Rebecca Yarros' ‘Onyx Storm' is the Fastest-Selling Adult Novel in 20 Years

A few years ago, Rebecca Yarros almost quit writing. A chronic illness often left her dizzy and exhausted, making it hard to work or even stand at times. She wondered if the stress she was putting on herself was worth it.
Then, she had the idea for a sprawling epic: a romance set at a military academy for dragon riders. The first novel, 'Fourth Wing,' became an instant best seller, as did its sequel, 'Iron Flame.'
Now, with the release of the third novel in the series, 'Onyx Storm,' this month, Yarros has hit a new sales record. The book sold more than 2.7 million copies in its first week. All together, the three novels, part of Yarros' planned five-book Empyrean series, have sold more than 12 million editions in the United States, according to her publisher, Entangled.
'It doesn't feel real — none of it does,' Yarros told a packed auditorium of around 1,700 fans who had come to see her in St. Paul, Minn. on Wednesday night.
Print sales alone well exceeded a million copies in the novel's first week, making 'Onyx Storm' the fastest-selling adult fiction title of the past 20 years, according to Circana BookScan, which tracks print sales.
There have been far bigger hits in children's literature: the seventh and final novel of 'Harry Potter' sold 8.3 million copies in its first 24 hours on sale. But in the realm of adult fiction, Yarros' early sales stand out. The last record-setting adult novel, Colleen Hoover's 2022 novel 'It Starts With Us,' sold 810,000 print copies in its first week.
Yarros currently holds the first three spots on The New York Times's hardcover best-seller list, a rare feat for an adult fiction series. On Thursday, the series also occupied the first three spots on Amazon's 'most sold' fiction list.
The success of 'Onyx Storm' also shows that romantasy, which blends spicy sex scenes and romance tropes with supernatural elements, is not a fleeting trend. Last year, the genre accounted for some 30 million print sales, a rise of 50 percent over the previous year, according to Circana.
When Yarros became a fixture on the best-seller list, with the release of 'Fourth Wing,' she had already published around 20 contemporary romance novels. But sales from book to book were largely stagnant, and she struggled with a chronic illness, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, a genetic connective tissue disorder.
Her illness, though debilitating at times, inspired her to write 'Fourth Wing,' she said. Yarros grew up loving fantasy, but had never read a fantastical novel with a protagonist who had physical limitations like she did. She decided to write about a young woman named Violet, who enrolls in an elite military academy for dragon riders, and is determined to succeed despite a chronic illness that makes her weak and physically frail.
When 'Fourth Wing' came out in 2023, it arrived at an ideal moment. BookTok was in the middle of a romantasy craze, and fans quickly coalesced around Yarros. In the months after the novel's release, videos with hashtags for Yarros and the series were viewed more than a billion times.
The genre's growth has been driven largely by the authors Yarros and Sarah J. Maas, whose hugely successful series, 'A Court of Thorns and Roses,' helped make her the best-selling author in the United States last year, with sales topping 7.7 million copies. Globally, English-language editions of her books have sold more than 55 million copies.
Some booksellers say the fervor around writers like Yarros and Maas, whose fans turn out for midnight release parties and dress up in elaborate costumes, is something they haven't seen since the days of 'Harry Potter' and 'Twilight.'
'Fandom, in the past several years, does have this very passionate parasocial element, where people feel very connected to the creator,' said Annie Metcalf, the events and marketing manager at Magers & Quinn Booksellers, an independent bookstore in Minneapolis that hosted Wednesday's event for Yarros.
Fans' fervor was palpable at the event, which was held in a huge auditorium in St. Paul. Many in the crowd were dressed up in sweatshirts, T-shirts and hats that said 'Basgiath War College,' the military academy of the series. Some were fully decked out in costume, dressed as Violet, in leather body armor, or as dragons.
'People were handing out friendship bracelets like it was a Taylor Swift concert,' Metcalf said. 'It's wild.'
Waiting outside the theater before the event, Kaylin Lu, who was dressed as Broccoli, a cat character in the series that has gained its own fan following, said she wasn't a romantasy reader until she picked up a copy of 'Fourth Wing' when she was working at Barnes & Noble. She quickly went from agnostic to evangelist. 'I was like, You know what, that book looks fun, I'm going to try it out,' she said. 'And then I was like, Everybody, listen, everybody must read this book.'
She pressed the book on her friend, Diane Nguyen. She was also hooked, and had joined Lu for the event, dressed up as a dragon. 'There's action and romance and it very fluidly moved together,' Nguyen said. 'Thanks to her, I love reading again.'
Inside the theater, as the boisterous crowd waited for Yarros to appear, Alejandra Herrera sat in the front row, almost vibrating with anticipation. She had driven some 380 miles from Omaha to attend the event, she said.
'I'm a little nervous,' she said. 'We're going to make eye contact with her.'
Herrera's friend Rachel Peterson, who also made the drive from Omaha, said she came not only to see Yarros, but to gather with other fans. 'It's nice being in a space with so many other people that love the series,' she said.
At the start of the event, Yarros was introduced by the romance writer Abby Jimenez, who noted that the Empyrean series had taken over the top three slots on the New York Times best-seller list.
Yarros uttered an expletive to express her surprise and gratitude. 'Thank you,' she said to the crowd. 'You guys did that.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

USA Today

an hour ago

• USA Today

Brad Pitt reflects on going to AA after Angelina Jolie divorce: 'I needed rebooting'

Brad Pitt is looking back on his "incredible" experience in Alcoholics Anonymous. The "F1" star, 61, reflected on seeking help from the recovery group while speaking to Dax Shepard on the "Armchair Expert" podcast in an episode released Monday, June 23. "I was pretty much on my back, on my knees," Pitt said. "I was trying anything anyone threw at me. It was a particular difficult time. I needed rebooting. I needed to wake the (expletive) up, in some areas." Pitt, who previously told The New York Times he spent a year and a half in Alcoholics Anonymous after ex-wife Angelina Jolie filed for divorce, described attending AA as a "really special" experience. He said it was "incredible" to see "men sharing their experiences, their foibles, their missteps, their wants, their aches," and doing so with "a lot of humor." Brad Pitt, girlfriend Ines de Ramon stun in rare red carpet appearance: See photos Jolie filed for divorce from Pitt in September 2016, kicking off a years-long legal dispute between the actors over issues including custody of their children. They reached a divorce settlement in December 2024, which an attorney for Jolie told USA TODAY was "just one part of a long, ongoing process." Jolie has accused Pitt of physical abuse, alleging he assaulted her and two of their kids on a plane in 2016. Pitt has denied her allegations and did not face any charges over the alleged incident. Shepard, who has also discussed his struggles with alcohol, noted that he met Pitt in an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting and recalled how "honest" the actor was. Pitt said that "everyone was so open," which "gives you permission" to share, adding that he "really grew to love it." 'F1' movie review: Brad Pitt's crowd-pleaser is 'Top Gun' on wheels The "Fight Club" star went on to describe going to AA as part of an effort to take "responsibility" for his actions and "be better." Pitt previously told The New York Times it was "really freeing just to expose the ugly sides of yourself" in Alcoholics Anonymous. But Pitt later said in an interview with GQ in 2024 that Alcoholics Anonymous reprimanded him for talking about his experience with the group publicly. "You know they came down on me for that? AA did," Pitt told GQ. "They were like, 'It's anonymous.' ... I'm not outing anyone. Everyone knows you exist. What's the issue?" Contributing: Anna Kaufman

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

Ray-Ban Meta AI glasses review: The future is here -- but it needs a better battery

Is it the future yet? It's starting to look that way, at least if you judge by Ray-Ban's Meta AI glasses. These fairly ordinary-looking spectacles pack a wealth of technology: cameras, microphones, headphones and an AI assistant that sounds like actress Kristen Bell. (Seriously. Intentionally. It can also be made to sound like Awkwafina, John Cena, Dame Judi Dench or Keegan-Michael Key. I am not making any of this up.) The result is something fairly remarkable: glasses that can not only capture and identify what you see, but also replace earbuds for music, phone calls and more. This isn't a new idea, but the Ray-Ban Meta is by far the best execution of it I've ever seen — and one of the most affordable at $299. However, while I'm sold on the idea of smart glasses, there's still work to be done — mostly in the areas of design and battery life. So, should you consider putting a pair on your face? Here's my Ray-Ban Meta review. First things first: The Ray-Ban Meta glasses start at $299, but that's for clear, non-prescription lenses. I tested the Wayfarer style (a classic for anyone familiar with Ray-Ban sunglasses); there's also a Skyler option for those seeking a different look. You can opt for Transition lenses (the kind that automatically darken when you're outdoors) for an additional $80, but keep in mind there's still the matter of your prescription — if you have one. If you do, you can order the glasses directly from Amazon, then take them to a Lenscrafters or Sunglass Hut store to get prescription lenses added. You also have the option of ordering directly from Ray-Ban, supplying your prescription details and choosing any lens options you might want. As you might expect, the more options you add, the higher the total price. I wear progressives; those plus Transitions and a few other add-ons would have put my total bill at around $1,000. Thankfully, Ray-Ban does accept most insurance. And you might be able to find more affordable lens options at one of the partner stores. I'll just note that the last time I bought new regular frames and progressive lenses (with all the bells and whistles) from an optical center, the price tag before insurance was approaching $800. Frames alone can easily cost $200-$300 (ripoff though that may be), so $299 for the Ray-Ban Metas strikes me as a pretty decent deal — especially considering what they're capable of. To look at the Ray-Ban Meta Wayfarer is to see a familiar-looking frame, one with a barely noticeable camera embedded in one corner and thicker-than-average arms (aka temples). The latter are arguably the only giveaway you're wearing smart glasses; unless someone looks closely, they might never know. That said, I find the design a little chunky overall, the thick black plastic a little bolder than I prefer. But that's just me; others have told me the frames look stylish, or at least similar to what a lot of people are wearing these days (myself included). And these were a review sample; I'd definitely have chosen a different color given the option. I did struggle a bit with the weight: at 2 ounces, they're definitely heavier than my everyday glasses, which weigh just 1.2 ounces. (Note that Meta's specs indicate 1.7 ounces; my scale says otherwise, but that could be the result of my fairly thick progressive lenses.) Although I wouldn't describe them as uncomfortable, I definitely noticed them more. Speaking of noticing things, privacy is often a concern with camera-equipped smart glasses — specifically, the privacy of others unaware you might be snapping photos or recording video. To remedy this, the glasses have a small white front-facing LED in the right corner, opposite the left-corner camera. When you take a picture or start a video, the LED lights up. Obviously this is a battery-powered product, and Meta took an interesting approaching to charging: There's no dock or power cord, but rather a traditional-looking leather case. Just drop the glasses in and an embedded LED ring lights up orange to indicate charging. (It shows green when done.) I have mixed feelings about this. The case is stylish, but also bulky and inconvenient; it's literally the only charging option, so you have to keep it close at hand. At minimum, Meta should offer a simple USB-C charging cord (one that connects directly to the glasses) you can use for travel, and I'd also like to see some kind of dock for desk or nightstand use. This might be less of an issue if the glasses had better battery life. Unfortunately, depending on your usage, they're going to require recharging in just four hours — possibly less. For example, during the course of 90 minutes, I recorded a one-minute video, listened to about 30 minutes of audio, answered some text messages and had a few chats with Meta AI. Then I checked the battery level in the Meta AI app: 60%. The battery level continued to drop even after I took off the glasses, folded them up and set them on my desk. Despite being in "standby" mode, the battery level dropped overnight to 14% from 51%. Thus, unless they're actually recharging inside their case, they're consuming power — even if you're not wearing them. Needless to say, these can't be your all-day glasses, or at least your all-day smart glasses. Of course they'll continue to help you see, even with a dead battery, but imagine heading off to work in the morning and losing access to your headphones, cameras and AI assistant, all before lunch. If there's any upside here, it's that the Ray-Bans can recharge to nearly 50% after just 20 minutes in the charging case (which itself promises eight full charges), but what do you do in the meantime? (One option: Carry your regular glasses in the case and wear them while these are charging.) This is the major problem with the product, and it's a big one — which is unfortunate because it's pretty great in most other respects. Worth noting: I'm also in the process of testing the Solos AirGo V glasses, which use ChatGPT in place of Meta AI but are fairly similar otherwise. They can last up to 10 hours while playing music — so I'm confused as to why the Ray-Bans have such poor battery life. (Note: Right before I published this review, Meta announced a new pair of smart glasses from a new partner: Oakley. Rated battery life: 8 hours. That adds to what I consider inexcusable power performance from the Ray-Bans.) As noted earlier, I consider these glasses to be half wearable camera and half headphone, with an AI assistant baked in for good measure. Let's talk about some of the specs associated with those features, then dive into the specifics. 12-megapixel camera 32GB of onboard storage Open-ear headphones 5 microphones Bluetooth 5.2 Wi-Fi 6 IPX4 water resistance Touch controls (In case it's not already clear, these have no display to speak of; they're not AR or VR glasses like the Apple Vision Pro or Meta Quest 3.) Imagine snapping photos or videos while on vacation or at a special event, without having to pull out your phone — without even having to lift a finger. You can activate the glasses' camera via a simple voice command: "Hey, Meta, take a photo." There's also a button on top of the right temple; a single click grabs a snapshot, a longer press starts video recording. That's a pretty powerful benefit, though there are a few limitations. First: no selfies. Second: While the camera captures whatever is in your field of view, there's no actual preview to know exactly what you're getting. No zoom, either. And videos are limited to three minutes, max, something to note if you're trying to capture, say, a kid's performance in the school play. In my testing, I found that the glasses worked really well for the kind of "reveal" videos popular on Instagram and TikTok, like when you start out looking at the ground and then slowly pan up to show a waterfall or some other natural wonder. But for anything longer, where you want to stay focused on a fixed subject, it's not great having your whole head as the "viewfinder," because your natural inclination is to look around from time to time — resulting in jarring footage. That's something to keep in mind if you plan to use the livestream feature, which works via the Facebook or Instagram app. I tested the glasses with the latter, despite having never livestreamed anything before, and got up and running with just a few easy taps. But once again, the resulting footage was shaky and, to my thinking, hard to watch, because I move my head a lot more than I do my phone. It's much easier to get stable video with the latter. Take note, too, that while the camera's image quality is pretty good overall — suitable for viewing on your phone and sharing on social media — it lacks the sharpness you'd expect from a 12-megapixel sensor. You can preview photos and videos in the Meta app, but to actually offload them from the glasses for sharing or full-resolution viewing, you need to connect the latter to your Wi-Fi network — a fairly quick process, but still an extra step. There's also the option to automatically import media when the glasses are charging, which is useful. There's another big benefit to the glasses' camera, and that's being able to instantly identify what you're seeing. I'll come back to that in the AI section, below. The Ray-Ban Meta's headphones are kind of miraculous — two tiny down-firing speakers built into the temple arms right where they start to curve over your ear. That's pretty far from your listening holes, yet these things sound amazingly good. Maybe not quite on par with the best open-ear headphones, but close — I was perfectly happy with the quality of music I heard while walking the dog, gardening and so on. (As noted above, the Solos AirGo V — despite having vastly superior battery life — sounds like tinny AM radio in comparison.) There's a bit of resulting "bleed" here, meaning others might be able to hear what you're hearing, but they have to be standing fairly close. Ultimately, I was amazed to discover that eyeglasses could sound nearly as good as headphones — and all the disappointed about the battery life. I'd love to be able to wear these all day, without needing earbuds or the like for podcasts, Zoom calls and so on. The glasses have arguably the best touch controls I've ever used: You can drag your finger along the outside of the right temple to raise or lower volume, tap to pause/play, double-tap to skip to the next track and so on. Each interaction is met with a little "tick" sound so you know it's registering. And because the touch area is very wide, spanning a good stretch of the arm, you're not likely to miss hitting it — which I've found to be the case with most open-hear headphones (and their comparatively tiny touch areas). I did encounter one small issue when watching videos: the audio was a bit out of sync. This was fairly noticeable in TikTok, less prominent in Netflix, but definitely there. It's not uncommon — I've seen this with some earbuds and headphones as well — but there's usually a software toggle (such as "game mode") to help compensate. At this writing, there's no such option in the Meta AI app. Meta AI performs many of the same voice-activated tricks as Alexa or Siri. It can raise or lower audio volume, place calls, send and read messages, tell you the date and time, deliver a weather report, identify the song you're hearing over the loudspeaker (a la Shazam) and so on. By default, it gives you fairly terse responses to any general-information inquiries, which I think is smart; if you say, "Hey, Meta, tell me about the Battle of Trafalgar," you don't necessarily want a 10-minute rundown. And after the initial response, you can say, "Tell me more" (no "Hey, Meta" required), to get additional information. I did experience a few AI glitches. For example, when I said, "Hey, Meta, help me with my glasses" (per the AI's own suggestion), the response was, "To get help with your glasses, say 'Hey, Meta, help me with my glasses.'" I got stuck in this comedic loop indefinitely. That kind of thing tends to get worked out over time, with software updates, but my more immediate request is for better integration with existing ecosystems (namely, my phone). I tested my glasses with an iPhone 16e; although you can ask Meta to set a reminder, it doesn't integrate with the iOS Reminders app; it relies on its own internal software. Similarly, it's limited in what notifications it can share: Anything I already have scheduled in Reminders won't get announced through the glasses. You can't add calendar entries, either; no "Hey, Meta, schedule a meeting with Bob at 10 a.m. tomorrow." And this isn't just an iOS limitation; it's true on Android as well. Overall there's fairly little integration with apps. So if this is just a sort of Alexa/Google/Siri wanna-be AI, what's the point? The camera. You can ask Meta to describe what you're seeing, give you a summary of the book you're holding, recommend recipes when you peer inside your fridge, translate text from a different language and much more. For blind and partially sighted users, there's incredible value in being told what's in front of you, be it an object you're holding in your hand or the overall scene in general. (Again, this is where battery life rears its ugly head; anyone who starts to rely on this for real-world assistance could run into trouble if the glasses run out of juice.) On the whole, Meta AI works fairly well, limitations notwithstanding. While the five available celebrity voices are a rather odd mix (and all AI-simulated, which itself is kind of crazy), I really dug having Keegan-Michael Key as my assistant. There are also three "company players" if you'd rather stick with a non-famous voice. Because this is a fairly high-profile feature, I wanted to give it some extra attention. To start, I used photo-recognition language translation ("Hey, Meta, translate what I'm seeing") on a page written in French; it did an impressive job reading it to me in English. However, it's an all-or-nothing performance; you can't force the glasses to focus on, say, a particular area of a menu; it would attempt to translate the entire thing, which would likely be confusing (and time-consuming) to hear. So this is more useful for a street sign or poster, something with relatively few words. Speaking of translation, there's also a new live-translation feature that arrived just as I was finishing my testing. When someone speaks to you in a different language, it's translated in real-time. Well, almost: While listening to a few YouTube videos in French, the translation lagged behind what was being said, often to the point where it seemed like the glasses couldn't keep up. Or there would be a pause of several seconds while the person continued speaking, and then I'd get a quick dump of translation, which made it difficult to concentrate on what I was hearing versus what I was seeing. Thus, I'm not sure I'd use this to try for actual conversation (though you could do that if the other person was also wearing Meta glasses); it seems better for short bursts, like someone giving you directions or answering a simple question. At this writing, there are four languages available — English, French, Italian and Spanish — and to use any of them, you must first download a language pack within the Meta AI app. In return for that bit of advanced planning, you get to use live translation offline (meaning you don't need to be connected to the internet). The Meta Ray-Ban AI glasses showed me the future. With their classic Wayfarer design, impressive camera, surprisingly good open-ear audio and affordable price tag, they made the case for smart spectacles you'd want to wear full-time. Now we just need a battery that makes that possible. I don't want to have to keep that bulky case with me at all times and don't want to have to dock the glasses in there every 3-4 hours. The point of all this is that if you're already wearing glasses anyway, wouldn't it be great if they could play music and record video and answer questions? Yes! But when they can't do those things all day, you add a hassle factor that I suspect will frustrate most users. Thus, I think Meta needs to at least double the battery life before these Ray-Bans can be considered for full-time use. I'm also hopeful the next version of this product will be a bit lighter (a challenge given the ask for a bigger battery). But mark me down as someone who's very eager to see these things happen.

Miami Herald

3 hours ago

• Miami Herald

Giant Banner of Jeff Bezos' Face Unveiled by Protesters in Venice

With only a few days to go before Jeff Bezos' lavish wedding to former television journalist Lauren Sanchez, protests continue in the Italian city that the billionaire has chosen for the ceremony. Activists from the international environmental group Greenpeace and campaign group Everyone Hates Elon unfurled a giant banner on Monday in Venice's St. Mark's Square, calling for Bezos to pay higher taxes. "If you can rent Venice for your wedding, you can pay more tax," the 65x65 inches banner featuring a giant smiling Bezos reads. As soon as Venice's mayor, Luigi Brugnaro, confirmed in March that Bezos wanted to celebrate his nuptials in the city, anger has been boiling among many residents over the Amazon founder taking over their home. The three-day celebration, scheduled for later this week, is expected to have famous guests, including Oprah Winfrey, Mick Jagger and Ivanka Trump. While not many details of the event have been shared with the public for security reasons, the wedding will take over the entire island of San Giorgio, located opposite St. Mark's Square, blocking parts of the city to both locals and tourists. Not only will residents have to plan their routes around the restrictions caused by the wedding, but they will also likely find that most of the city's water taxis have already been booked by Bezos and his guests. Part of the port of Venice, on the other hand, will be occupied by Bezos' super yacht, which will be docked there during the dayslong event. While city and regional authorities who greenlit the wedding said that the event will bring prestige and wealth to the city, residents already struggling with overtourism and the rising costs of housing are skeptical. "Life is getting increasingly difficult in Venice," Marta Sottoriva, an activist with the group 'No Space for Bezos,'" previously told Newsweek. "Of course, part of the city is in favor [of the wedding]. It's the part that has something to gain from it, but we're talking about a small percentage. Luxury hotel owners, taxi drivers, catering agencies," she said. However, many Venetians are tired of these large-scale events, which "block the city" for residents, Sottoriva said. "There's a feeling spreading among citizens, we don't believe that these big events bring money to the city anymore. It's linked to an economy that is becoming increasingly precarious, tied to tourism," she said. Protesters in Venice, who plan to disrupt the wedding by jumping into the canal's waters this weekend, said that their anger is not directed at the wedding itself, but rather at the groom. "Jeff Bezos is not a superstar, not a Hollywood actor, not a sports champion," Sottoriva said, mentioning actor George Clooney's wedding in Venice in 2014, which was well-received by locals. "He's the third-richest man in the world, who's built his wealth by exploiting workers and resources." "He's the same person who stood next to Trump during his inauguration ceremony, together with many other oligarchs he hasn't hesitated to change his company's entire branding to get onboard with this totalitarian turn," she added. "It's a protest against Bezos, he's not welcome in Venice." The new banner revealed on Monday in St. Mark's Square focuses on Bezos' enormous wealth, which protesters said should be taxed more than it currently is. "As governments talk about hard choices and struggle to fund public services, Jeff Bezos can afford to shut down half a city for days on end just to get married. Just weeks ago, he spent millions on an 11-minute space trip. If there was ever a sign billionaires like Bezos should pay wealth taxes, it's this," a spokesperson from Everyone Hates Elon said in a statement shared with Newsweek. "While ordinary people struggle to pay the bills, there are more billionaires than ever before. These two things are obviously connected—they're getting richer at our expense. It's not rocket science: tax billionaires like Jeff Bezos now." Bezos is the second-richest person in the world, after Elon Musk, but he reportedly pays a 1.1 percent true tax rate, according to ProPublica. His wedding in Venice has been estimated to cost between $15 million and $20 million, according to the Mail Online, while Sanchez's wedding ring alone is worth as much as $5 million. There is also an environmental factor at play: it is no secret that Venice is sinking, and the city's future is under threat from climate change and human activity. According to Royal Museums Greenwich, the city is currently sinking by 1mm (0.04 inches) a year due to natural processes, while sea level rise is accelerating due to global warming. Venice has recently banned big cruise ships from docking. Bezos' wedding splurge is seen as unnecessary and harmful by protesters. "While Venice is sinking under the weight of the climate crisis, billionaires are partying like there is no tomorrow on their mega yachts," Clara Thompson, a Greenpeace campaigner, said in a statement shared with Newsweek. "This isn't just about one person—it's about changing the rules so no billionaire can dodge responsibility, anywhere. The real issue is a broken system that lets billionaires skip out on taxes while everyone else is left to foot the bill. That's why we need fair, inclusive rules, and they must be written at the UN." Related Articles Jeff Bezos Wedding Under Threat From Angry ItaliansSlate Confirms $700 Million in Funding, Bezos InvestmentJeff Bezos May Sell up to 25M Amazon SharesJames Clyburn Takes a Swipe at Washington Post, CBS for Caving to Trump 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.