Heavy propaganda attacks on teals in key seats orchestrated by third-party groups
Third-party groups targeting the teal independents are flooding pre-poll locations in Victoria and New South Wales, and include campaigners with links to the Jewish community such as Repeal the Teal.
In Goldstein, where the independent Zoe Daniel is hoping to hold off Liberal candidate Tim Wilson, Repeal the Teal has made its presence known this week with posters, T-shirts and pamphlets. The group is also campaigning in Kooyong.
Repeal the Teal is part of J-United, an initiative that campaigned against the Greens in the recent Prahran byelection in Victoria over the party's stance on Israel.
The J-United co-founder Simonne Whine said Repeal the Teal does not tell voters to favour either of the major parties, and has people of various backgrounds involved. 'Whether it's Liberal or Labor, that's their choice,' she said. 'The message is just that [the teal independents] had three years to help Australians, and they haven't achieved much.'
Repeal the Teal's materials are authorised by Harriet Warlow-Shill, a Melbourne lawyer who presented an online session in March for the Australian Jewish Association titled Does My Teal Support Terror?
She outlined how her view of the teals was affected by debates over funding for Unrwa, which provides aid in Gaza, after the 7 October attacks.
Warlow-Shill described herself as 'part of the Liberal party' during the March event and told viewers it was 'of key importance that the Liberal party wins the next federal election for the safety of the Jewish community'.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
On Thursday, she told Guardian Australia she was no longer a member of the party. 'I felt it was important not to be a member if I were to do this campaign,' she said.
Daniel said the rise of 'third-party attack groups like Repeal the Teal and Better Australia shows that the major parties are rattled'.
'These groups are a reaction to the growing influence of independents who challenge the status quo,' she said. 'They're funded by those invested in maintaining a two-party system that often overlooks community needs. Their emergence underscores the fear of losing control to a more transparent and accountable political movement.'
Daniel said she had worked 'incredibly hard' on measures to combat antisemitism. On the issue of Unrwa and 'critically important' humanitarian aid to Gaza, Daniel said: 'I'm agnostic about who [delivers aid], but at the time I was advocating for the reinstatement of funding to Unrwa, it was the only organisation capable of doing it.'
As Guardian Australia has previously reported, rightwing advocacy group Advance provided support to J-United in the form of flyers, T-shirts and corflutes during its Prahan campaign. Whine said Repeal the Teal is its own project, but J-United is separately assisting Advance with volunteers.
Another third-party group, Better Australia, has posters and representatives wearing yellow 'community adviser vests' at multiple locations in Sydney.
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
An offshoot of Better Council, which targeted the Greens during the 2024 NSW local elections, Better Australia is running an extensive campaign against teal candidates across the eastern Sydney electorate of Wentworth and targeting the Greens in other seats, including Brisbane and Melbourne. The teal independent Allegra Spender won Wentworth in 2022.
Better Australia is headed by Labor party member Sophie Calland. The former adviser to Scott Morrison Yaron Finkelstein and former Liberal staffer Alexander Polson have also been involved in discussions about Better Australia election strategy, according to meeting minutes obtained by journalist Wendy Bacon.
Guardian Australia spoke to four people handing out 'Don't get tricked by the teals' leaflets for Better Australia in Sydney on Thursday. All said they were volunteers and visitors from countries including Israel, Spain and Italy. None were eligible to vote in Australia.
At a booth in Bondi, located in the Wentworth electorate, one volunteer said she found out about the role from a WhatsApp group. Asked why she was representing Better Australia, she pointed to the corflute of the Liberal candidate, Ro Knox, and said she hoped she would win.
Calland said Better Australia's campaign is non-partisan. 'We are not advocating for a particular major party but against the Greens, teals and other minor party candidates across the country,' she said. 'Our message is resonating with a diverse range of nationalities across Australia.'
At another location in Bondi Junction, someone had printed out the authorisation on the Better Australia posters in a large font and taped it over the original smaller print. The AEC said it could not comment about whether it had contacted the group over the legibility of its authorisation.
Knox was speaking to voters outside a pre-poll location in Bondi Junction. She said the atmosphere during pre-poll voting had been positive, with voters largely raising concerns about the cost of living.
The Wentworth campaign was dominated this week by the AEC's investigation into 47,000 unauthorised pamphlets targeting Spender. On Wednesday evening, the agency said it had identified the person behind the material but did not provide more detail.
'There's obviously very passionate supporters on all sides, as you'd expect,' Knox said of her conversations on the campaign trail. 'All material must be authorised, it's really important.'
The Liberal campaign did not respond to a request for comment by deadline.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump vowed to keep US out of wars. What changed with Iran attack?
It's not clear what exact damage was done in Iran. The White House says U.S. bombers decimated three uranium enrichment facilities. What comes next is also far from certain: additional U.S. strikes, Iran's retaliation, a resumption of diplomacy, even? Is this the start of the collapse of Iran's clerical regime? Is it a historical moment akin to the breakup of the Soviet Union? What's indisputable is that one pull factor for the U.S. is Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's long, complicated relationship with recent American presidents. The U.S. bombing of Iran is also the culmination of a process that traces at least as far back to the 1990s when Netanyahu, then a young lawmaker, predicted the Islamic Republic, Israel's sworn enemy, would one day either acquire, or be on the cusp of acquiring, a nuclear weapon and Israel would be forced to act - ideally with U.S. help. "Within three to five years, we can assume that Iran will become autonomous in its ability to develop and produce a nuclear bomb," Netanyahu said in 1992. His prediction was later repeated in his 1995 book, "Fighting Terrorism." Netanyahu's constant refrain: bomb Iran Netanyahu is the longest-serving Israeli prime minister in the Jewish state's history. He's occupied the role on and off for more than 17 years. In every one of those years he's sought to convince American presidents to bomb Iran's nuclear program, which Tehran insists is for civilian energy purposes only. Netanyahu has appeared at the United Nations with elaborate maps and cartoon-style drawings of bombs. He worked hard to scupper the 2015 nuclear accord between Iran and world powers that Trump exited because he said Iranian officials could not be trusted. In 2002, Netanyahu told a U.S. congressional committee that both Iraq and Iran would soon have a nuclear bomb. A year later the U.S. invaded Iraq. In 2009, he told members of Congress in private that Iran was just a year or two away from producing a nuclear weapon, according to a U.S. State Department cable released by WikiLeaks. Successive American presidents have listened and acted on Netanyahu's Iran warnings, most substantively politically in the form of the Obama administration's 2015 nuclear deal, which was designed to limit Iran's uranium enrichment in return for relief of U.S. economic sanctions on Iran. When Trump, in his first term, exited that agreement it was working in the sense that Iran was not enriching uranium at a level necessary to produce a nuclear weapon, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. Netanyahu's public and private relationships with recent American presidents have been marked by chilly tensions and insults. In 2015, Netanyahu's spokesman apologized to former President Barack Obama. He has also clashed with former Presidents Bill Clinton and Joe Biden. Netanyahu has even annoyed Trump, although their relationship trends toward mutual lavish praise. But no American president - until now - has gone along with Netanyahu's war plans for Iran, fearing the U.S. could be dragged into a wider Middle East war. The experiences of Iraq and Afghanistan still haunt U.S. presidents. "The president more than anybody is worried about protracted military conflicts and that is not what we are getting ourselves involved in," U.S. Vice President JD Vance said on ABC's "This Week" program on June 22. Vance said the Trump administration is also not trying to force regime change in Iran. Reading Trump's Iran tea leaves Trump may also not be as risk averse to military actions as is sometimes portrayed, including by himself. In his first term, he ordered a missile attack in Syria to punish then-Syrian President Bashar al-Assad for using chemical weapons; a raid to kill ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi; and a drone attack that killed Qasem Soleimani, a senior Iranian military commander much beloved in Iran whose death led to Iranian reprisals on U.S. bases in Iraq. Also in the background: The IAEA, the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, and former U.S. officials such as Dan Shapiro, U.S. ambassador to Israel during the Obama administration, say Iran's nuclear capabilities have advanced since Trump exited the nuclear deal. "Iran cannot be left with an enrichment capability, able to produce a nuclear weapon at a time of its choosing," Shapiro wrote in a recent blog post. Trump has made various comments for years that reflect that sentiment. The main thrust of his remarks in recent weeks have been to say he won't allow Iran to continue its nuclear enrichment program, and Tehran could give it up through negotiation or through what he called "the hard way." After first pushing for a diplomatic solution, Trump's tone changed after Israel on June 13 struck dozens of nuclear and military targets in Iran, killing many of Iran's military elite and senior nuclear scientists. By June 17, the president was threatening Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on social media, calling him an "easy target." See updated maps, satellite images: Iran's nuclear sites before and after Israeli attacks Trump likes a winner. He often says so himself. In the days leading up to the U.S. strike, Israel appeared to be winning. "Congratulations, President Trump, your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history," Netanyahu said in a statement as he addressed the world on June 22 to update them on the war's latest development. He spoke in English, not Hebrew. In his own address, to the American people, Trump said, "I want to thank and congratulate Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu. We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before, and we've gone a long way to erasing this horrible threat to Israel." Not mentioned: U.S. intelligence agencies assessed earlier this year that they did not think Iran was close to building a nuclear bomb. Contributing: Francesca Chambers, Tom Vanden Brook
Belfast Telegraph
19 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
‘It raises a lot of complicated questions': Drogheda's US owner opens up on impact of European nightmare
United co-chairman admits internal confidence around navigating Uefa's ownership rules were 'misplaced' but resolves to fix 'bump in the road' It was late Monday morning in Birmingham, Alabama when Ben Boycott, the co-chairman of Drogheda United, learned the crushing news that the club's European campaign was over before it had started. He immediately booked a flight to Ireland and told his wife he was going to be away until the weekend. The Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) hearing that confirmed Drogheda's fate, by standing over Uefa's decision to expel them from the Europa Conference League, may have been a six-hour virtual affair with scratchy connectivity, but Boycott knew the fall-out needed to be handled face to face.
Edinburgh Live
a day ago
- Edinburgh Live
Edinburgh woman living in war torn country fears 'start of World War III'
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info An Edinburgh woman living under daily bombardment in Tel Aviv in Israel fears Benjamin Netanyahu's strikes on Iran could lead to World War III. Danielle Bett, a Scottish-Israeli who was born in the capital, is an opponent of the Israeli PM's 'horrific' military action in Gaza, has said she worried the country's reputation could be tarnished forever. The 35-year-old, who now lives in the Ramat Gan area, said residents were struggling to cope with their 'dystopian' new lives after Netanyahu plunged the nation into a war against Iran on June 13, reports The Sunday Mail. She spoke of local businesses shuttered up and nightly trips to bomb shelters as an unprecedented barrage of Iranian ballistic missiles rain down on her community. Our sister publication, the Sunday Mail, spoke to Danielle on Thursday, June 19, just hours after a missile strike injured dozens of people in a business district close to her home. Danielle, who works for a pro-peace Jewish charity and has taken part in protests against the assault on Gaza, said: 'It hasn't been a fun week. People are just incredibly exhausted. 'Obviously, this is a country that has gotten quite used to rounds of war and bomb shelters and whatever else, but this is one of the heavier bombardments of bigger missiles that we've had to deal with. "It's a lot scarier. Most nights, you're having to wake up once or twice or more, between 11pm and first thing in the morning. "And the actual bombings themselves are quite terrifying. You can hear very loud explosions from within the bomb shelter, and often you can hear the building shaking, even if it's a kilometre or more away. 'Already Netanyahu has left a pretty terrible legacy for this country, not just in terms of what has been done to Palestinians and the wider region but everything that's happened with democracy in this country. 'Democratic institutions have been worn down by his government and his willingness to legitimise the far-right and bring them into power. It's important to remember the difference between him and his government and ordinary civilians just trying to get through the day. 'We can't pick and choose when it comes to human lives, who we see as innocent when it comes to civilians, be it a hospital in Gaza or a hospital in Israel. 'We're so concerned with who are the bad guys and who are not that we've stopped separating governments who actually have the power and responsibility from populations. 'In this region, that's become incredibly dehumanising.' Danielle questioned Netanyahu's motives in escalating the Iran conflict at a time when he faces corruption charges and unpopularity at home. She added: 'It is both true - and it is true - that Iran is a serious threat and also that there are very big question over the current Israeli leadership. 'In the war in Gaza, Netanyahu has proven himself to be inadequate and unable to save the Israeli hostages who are still there. 'I can't say, even with the threat of Iran, that I can put my faith in what I see as a very dangerous leadership. 'Unfortunately, the same goes for Trump's interventions and his comments which have been so unclear.' Danielle, who is active on X as @daniellebett in opposing war and civilian suffering in the Middle East, added she was wary of any direct Western military involvement - including from Keir Starmer's UK Government. She said: 'I definitely have concerns about US involvement. 'We need to know if their end game is to reach a diplomatic resolution with Iran with regards to the nuclear programme, or if this is going to spill over into a regional war, or indeed, a global war. 'The level of instability in this region really needs to be taken into account. I'm very wary of this escalating without knowing what the plan is. 'Clearly, Iran is also a concern for the UK and others in Europe. "When it comes to helping with defence, defending civilians from missile launches which the UK has helped with in the past, that's one thing I would put support behind. I think protecting civilians on the ground is the most important thing, not just for us but for everyone. "But diplomacy is always the thing that's brought us the most security… that is what brings us safety, not war."
