10 African countries where press freedom is on the decline
The year 2025 continues to witness an alarming escalation of threats to press freedom across the globe, with several African countries experiencing some of the worst crackdowns on independent journalism and press freedom.
Business Insider Africa presents 10 African countries with declining press freedom
The list is courtesy of the World Press Freedom Index by Reporters Without Borders
African countries like Cameroon, Rwanda, and Somalia remain hostile environments for journalists due to ongoing conflicts and restrictive laws.
At the core of this attack on press freedom as seen in some African countries is a complex interplay of factors, including political regimes tightening control over information, inaccessible legal systems, and the exertion of state and corporate influence to coerce the media into compliance, particularly in conflict-ridden or authoritarian states.
According to the latest World Press Freedom Index by Reporters Without Borders (RSF), press freedom in several African countries has deteriorated significantly, marked by some of the lowest global scores and a rising toll of detained and killed journalists.
This decline is attributed to state censorship, legal crackdowns, insecurity, and financial pressures, which ultimately compromises media independence and economic viability.
Notably; RSF's global ranking and scoring system assesses 180 countries based on five key indicators: political context, legal framework, economic situation, sociocultural conditions, and safety.
Business Insider Africa highlights 10 African Countries where Press decline have reached alarming heights, based on their latest rankings, press freedom scores, and the number of journalists killed or detained this year:
Country Index Score Global Rank No. of Journalists Killed or Detained
Eritrea 11.32 180 14 detained
Egypt 24.74 170 20 detained
Rwanda 35.85 146 3 detained
Ethiopia 36.92 145 6 detained
Libya 40.42 137 1 detained
Somalia 40.49 136 5 detained
DR Congo 42.31 133 1 killed / 4 detained
Cameroon 42.75 131 4 detained
Tunisia 43.48 129 4 detained
Nigeria 46.81 122 5 detained
The 2025 RSF Press Freedom Barometer reveals the scale of the crisis:
A Continental Crisis
Eritrea remains at the bottom of the global rankings, characterized by a complete absence of a functioning press and the prolonged detention of at least 14 journalists without trial. Notable cases include Dawit Isaak and Seyoum Tsehaye, who have been imprisoned for decades.
Egypt follows closely, maintaining a harsh grip on its media environment through military and political control. Currently, 20 journalists are detained under anti-terror and state security laws, while many independent media outlets have been shut down or forced out of the country.
In Ethiopia, ongoing conflict and rising authoritarianism have reversed years of press reform. Six journalists, including Dawit Begashaw, are currently detained.
Cameroon, Ethiopia, Rwanda, and Somalia are consistently ranked among the most perilous for press freedom, plagued by ongoing conflicts and draconian laws that instill fear in reporters.
The Democratic Republic of Congo has tragically lost one journalist, Patrick Adonis Numbi of Pamoja TV, this year, underscoring the precarious environment in conflict zones like eastern DRC.
Nigeria, Africa's largest democracy, has dropped 10 places in the global ranking this year. According to RSF, five journalists are currently detained, and media independence is being undermined by financial dependence on state and corporate advertisers.
As Reporters Without Borders (RSF) continuously collects global information on abuses against journalists, updating its press freedom barometer daily, it highlights the need for increased protection and support for media professionals worldwide due to ongoing threats and violence against journalists, In Africa and beyond.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
Trump declares end to Rwanda–DRC conflict with historic peace agreement
President Donald Trump has announced a landmark peace agreement between the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and the Republic of Rwanda, aimed at ending one of Africa's longest-running and most violent conflicts. President Donald Trump announced a peace agreement between the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and the Republic of Rwanda. The treaty addresses violent conflicts and aims to stabilize the mineral-rich eastern Congo region. It signifies a potential turning point in regional stability and a diplomatic achievement for the Trump administration. According to a statement shared on his social media platform, Trump said the treaty, facilitated in collaboration with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, will be signed in Washington by representatives of both countries on Monday. " I am very happy to report that I have arranged, along with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a wonderful Treaty between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Rwanda, in their war, which was known for violent bloodshed and death, more so even than most other wars, and has gone on for decades," Trump said. Trump added that representatives from Rwanda and the Congo will be in Washington on Monday to sign Documents The long-standing tensions between Rwanda and the DRC, particularly over the mineral-rich and conflict-prone eastern Congo, have fueled years of armed violence, regional instability, and humanitarian crises. Kinshasa has repeatedly accused Kigali of supporting rebel groups operating in its territory, most notably the M23 rebels, an allegation Rwanda denies. Rwanda–DRC peace treaty marks diplomatic turning point The treaty, set to be signed in Washington, was the product of intensive diplomacy led by Massad Boulos, Trump's senior adviser on African affairs, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Boulos began shuttle diplomacy in April 2025, meeting leaders in Kinshasa and Kigali to negotiate troop withdrawals, an end to rebel support, and regional security guarantees. His efforts culminated in the signing of a ' Declaration of Principles ' in Washington, followed by draft treaty submissions from both countries in early May. By mid-June, Trump announced the final agreement, calling it a step toward ending ' violent bloodshed and death… more so even than most other wars.' The treaty includes commitments to withdraw troops, disarm armed groups like M23, and repatriate displaced persons. It also introduces a minerals-for-security framework, offering U.S. access to strategic resources such as cobalt and lithium in exchange for helping stabilize eastern Congo.
Business Insider
7 hours ago
- Business Insider
Future of U.S.-Africa trade under review as AGOA takes spotlight at Angola summit
The U.S.-Africa business summit, organized by the Corporate Council on Africa (CCA), brings together African heads of state, senior U.S. government representatives, business executives, and development partners. This year's summit comes at a significant moment, as African nations seek to revive their trade relations with the United States following years of uncertainty. Key on the agenda are the future of the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), which is due to expire in 2025, and the push for increased U.S. investment across critical sectors such as energy, infrastructure, and finance. Several African leaders are using the platform to press for more equitable trade terms and long-term commitments from Washington. Angola, which currently chairs the African Union, is leveraging the summit to spotlight its ongoing economic reforms and infrastructure ambitions. In particular, the country is promoting projects like the Lobito Corridor, a strategic rail and logistics route linking Angola to the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia as a model for regional integration and cross-border trade development. The corridor is also part of broader efforts to position Angola as a key logistics and investment hub in Southern Africa. The summit builds on recent high-level engagements between both parties. In December 2024, President Joe Biden visited Angola, becoming the first sitting U.S. President to do so. During that visit, discussions centered around strengthening bilateral relations and boosting U.S. involvement in infrastructure and energy projects. Angola also recently signed a Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) with the United States, further reinforcing its commitment to deepening economic ties. The Luanda summit comes as Angola celebrates 50 years of independence, a milestone that adds symbolic weight to its efforts to lead economic diplomacy across the continent. While official outcomes from the summit are yet to be fully announced, delegates are hopeful that the event will foster new partnerships, agreements, and investment opportunities. Summit supports Africa's call for long-term trade with the U.S. Beyond bilateral ties, the summit underscores a wider competition for influence on the continent. As China, Russia, and the European Union continue to increase their trade and infrastructure investments across Africa, pressure is mounting on the United States to show stronger and more consistent engagement. For many African leaders, the U.S. must move beyond symbolic gestures and provide sustained economic support backed by predictable policies. The uncertainty surrounding AGOA's expiration in 2025 has amplified those concerns. While the Trade Act has allowed duty-free access for African exports for over two decades, its renewal remains undecided. Several leaders have used the Luanda Trade Act to call for a clearer and more permanent U.S.–Africa trade strategy. Without it, many fear African nations could increasingly turn to alternative partners offering more immediate and less conditional support. For Washington, the message from Luanda is clear: the continent is open for business, but the window for leadership is narrowing.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
As the UN turns 80, its crucial humanitarian aid work faces a clouded future
KAKUMA, Kenya (AP) — At a refugee camp in northern Kenya, Aujene Cimanimpaye waits as a hot lunch of lentils and sorghum is ladled out for her and her nine children — all born while she has received United Nations assistance since fleeing her violence-wracked home in Congo in 2007. 'We cannot go back home because people are still being killed,' the 41-year-old said at the Kakuma camp, where the U.N. World Food Program and U.N. refugee agency help support more than 300,000 refugees. Her family moved from Nakivale Refugee Settlement in neighboring Uganda three years ago to Kenya, now home to more than a million refugees from conflict-hit east African countries. A few kilometers (miles) away at the Kalobeyei Refugee Settlement, fellow Congolese refugee Bahati Musaba, a mother of five, said that since 2016, 'U.N. agencies have supported my children's education — we get food and water and even medicine,' as well as cash support from WFP to buy food and other basics. This year, those cash transfers — and many other U.N. aid activities — have stopped, threatening to upend or jeopardize millions of lives. As the U.N. marks its 80th anniversary this month, its humanitarian agencies are facing one of the greatest crises in their history: The biggest funder — the United States — under the Trump administration and other Western donors have slashed international aid spending. Some want to use the money to build up national defense. Some U.N. agencies are increasingly pointing fingers at one another as they battle over a shrinking pool of funding, said a diplomat from a top donor country who spoke on condition of anonymity to comment freely about the funding crisis faced by some U.N. agencies. Such pressures, humanitarian groups say, diminish the pivotal role of the U.N. and its partners in efforts to save millions of lives — by providing tents, food and water to people fleeing unrest in places like Myanmar, Sudan, Syria and Venezuela, or helping stamp out smallpox decades ago. 'It's the most abrupt upheaval of humanitarian work in the U.N. in my 40 years as a humanitarian worker, by far,' said Jan Egeland, a former U.N. humanitarian aid chief who now heads the Norwegian Refugee Council. 'And it will make the gap between exploding needs and contributions to aid work even bigger.' 'Brutal' cuts to humanitarian aid programs U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has asked the heads of U.N. agencies to find ways to cut 20% of their staffs, and his office in New York has floated sweeping ideas about reform that could vastly reshape the way the United Nations doles out aid. Humanitarian workers often face dangers and go where many others don't — to slums to collect data on emerging viruses or drought-stricken areas to deliver water. The U.N. says 2024 was the deadliest year for humanitarian personnel on record, mainly due to the war in Gaza. In February, it suspended aid operations in the stronghold of Yemen's Houthi rebels, who have detained dozens of U.N. and other aid workers. Proponents say U.N. aid operations have helped millions around the world affected by poverty, illness, conflict, hunger and other troubles. Critics insist many operations have become bloated, replete with bureaucratic perks and a lack of accountability, and are too distant from in-the-field needs. They say postcolonial Western donations have fostered dependency and corruption, which stifles the ability of countries to develop on their own, while often U.N.-backed aid programs that should be time-specific instead linger for many years with no end in sight. In the case of the Nobel Peace Prize-winning WFP and the U.N.'s refugee and migration agencies, the U.S. has represented at least 40% of their total budgets, and Trump administration cuts to roughly $60 billion in U.S. foreign assistance have hit hard. Each U.N. agency has been cutting thousands of jobs and revising aid spending. 'It's too brutal what has happened,' said Egeland, alluding to cuts that have jolted the global aid community. 'However, it has forced us to make priorities ... what I hope is that we will be able to shift more of our resources to the front lines of humanity and have less people sitting in offices talking about the problem.' With the U.N. Security Council's divisions over wars in Ukraine and the Middle East hindering its ability to prevent or end conflict in recent years, humanitarian efforts to vaccinate children against polio or shelter and feed refugees have been a bright spot of U.N. activity. That's dimming now. Not just funding cuts cloud the future of UN humanitarian work Aside from the cuts and dangers faced by humanitarian workers, political conflict has at times overshadowed or impeded their work. UNRWA, the aid agency for Palestinian refugees, has delivered an array of services to millions — food, education, jobs and much more — in Lebanon, Syria and Jordan as well as in the West Bank and Gaza since its founding in 1948. Israel claims the agency's schools fan antisemitic and anti-Israel sentiment, which the agency denies. Israel says Hamas siphons off U.N. aid in Gaza to profit from it, while U.N. officials insist most aid gets delivered directly to the needy. 'UNRWA is like one of the foundations of your home. If you remove it, everything falls apart,' said Issa Haj Hassan, 38, after a checkup at a small clinic at the Mar Elias Palestinian refugee camp in Beirut. UNRWA covers his diabetes and blood pressure medication, as well as his wife's heart medicine. The United States, Israel's top ally, has stopped contributing to UNRWA; it once provided a third of its funding. Earlier this year, Israel banned the aid group, which has strived to continue its work nonetheless. Ibtisam Salem, a single mother of five in her 50s who shares a small one-room apartment in Beirut with relatives who sleep on the floor, said: 'If it wasn't for UNRWA we would die of starvation. ... They helped build my home, and they give me health care. My children went to their schools.' Especially when it comes to food and hunger, needs worldwide are growing even as funding to address them shrinks. 'This year, we have estimated around 343 million acutely food insecure people,' said Carl Skau, WFP deputy executive director. 'It's a threefold increase if we compare four years ago. And this year, our funding is dropping 40%. So obviously that's an equation that doesn't come together easily.' Billing itself as the world's largest humanitarian organization, WFP has announced plans to cut about a quarter of its 22,000 staff. The aid landscape is shifting One question is how the United Nations remains relevant as an aid provider when global cooperation is on the outs, and national self-interest and self-defense are on the upswing. The United Nations is not alone: Many of its aid partners are feeling the pinch. Groups like GAVI, which tries to ensure fair distribution of vaccines around the world, and the Global Fund, which spends billions each year to help battle HIV, tuberculosis and malaria, have been hit by Trump administration cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development. Some private-sector, government-backed groups also are cropping up, including the divisive Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which has been providing some food to Palestinians. But violence has erupted as crowds try to reach the distribution sites. No private-sector donor or well-heeled country — China and oil-rich Gulf states are often mentioned by aid groups — have filled the significant gaps from shrinking U.S. and other Western spending. The future of U.N. aid, experts say, will rest where it belongs — with the world body's 193 member countries. 'We need to take that debate back into our countries, into our capitals, because it is there that you either empower the U.N. to act and succeed — or you paralyze it,' said Achim Steiner, administrator of the U.N. Development Program. ___ Chehayeb reported from Beirut and Keaten from Geneva. Associated Press writer Melina Walling in Hamburg, Germany, contributed to this report.
