‘Is AI rebellion in the room': Humanoid robot turns violent, attacks factory workers in eerie video
In what looked like a scene straight out of a dystopian sci-fi film, a humanoid robot recently malfunctioned at a factory in China, unleashing chaos and alarming onlookers, reported FOX News. The moment was captured in eerie footage that quickly went viral, drawing over 100,000 views on X and sparking widespread online debate. The incident took place at a factory in China.(X/@AI_Archive_)
The incident occurred at an undisclosed factory where the robot, suspended from a construction crane, suddenly began flailing its limbs violently while two men nearby looked on in confusion and alarm. The footage, reported by Jam Press, shows the robot thrashing about erratically, resembling a rejected prototype from a 'Robocop' film.
Also read: Rare predator caught on camera: Snow leopard casually strolls past stunned tourists in Spiti Valley
As the scene unfolded, the robot lurched forward, swinging wildly and dragging its stand along the factory floor. The men scrambled to avoid being struck by the flailing machine.
In the midst of the chaos, the robot toppled to the ground, knocking several items off a nearby table. The clip ends with one of the men cautiously repositioning the machine's stand in an effort to regain control.
The internet was quick to draw comparisons to classic robot rebellion narratives.
'This is what the machine uprising might look like,' wrote a user in their caption of the video. Take a look at the video:
'Went full terminator,' said one user, while another ominously commented, 'Sarah Connor was f–king right.'
One viewer even linked the unsettling event to growing concerns in medical technology: 'This is what worries me about robotic surgery,' they wrote, pointing to the increasing presence of robotic systems in operating rooms.
This alarming episode comes at a time when humanoid robots are being integrated more deeply into daily life. Earlier this year, Chinese tech firm Pudu Robotics introduced the D9, a robot capable of walking at 4.5 mph, climbing stairs, and maintaining balance when pushed — features that mirror human behaviour more closely than ever.
Also read: Navi Mumbai techie offers unusual service: will live in your flat without paying rent
In February, Clone Robotics showcased the 'Protoclone,' a highly realistic bipedal robot modelled with a musculoskeletal design. Though intended to perform helpful tasks such as cooking, cleaning, and chatting, many viewers found the bot's lifelike appearance disturbing.
Described by some as 'dystopian' and 'terrifying', these increasingly sophisticated machines are pushing the boundaries of what robotics can do and prompting new questions about where we're headed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Contract maker Zetwerk set to pump Rs 500–800 crore for component making
Zetwerk is looking to pump in Rs 500–800 crore as the Bengaluru-based unicorn embarks on manufacturing printed circuit boards (PCBs), enclosures and electromechanical components such as heat sinks and sensors, said its co-founder Rahul Sharma 'We are very excited about the component PLI (production-linked incentive) and have seen a lot of traction,' he told ET. While the application for the government's PLI scheme is being prepared, Zetwerk has forged technology tie-ups with companies in Taiwan and is eyeing setting up manufacturing plants over the next one year. 'We are in talks with a Taiwanese company for PCBs and have gotten into a definitive agreement with them," Sharma said. "We are also speaking to a South Korean company. And for products like enclosures, we are partnering with an Indian company since that capability already exists here. Within enclosures, we are looking at enclosures for laptops and non-Apple mobile brands and products." ETtech Live Events Zetwerk is also evaluating potential collaborations with Chinese companies, particularly in specialised areas like PCBs, he said. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories 'Recent policy developments have signalled a pragmatic approach toward allowing minority partnerships with Chinese firms, recognising the value they can bring in bridging critical technology gaps and supporting India's self-reliance goals. Once we receive the necessary government approvals, we will move forward with these partnerships,' he said. Once the necessary approvals are obtained, Zetwerk would set up the manufacturing units, Sharma said. 'We are already present in Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka with plants in the electronics sector. Now, with the component PLI, we would be setting up new plants and are in close talks with a few of the state governments,' he said. While Sharma did not name the states that Zetwerk was engaging with, he said none of them had reached a definitive agreement yet. He also said that segments like electromechanical components, unlike PCBs, can be housed within the existing units. 'PCBs cannot be stationed at the same place where our existing EMS (electronic manufacturing services) factories are stationed,' he said. 'It will definitely be in a different place because it has different requirements for polishing control, power and other factors. Same goes for enclosures where we don't have to have these facilities situated in our existing clusters." Sharma further said, 'We have also hired one of the big four firms to help us prepare an application which is suitable for the government to evaluate.'
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Contract maker Zetwerk set to pump Rs 500–800 crore for component making
Synopsis Zetwerk plans to invest Rs 500–800 crore in manufacturing printed circuit boards (PCBs), enclosures, and electromechanical components. Cofounder Rahul Sharma mentioned the company is preparing for the government's PLI scheme and has technology tie-ups with Taiwanese companies. Zetwerk is also exploring collaborations with South Korean and Chinese firms, pending government approvals, to enhance India's self-reliance in electronics manufacturing.
Economic Times
7 hours ago
- Economic Times
Will India's AI Action Summit redefine global AI governance?
Then there's the tech in between After Britain, South Korea and France, it's India's turn to host the next AI Action Summit. GoI has invited public comments until June 30 to shape the summit, which sets the tone for AI governance. India is expected to bring global majority perspectives from the margins to the mainstream and exhibit a unique approach to the delicate balancing acts involved in AI there is the question of whether to regulate, and if so, how. The recent US proposal to ban state AI laws for 10 years is seen by many as pro-innovation. By contrast, the EU's AI Act takes a more precautionary, product-safety approach. China's approach tends to tailor regulation to authoritarian state control. Beyond this dichotomy, India is often seen as capable of offering a third way. The summit presents an opportunity for India to showcase elements of this approach and take on the equally thorny question of how open or closed AI development should be. On openness, India can push beyond the binary of 'open or closed' approaches to releasing AI base models. Some argue that AI models must be kept under the control of a small number of people. Others argue that base models should be released with no restrictions. India has no interest in a future where a handful of US and Chinese companies hold the key to advanced AI models and can arbitrarily restrict their use. At the same time, however, openness should not be understood in a purely libertarian way where people can do whatever they want with these we need is a truly open approach that enables independent evaluation of how the foundation models work so that they can be used to innovate without inadvertently importing the latest US political, one-upmanship-driven ideas or Chinese state censorship. Demanding this openness and transparency, followed by independent testing and evaluation, should be a key goal for India with its new AI Safety Institute (ASI). Additionally, ASI must take the lead in ensuring that systems, particularly in high-impact domains such as public services, are secure and reliable. With its 'Safe and Trusted AI' pillar, the IndiaAI mission is encouraging projects on bias mitigation, privacy enhancement and governance testing-themes that should reflect in the summit's agenda-and affirming the stance taken by the EU to push for 'Trustworthy AI'. It is key here, however, that trustworthiness, privacy and safety are not merely demanded of AI systems but rather achieved through effective governance frameworks. Many of the purported benefits of AI are undermined if the data is not secure, if the system responses are unreliable or biased, and if the public turns against the technology due to high-profile scandals. A telling case is that of the 'Child Benefits Scandal' in the Netherlands, where an opaque and discriminatory system mistakenly flagged thousands of families for benefits-related fraud. In response, the Netherlands is working towards improving AI accountability through human rights impact assessments and public databases of government AI systems. Public trust in AI systems can only be achieved through robust transparency and accountability practices. Centring global conversations and policy imperatives on open, transparent and rights-protecting AI development reduces uncertainty and offers a level playing field for smaller players, even if it is not enshrined in dedicated legislation but through an ecosystem of institutional oversight via ASI and adaptation of existing laws, as is the preference of the IndiaAI logic is straightforward-when a tech is built to be rights-respecting and safe, more people trust it, and therefore more people use it, particularly when it can be independently verified. It's a win-win for commerce, rights and the global majority, such frameworks are necessary because without close attention to the impact of AI models, the region risks becoming a testing ground for nascent and half-baked technology that is developed elsewhere. Their absence could result in 'innovation arbitrage,' a term used to refer to the exploitation of regulatory gaps to deploy questionable technology. The harms of AI-driven systems without oversight are well-documented-be it opaque, unaccountable data collection practices that give people no real choice, or flawed algorithmic decisions that impact people's education, employment and healthcare. In demanding openness, transparency, and security, India has an opportunity to work with the global majority countries to develop shared approaches and demands. Demanding such inclusion and space for leadership would allow us to leverage our collective expertise to ensure 'access for all'-a key goal of GoI. The AI Impact Summit is the moment to bring like-minded countries together and lay out a roadmap for how AI development can be driven in a way that benefits the global majority and allows for individual and regional autonomy, instead of cementing hegemony. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Looking for quick buck in unlisted shares? Better think twice! Small finance banks struggle with perception. Will numbers turn the tide? Aadit Palicha on Zepto dark store raid, dark patterns, and IPO China rare earths blockade: Will electric vehicles assembly lines fall silent? Flames below deck: The silent threat lurking in cargo holds Is India ready to hit the aspirational 8% growth mark? For medium- to long-term investors with moderate risk appetite: 6 large-cap stocks with an upside potential of up to 40% Sin goods, but not sin stocks from a long-term perspective: 6 stocks from liquor industry with an upside potential of up to 34%
