Springsteen doubles down on political criticism with a digital EP that includes anti-Trump comments
There's no retreat or surrender from Bruce Springsteen — or from President Donald Trump, for that matter.
The rock star released a digital EP on Wednesday with four songs recorded live in Manchester, England last week, along with two of his addresses to the audience that attacked Trump's 'corrupt, incompetent and treasonous administration.'
The Boss pointedly opened his concert in Manchester Tuesday night, his third in the English city, with the song 'No Surrender.'
A satirical video posted on Trump's social media account on Wednesday showed the Republican president taking a swing on the golf course and his 'ball' hitting Springsteen in the back as he stumbles to get onstage.
Springsteen, long a Trump opponent, began the latest skirmish in the culture war in England last week, where he opened a European tour. His same-state neighbor Trump — they both have homes in New Jersey — responded by calling the Boss a 'dried-out prune of a rocker.'
Both men have had other rock stars leap to their defense. Trump supporter Kid Rock appeared twice on Fox News Channel last week. He said his fellow Michigander, Bob Seger, 'smokes' Springsteen.
'Bruce Springsteen is another one of the liberals who has mountains of money who so desperately wants to keep his good standing in the eyes of Hollywood and the elite,' Kid Rock said. Springsteen 'plays the working-class guy' but his politics are 'ass-backward,' he said.
On Fox's influential show 'The Five,' former White House press secretary Dana Perino said she always found Springsteen overrated, and Greg Gutfeld denounced him with an off-color slur.
Neil Young has backed Springsteen, and Pearl Jam's Eddie Vedder praised him during a concert in Pittsburgh over the weekend. Springsteen brought up issues, and in response 'all that we heard were personal attacks and threats that nobody else should even try to use their microphones or use their voices in public or they will be shut down,' Vedder said.
'The name-calling is so beneath us,' said Vedder, before Pearl Jam performed Young's 'Rockin' in the Free World.'
For Springsteen, 'No Surrender' replaced 'Land of Hope and Dreams' atop his concert set list. The EP released digitally on Wednesday also contained a cover of Bob Dylan's 'Chimes of Freedom.'
___
David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder and https://bsky.app/profile/dbauder.bsky.social.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
David Lammy refuses to say whether US attack on Iran was ‘right' or ‘legal'
Foreign secretary David Lammy has refused to defend Donald Trump 's attack on Iran and confirm it was either legal or even 'the right thing to do'. In an awkward interview on BBC Radio 4's Today Programme, Mr Lammy was asked four times if the attack on Iranian nuclear facilities was legal. It comes after Donald Trump's regime conducted airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, despite Sir Keir Starmer pushing for de-escalation in the preceding days. The questions followed reports that UK attorney general Lord Hermer has suggested it would not be legal for the UK to launch such attacks. Radio 4 Today presenter Justin Webb asked him four times if the attack was legal with the foreign secretary avoiding the answer. 'We were not involved, it is for the Americans to discuss those legal issues," he responded repeatedly. The issue is important because of fears that it undermines the case against Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine. However, Mr Lammy was not even able to answer whether the attack by US B-2 stealth bombers was even 'the right thing to do'. Mr Webb asked him: "Was the (US) military action the right thing to do?" Mr Lammy avoided the question, answering: "I've said that we weren't involved in the military action." Webb asked again: "Was it the right thing to do?" Lammy responded: "What I've said is that ultimately this can only be dealt with in diplomacy." The foreign secretary was not the only senior minister to refuse to answer difficult questions about the rapidly changing international crisis in the Middle East. Earlier, armed forces minister Luke Pollard claimed it is 'not for [him] to comment' on US action in the Middle East, refusing to say whether Britain is supportive of US strikes in Iran. Asked whether the UK was disappointed or pleased about the military intervention, Luke Pollard told Sky News: 'Well, it's not for me to comment on the particular US action, but we're assessing the battle damage at the moment to understand the true extent of the strikes. 'But our focus and the work that we are doing in conjunction with our US allies as well as those across Europe, is to put the pressure on the Iranian regime to get back to negotiating because a diplomatic solution is how we bring this crisis to an end.' When it was put to Mr Pollard that it was specifically his role to comment on military action around the world, he replied: 'I'm not going to be able to comment on that question, but what we can say is that we were not involved in the military action that the US took.' He added that Britain's focus was also on putting 'pressure on the Iranian regime to get back to negotiations because a diplomatic solution is how we bring this crisis to an end, with Iran not able to create a nuclear weapon, handing over their nuclear materials that they possess, and giving commitments that they won't threaten regional stability by developing a nuclear weapon in the future'. Over the weekend, the US attacked Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz which are linked to Iran's nuclear programme. Ahead of the strikes, the prime minister had been calling for calm, saying he has 'no doubt' that Mr Trump backs the G7's call for a de-escalation of tensions in the Middle East. It is understood there was no British involvement in the action but the government was informed before the US strikes. After the strikes took place, Sir Keir backed Mr Trump's administration describing Iran's nuclear programme as a 'grave threat to international security'. 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon, and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat', he added. But he later warned there was a risk of the Middle East crisis spiralling beyond the region and urged all sides to return to negotiations.
The Sun
36 minutes ago
- The Sun
I found a ‘very comfortable' £12 M&S bodysuit to hide back rolls – it's lightweight & smooths out all lumps & bumps
SHOPPERS are going wild for a 'very comfortable' bodysuit from M&S that 'holds you in all the right places.' So if you're looking for shapewear that is not only flattering but lightweight, then you've come to the right place and will need to check this out. 3 3 3 But that's not all, as this Light Control Seamless Shaping Body is also incredibly affordable - so if your purse is feeling the pinch, you'll be pleased to know that this high-street find is only £12. According to M&S bosses, this seamless bodysuit ensures a 'truly flattering silhouette.' This sleeveless piece features 'light control shaping for gentle smoothing with plenty of comfort.' Not only this, but it is non-padded and non-wired for a natural look. But that's not all, as it also features a no-VPL finish for a smooth effect under clothing. It is made with Special Cool Comfort technology and a 'moisture-wicking finish' which helps to keep you cool and dry. The Light Control Seamless Shaping Body is available in two colours - black and rose quartz. Sizes range from small to extra large and customers say it fits 'true to size.' The versatile bodysuit can be worn under clothes for a smooth finish, or even as a staple bodysuit with shorts on a warm summer 's day. It has quickly proved a hit with many shoppers, as it has quickly amassed an average rating of 4.3 out of five. Spring Into Style with M&S: Your Must-Have Wardrobe Update Not only did many claim that it 'hides back rolls', but others described it as 'easy to wear.' One person said: 'Comfy bodysuit which hides my back rolls like magic.' Another added: 'This is a great bodysuit. Very comfortable and easy to wear.' A third commented: 'Fits great, looks good, holds you in all the right places. My daughter said it looks so good she wants one.' Why Everyone Is Loving M&S Deputy Fashion Editor Abby McHale revealed to Fabulous why M&S is the shop of the moment. She explained: 'M&S has really pulled it out of the bag this season, there is so much good product to be excited about. 'A brand once known for its 'frumpy fashion' that notion is long gone with it now being one of the leading high street stores for womenswear. 'Its handbag range in particular is super strong with them selling 170% vs plan, with lots more designer dupes for just a fraction of the price. 'The brand is now also the #1 for style perceptions, compared to the #3 spot it had last year, this comes from a really strong design team focused on modernising the brand, not only taking into consideration how the pieces look, but how easy they are to wear also. 'Price is also a big factor with you being able to get many good quality pieces all for under £30. 'After having a sneak peak of the upcoming collection there are so many more amazing pieces that are dropping over the next few months to keep your eyes on. 'Think leopard print dresses, colourful co-ords, embroidered boho jackets, plus lots of swimwear and amazing accessories, as well as great wardrobe staples that will last year on year.' Meanwhile, someone else beamed: 'A lovely smoothing effect and looks great under anything.' Not only this, but another happy shopper praised: 'Lightweight but smooths out lumps and bumps, love it.' But that's not all, as another M&S fan explained: "I like that it's fairly lightweight as I wanted a comfortable everyday smoothing vest. I also prefer that it's not shiny/silky as it feels more breathable."
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump will not lose Maga support over bombing Iran. This is why
'I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, OK?' Donald Trump boasted at an event in Iowa during his first campaign for president in 2016. 'It's, like, incredible.' Will he lose his Maga base after bombing Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities? Clearly he doesn't think so. On June 19 the president told journalists: 'My supporters are for me. My supporters are America First and Make America Great Again. My supporters don't want to see Iran have a nuclear weapon.' In the aftermath of the attack he ordered on Iran on June 21, Trump likely has Fifth-Avenue-style immunity from mutinies by most of his conservative populist supporters, in spite of their scepticism toward overseas military interventions. He is helped by the fact that the pundits and elected representatives who claim to speak for his Maga followers do not agree. There are hawks like the TV and radio pundit Mark Levin and advocates of restraint like Georgia representative Marjorie Taylor Green. Tucker Carlson himself engaged in a harsh debate with Texas Republican senator Ted Cruz about U.S. policy toward Israel and the Middle East. Fox News leans toward the pro-war side. His former aide Steve Bannon, host of the popular podcast 'Bannon's War Room,' whom Trump invited to the White House before the attack, has urged restraint. But even without these divisions over Middle Eastern strategy on the populist Right, Trump has little reason to fear a significant loss of support. The reason is that Maga is not a creed or a movement with many leaders who share a common and well-understood set of principles; it is a cult of personality around a single charismatic leader. Charismatic presidents with cults of personality have existed in America's past. Their ranks include Andrew Jackson, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and Ronald Reagan. (Lincoln and Kennedy were only deified in the public mind after their assassinations). Because he served an unprecedented four terms, FDR showed how powerful a cult of personality can be. Between his first inauguration in 1933 and his death during World War II in 1945, he abandoned or reversed policies many times. As a candidate in 1932, FDR denounced President Herbert Hoover for the 'reckless growth of government.' Once in power, however, he dramatically expanded the federal government's role in the economy and society. He promised to keep the U.S. out of World War II but made the U.S. a de facto co-belligerent of the UK and Soviet Union even before Pearl Harbour. He was a deficit hawk at times and a deficit dove at others. He backed anti-trust reformers in the 1930s then reined in government attacks on big businesses whose help was needed during the war. In spite of his inconsistency, FDR retained the loyalty of millions of Americans, particularly members of the working class majority. Trump's base, like that of FDR, is found among working-class whites, along with a growing number of working-class Hispanics and blacks. They don't follow disputes about the questionable constitutionality of many of his executive orders, but they approve of his campaigns to enforce border laws and take on the oppressive woke Thought Police in their journalistic and academic bastions. Charisma cannot be passed on when a charismatic president leaves office, as Jackson's successor Martin van Buren, TR's successor William Howard Taft, and FDR's successor Harry Truman found out. A cult of personality is a kind of celebrity worship, not a body of political or economic principles. On May 23, at an investment conference in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia, Trump echoed the themes of the anti-interventionist Right and the anti-imperialist Left while condemning previous American administrations. 'In the end, the so-called nation builders wrecked far more nations than they built. And the interventionists were intervening in complex societies that they did not even understand.' Now he has carried out the long-sought goal of the neoconservatives who despised him and has bombed Iran; something that even George W. Bush refused to do. If Trump commits U.S. troops to an open-ended war with Iran, rather than limiting hostilities with Iraq to air strikes, some of his followers no doubt will defect, accusing him of betraying them by launching a new Forever War in the Middle East like Bush's Iraq war. Most of his followers, however, will stick with him – not only because of the rally-round-the-flag effect in war-time, but also because their loyalty is to him, not to a particular domestic agenda or foreign policy. Meanwhile, conservative pundits who fear losing access and favour no doubt will try to rationalise the apparent inconsistency of his policy toward Iran shows that Trump is playing a brilliant game of three-dimensional chess – 'peace through strength,' or something like that. In 1077, following his excommunication, Emperor Henry IV of the Holy Roman Emperor journeyed through the snow to Canossa Castle in Italy to beg forgiveness from Pope Gregory VII. On June 18 of this year, before the bombing and after he denounced the Trump administration for being 'complicit' in Israel's attacks on Iran, conservative commentator Tucker Carlson spoke to the president. Trump told reporters: 'He called and apologised the other day because he thought he said things that were a little bit too strong, and I appreciated that.' Following the strikes on Iran, Republican Representative Thomas Massie denounced them as unconstitutional and unnecessary: 'There was no imminent threat to the United States which is what would authorise that.' On Truth Social, his personal social media platform, Trump excommunicated him: 'Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky is not Maga, even though he likes to say he is. Actually Maga doesn't want him, doesn't know him, and doesn't respect him.' Massie's excommunication, like Carlson's metaphorical road to Canossa, demonstrates that in the Church of Maga Donald Trump is both Emperor and Pope.
