Ukraine says 'massive' Russian drone attack on Kyiv
Diplomatic efforts to end the three-year war have stalled, with the last direct meeting between the two sides almost three weeks ago and no follow-up talks scheduled.
"Another massive attack on the capital. Possibly, several waves of enemy drones," said a statement from Tymur Tkachenko, head of Kyiv's military administration.
Two people were hospitalised in the Solomianski district, said Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko, and two others were injured near a metro station in the Sviatochinski district, Tkachenko later said.
AFP journalists in Kyiv heard the buzzing of a drone flying over the city centre and explosions, as well as gunfire.
They saw around 10 people sheltering in the basement of a residential building in central Kyiv waiting for the attack to end, most of them scrolling their phones for news.
The latest strikes came after Ukrainian commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrsky vowed to intensify strikes on Russia.
"We will not just sit in defence. Because this brings nothing and eventually leads to the fact that we still retreat, lose people and territories," he told reporters, including AFP.
Syrsky said Ukraine would continue its strikes on Russian military targets, which he said had proved "effective".
"Of course, we will continue. We will increase the scale and depth," he said.
Fair response
Ukraine has launched retaliatory strikes on Russia throughout the war, targeting energy and military infrastructure sometimes hundreds of kilometres from the front line.
Kyiv says the strikes are a fair response to deadly Russian attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure and civilians.
At least four people were killed in an overnight Russian strike on an apartment building in the eastern Ukrainian city of Kramatorsk, while a strike on a Ukrainian army training ground later in the day killed three others, officials said.
In wide-ranging remarks, Syrsky conceded that Russia had some advantages in drone warfare, particularly in making fibre-optic drones that are tethered and difficult to jam.
"Here, unfortunately, they have an advantage in both the number and range of their use," he said.
He also claimed that Ukraine still held 90 square kilometres (35 square miles) of territory in Russia's Kursk region, where Kyiv launched an audacious cross-border incursion last August.
"These are our pre-emptive actions in response to a possible enemy offensive," he said.
Russia said in April that it had gained full control of the Kursk region and denies that Kyiv has a presence there.
Russia occupies around a fifth of Ukraine and claims to have annexed four Ukrainian regions as its own since launching its invasion in 2022 -- in addition to Crimea, which it captured in 2014.
Kyiv has accused Moscow of deliberately sabotaging a peace deal to prolong its full-scale offensive on the country and to seize more territory.
The Russian army said Sunday that it had captured the village of Petrivske in Ukraine's northeast Kharkiv region.
Russian forces also sent at least 47 drones and fired three missiles towards Ukraine between late Saturday and early Sunday, the Ukrainian air force said.
© 2025 AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
'Noble to attend': Budapest prepares for 'banned' Pride march
"This legal wrangling only made many feel compelled to express their solidarity," 25-year-old engineering student Csanad Sebesy told AFP. "Now it is more noble to attend," he added. Sebesy is one of the record number of people -- more than 250 -- organisers said have applied to help at the parade despite the threat of penalties. He volunteered last year too, but said the preparatory training this time focussed more on legal issues. "I really liked that because there were concerns about the event existing in a legal grey area." Prime Minister Viktor Orban announced in February that he intended to ban the Pride celebration. Within weeks, the government had codified into law and the constitution provisions designed to prohibit the annual march. Those changes -- condemned by the European Union and rights groups -- advance the years-long clampdown on LGBTQ rights in the central European country. They allow authorities to fine organisers and attendees of a banned event up to 500 euros ($570) and empower police to use facial recognition to identify offenders. 'I don't give a damn' The organisers and Budapest city council tried to exploit a legal loophole to allow the parade to proceed but police still issued a ban. The capital's progressive mayor, Gergely Karacsony, insisted the march would go ahead regardless. He said the police decision had "no value" because a municipal event does not require formal authorisation. For many volunteers, this is the first time they have applied to help at the march. "After seeing the proposed legislation, I felt I had two options -- either I could completely collapse and not get up for three days or I could quickly figure out how to help," said Emma Elefanti. The 26-year-old student said she hoped in this way to support her loved ones in the LGBTQ community. "I don't care about being fined. It's not a meaningful deterrent. I'll gladly participate to help out the community," she told AFP. Marta Aleva volunteered to show that threats don't work. "Even if it's 30 degrees Celsius (86 degrees Fahrenheit) and we have to cover ourselves in mosquito repellent and sunscreen, we have to be there now," said the lawyer. "I don't give a damn about the ban." 'Psychological pressure' The Hungarian Helsinki Committee and two other rights groups have pledged to provide legal aid to attendees facing fines. Support is pouring in from abroad as well, with solidarity messages for Hungary's LGBTQ community displayed at Pride celebrations across Europe. Dozens of European Parliament lawmakers are due to attend the Budapest march and the assembly has promised to share safety tips. European Equalities Commissioner Hadja Lahbib and ministers from several EU countries are expected, organisers said. Under Orban, Hungary has progressively rolled back LGBTQ rights in the name of "child protection". The government's targeting of the parade has caused "immense psychological pressure" for volunteers, the head of the organising foundation, Viktoria Radvanyi, told AFP. But they dismissed Orban's warning about not wasting "money and time" on this year's parade, spending hours on tasks as mundane as inventories of high-visibility jackets. Since the ban was imposed, they also face a one-year prison sentence for continuing preparations. 'Not permissible' Despite the pressure, Radvani predicted this year's Pride would be "largest Hungary ever seen", surpassing the estimated 35,000 attendees of past years. "We're not just standing up for ourselves... If this law isn't overturned, eastern Europe could face a wave of similar measures," she explained. "We have seen many historical examples of what happens when people deprived of rights simply bow down." "But it is not permissible to march through the city or engage in behaviour that we believe is contrary to the interests of children," he told French LCI TV this month. The government suggested Kincsem Park racecourse or Puskas Stadium in Budapest as possible venues. But volunteer Sebesy predicted efforts to prevent the public parade would ultimately be in vain. "They can't change moral standards with regulations," he said. © 2025 AFP
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
NATO agrees to 5% defence spending target ahead Hague summit
NATO allies have reached a consensus to increase spending on defence to 5% of their countries' GDP by 2035, media reports showed on Sunday. According to the reports citing diplomatic sources, ambassadors from all 32 NATO member states signed the new spending pledge ahead of its major summit in The Hague on Tuesday and Wednesday. This week, allies are expected to commit to spending around 3.5 percent of GDP on "hard defence" that will include weapons and troops and an additional 1.5 percent on defence-related investments such as cybersecurity and military mobility. The 5 per cent pledge has long been championed by US President Donald Trump, but Trump hinted last week that Washington may not follow through, and should not be held to the same standard. The US currently spends around 3.2 to 3.4 percent of its GDP on defence. Trump cited decades of US financial support to back up his The Netherlands is hosting the annual meeting of the 32-nation alliance starting Tuesday, 24 June, with leaders scheduled to meet on Wednesday, 25 June. The heads of government want to hammer out the agreement on a hike in defence that appeared largely done last week, until Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez wrote to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte that committing Madrid to spending 5% of its gross domestic product on defense 'would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive.' Reports suggest the alliance will make a provision and exception that accommodates Madrid's situation. Around 45 heads of state and government are expected at the summit in the Dutch town for two- day summit. Meanwhile, hundreds of people protested on Sunday against NATO and military spending. Billed as a demonstration against NATO and the war in Gaza, protesters also denounced Israel and US military actions in Iran, chanting, 'No to war.' 'We are opposed to war. People want to live a peaceful life,' said 74-year-old Hossein Hamadani, an Iranian who lives in the Netherlands. Look at the environment. 'Things are not good. So why do we spend money on war?' he added. Almost a third of US allies still fall short of NATO's current aim of at least 2% of their gross domestic product, even though defence expenditure has increased since Russian President Vladimir Putin authorised a full-scale invasion of Ukraine more than three years ago. The summit is being guarded by thousands of military and police personnel, drones, no-fly zones, and cybersecurity specialists. Code-named "Orange Shield," the largest Dutch security operation to date, around 27,000 officers, that is half of the Dutch police force, will be present to provide security for the summit.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Oil rises and stocks slump after US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites
Investors reacted to US strikes on Iran over the weekend as Iran and Israel continued to trade missile fire on Monday morning. The price of Brent crude oil rose around 1.53% to $78.19 a barrel as of around 7.15 CEST, while WTI rose 1.48% to $74.93 a barrel. On Sunday, US forces attacked three Iranian nuclear and military sites, stating that Tehran must not be allowed to possess a nuclear weapon. President of Iran Masoud Pezeshkian said that the country "will never surrender to bullying and oppression", while Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi has arrived in Moscow for talks with Russian president Vladimir Putin. Futures for the S&P 500 slipped 0.13% to 6,010.25 and Dow Jones Industrial Average futures dropped 0.2% to 42,431.00. Nasdaq futures fell 0.18% to 21,804.50 on Monday morning. In Asian trading, Tokyo's Nikkei 225 index fell 0.19% to 38,331.12, the Kospi in Seoul dropped 0.3% to 3.012,88, and Australia's S&P/ASX 200 declined 0.37% to 8,474.40. Hong Kong's Hang Seng and the Shanghai Composite Index were in positive territory, with respective gains of 0.35% to 23,611.68 and 0.13% to 3,364.29. The conflict, which flared up after an Israeli attack against Iran on 13 June, has sent oil prices higher linked to Iran's status as a major oil producer. The nation is also located on the narrow Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world's crude oil passes. Investors are concerned that Tehran might decide to bomb oil infrastructure in neighbouring countries or block tankers from travelling through the Strait of Hormuz. Shipping company Maersk said on Sunday that it was continuing to operate through the strait, adding: "We will continuously monitor the security risk to our specific vessels in the region and are ready to take operational actions as needed." According to vessel tracking data compiled by Bloomberg, two supertankers Coswisdom Lake and South Loyalty U-turned in the Strait of Hormuz on Sunday. The situation now hinges on whether Tehran decides to opt for aggression or a more diplomatic response to US and Israeli strikes. Iran could attempt to close the waterway by setting mines across the Strait or striking and seizing vessels. Even so, this would likely be met by a forceful response from the US navy, meaning the oil price spike may not be sustained. Some analysts also think Iran is unlikely to close down the waterway because the country uses it to transport its own crude, mostly to China, and oil is a major revenue source for the regime. If Tehran did successfully close the Strait, this would cause a wider price spike for transported goods and complicate the deflationary process in the US, potentially keeping interest rates higher for longer. On Monday morning, Trump also floated the possibility of regime change in Iran. "If the current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran great again, why wouldn't there be regime change?" said the US president on Truth Social. Vice-president J.D. Vance had commented earlier that the administration did not seek regime change in Iran.
