House Passes Trump's ‘One Big Beautiful Bill', Here's What It Means For Student Loan Forgiveness And Repayment

In the early hours of May 22, House Republicans passed President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill," a sweeping package of tax breaks and spending cuts passed after an all-night session. The 1,000-page bill, which narrowly passed 215-214 at dawn, carries significant implications for student loan forgiveness and repayment. Tucked within the multitrillion-dollar legislation are dramatic changes to federal student aid: A complete overhaul of income-driven repayment plans, a new Repayment Assistance Plan, new caps on borrowing, and more. GOP leaders hail these reforms as overdue fixes to a broken system that will save taxpayers billions, while critics warn the bill raises costs for students to fund tax cuts elsewhere.
Under the House GOP plan, the spaghetti bowl of income-driven repayment plans would be simplified to just two choices for future borrowers. Gone would be programs like PAYE, ICR, and the Biden administration's contested SAVE plan, all eliminated in favor of a simplified system. Starting July 1, 2026, new federal student loan borrowers would have only a Standard Repayment Plan with fixed payments over 10 to 25 years, or the new Repayment Assistance Plan, which ties payments to income. This means the menu of IDR options borrowers have grown accustomed to over the past decade would be largely wiped away.
House Education Committee Chairman Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) argues this streamlining is needed to fix a system "littered with incentives that push tuition prices upward," according to NPR. By contrast, Democrats like Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.) say the GOP remedy would "increase costs for colleges and students" and then use "so-called 'savings' to pay for more tax cuts for the wealthy." Republicans project over $330 billion in savings from the education provisions alone, signaling how central the student loan changes are to fund the bill's broader agenda.
RAP is the centerpiece of the GOP's student loan overhaul, billed as a single, simpler, income-driven plan for 40 million borrowers. Your monthly payment under RAP is tied to your income on a sliding scale. Borrowers will pay a small percentage of their total income, between 1% and 10% depending on their earnings, with lower earners paying less and higher earners paying more.
RAP fixes a major pitfall of earlier income-driven plans: Accruing interest that makes balances balloon over time. Under RAP, if a borrower's payment doesn't fully cover the monthly interest, the government waives the remaining interest. This means borrowers will no longer see their loan balances grow just because they can't afford full interest each month, a feature hailed as ending the cycle of negative amortization.
With these borrower safeguards comes a longer timeline. RAP extends the repayment term to a maximum of 360 qualifying payments before any remaining balance is forgiven, a full 5 to 10 years longer than today's IDR plans, which promise forgiveness after 20 or 25 years. For many graduate borrowers with large balances, the extra years mean they'll likely pay off their debt in full before hitting the forgiveness mark under RAP, effectively receiving no forgiveness. Another limitation is that once a borrower opts into RAP, they cannot switch to another plan later. This one-way door could give some borrowers pause before committing to RAP's rules long-term.
Beyond repayment plans, Trump's bill imposes significant new limits on student borrowing and aid. For the first time, federal student loans would face aggregate caps: undergraduates could borrow a maximum of $50,000 total, graduate students up to $100,000, and professional students up to $150,000. These caps aim to prevent students from accumulating six-figure debts but could also push students who hit the limit toward private loans. The bill eliminates the Grad PLUS loan program. 'We know that private loans have much less protections… The more we push folks out of the federal market and into the private market, the less borrowers have safeguards if things go wrong," warns Aissa Canchola Bañez of the Student Borrower Protection Center to NPR.
Several other noteworthy changes would reshape federal aid:
In sum, these measures seek to curb how much students can borrow and put schools on notice for their graduates' outcomes. But they also risk making it harder to finance degrees: Graduate students, for instance, may need to find private loans once federal loans hit the new cap, likely at higher interest and with no forgiveness safety net.
Public Service Loan Forgiveness, the program that forgives student debt for nonprofit and government workers after 10 years, isn't directly altered in the House bill's education section. However, a late provision in the broader package could indirectly put PSLF at risk for many borrowers. In the tax portion of Trump's bill, House Republicans inserted a clause giving the Treasury Department unilateral authority to revoke the tax-exempt status of any 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization it deems supporting terrorism. Crucially, if a nonprofit employer were stripped of its 501(c)(3) status under this law, employees of that organization would instantly lose eligibility for PSLF since the program requires working for a nonprofit or public employer.
The House-passed Big Beautiful Bill now heads to the Senate, where its overall fate will be decided. However, significant changes appear unlikely when it comes to the student loan provisions. Republicans are advancing the package via budget reconciliation, meaning it only needs a simple majority in the Senate. With the GOP holding the chamber and eyeing the bill's $4.9 trillion tax cuts and spending priorities, party leaders likely have little appetite to remove the education cuts that help pay for it.
The savings from the student loan reforms, estimated at over $300 billion, are financing other parts of Trump's agenda. If senators watered down the loan provisions, they'd have to plug a large budget hole elsewhere.
Therefore, aides suggest that the core student loan measures will remain largely intact through Senate negotiations. Some tweaks are possible, but observers note that Republicans view these education changes as both good policy and fiscal necessity. "Bottom line, it's time to fix this broken cycle… that leaves students worse off than if they never went to college," Rep. Walberg said of the plan to Business Insider, signaling the party's commitment to seeing it through.
A new student loan forgiveness and repayment regime is likely on the horizon. If enacted, current federal loan borrowers would see significant changes by 2026, and future borrowers would face a very different landscape of college financing. Income-driven repayment will become less generous on paper but more predictable; forgiveness will be rarer but delivered in trickles along the way.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Fast Company

15 minutes ago

• Fast Company

Employee support shouldn't start at the breaking point

Burnout has become an escalating crisis in the modern workplace. As many as 57% of workers experience the negative impacts of work-related stress and burnout, driven by overwhelming amounts of work, not enough resources, and economic uncertainty. This isn't just an employee well-being issue—it's a business issue. Burnout erodes engagement, drives turnover, and drains productivity, on average costing companies approximately 15% to 20% in payroll. The mistake most organizations make is waiting too long to step in and help. Support often arrives after someone is already overwhelmed, grieving, or emotionally checked out. We need resilient systems if we want resilient teams—teams that can adapt, recover, and perform through disruption. This starts with replacing or supplementing reactive gestures, such as an employee assistance program (EAP) hotline, leave of absence, or wellness webinars, with infrastructure that consistently supports people through the complexity of real life, not just their workloads. Resilience isn't just about helping people recover from a crisis—it's about recognizing the full spectrum of life's disruptions, both big and small. Sometimes it's a tragedy. But just as often, it's transition: a cross-country move, a parent's declining health, a child's wedding, or the quiet pressure of managing too much for too long. These moments don't always come with a formal request for help, which is why reactive support models fall short. A truly resilient organization builds systems that assume people will need support and shifts from episodic support to an embedded support system. Instead of waiting for someone to raise their hand, it proactively puts structures in place that meet employees where they are—before, during, and after change. The most effective organizations are proactively integrating support into how they operate, communicate, and lead for employee well-being. Examples include: Life navigation services that help employees manage major transitions, like caregiving, end-of-life planning, or financial and legal challenges after a death in the family. Peer-based support networks, including trained mental health allies or employee resource group leads who are visible, accessible, and empowered to connect teammates to help. Crisis-aware leadership trained to ask deeper questions, spot warning signs, and create space for people to step back, recover, or reset without penalty. Flexible infrastructure to help employees respond to the unpredictable—from school closings to elder care needs—without disrupting their livelihood. Proactive use of people analytics to spot patterns of burnout or disengagement and identify support gaps early to intervene before they compound. But programs alone aren't enough. The signs that someone needs support are often subtle, and burnout rarely begins with a dramatic breakdown. It starts with small changes—a high performer who goes quiet in meetings, a team member who starts logging on late, or a leader who suddenly misses details they wouldn't have missed before. In high-performing cultures, people may not admit or vocalize that they're struggling. Employees need to feel comfortable trusting that it's safe to ask for help before they reach a breaking point. And that trust is shaped by what leaders model, what behaviors are rewarded, and how organizations respond when life inevitably interrupts work. That's why culture matters just as much as infrastructure. Culture tells employees whether they can actually use the resources that exist. You can have the best support offerings in the world, but if you don't normalize using them or employees worry they'll be penalized for needing help, none of it matters. Resilience is built when leaders model vulnerability, teams normalize checking on one another, and support becomes part of everyday work, not just a once-a-year initiative. So, ask yourself: Do your people know where to go when life throws something big at them? Do your leaders know how to respond when it does? Are you building a culture that helps people reset, not just perform? FINAL THOUGHTS Too often, we talk about resilience as if it lives entirely within the individual. But in any organization, it's shared—a balance of what the company provides and what the employee brings. It's the organization's responsibility to create an environment where asking for help is safe, support is accessible, and care is embedded in how work gets done. It's the individual's responsibility to show up with awareness, to use what's available, and to keep growing through what life brings. The companies that will thrive in the next chapter are the ones building systems and cultures that reflect that truth. Because support shouldn't start at the breaking point—it should already be there.

Bloomberg

15 minutes ago

• Bloomberg

FICO to Offer Credit Scores Including Buy-Now, Pay-Later Data

FICO is introducing two credit scores that incorporate buy-now, pay-later data, underscoring how significant a part of the consumer credit landscape the popular and controversial installment plans have become. The company will offer the products — FICO Score 10 BNPL and FICO Score 10 T BNPL — later this year, it said in a statement Monday. The scores will help lenders make more accurate decisions about consumer creditworthiness, especially for those who borrow for the first time using the payment plans, FICO said.

Skift

17 minutes ago

• Skift

Travel Industry's Quiet AI Talent Wars Are Heating Up

A job-posts deep-dive shows how cruise lines, hotels, theme parks, and OTAs are staffing up for an AI future. Every so often, a single LinkedIn job ad says more about strategy than a 40-page 10-K. Last week I dove into AI listings across travel, decoding four that reveal how the biggest brands are reorganizing around machine intelligence. Together they form a breadcrumb trail from C-suite power moves to nuts-and-bolts product work. We're calling this new series Skift AI Talent Tracker. Think of it as a recurring, detective-style column, scouring hiring boards for the real story behind corporate press releases about AI developments: raw signals, a quick take, and why it matters for the people who move the industry. Below are four companies with my brief analysis, based on their recent LinkedIn job postings. 1. Royal Caribbean | A Quiet Chief AI Officer Promotion Royal Caribbean Group quietly promoted Matthew Denesuk, Ph.D., to Chief AI Officer, according to his LinkedIn profile, one of the first roles of its kind in travel. Can't wait to see how this plays out. We have RC Group CEO Jason Liberty on stage at Skift Global Forum 2025 in September; you can bet this will come up. Who else among large or mid-cap public travel companies has hired a Chief AI Officer or equivalent? The only other ones I know are Brand USA, who put Janette Roush in that seat months ago, already ahead of the curve. 2. Universal Orlando | Theme-Park Test Lab Theme parks are perfect AI sandboxes, closed, sensor-rich, and guest-dense. Universal Orlando Resort is hiring a head of AI, and it looks like they're just starting to explore its potential (presumably GenAI): 'The Director of Artificial Intelligence provides end-to-end technical leadership for AI and automation initiatives across the enterprise, navigating organizational vision, directing advanced ML solutions, and aligning AI efforts with broader strategic goals.' 3. Marriott | Betting Big on a Single AI Messaging Brain Found this fascinating job posting from Marriott International, and you can read the tea leaves about their AI strategy. It's hiring a Senior Director of Engineering & Architecture to lead the design of a centralized messaging platform orchestrating guest communications across call centers, hotel front desks, web chat, mobile apps, WhatsApp, SMS, iMessage, and more. This centralized approach contrasts sharply with lots of small experiments happening at other chains, aligning precisely with what Marriott CTO Naveen Manga hinted at our Skift Data + AI Summit when he emphasized efficiency through centralization. Here's another intriguing twist: it's a temporary but full-time position. My guess? Marriott wants to rapidly build this infrastructure without navigating the internal approval red tape needed for permanent executive headcount. At $68–$112 an hour (~$142K–$232K/year before benefits), that's solid senior-tech money for hospitality. All in all, fascinating. 4. Priceline | Penny Gets a Full-Stack Makeover Everyone assumes Booking Holdings is all-in on as its AI flagship, attracting most resources and attention. But here's a surprise: Priceline is quietly staffing four heavyweight roles to build out Penny, its AI travel assistant most people haven't even heard of: Senior PM, AI Experiences – builds orchestration layer, memory & reasoning (mini-AutoGPT for travel). – builds orchestration layer, memory & reasoning (mini-AutoGPT for travel). Staff Multimodal Product Designer – gives Penny voice, chat, touch & vision. – gives Penny voice, chat, touch & vision. Senior PM, Mobile AI – makes Penny feel native on iOS/Android, not bolted on. – makes Penny feel native on iOS/Android, not bolted on. Senior PM, Conversational AI – fine-tunes personality, prompts, and emotional tone. That's the whole stack: brains, face, body, and soul. Why Priceline? Being the underdog might give it room to experiment freely. By incubating a standalone AI concierge in the lighter-regulation U.S. market, Priceline can iterate quickly and quietly ship innovations that later flow upstream to its larger Dutch sibling. Whatever the reason, Priceline is positioning itself as a quiet product lab for AI in travel. Worth watching, not because it's flashy, but because they're actually building something real. For now, that's it. Follow the job ads and you'll spot travel's next big bets months before the official announcement. Cruises, parks, hotels, OTAs – they're all converging on one reality: AI talent is now the toughest first-class upgrade to snag on a transatlantic red-eye. Keep watching Skift AI Talent Tracker; the future of travel is being written one job requisition at a time.