Panel To Study Feasibility Of Periodic Reviews Of DU Staff
New Delhi: Delhi University has set up a nine-member committee to examine the feasibility of implementing periodic performance reviews of its employees. This is in line with a central govt notification that allows premature retirement of staff deemed underperforming or lacking integrity.
The panel, headed by executive council (EC) member Indra Mohan Kapahi, will assess whether such a policy can be adopted within the university framework.
The proposal, tabled during the EC meeting on Friday, referred to an office memorandum issued by the department of personnel and training in June 2024. The memorandum lays down guidelines for quarterly reviews of central govt employees—including those working in autonomous bodies and statutory institutions—with a report to be submitted each month on staff identified as ineffective or of "doubtful integrity.
" The rules permit premature retirement in public interest for employees aged 50 or 55, or those who have completed 30 years of service.
While university officials say the move is aimed at strengthening administration, sections of the teaching community have raised red flags, alleging that such provisions may be misused to target dissenters.
"The university administration has overstepped its authority by attempting to adopt the DoPT circular without clearance from the ministry of education or UGC.
This raises serious concerns about procedural violations and the motive behind such haste," said Rudrashish Chakraborty, executive member of Delhi University Teachers' Association and associate professor at Kirori Mal College.
Mithuraj Dhusiya, a former EC member, submitted a dissent note arguing that the memorandum applies only to central govt employees under the Central Civil Services Rules, which do not govern DU staff.
"The notification has not even been officially forwarded to universities, making the administration's urgency highly questionable," he wrote.
Maya John, member of the DU academic council, echoed similar concerns during a protest organised by DUTA outside the EC meeting venue. She alleged that the criteria listed in the memorandum—such as "doubtful integrity" and "ineffectiveness"—are vague and susceptible to misuse.
"This conflation of teaching staff with central govt employees violates DU's institutional autonomy and risks creating a culture of fear and compliance," she said.
EC member Aman Kumar also objected, noting that DU already has robust mechanisms for staff evaluation, including annual performance appraisal reports, the UGC's career advancement scheme, and annual departmental reviews. "The imposition of additional layers through central administrative procedures is unwarranted and threatens academic freedom," he said.
The committee's recommendations are expected to be tabled in a future EC meeting.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Brother's Day wishes
,
messages
and quotes !
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
EC: Sharing video footage of booth breaches voters' privacy
Representative Image NEW DELHI: Election Commission officials on Saturday justified the recent amendment in Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, barring stakeholders other than itself from accessing poll-day webcasting feed from polling stations, unless an election petition was filed, saying that it was necessary to protect secrecy of voters and save them from possible intimidation. The poll-day CCTV footage or webcasting feed shall not be destroyed if an election petition (EP) is filed and shall be made available to the competent court when asked. However, where no EP is filed, such feed shall be disposed of in 45 days, it said. Slamming the move, LOP in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi said EC's decision is another evidence that the "match is fixed" - a charge he has levelled about the Maharashtra contest. Poll-day CCTV feed shall be disposed of in 45 days, in sync with the 45-day time-bar for filing election petitions, Election Commission recently ordered in its revised instructions dated May 30, 2025. EC sources warned that sharing poll-day videography/webcasting with any person, candidate, NGO or third party, without the express consent of the electors, ran the risk of identification of electors who voted or did not vote, from the footage, and their possible harassment and intimidation by anti-social elements. The officials insisted that the CCTV/webcasting feed from polling stations was only meant as an internal management tool and not mandated by the law. "What is veiled as a very logical demand to share video or CCTV footage of webcasting done at polling stations on poll day, is actually entirely contrary to the privacy and security concerns of the voters, which is a legal requirement under Representation of the People Act, 1950/1951 and in line with directions of the Supreme Court," an officer underlined. "Election Commission of India is legally bound and committed to protect the privacy of the electors and secrecy of voting, so video footage from polling station cannot be given to any person, candidate or NGO or any third party without the express consent of the elector(s)," the official said and added that the profiling of voters vs non-voters may become the basis for discrimination, denial of services, intimidation and inducement.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
DU Asks Quota UG Aspirants To Provide Sub-Caste Details
New Delhi: Delhi University has asked the applicants under the reserved categories to disclose their sub-caste details during registration on its Common Seat Allocation System (CSAS) portal for undergraduate admissions. In addition to selecting scheduled caste, scheduled tribe or other backward class, aspirants are required to specify their sub-caste, such as dhobi, mochi, nai, mali, kasai or fakir, among others. While the university administration has not clarified the purpose behind this move, it has triggered concerns over the need for such granular caste data during the admission process. Aspirants and faculty members have urged DU to address the concerns and ensure responsible handling of the sensitive data. Several applicants have expressed discomfort at being asked to enter their sub-caste, even after uploading valid caste certificates as required. "I found it strange. The portal already asks for the category and supporting documents. Why ask for sub-caste again? It feels intrusive," said Shivam Mourya, an OBC applicant from UP. DU has already drawn criticism this year for inaccuracies in the mother tongue section of the portal, where languages like Urdu and Bangla were initially missing. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Nhà container vận chuyển 2025 (Xem ngay) Shipping Container Homes Tìm hiểu thêm Undo In addition, Bihari and Muslim were wrongly listed as mother tongues—errors that sparked outrage among aspirants and teachers, who called them "careless" and "insensitive". In a statement issued on X on Saturday, DU said, "The University of Delhi sincerely regrets the inadvertent error in its admission form. We acknowledge your concerns and are committed to addressing them. However, attributing ulterior motives to this entirely unintentional oversight is unwarranted. We request all not to vitiate the university's diverse and harmonious environment." TOI reached out to dean-academics Haneet Gandhi for a response on the rationale behind collecting the sub-caste data, but did not receive a reply. Officials familiar with the admission process said the move could be intended to verify if applicants fall under central govt's reserved category list, which could differ from state-specific lists. However, this has not been confirmed by the university. "Asking candidates to specify their caste is unconstitutional. It is derogatory, too," said Latika Gupta, a faculty member at DU. "Education is a site of social reform through reservations, but institutions end up labelling students for accessing those opportunities. Once a student has a category certificate, nothing else should matter," she said. "With over 1,500 castes in India and significant variation across states, any such list will always be incomplete. If the university is undertaking data collection, it must declare the reasons and make disclosure voluntary," Gupta emphasised. The CSAS portal was introduced in 2022 after DU adopted Central Universities Entrance Test for its admissions. Launched afresh every year, it serves as the primary platform for aspirants to register, fill in their academic and personal details, and select preferred courses and colleges. Once CUET results are declared, seat allocation is done based on eligibility and merit.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Isro ex-chief-led panel to onboard HEIs in new regulatory setup
NEW DELHI: In a key development on the much-delayed Higher Education Commission of India (HECI), the Centre has constituted an empowered committee under the chairmanship of former Isro chief K Radhakrishnan to facilitate the onboarding of higher educational institutions (HEIs) under the proposed regulatory framework. The ministry of education notified the committee on Friday, tasking it with resolving implementation issues and harmonising existing protocols to ensure a smooth transition. The committee is expected to submit its report within three weeks. With 18 members, the committee includes directors of leading institutions such as IIT-Bombay, IIM-Ahmedabad, School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi, and VCs of Delhi University, Utkal University and SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur. Also on board are chairpersons of existing statutory bodies like the UGC, AICTE and NCTE. HECI was proposed under the National Education Policy 2020 as an overarching body to replace UGC and consolidate higher education regulation. It aims to bring all institutions under a single umbrella for academic standards, accreditation, and funding, while maintaining autonomy for domain-specific decisions through subject councils. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Upexi's $100M Solana Investment: What It Means for Shareholders bullseyealerts Read More Undo However, the legislation to establish HECI has faced delays since its draft in 2018, with various iterations seeking to address concerns. The panel's terms of reference include addressing 'specific difficulties of HEIs to be brought under HECI's purview so that appropriate clarifications may be issued,' and analysing 'regulatory protocols of different statutory bodies and recommending applicable protocols for HEIs to become multidisciplinary institutions.' It is also tasked with proposing ' mechanisms in view of HECI' for funding and technical support systems, and to 'suggest organisational structure of Standards Councils,' while ensuring that statutory bodies continue to lay down academic standards and coordinate between teaching and research.
