US Helps Israel Shoot Down Barrage of Iranian Missiles
AP file photo
The future USS Thomas Hudner, a U.S. Navy destroyer named after Korean War veteran Thomas Hudner, during christening ceremony at Bath Iron Works in Bath, Maine, April 1, 2017. The ship was commissioned, Dec. 1, 2018 in Boston.
WASHINGTON (AP) — American air defense systems and a Navy destroyer helped Israel shoot down incoming ballistic missiles Friday that Tehran launched in response to Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and top military leaders, U.S. officials said.
The U.S. has both ground-based Patriot missile defense systems and Terminal High Altitude Air Defense systems in the Middle East capable of intercepting ballistic missiles, which Iran fired in multiple barrages in retaliation for Israel's initial attack.
A Navy destroyer in the eastern Mediterranean Sea also shot down Iranian missiles heading toward Israel, one official said.
The United States also is shifting military resources, including ships, in the Middle East in response to the strikes.
The Navy directed the destroyer USS Thomas Hudner, which is capable of defending against ballistic missiles, to begin sailing from the western Mediterranean Sea toward the eastern Mediterranean and has directed a second destroyer to begin moving forward so it can be available if requested by the White House, U.S. officials said.
American fighter jets also are patrolling the sky in the Middle East to protect personnel and installations, and air bases in the region are taking additional security precautions, the officials said.
The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to provide details not yet made public or to discuss ongoing operations.
President Donald Trump met with his National Security Council principals Friday to discuss options.
The forces in the region have been taking precautionary measures for days, including having military dependents voluntarily depart regional bases, in anticipation of the strikes and to protect personnel in case of a large-scale response from Tehran.
Typically around 30,000 troops are based in the Middle East, and about 40,000 troops are in the region now, according to a U.S. official. That number surged as high as 43,000 last October amid the ongoing tensions between Israel and Iran as well as continuous attacks on commercial and military ships in the Red Sea by the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen.
The Navy has additional assets that it could surge to the Middle East if needed, particularly its aircraft carriers and the warships that sail with them. The USS Carl Vinson is in the Arabian Sea — the only aircraft carrier in the region.
The carrier USS Nimitz is in the Indo-Pacific and could be directed toward the Middle East if needed, and the USS George Washington just left its port in Japan and could also be directed to the region if so ordered, one of the officials said.
Then-President Joe Biden initially surged ships to protect Israel, a close U.S. ally, following the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks by Hamas that launched the war in Gaza. It was seen as a deterrent against Hezbollah and Iran at the time.
On Oct. 1, 2024, U.S. Navy destroyers fired about a dozen interceptors in defense of Israel as the country came under attack by more than 200 missiles fired by Iran.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
4 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
How Japan could benefit from demise of USAID at Elon Musk's hands
Comment It should leverage the soft power it has cultivated for years in Asia Both U.S. President Donald Trump, right, and billionaire Elon Musk have expressed skepticism toward foreign aid, but they may be underestimating its value and effectiveness in global politics. © Reuters TORU TAKAHASHI TOKYO -- In just four months at the helm of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) through May, tech billionaire Elon Musk inflicted serious damage on key government agencies and undermined broader U.S. strategic interests. Among the most consequential moves was the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), long a cornerstone of American engagement with the developing world.
Yomiuri Shimbun
6 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Japan, ROK Expected to Deepen Future-Oriented Cooperation; Nations on Equal Economic Footing, Share Common Challenges
Japan and South Korea marked the 60th anniversary of the normalization of their diplomatic relations on Sunday. The two countries once interacted as an industrialized country and a developing country, but they have now become equal partners, on par with each other in economic terms. They are also facing common challenges, including the drastically changing international situation and populations that are rapidly graying with chronically low birthrates. It will be essential for Japan and South Korea to deepen their future-oriented cooperation while carefully dealing with historical issues that could trigger conflicts. 'There are many fields in which we can cooperate by sharing knowledge. We want to further broaden the areas for Japan-South Korea cooperation and pass the baton of cooperation to future generations,' Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said at a ceremony in Tokyo on Thursday to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the normalization of diplomatic ties. Ishiba referred to regional revitalization and measures to address the low birthrate, issues on which he is focusing. The prime minister called on South Korea to work together on issues where the two countries share common interests, apparently in consideration of the fact that South Korea's President Lee Jae-myung, who took office earlier this month, is promoting a pragmatic approach by focusing on practical benefits. South Korea was one of the poorest countries in the world following the Korean War. However, it managed to achieve high economic growth, known as the 'Miracle on the Hangang River,' partly due to the normalization of diplomatic ties with Japan. The Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea and The Agreement on the Settlement of Problems concerning Property and Claims and on Economic Cooperation between Japan and the Republic of Korea were both signed on June 22, 1965. Via these agreements, the two countries acknowledged that the issue of claims between them had been settled, under the premise that Japan would provide South Korea with economic cooperation worth $500 million — about twice the size of South Korea's national budget at that time — establishing the foundation of later Japan-South Korea relations. Currently, the two countries have about the same level of gross domestic product per capita. In the field of semiconductors, Japan has advantages in materials and manufacturing equipment while South Korea has strengths in production, making the two countries increasingly mutually dependent. Japan and South Korea also share the problem of a poor working environment for women, which is considered one of the factors behind the low birthrate in both countries. Japan ranked 118th among 148 countries in the Global Gender Gap Report by the World Economic Forum, while South Korea stood at 101st. 'Complimentary partners' President Lee reportedly expressed a sense of crisis over his country's low birthrate when he met Koichi Aiboshi, a former Japanese ambassador to South Korea, in December 2021. '[South Korea] has spent a considerable amount of budgetary funds on measures to counter the low birthrate, but the situation has failed to see any progress,' Lee reportedly said. He also told Aiboshi that he would like to find out what is done in other countries to use them as references. 'To collaborate with President Lee, who is focusing on the economy, it will be important to explore specific cases for cooperation,' Aiboshi said. In a congratulatory video message for an event held in Seoul on June 16 to mark the anniversary of diplomatic relations, Lee said, 'South Korea and Japan are key partners who must cooperate closely in responding to a rapidly changing global landscape.' In his first summit meeting with Ishiba in Canada later in the week, Lee also said Japan and South Korea are 'complimentary partners.' South Korea experienced a political vacuum for about six months due to the impeachment and removal of former President Yoon Suk Yeol. It is an urgent task for the country to respond to the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff measures and demand to increase defense spending as well as a military alliance between Russia and North Korea. Like Japan, South Korea relies on energy imports, and stability in the East and South China Seas and the Middle East is directly linked with its economy. According to Japan's Defense Ministry officials, the ministry examined a plan to provide maintenance work in Japan for South Korea's F-35 fighters, as a symbol of improved bilateral ties during the rule of former President Yoon's administration. In the Asia-Pacific region, maintenance bases for F-35 jets are located only in Japan and Australia. South Korea is cautious about defense equipment cooperation with Japan, so it currently has to take its F-35 fighters to Australia for maintenance. Changing public opinion South Korea's political left wing, which supports President Lee's administration, is strict about historical issues and tends to be conciliatory to China and North Korea. Therefore, Japan remains wary of the new administration. However, in an opinion poll conducted by South Korean's Korea JoongAng Ilbo this month regarding the country's diplomatic relations with Japan, 49.6% of respondents sought future-oriented cooperation in such fields as the economy, technology, security and the environment. This exceeds the 31.5% who sought the resolution of historical issues. The groundwork is nearly completed to take cooperation between the two countries to a new level.
Japan Today
7 hours ago
- Japan Today
Nations react to U.S. strikes on Iran with calls for diplomacy
This satellite image provided by Maxar Technologies shows vehicles at Fordo enrichment facility in Iran on Thursday, June 19, 2025. (Maxar Technologies via AP) By Associated Press The U.S. strike on Iran fueled fears that Israel's war with Tehran could escalate to a wider regional conflict, and other countries began reacting Sunday with calls for diplomacy and words of caution. President Donald Trump had said Thursday that he would decide within two weeks whether to get involved. In the end, it took just days, and Washington inserted itself into Israel's campaign with its early Sunday attack. It remained unclear early on how much damage had been inflicted, but Iran had pledged to retaliate if the U.S. joined the Israeli assault. Some have questioned whether a weakened Iran would capitulate or remain defiant and begin striking with allies at U.S. targets scattered across the Gulf region. Here is a look at reactions from governments and officials around the world. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said that Lebanon needs to stay away from any possible regional spillover from the conflict. 'It is increasingly important for us to adhere strictly to the supreme national interest, which is the need to avoid Lebanon being ... drawn into the ongoing regional confrontation in any way,' Salam said in a post on X. U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres said he was 'gravely alarmed' by the use of force by the United States. 'There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control – with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world,' he said in a statement on the social media platform X. 'I call on Member States to de-escalate.' 'There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy.' New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters urged 'all parties to return to talks.' He wouldn't tell reporters Sunday whether New Zealand supported President Trump's actions, saying they had only just happened. The three-time foreign minister said the crisis is 'the most serious I've ever dealt with" and that it was 'critical further escalation is avoided.' 'Diplomacy will deliver a more enduring resolution than further military action,' he said. A flash commentary from China's government-run media asked whether the U.S. is "repeating its Iraq mistake in Iran.' The online piece by CGTN, the foreign-language arm of the state broadcaster, said the U.S. strikes mark a dangerous turning point. 'History has repeatedly shown that military interventions in the Middle East often produce unintended consequences, including prolonged conflicts and regional destabilization,' it said, citing the American invasion of Iraq in 2003. It said a measured, diplomatic approach that prioritizes dialogue over military confrontation offers the best hope for stability in the Middle East. South Korea's presidential office held an emergency meeting on Sunday to discuss the potential security and economic ramifications of the U.S. strikes. National security director, Wi Sung-lac, asked officials to coordinate closely to minimize any negative impacts on South Korea, emphasizing that the top priority is ensuring the safety of the South Korean people and the continuation of their stable daily lives, according to the presidential office. Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba was expected to hold a meeting with key ministers Sunday afternoon to discuss the impact of the U.S. strikes, according to Japan's NHK television. Japan's largest-circulation newspaper Yomiuri is distributing an extra edition on the attack in Tokyo. Australia, which shuttered its embassy in Tehran and evacuated staff Friday, pushed for a diplomatic end to the conflict. 'We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security,' a government official said in a written statement. 'We note the U.S. President's statement that now is the time for peace.' 'The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy.' © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
