Near miss with train workers at Bookham Tunnel to be investigated

A near miss involving three track workers and a passenger train in Surrey is to be investigated by the government.At around 11:44 BST on 29 April, a train operated by South Western Railway was involved in the incident at Bookham Tunnel.Upon hearing the approaching train, two of the track workers entered refuges built into the tunnel walls, while the third worker leant against the tunnel wall as the train passed.The workers, who were not hurt, had been walking back to Bookham station after completing work on the telephones located at either end of the tunnel.
A line blockage had been arranged with the signaller to stop trains from running through the tunnel, but it was later discovered that this had been arranged for the nearby Mickleham Tunnel and did not cover Bookham Tunnel.The government's investigation, which sits independent from any undertaken by the railway industry, will look to identify the sequence of events which led to the incident.It will also investigate the actions of those involved, the way in which the work was planned and any underlying management factors.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

BBC News

26 minutes ago

• BBC News

Police investigation after two people stabbed in Cornwall

A police investigation is under way after two people were stabbed. Devon and Cornwall Police said the victims were stabbed "multiple times" at a property on Reskadinnick Road in Camborne, Cornwall, just after said both victims were taken to hospital with injuries "not believed to be life-threatening" while a man in his 20s was Ch Insp Steve Fleetwood said: "Although an isolated incident, we appreciate that this will have caused local concern amongst the community." "The incident happened just after midnight inside the address," said Mr Fleetwood."Two victims received multiple stab wounds and were taken to hospital where they are receiving treatment."The suspect is a 20-year-old man who is known to the victims. "He was swiftly arrested, and a knife has since been recovered."The force said a scene guard remains in place and officers are progressing the Fleetwood added: "We will continue to be in the area this afternoon and advise anyone with concerns to come up and speak to officers."We have one man in custody, and we are not looking for anyone else in connection with the matter."

Telegraph

28 minutes ago

• Telegraph

Pro-Palestine nutritionist gives anti-Israel diet advice

A nutritionist is under investigation after calling for the boycott of Israeli dates. Joan Faria, who runs nutrition clinic Empowered Nutrition, shared a recipe for stuffed dates with almond butter dipped in dark chocolate on social media. But the nutritionist wrote at the bottom of her business Facebook post for the recipe: ' Please boycott Israeli dates – if you can find Zaytoun, buy these as they support farmers in Palestine. These dates were Moroccan.' The bottom section of the post has since been deleted after Ms Faria was requested remove the remarks by the professional body for nutritionists – the British Association for Nutrition and Lifestyle Medicine (BANT). UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) complained to BANT, claiming Ms Faria breached their code of conduct, which states that members should conduct themselves in an 'honourable and courteous manner' and should be a 'professional and independent health specialist'. BANT said they requested that Ms Faria remove the section of her post mentioning the boycott and would be 'reinforcing their professional standards'. 'Unsolicited advice' The letter from UKLFI to BANT, seen by The Telegraph, claimed: 'We believe that by urging a boycott of Israeli dates brings BANT into disrepute. Ms Faria has not demonstrated an honourable and courteous manner, in particular to any Jewish, Israeli or Zionist clients or others who may follow her, or who may see her Facebook post.' It adds: 'By urging people to boycott Israeli dates, Ms Faria has offered unsolicited advice, which is not appropriate for a nutritionist.' The letter also claimed the nutritionist breached Section 29 of the 2010 Equality Act, which states: 'A service-provider must not, in relation to the provision of the service: Harass a person requiring the service, or a person to whom the service-provider provides the service.' The letter adds: 'Ms Faria is creating a hostile and offensive environment for any Jewish, Israeli or Zionist clients or potential clients, by expressing her hostility to Israeli-produced dates and commanding her followers to boycott them.' The letter also pointed out that Jews, Israelis and Zionists have protected characteristics of race, religion or belief according to Section 4 of the 2010 legislation. UKLFI also complained to the regulator, the Complementary and Natural Healthcare Council (CNHC), who told The Telegraph they had 'launched an investigation into the complaint' which was at an 'early stage'. 'She is not prioritising the health of her patients' In a second letter to the CNHC, UKLFI claimed Ms Faria was breaching their code of conduct by not 'respecting privacy and dignity', not following a 'legal duty to promote equality' and not 'avoiding unfair discrimination'. The letter said: 'If Ms Faria is allowing her own beliefs and values to prejudice her clients' care and wellbeing, she is discriminating against products of Israel, for no nutritional or health-based reason. 'She is likely to discriminate against other Israeli products and medicines, which may be the detriment of her patients. 'She is not prioritising the health of her patients, but instead prioritising her own political position. 'If she feels so strongly about her political cause that she boycotts Israeli products on her professional social media pages, she is also likely to treat Israeli or Jewish patients in a less favourable manner.' The boycott calls also drew condemnation from other Jewish groups, with the Campaign Against Antisemitism saying: 'A nutritionist should not be injecting her own inflammatory politics into dietary advice. 'Boycotts like this have real-world effects on the Jewish community. 'The regulator is absolutely right to take this seriously, and we will monitor the outcome with interest.' 'Putting political interests before those of patients' Russell Langer, director of Public Affairs at the Jewish Leadership Council, added to The Telegraph: 'Over the past 20 months, far too many workplaces, including those responsible for the welfare of Jewish and Israeli clients, have seen attempts to import a foreign conflict to the detriment of community cohesion. 'We therefore welcome BANT's confirmation that they will reinforce their professional standards and not allow their members to promote divisive boycotts of Israel in their work.' Caroline Turner, director of UKLFI, said: 'We are pleased that the regulatory bodies for nutritionists are tackling the issue of boycotts and appear to be cracking down on any members who advocate boycotting Israeli food or other items, putting their own political interests before those of their clients and patients.' Israel is a significant exporter of dates, with Medjool dates being a prominent variety. Exports were worth over £174m in 2023, with the UK being a key export destination. 'Always check the label' Various groups, such as the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign (PSC), have launched boycott campaigns and guidance, saying dates should only be bought from Palestinian sources. One bit of PSC guidance says: 'Always check the label when buying dates. Don't buy dates that are produced or packaged in Israel or its West Bank settlements. If no country of origin can be found on the box, check the retailer's website.' Last month, Co-op members urged the retailer to stop selling Israeli products as soon as this summer. Three-quarters of voters backed a motion urging the board to show 'moral courage and leadership' by removing Israeli products from its shelves. Responding to the result, the Co-op announced at its annual general meeting that the motion was advisory, but confirmed it was reviewing its sourcing policy. The CNHC added: 'CNHC Registrants have a legal duty to promote equality and must make sure that their own beliefs and values do not prejudice their clients' care and wellbeing.' A spokesman said: 'The Registrant has been invited to provide her written representations in response to the Complaint.' Ms Faria said: 'Because the CNHC investigation is at an early stage and ongoing, I will not be responding at this stage.'

The Sun

28 minutes ago

• The Sun

Reform on course to win next election with over a third of voters backing Nigel Farage, bombshell new poll reveals

REFORM are on track to win the next election, according to a new poll. More than a third of voters said they will support Nigel Farage's party, as reported by the Telegraph. Figures revealed 34 per cent of poll takers voted for Reform, ahead of 25 per cent who were in favour of Labour. It also emerged only 15 per cent of users elected the Conservatives. This marks the biggest breakthrough for Reform in a poll and in response Mr Farage told The Telegraph: 'This poll shows Reform can and will win the next general election.' The news outlet estimated if the poll was taken in four years time, Farage would win more than 400 seats and a majority. It could see the party leader win his place as the UK's next Prime Minister. The research also suggested Labour would lose around 270 seats, while the Conservatives would have less than 10. Despite the stats, it is important to bare in mind opinion polls and seat numbers are very hard to correlate. A Reform UK source said: 'This is big Reform majority territory.' Meanwhile, Gideon Skinner, senior director of UK politics at Ipsos, said: 'The last year has indeed been a long time in politics, with our first voting intention poll since the election showing just how much the political landscape has transformed since then. 'Reform UK has continued to build on its success, helped by high levels of enthusiasm among its own support and among working class voters in particular, and taking votes from both Labour and especially the Conservatives, who show little sign of recovery.' He added: 'The disappointment with Labour is clear, even among those who voted for the party in 2024. "We know from Ipsos research how difficult it has been to shift entrenched public pessimism over the cost of living, immigration, and the state of public services, and so far, Britons do not think Labour is delivering the tangible change they were hoping for in 2024. "This is reflected in satisfaction ratings for the government and Prime Minister that - while not quite the worst Ipsos has ever seen - are well below the average we usually see coming up to a one year anniversary. "Indeed, they look remarkably similar to the poor ratings received by Gordon Brown in 2008 after the financial crash. Labour will be hoping that the Spending Review will start to switch the narrative to a more positive one of renewal, but the challenge they face is significant. "This research also marks a new methodological approach for Ipsos, using our online KnowledgePanel based on gold-standard random probability sampling, and other changes we have made since the general election. "As with any individual survey it is important to remember that margins of error apply, and results should be interpreted in the round along with other sources of data. "As always, Ipsos will continue to review this new approach, and may make further refinements in the future if necessary." 1 is your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video. Like us on Facebook at and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSun.