Edinburgh woman sues charity and earns £8k compensation payout over 'holiday row'

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
A French woman who sued an Edinburgh charity is entitled to thousands of pounds in compensation from her former employers, a judge has ruled.
Lydia Magloire took legal action against Edinburgh non-profit Earth in Common. Edinburgh Live covered the proceedings at the Employment Tribunal in February where Ms Magloire alleged she suffered detriment due to being French, among other claims.
Employment Judge Macleod ruled that Ms Magloire should be paid "£7,642.48 by way of compensation for financial loss and injury to feelings".
The judge released his decision on June 5, dismissing the claims of racial discrimination but carrying other claims.
A report states: "The claimant's claim of indirect discrimination on the grounds of race fails, and is dismissed".
However, Judge Macleod found the respondent refused to grant Ms Magloire annual leave and warned her "if she took her holidays she would be dismissed". The report also states Ms Magloire "was dismissed because she raised a protected disclosure" and "was therefore automatically unfairly dismissed".
At the Edinburgh Employment Tribunal, Ms Magloire claimed she was 'humiliated' by the company on the basis of her English proficiency. She also claimed one of her managers had a 'strong Aberdeen accent' that was 'hard to understand'.
Representing herself at the tribunal, Ms Magloire alternated between answering questions in English and speaking through an interpreter.
She became involved with the organisation as a volunteer in 2019, eventually beginning employment at the charity in 2021 as a coordinator. Her employment was terminated on August 21, 2023. The court heard that Earth in Common dismissed Ms Magloire for 'unsatisfactory performance,' which she contested.
The court heard Earth in Common dismissed Ms Magloire due to 'unsatisfactory conduct'. The charity claimed Ms Magloire refused to engage with email correspondence, lead workshops, and she booked an extended holiday without approval during one of the charity's busiest months in 2023.
Ms Magloire contested that her performance was unsatisfactory, claiming Ms Murray was aware of her intention to take holiday and that she booked the trip prior to her leave being approved to secure cheaper tickets.
She told the court she was 'surprised' by her dismissal as she thought that she was doing a 'great job' in her role. She acknowledged her English speaking and writing was not the best but she was improving her proficiency.
Ms Magloire added: 'I was very sad. I invested myself a lot in the company. I was totally destroyed emotionally.'
Ms Magloire secured new employment at the Edinburgh Zoo in December 2023 where she works 37.5 hours per week as a groundskeeper. She now earns more income than when she was employed at Earth in Common, where she worked 26 hours per week.
Earth in Common was founded in 2013 by Evie Murray in an effort to give locals access to outdoor spaces in an urban environment. It repurposed unused land at the northern extremity of Leith Links into community crofts. The charity also runs a cafe and farm shop, which sells local produce. It regularly holds community events focusing on skill-building, exercise, and mental wellbeing.
Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community her e and get the latest news sent straight to your messages.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Times

39 minutes ago

• Times

I tried the Japanese loo taking the world by storm

During the Nineties, bidets were seen as the ultimate bathroom status symbol for those with enough space and a desire for cleanliness. However, with the French plumbing fixture never quite taking off, it appears an increasing number of Britons wanting to take their bathroom hygiene to the next level are now looking to Japan. Bathroom retailers are citing an increase in demand for Japanese lavatories, which has in part been put down to an heightened awareness for personal hygiene due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Ilter Gokceoglu, director of Specifo, a bathroom shop in Mortlake, southwest London, said demand for toilets made by the Japanese manufacturer Toto had risen significantly since the pandemic as hygiene became 'more important to people'. Gokceoglu said: 'In the past these toilets have simply been a luxury toy for rich people and every rich person has wanted to have them in their bathroom as a status symbol.' But Gokceoglu claimed that had changed as people were drawn to the functionality of the toilets, which are increasingly seen as a status symbol among the middle classes, many of whom have travelled to Japan or stayed in plush Asian hotels. • 23 of the world's best luxury holiday destinations Toto's 'smart' lavatories come equipped with an auto-flush, a heated seat and a lid that opens and closes at the press of a button. The company's top-of-the-range models, such as their Neorest washlet, even include a lamp to assist those struggling to find the light switch during a late-night bathroom trip. As I sat on a Toto toilet seat in a showroom in Battersea, I found the seat was more comfortable than most office chairs and could be heated to a temperature of your choice. Inside all of Toto's loos there is a piece of apparatus named a wand from which water is squirted at an intensity of your choosing. It also has a deodorant spray for those really wanting to freshen up at the click of a button. Specifo, which entered the UK market in 2009 and supplies luxury hotels in London, has sold 50 per cent more smart lavatories in the past year than in the previous year, Gokceoglu said. He estimates that more than half of luxury hotels in London now have Toto washlets in their guest rooms. Louise Ashdown, the in head of design at West One Bathrooms, which has ten showrooms across London and the southeast, said the more people travelled and went to luxury resorts, such as the ones depicted in the HBO series The White Lotus, the 'more people were inspired to get the toilets in their own bathrooms'. • How to get the White Lotus look in your home Ashdown said Toto's lavatories had become an 'aspirational product', as they could be purchased for as little as £2,000, with the more expensive models costing between £12,000 and £14,000. In the same way the vacuum cleaner became synonymous with Hoover and, later, Dyson, people have begun to use Toto as shorthand for referring to a washlet toilet, Ashdown said. 'People want to have a spa feeling at home and even just a heated seat to sit on when they get up for the toilet in the middle of the night,' Ashdown said. However, there are also far cheaper options for people who want some of the functionality without the premium price tag. Generic seats with built in washlets that fit to a conventional lavatory and are easily attached to the existing plumbing are available from online retailers for about £100.

BBC News

42 minutes ago

• BBC News

From £11m to £100m - how has Liverpool's record spending changed?

They say you get what you pay for - and Liverpool will be hoping that rings true in the case of Florian is understood the initial fee for the 22-year-old will be a £100m, and with that Wirtz becomes the Reds' club record is a badge that has been held by club captain Virgil van Dijk since he joined for £75m from Southampton in January praised for their shrewd business in recent years, it is not a regular occurrence for Liverpool to go out and break the bank to secure a the arrival of Wirtz, since 2000 the Reds have set a new club record on seven occasions, so how has that spending evolved?Emile Heskey - £11m in 2000The striker was the first club record signing after the turn of the century when he joined from Leicester for £11m - the third most expensive player in English football at the was a long-standing pursuit of Heskey for Liverpool but it proved worth it with the England international scoring 60 goals in 223 appearances and securing five medals before leaving for Birmingham City in Cisse - £14m in 2004Four years after the signing of Heskey, the Reds broke their club record by £3m to bring in another forward in Cisse from French side then 22-year-old suffered serious bad luck with injuries during his time at Anfield. However, he did still feature 79 times in two years and scored 24 also scored a crucial penalty in Liverpool's Champions League final shootout with AC Milan in Torres - £20m in 2007In a running theme, it was another striker three years later that would increase the club's record signing by £6m with the arrival of Torres from Atletico Spaniard became adored by Reds during his time on Merseyside, before an acrimonious £50m exit to Premier League rivals Chelsea in January his four years, he played 142 times and scored an impressive 81 Carroll - £35m in 2011Once again, the Reds brought in a number nine and broke the club record by £15m when signing Andy Carroll from Newcastle following the exit of signing a five-and-a-half-year deal, it was a somewhat ill-fated time at Anfield for Carroll. He made just 58 appearances and netted 11 goals before making a loan move in 2012 and then permanent switch to West Ham in Keita - £48m in 2017It would be six years before Liverpool would break their record again, this time spending £48m (plus a reported undisclosed premium) to secure the signature of Keita from RB Leipzig - a year before he would officially arrive in were big expectations on the midfielder, but injuries hampered his time with the Reds - 129 appearances across five years - but he still came away with multiple winners' van Dijk - £75m in 2018It was a big-spending 12 months for Liverpool when they smashed their club record by £27m with the signing of Van Dijk from Southampton a year after was also a then world record fee for a defender and former Newcastle striker Alan Shearer said at the time the Netherlands international was "not worth it at all".However, 319 appearances and nine pieces of silverware later, it is safe to say it has been a Wirtz - £100m in 2025It has taken seven years for the Reds to break their own record again, but they will do that with only time will tell whether it will go down as one of the success stories or relative disappointments.

The Independent

an hour ago

• The Independent

The success of a key NATO summit is in doubt after Spain rejects a big hike in defense spending

The success of a key NATO summit hung in the balance on Friday, after Spain announced that it cannot raise the billions of dollars needed to meet a new defense investment pledge demanded by U.S. President Donald Trump. Trump and his NATO counterparts are meeting for two days in the Netherlands from next Tuesday. He insists that U.S. allies should commit to spending at least 5% of gross domestic product, but that requires investment at an unprecedented scale. Trump has cast doubt over whether the U.S. would defend allies that spend too little. Setting the spending goal would be a historic decision. It would see all 32 countries invest the same amount in defense for the first time. Only last week, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte expressed confidence that they would endorse it. But in a letter to Rutte on Thursday, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez wrote that 'committing to a 5% target would not only be unreasonable, but also counterproductive.' 'It would move Spain away from optimal spending and it would hinder the (European Union's) ongoing efforts to strengthen its security and defense ecosystem,' Sánchez wrote in the letter, seen by The Associated Press. Spain is not entirely alone Belgium, Canada, France and Italy would also struggle to hike security spending by billions of dollars, but Spain is the only country to officially announce its intentions, making it hard to row back from such a public decision. Beyond his economic challenges, Sánchez has other problems. He relies on small parties to govern, and corruption scandals have ensnared his inner circle and family members. He's under growing pressure to call an early election. In response to the letter, Rutte's office said only that 'discussions among allies on a new defense investment plan are ongoing.' NATO's top civilian official had been due to table a new proposal on Friday to try to break the deadlock. The U.S. and French envoys had also been due to update reporters about the latest developments ahead of the summit but postponed their briefings. Rutte and many European allies are desperate to resolve the problem by Tuesday so that Trump does not derail the summit, as he did during his first term at NATO headquarters in 2018. Budget boosting After Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, NATO allies agreed that 2% of GDP should be the minimum they spend on their military budgets. But NATO's new plans for defending its own territory against outside attack require investment of at least 3%. Spain agreed to those plans in 2023. The 5% goal is made up of two parts. The allies would agree to hike pure defense spending to 3.5% of GDP. A further 1.5% would go to upgrade roads, bridges, ports and airfields so that armies can better deploy, and to prepare societies for future attacks. Mathematically, 3.5 plus 1.5 equals Trump's 5%. But a lot is hiding behind the figures and details of what kinds of things can be included remain cloudy. Countries closest to Russia, Belarus and Ukraine have all agreed to the target, as well as nearby Germany, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands, which is hosting the June 24-25 summit. The Netherlands estimates that NATO's defense plans would force it to dedicate at least 3.5% to core defense spending. That means finding an additional 16 billion to 19 billion euros ($18 billion to $22 billion). Supplying arms and ammunition to Ukraine, which Spain does, will also be included as core defense spending. NATO estimates that the U.S. spent around 3.2% of GDP on defense last year. Dual use, making warfighting possible The additional 1.5% spending basket is murkier. Rutte and many members argue that infrastructure used to deploy armies to the front must be included, as well as building up defense industries and preparing citizens for possible attacks. 'If a tank is not able to cross a bridge. If our societies are not prepared in case war breaks out for a whole of society approach. If we are not able to really develop the defense industrial base, then the 3.5% is great but you cannot really defend yourselves,' Rutte said this month. Spain wanted climate change spending included, but that proposal was rejected. Cyber-security and counter-hybrid warfare investment should also make the cut. Yet with all the conjecture about what might be included, it's difficult to see how Rutte arrived at this 1.5% figure. The when, the how, and a cunning plan It's not enough to agree to spend more money. Many allies haven't yet hit the 2% target, although most will this year, and they had a decade to get there. So an incentive is required. The date of 2032 has been floated as a deadline. That's far shorter than previous NATO targets, but military planners estimate that Russian forces could be capable of launching an attack on an ally within 5-10 years. The U.S. insists that it cannot be an open-ended pledge, and that a decade is too long. Still, Italy says it wants 10 years to hit the 5% target. Another issue is how fast spending should be ramped up. 'I have a cunning plan for that,' Rutte said. He wants the allies to submit annual plans that lay out how much they intend to increase spending by. The reasons for the spending hike For Europe, Russia's war on Ukraine poses an existential threat. A major rise in sabotage, cyberattacks and GPS jamming incidents is blamed on Moscow. European leaders are girding their citizens for the possibility of more. The United States also insists that China poses a threat. But for European people to back a hike in national defense spending, their governments require acknowledgement that the Kremlin remains NATO's biggest security challenge. The billions required for security will be raised by taxes, going into debt, or shuffling money from other budgets. But it won't be easy for many, as Spain has shown. On top of that, Trump has made things economically tougher by launching a global tariff war — ostensibly for U.S. national security reasons — something America's allies find hard to fathom.