Eradicating docks effectively before first-cut silage
Over the past two years – due to the wet, late spring weather – the opportunity to control docks in silage ground has proven difficult.
However, this year's earlier spring offers farmers the opportunity to control dock-infested silage swards over the next couple of weeks.
Where docks prove problematic in fields closed for first-cut silage, there are sizeable advantages in getting rid of them before the silage is cut.
And when it comes to product selection, nothing beats DoxstarPro, the specialist translocated herbicide for docks, distributed by Whelehan Crop Protection.
Even a moderate infestation of docks will cut dry matter yield by at least a tonne per acre, significantly impairing the quality of pit and baled silage.
As well as boosting both yield and quality, a pre-harvest application of DoxstarPro will also ensure a clean, productive sward for a second cut of silage or grazing.
Containing two powerful actives – triclopyr and fluroxypyr – DoxstarPro delivers the most effective kill of the dock root system, which can be up to a metre deep. It is also highly effective on dandelions and chickweed.
The ideal time to spray is two to four weeks after nitrogen is applied, when docks are at the perfect stage for an effective kill.
The optimum results are achieved when docks are actively growing, are 15-25cm (6-10in) high or across and before a seed head appears.
When the plant starts to produce seeds, more nutrients are translocated up the plant. Therefore, less chemical is taken down to the roots, which leads to a reduction in long term control.
The key requirement is to wait a minimum of three weeks after DoxstarPro is applied before cutting the silage. This ensures that the chemicals get fully translocated into the root system, which is vital in achieving long-term control
Docks compete with grass for light, nutrients, and moisture, thus reducing grass yields. They have only 65% of the feed value of good grass and are generally unpalatable to livestock.
Docks are a long-term problem and therefore require a long-term solution.
As well as reducing yield, docks can lead to a decline in silage quality through poorer fermentation. In addition, dock stems inflict serious damage to the quality of baled silage through puncturing of the film.
The benefits of eliminating docks and other weeds before silage is cut are unquestionable.
In addition to higher dry matter yield and better quality, it will also ensure a clean, productive sward for subsequent grazing or a second silage cut. That's why farmers should choose DoxstarPro.
DoxstarPro
DoxstarPro contains two powerful actives, triclopyr and fluroxypyr;
It works powerfully on docks and is highly effective on chickweed and dandelions;
Best results are achieved when docks are actively growing, are 15-25cm (6-10in) high or across and before a seed head appears;
Leave at least three weeks between spraying and silage harvesting;
DoxstarPro should be applied at a rate of 2L/ha as a single application or two applications of 1L/ha six to 12 months apart.
Tackling chickweed
Chickweed. Image source: TP Whelehan
Common chickweed seems to be a growing problem in silage and grazing swards.
It appears to be a particular problem in swards that were tightly grazed. This results in chickweed seeds being disturbed.
The seeds germinated during the autumn and continued to grow during the relatively mild winter and spring. Where chickweed is the dominant weed in a silage sward, Envy – a herbicide for broad-leaved weed control in grassland – is the product of choice.
Mouse-eared chickweed is also a problem, particularly in recently re-seeded swards. It differs from common chickweed as it contains many tiny hairs on the leaves, which can prevent the spray droplets reaching the plant leaf cuticle.
Because of the combination of active ingredients and its formulation type, Envy is particularly effective on mouse-eared chickweed.
Proclova XL: a dock controlling solution
ProClova XL is a clover-safe herbicide which kills key weeds in established grassland enabling farmers to build and preserve clover populations for lengthier periods;
Where clover needs to be retained, Proclova XL offers a solution to controlling docks;
Use at 125gr/ha + 250ml/ha (1 pack = 2 hectares). Again the ideal timing is when docks are 15-25cm high or across and in the rosette stage, and ensure there is active growth;
Proclova XL also controls buttercups, dandelions, plantains, and hogweeds in grassland.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Outlander' prequel 'Blood of My Blood' renewed for Season 2
June 23 (UPI) -- The Outlander prequel, Outlander: Blood of My Blood, has been renewed for a second season ahead of its planned Season 1 premiere on Aug. 8. Production on the episodes began Monday in Scotland, Starz announced. Blood of My Blood follows the love stories of Ellen MacKenzie (Harriet Slater) and Brian Fraser (Jamie Roy), and Julia Moriston (Hermione Corfield) and Henry Beauchamp (Jeremy Irvine). The two couples are the parents of Outlander lovers Jamie (Sam Heughan) and Claire (Caitriona Balfe). "The passion and talent our cast and crew have poured into Outlander: Blood of My Blood has been extraordinary and we're thrilled to continue these epic love stories in Season 2," Matthew B. Roberts, showrunner and executive producer, said in a statement Monday. "Just as audiences fell in love with Jamie and Claire, we hope viewers will be enamored by these new couples when they meet them this summer."
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Q&A: Pulitzer Prize winner Robin Givhan chronicles Virgil Abloh's rise to fashion fame
NEW YORK (AP) — With his calm and cool demeanor, fashion disruptor and multi-hyphenate Virgil Abloh artfully challenged the fashion industry's traditions to leave his mark as a Black creative, despite his short-lived career. In the years since his 2021 death at just 41, his vision and image still linger. Pulitzer Prize-winning writer Robin Givhan sheds new light on how Abloh ascended the ranks of one of the top luxury fashion houses and captivated the masses with her latest book, 'Make It Ours: Crashing the Gates of Culture with Virgil Abloh.' In the book out Tuesday, Givhan documents Abloh's early life growing up as the son of Ghanaian immigrants in Rockford, Illinois, his days as graduate student studying architecture and his working relationship and friendship with Kanye West. Before taking the helm of Louis Vuitton as the house's first Black menswear creative director, Abloh threw himself into his creative pursuits including fine art, architecture, DJing and design. Abloh remixed his interests with his marketing genius and channeled it into fashion with streetwear labels like Been Trill and Pyrex Vision. These endeavors were the launchpad for his luxury streetwear label Off-White, known for its white diagonal lines, quotation marks, red zip ties and clean typeface. Off-White led to Abloh's collaboration with Ikea, where he designed a rug with 'KEEP OFF' in all-white letters and also with Nike where he deconstructed and reenvisioned 10 of Nike's famous shoe silhouettes. Throughout his ventures, Abloh built a following of sneakerheads and so-called hypebeasts who liked his posts, bought into his brands and showed up in droves outside his fashion shows. Social media made Abloh accessible to his fans and he tapped into that. Off-White had built a loyal following and some critics. Givhan, a Washington Post senior critic-at-large, openly admits that she was among the latter early on. Givhan said she was fascinated that Abloh's popularity was more than his fashion. 'For me, there was something of a disconnect really,' she said. 'That here was this person who had clearly had an enormous impact within the fashion industry and outside of the fashion industry, and yet it wasn't really about the clothing. It was about something else.' For her latest project, Givhan spoke with The Associated Press on how she approached each of Abloh's creative undertakings and his legacy during a period of heightened racial tension in America. This interview has been edited for brevity and clarity. AP: Tell me why you felt it was important to include the context of what was happening at the time Abloh was growing up as well as on his rise up through the fashion industry, with him ultimately ending up at Louis Vuitton. GIVHAN: Fashion doesn't just sort of happen in a vacuum. People are the product of their parents, their family, their environment, their timing, their interests, all of those things. I always like to see, what is swirling around people when they make certain decisions? What is sort of in the water that you're absorbing, that you are not even conscious that you're absorbing it. AP: Can you talk about the process of writing about all of his creative endeavors and how they shaped his career? GIVHAN: The skater culture — in part because it was such a sort of subculture that also had a very specific aesthetic and was such a deep part of the whole world of streetwear — and then the DJing part intrigued me because so much of his work as a designer seems to reflect a kind of DJ ethos, where you're not creating the melody and you're not creating the lyrics. You're taking these things that already exist and you're remixing them and you're responding to the crowd and the crowd is informing you. And so much of that, to me, could also be used to describe the way that he thought about fashion and the way that he designed. AP: What role would you say that Virgil has had in the fashion industry today? GIVHAN: He certainly raised the question within the industry of what is the role of the creative director? How much more expansive is that role? ... And I do think he has really forced the question of how are we defining luxury? Like what is a luxury brand? And is it something that is meant to sort of have this lasting impact? Is it supposed to be this beautifully crafted item? Or is it really just a way of thinking about value and beauty and desirability? And if it's those things, then really it becomes something that is quite sort of quite personal and can be quite based on the community in which you live. AP: How did he use social media to his advantage and to help catapult his career? GIVHAN: He really used social media as a way of connecting with people as opposed to just sort of using it as kind of a one-way broadcast. He was telling his side of things, but he was also listening to other people. He was listening to that feedback. That's also what made him this larger-than-life person for a lot of people, because not only was he this creative person who was in conversation with fans and contemporaries, but he was this creative person inside. He was this creative person at the very top of the fashion industry. For a lot of people, the idea that you could ostensibly have a conversation with someone at that level, and they would seemingly pull back the curtain and be transparent about things — that was really quite powerful. AP: You write about his relationship to Kanye in the book. Were you able to get any input from him on their relationship for the book? GIVHAN: Their individual ambitions, aesthetic ideas and curiosity kind of propelled them forward in separate directions. I did reach out to Kanye after a lot of the reporting because he obviously is this thread that is woven throughout the book. And, ultimately, he elected not to engage. But I was lucky enough to get access to an unpublished conversation that Virgil had had around, I think it was 2016-ish, where he talked at length about his working relationship with Kanye and sort of the differences between them and the similarities and the ways in which ... Kanye inspired him and sort of the jet fuel that he got from that relationship. More than anything, because Virgil's personality was in so many ways kind of the opposite of Kanye's, that for every door that Kanye was kind of pounding on, Virgil was able to politely sort of walk through. AP: Why do you think his legacy continues to persist? GIVHAN: For one, he had such an enormous output of work. I think there's a lot of it to consider. Also, sadly, because his career was cut so short that there is this sense of someone who sort of stops speaking mid-sentence. I've been thinking about how Virgil might have responded, how his creativity might have responded to this moment because so much shifted post-George Floyd that like this is another inflection point and it makes me wonder, 'OK, how would he have responded today?' And with the person who said, 'I'm not a rebel and I'm not a flame thrower,' would he have picked up some matches? I don't know.
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
ASEAN stonewalling FTA review, 9 rounds done: Official
The 10-member ASEAN has stonewalled the review of its free trade pact with India, a critical demand of New Delhi as it seeks to balance its trade with the bloc. The ASEAN-India Trade in Goods Agreement (AITIGA), came into effect in 2010, is currently under review. India has been demanding a review of the pact to eliminate barriers and its misuse. The review is aimed to be completed this year. 'Diplomatically, the relations are very good but why should our industry suffer? It's the anguish of the Indian industry as nine rounds have happened and the Asean have stonewalled the progress,' said an official. Last week, commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal slammed the ASEAN describing several countries in the region as a 'B team of China' and the trade pact with the bloc 'silly'. Asean, or the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, comprises Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. India's goods exports to the ASEAN shrank 5.4% on-year in FY25 to $38.96 billion while rose 5.6% to $84.16 billion. 'India's exports have doubled but imports trebled since the pact. There is a whopping 26 times increase in imports,' said an official. The AITIGA is being reviewed as India seeks to eliminate barriers and misuse of the trade pact. Concerns have also been raised about routing of goods to India from third countries especially China through Asean members by taking the duty advantages of the agreement. India had opened 71% of tariff lines while Indonesia opened only 41%, Vietnam 66.5%, and Thailand opened 67%, said another official. As per the official, subsidised goods from a third country were found to be dumped until India levied anti-dumping duty. Similarly, India cracked down on dumping of steel imports via Safeguard duty as the melt-and-pour clause was not a part of the AITIGA.
