakistani Taliban for the attack, but the political opposition condemned it as a consequence of the government's flawed security strategy, the report added
Pakistan is one of four countries actively deploying drones against terrorist threats within its own borders, alongside Iraq, Nigeria, and Turkey.
Despite the growing use of unmanned aerial strikes, the Pakistani government has yet to officially acknowledge the role drones play in its counterinsurgency efforts, the report said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Pakistan steps up online defence
Pakistani security officials are becoming increasingly vocal online in an apparent effort to counter criticism of the country's drone campaign, according to The New York Times report.
A series of unverified videos, widely circulated on social media by pro-military accounts, appear to showcase drone strikes targeting alleged militants.
One viral clip shows armed men, identified by officials as Pakistani Taliban fighters, attempting to breach a barbed-wire perimeter at night before being hit by a drone strike. Officials claim the footage was recorded in 2024.
Another video reportedly shows a drone strike targeting Taliban-linked operatives in a district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, a restive region bordering Afghanistan.
While the authenticity of the footage has yet to be independently confirmed, NYT reported that the Pakistani government is actively supporting this digital campaign, using it to bolster public support for drone operations and push back against allegations of civilian casualties.
US drone campaign in Pakistan
For many years, the US conducted drone strikes inside Pakistan that targeted Al Qaeda, the Pakistani Taliban, and affiliated groups.
The first known US strike took place in 2004, in which a prominent Taliban commander, Nek Muhammad, died.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
According to the NYT report, the George Bush administration had allowed 48 drone strikes in Pakistan, while Barack Obama authorised 353.
The last recorded drone strike in the Pakistan borders by the US was in 2016, in which the chief of the Afghan Taliban, Mullah Akhtar Mansour, was killed, added the report.
US President Donald Trump had reportedly ordered 13 strikes in Pakistan during his first term.
However, no drone strikes by the US were reported after 2018.
Pakistan and terrorism
Pakistan was placed on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list in June 2018, a designation for countries identified as safe havens for terror financing and money laundering.
At the time, Pakistan was criticized for lacking a comprehensive and coordinated, risk-based strategy to tackle these issues. In response, FATF issued a 34-point action plan, urging Islamabad to implement it by the end of 2019. However, the deadline was extended due to disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Between 2020 and 2022, Pakistan introduced a series of reforms, strengthening its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing frameworks. In September 2022, FATF conducted an on-site inspection to assess Pakistan's progress and confirmed that the country had met the requirements.
Subsequently, in October 2022, Pakistan was officially removed from the grey list.
Reacting to the development, India emphasized that Pakistan must continue to take 'credible, verifiable, irreversible' action against terrorism, underscoring lingering regional concerns despite FATF's decision.
With inputs from agencies

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Hindustan Times

21 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

‘They won't give me because…': Trump on being nominated for Nobel Peace Prize by Pak

US President Donald Trump reignited his calls for a Nobel Peace Prize soon after Pakistan nominated him for the prestigious award. Claiming that he played key diplomatic efforts across several global conflict zones, including India-Pakistan and the Congo-Rwanda crisis, Trump said that he should have won the prize 4-5 times by now. Pakistan Field Marshal Asim Munir met US President Donald Trump during his Washington trip. "They should give me the Nobel Prize for Rwanda and if you look, the Congo, or you could say Serbia, Kosovo, you could say a lot of them," Trump told reporters Friday. "The big one is India and Pakistan. I should have gotten it four or five times." The Pakistani government formally nominated US President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing his "decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership" during the recent conflict between India and Pakistan. In a post on X, Pakistan's Foreign Ministry said, 'President Donald J. Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026 in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis.' Trump has long claimed that he helped de-escalate tensions between the two nuclear powers, a claim that Indian government has dismissed numerous times. In his Friday comments, Trump also alluded to a peace agreement he said would be signed on Monday, aimed at ending hostilities between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda - a long-standing regional conflict that has seen renewed violence in recent months. Details of the treaty remain unclear, and no independent verification of US involvement has been released. 'I should have gotten it four or five times,' Trump reiterated. 'They won't give me a Nobel Peace Prize because they only give it to liberals.' Trump has previously received multiple Nobel Prize nominations from supporters, particularly for his role in facilitating normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab states under the Abraham Accords. However, he has not been awarded the prize. The Nobel Peace Prize is awarded annually by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, which selects recipients based on their efforts to promote peace and resolve conflicts. The committee has never publicly commented on Trump's candidacy.

Mint

33 minutes ago

• Mint

Trump again snubs spy chief Tulsi Gabbard's take on Iran's nuclear programme, says ‘she is wrong'

US President Donald Trump said that the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was 'wrong' when she earlier stated said that the US believed Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon, whereas he suggested that it would be 'very hard to stop' Israel's strikes on Iran in order to work out a possible ceasefire. He bluntly said, 'She's wrong.' Trump echoed remarks made by Gabbard when speaking to reporters on Tuesday. 'I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having it," he had said. While testifying to Congress in March that the US intelligence community continued to believe that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon, Tulsi said, 'The (intelligence community) continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon.' She took to X on Friday and clarified, 'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.' She added her testimony was taken "out of context in a way to manufacture division'. Tulsi in March called Iran's enriched uranium stockpile as unprecedented for a state without such weapons and mentioned the government was monitoring the situation closely. She also specified that Iran had begun conversing about nuclear weapons in public, 'emboldening nuclear weapons advocates within Iran's decision-making apparatus.' The assessment presented by Gabbard has not altered, Reuters reported citing a source with access to US intelligence reports. US spy services also assessed that it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could strike a target of its choice. Some experts, however, argue that Iran could produce and deliver a crude, untested nuclear device in a much shorter timeframe, though its effectiveness would be uncertain. Trump has often dismissed the conclusions of US intelligence agencies, which he and his supporters have accused, without offering evidence, of being part of a "deep state" conspiracy of officials working against his presidency. During his first term, he frequently clashed with US intelligence agencies, notably over their judgement that Moscow interfered in the 2016 presidential election to benefit him, as well as his willingness to accept Russian President Vladimir Putin's denials of involvement. The White House stated that Trump would decide involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict over the next two weeks. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended a week of airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military facilities, claiming that Tehran was close to acquiring a nuclear warhead. Iran, however, denies pursuing nuclear weapons, insisting that its uranium enrichment programme is intended solely for peaceful purposes. (With inputs from Reuters and AP)

Hindustan Times

43 minutes ago

• Hindustan Times

Nobel Peace Prize to 'peacemaker' Trump: Behind Pakistan's big shoutout

US President Donald Trump has found an unusual backing by Pakistan with a Nobel Peace Prize nomination. The development comes over a month after India and Pakistan reached an understanding on cessation of hostilities, a move Islamabad has credited Trump for as it pushed him for a Nobel Peace Prize 2026. President Donald Trump arrives on Air Force One at Morristown Municipal Airport in Morristown.(AP) Pakistan believes the Republican leader should get the acclaimed award 'in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership" during the conflict. Trump has time and again claimed credit for brokering peace between India and Pakistan, but New Delhi has denied any US intervention, clarifying that the May 10 truce was the result of direct negotiations between the two countries. Why Pak nominated Trump While India has repeatedly denied any US role in cessation of hostilities, Pakistan has acknowledged Trump's "robust" diplomatic engagement with New Delhi and Islamabad, Dawn has reported. Donald Trump "demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi," the Pakistani newspaper quoted an X post by the government as saying. Pakistan also reportedly blamed India for an "unprovoked" aggression, and directly labelled Trump the peacemaker for securing a ceasefire with India. "This intervention stands as a testament to his [Trump's] role as a genuine peacemaker and his commitment to conflict resolution through dialogue," the government reportedly said, as quoted by Dawn. The Pak government reportedly also stated that Trump's leadership during the conflict clearly reflected his legacy of "pragmatic diplomacy and effective peace-building". The timing of Pakistan's shoutout to Trump for a Nobel Prize is also worth noting. It came a day after Trump endorsed himself for the honour, listing "his work" on India and Pakistan as one of the reasons. Notably, India has always maintained that the original escalation of a conflict was the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, to which India gave a befitting response a fortnight later with Operation Sindoor on May 7. Trump's claims and India's stance At the height of the India-Pakistan conflict after Op Sindoor launch, Donald Trump took to social media to announce a ceasefire brokered by the US. In the following days, he repeated his claim many times, even as New Delhi denied any US intervention. Trump also linked the ceasefire to trade, claiming a "big deal" with both India and Pakistan. "We settled that whole thing, and I think I settled it through trade. We're doing a big deal with India. We're doing a big deal with had to be the last one to shoot," said Trump on May 22, days after the cessation of hostilities. However, India has strictly maintained that the truce was reached bilaterally, with no third-party involvement. As for trade, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri has said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has clarified to Donald Trump that there were no India-US trade talks through the entirety of the India-Pakistan conflict. "PM Modi made it clear to President Trump that during this entire episode, at no time, at any level, were issues such as India-US trade deal or mediation by the US between India and Pakistan discussed," Misri said on Wednesday.