Indonesia signs $10bn deal to buy 48 Turkish Kaan fighter jets
Indonesia will purchase 48 Kaan fifth-generation fighter jets from Turkey in a deal valued at more than $10bn, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan announced on Wednesday.
The agreement was signed at the Indo Defence 2025 exhibition in Jakarta, which has been attended by Turkish defence firms.
The deal will span 10 years and includes the co-production of some Kaan jet components in Indonesia.
Erdogan thanked his Indonesian counterpart, Prabowo Subianto, describing the agreement as the largest defence industry export deal in Turkey's history.
Yusuf Akbaba, a Turkish defence industry expert, said the deal is a landmark for the Kaan project, noting that Ankara would have struggled to fund the development of the fifth-generation aircraft alone.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
'To reduce costs, it is essential to increase the number of orders,' Akbaba told Middle East Eye. 'As the number of units increases, the per-unit price of the aircraft decreases.'
Akbaba believes Indonesia's participation could attract interest from Islamic countries and other states in the Asian market.
'Countries like Qatar, Azerbaijan, Saudi Arabia, and a few others are also considering acquiring the aircraft,' he said.
'After this order from Indonesia, procurement processes in those countries may also accelerate.'
Azerbaijan announced last year that it would participate in the project, while reports in January indicated that Saudi Arabia was interested in becoming a partner, although that has not yet materialised.
For Jakarta, the Kaan would help to replace its dated F-16 fleet and also fill a gap left after it parted ways with South Korea on its KF-21 project.
Experts say the KF-21 is not a genuine fifth-generation aircraft, while the Kaan features some sixth-generation capabilities, such as AI integration and drone teaming.
Turkey has been developing a fifth-generation aircraft since 2010, but the project accelerated after Ankara was removed from the F-35 programme by the US in 2019 over its purchase of the Russian-made S-400 missile system.
The Kaan made its maiden flight in February 2024, temporarily using two General Electric F110-GE-129 engines, the same as those found in Turkish F-16s.
Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI), which is leading the Kaan project, is working on a locally produced engine for the aircraft.
The company aims to deliver the first plane to the Turkish Air Force by the end of 2028, although some analysts predict this might be delayed until 2030.
The first 10 Kann Block-1 fighter jets are scheduled to be delivered to the Turkish Air Force between 2030 and 2033.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
25 minutes ago
- Gulf Today
Compassion led to hard EU line on migration
A decade ago, the image of a three-year-old Syrian boy washed up dead on a Turkish beach prompted an outpouring of emotion and renewed commitments from European governments to take in refugees fleeing Syria's civil war. Alan Kurdi drowned alongside his mother and brother when a rubber dinghy headed for Greece sank off the coast of Turkey in September 2015, reported Reuters. A decade later, thousands of people escaping hardship, conflict and climate disasters still risk their lives on similarly perilous boat journeys to Europe. But the reception they might get has changed. Ten years ago, the European Union (EU) vowed as one to prevent further loss of life at sea. Now, keeping migrants out is the key goal, as governments play to right-leaning voters. Rights groups and policy experts say the future for these people is becoming even more precarious as the EU looks set to further harden its restrictions on migration, Reuters informed. 'All of this started in 2015, and measures are getting even stricter,' said Josephine Liebl, head of advocacy at the European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), an alliance of non-governmental organisations. Last year, the EU overhauled its rules with a new Pact on Asylum and Migration that aims to limit irregular entry to the bloc and speed the asylum process. 'For people arriving in Europe, it will become more difficult to access an asylum procedure in the first place and for that procedure to actually assess their claim fairly,' Liebl said. The arrival of an unprecedented 1 million refugees in 2015 sparked a crisis in the EU, which over the last decade has attempted to reform its asylum system to ease the burden on frontline states such as Greece and Italy, observed Reuters. At the same time, anti-immigrant feeling has gained momentum, encouraged by the rise of the far right. The bloc has also increasingly sought to push the problem beyond its borders, making deals with third countries and reinforcing its physical and legal entry points. Even before Kurdi died, his image galvanising the bloc, a shipwreck that claimed the lives of over 600 people in April 2015 had driven migration to the top of the EU's policy agenda. Then, the bloc's main aims were not far off what they are today: fighting people traffickers, preventing illegal migration and reinforcing solidarity across the bloc. But the EU also pledged emergency aid to frontline states receiving the most refugees and tripled its funding of naval missions to strengthen rescue operations in the Mediterranean. In 2020, when the EU reaffirmed its support to border countries, it emphasised bolstering border guard capabilities - not humanitarian aid. Berna Turam, a researcher at Northeastern University in Boston, said there was 'a golden age of solidarity' pre-2019, when compassion outweighed anti-immigrant, populist forces. Europeans felt sympathy for refugees camping in their public squares and strong grassroots movements tempered the xenophobic narratives, her research found. 'The main change between then and now is the perception of (migrants) as criminals, potential terrorists and people who are going to destroy order and stability,' said Turam. 'The mood changed because of EU policies criminalising people at the borders.' In 2016, the EU pledged 3 billion euros ($3.45 billion) to support Syrians - then also poured money into strengthening surveillance tech and support for its border agency Frontex. Under a deal that year, Turkey agreed to take back migrants and refugees who cross irregularly into Greece from its shores. The islands effectively became a holding pen for refugees and migrants, barred from advancing their EU asylum claims and restricted to a camp life lived in limbo.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
US strikes on Iran: What we know so far
The US strikes on Iran early on Sunday marked a significant escalation in the ongoing Israeli war on Iran. At midnight GMT (8pm Washington time), President Donald Trump announced that US bombers had struck three Iranian nuclear sites. He claimed all three had been "obliterated". However, the extent of the damage and the precise impact of the strikes remains unclear. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Middle East Eye takes a closer look at what we know so far. Which facilities were targeted? US forces targeted three major nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Isfahan houses a prominent nuclear research centre, while Fordow and Natanz are key uranium enrichment sites. Earlier reports suggest that Israeli warplanes had previously hit Natanz, cutting power to its centrifuge hall and potentially damaging the equipment. Fordow, considered one of Iran's most fortified facilities, is located 80–90 metres underground in a mountainous area. Israel had avoided striking Fordow earlier in the war, lacking munitions capable of penetrating to such depths. The White House has not disclosed what munitions were used, though a US official said B-2 heavy bombers took part in the operation. The scale of damage is still unknown, and no casualties have been confirmed so far. Could there be a nuclear disaster? Iranian officials have downplayed the impact of US strikes on nuclear sites, saying there is no threat to nearby residents, according to state media. The Crisis Management Headquarters in Qom province, where the Fordow facility is located, told Iran's state-run news agency IRNA: "There is no danger to the people of Qom and the surrounding area." Al Jazeera also cited an official who claimed Fordow had been "long evacuated" and had not sustained any irreversible damage. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia's Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Authority said no radioactive effects had been detected in Gulf countries. How has Iran responded? Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation condemned the strikes as "a barbaric act" and a violation of international law, including the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned the attack would have "everlasting consequences" and said Iran "reserves all options" in its response. "The events this morning are outrageous," Araghchi wrote on X. "Every UN member should be alarmed by this dangerous, lawless and criminal behaviour." State media reported that Iran has formally requested an emergency UN Security Council session to prevent further escalation. How has Israel responded? Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised Trump for ordering the strikes. He called it an act of "awesome and righteous might" that would "change history". In a video address, Netanyahu said the United States had "done what no other country on Earth could do". Trump, in turn, lauded Netanyahu, saying the two leaders had "worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before" and had taken a major step towards "erasing this horrible threat to Israel".
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel-US attack on Iran: The price of Netanyahu's forever wars
Israel's decision to attack Iran cannot be interpreted through any rational lens. It directly contradicts Israel's longstanding military doctrine, which was built on short, decisive operations aimed at securing tangible strategic goals - a doctrine rooted in Israel's inherent geographic, economic and demographic vulnerabilities. What we are witnessing now is a fundamental shift: the abandonment of strategic realism in favour of a theology-driven war without end. The transformation is stark. Israel is evolving from a western-backed colonial project seeking international legitimacy, into a messianic colonial enterprise that thrives on perpetual war. The growing use of religious rhetoric and the enlistment of God into the logic of war underscore this systemic change. On Sunday, Washington joined Israel's war on Iran as it carried out attacks on Iranian nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Donald Trump described the strikes as 'very successful'. Iranian officials confirmed that parts of nuclear sites were struck, including Fordow, the secretive Iranian nuclear enrichment facility buried half a kilometre under a mountain near the city of Qom. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised what he called a "bold decision" by Trump to bomb Iran's nuclear sites, saying it would "change history." Following the US strikes, Netanyahu now faces a profound internal challenge. His secular opposition, who once backed his military ventures, are questioning why they must sacrifice their quality of life for the sake of endless conflict. At the same time, Netanyahu is eroding the democratic space for the Jewish public in order to maintain the momentum of his militarised agenda. The internal front, not Iran, may become his toughest battlefield. One of the most bizarre but telling decisions has been the imposed restrictions of Israeli citizens' freedom of movement, including the closure of Ben Gurion Airport for outbound travel, coupled with a warning from the National Security Council discouraging reentry via Jordan or Egypt. Although flights still depart from Israel, they are largely reserved for tourists and foreign residents, while citizens are effectively trapped. This move has an unmistakable internal political logic: it disproportionately impacts middle-class opposition voters who can afford long-term travel abroad, while Likud's working-class base, largely from the periphery, remains unaffected. Moving money Meanwhile, since the outbreak of the war on Gaza - and even earlier, during Israel's judicial overhaul - many Israelis have opted to move money overseas, with a financial services firm reporting in March a 50 percent increase in the number of Israelis seeking to exchange and transfer money overseas. Since October 2023, there has reportedly been a seven-fold rise in money transfers from Israel to other countries, with around $5.6bn moved out of the country that year alone. For Netanyahu, these financial shifts must be alarming. For years, he has championed the idea that Israel could only maintain its highly equipped military through a strong economy. Yet his ultra-Orthodox coalition partners contribute little in this regard, while his messianic allies push for more wars and territorial expansion. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war Ironically, the segments of society that sustain the Israeli economy are the ones most opposed to Netanyahu's government. But they have not opposed his wars: rather, they continue to support Israel's military actions, while attempting to preserve a western standard of living. Their inability - or refusal - to critically examine the Zionist ethos that taught them the world is inherently antisemitic, and that they must live by the sword, has allowed Netanyahu and his allies to exploit their economic power. In doing so, they've helped accelerate Israel's descent into a messianic state, emboldening racist policies and a Jewish supremacist ideology. This is Netanyahu's vision for Israel: an ethno-religious, free-market state in permanent conflict with its neighbours, sowing destruction wherever it extends its reach This dynamic is now visible amid the conflict with Iran, with multiple documented cases where Jewish Israelis have denied Palestinian citizens - and even foreign workers - access to bomb shelters during missile attacks. This is Netanyahu's vision for Israel: an ethno-religious, free-market state in permanent conflict with its neighbours, sowing destruction wherever it extends its reach, while actively destabilising the surrounding region. Ironically, this echoes Israel's critiques of Iran. Those Israelis who do understand the consequences of this war are already feeling them. The financial impacts range from damage to private property, to the broader repercussions of shutting down Israel's civilian economy and transitioning to an emergency economy, in which only essential businesses and institutions continue to operate. On one hand, this creates economic uncertainty and mounting concern; on the other, it is happening under psychological pressure and a genuine fear of Iranian missile attacks. Temporary stability Although the Israeli economy continues to show resilience, Israeli analysts are warning that this stability is temporary. If Israel does not return to its doctrine of short, decisive wars, its financial resources will be depleted, and the economy will suffer long-term damage. While the number of Iranian missiles that have successfully struck Israeli territory is relatively small, each impact brings serious consequences, rendering entire residential blocks uninhabitable. In the Israeli context, where the real-estate market is among the most expensive in the world, even limited damage carries outsized economic implications. On a personal level, I can attest to a real and unfamiliar fear of Iranian missiles - a fear that neither Palestinian citizens of Israel nor Jewish Israelis have experienced before. It is producing widespread panic and deep concern. The Turkish public asks: After Israel's attack on Iran, are we next? Read More » Many families are now homeless, yet still saddled with mortgage debt. So when reports emerged of Israelis attempting to flee to Cyprus via private yachts, it came as no surprise. The fantasy of sipping espresso in Tel Aviv while Gaza burns has collapsed. Living in a messianic state that wages perpetual war carries psychological and financial costs, even for those who once enjoyed its benefits. There is now a widespread belief that Netanyahu will not stop with Iran. Escalations involving Pakistan or Turkey are no longer far-fetched. Israeli think-tanks are already laying the groundwork to justify future confrontations with Ankara, portraying them as inevitable. To the rational observer, this is madness. But this is the reality of Israel today: a state that has dragged the global economy into its war games, ignited regional tensions, and invoked God to justify destruction. Secular Israelis who supported Netanyahu's wars now have the privilege of planning their escape, while Palestinians continue to pay the price - not only for Israeli policy, but for the West's enduring complicity in legitimising it. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
