Dundee University: Damning report says financial crisis 'self-inflicted'
A damning report into Dundee University has said the financial collapse that led to a government bailout was caused by a "self-inflicted" failure of its oversight system.The independent report said university bosses and its governing body failed multiple times to identify the worsening crisis and continued to overspend instead of responding.It said the problems should have been clear to senior members of the university that its financial position "was worse than presented".Prof Iain Gillespie, who resigned as the university's principal in December, was said to have had an "overbearing leadership style" and a dislike of potentially awkward confrontations or questioning.
The report said he frequently demonstrated hubris - or excessive pride - in his role, which it said can lead to a contempt towards people who offer criticism and obsession with personal image and status. Prof Gillespie stood down weeks after he had told staff that job losses were "inevitable" in order to tackle a "significant deficit".He blamed "an extremely challenging period" for the UK higher education sector.It later emerged that the university had a £35m blackhole in its funding and it had to be bailed out with £22m from the Scottish government.The Scottish Funding Council then commissioned an investigation into why the university's financial position deteriorated so suddenly.The independent report, led by Prof Pamela Gillies, found the main causes included poor financial judgement from university bosses and weak governance from the university court, which is meant to hold senior management to account.The report found that almost £40m of ringfenced money had been spent elsewhere and there had been "a lack of real action" to address an £8m "hole" due to a fall in international student recruitment.It said those in charge of the university's governance should have known well before November last year that there was a problem.There were numerous points where "a reasonable person" could have reached a judgement that the university's financial position was worse than presented, it said.It then detailed the occasions when those overseeing the finances failed to challenge executives on the gap between rapidly falling income and continued high spending.The report stated: "The failure of the university's financial governance system was self-inflicted and experienced multiple times and at multiple levels."This led to a failure in identifying the worsening situation and not responding early enough."
Fall in overseas students
According to the report the university had a £33.7m increase in revenue in the year to July 2023, mainly driven by growth in international students and an increase in research income.However, year-on-year recruitment of overseas postgraduate students then fell from 1,230 to 393.The report said that the university needed to make £8m of savings in 2024 due to this fall in overseas recruitment, but that nothing had been done to address the "inevitable outcome".It said this "set the university up for failure" in the 2025 financial year.The report added that this should have signalled "an immediate change" in the 2024 budgets and operations.It added: "Despite this decline in student numbers and resultant impact on revenues, the university did not make significant cost reductions, notably around staff costs which account for about 60% of total costs."Instead, a message from Prof Gillespie was circulated to staff and students on 1 March 2024, which said that the university had improved its resilience, allowing it to "invest in our strength and continuing on a path of growth".The report noted: "This set the tone within the university for investment and growth at a time when savings should have been rapidly implemented."It added: "This was at a time when the Principal was aware that there was an £8m "hole" in the (2024 financial year) budget. "There were no plans in place to deliver savings necessary to move into a surplus position."
'Significant concerns from staff'
The report said that despite a fall in student numbers, there was an internal failure to control costs, stating: "There is little evidence that budgets were meaningfully updated to reflect changing circumstances."The report said that Prof Gillespie resisted "difficult conversations" and that "few dared to speak truth to power", with women in particular finding it difficult to be heard.It noted: "Female members of staff in particular, reported being spoken over, side-lined or discussed in public as being obstructive if they attempted to be heard."The report said that it was apparent there were "significant concerns" from staff in relation to income, expenditure and capital spending, but the true picture "was never put together in one place".The university's current principal Shane O'Neill was previously deputy vice chancellor and is identified along with Prof Gillespie, the chief operating officer and the director of finance as one of the bosses who "did not cultivate a culture of openness and challenge at all levels". The report said greater scrutiny, challenge and curiosity should have been forthcoming and "would reasonably have exposed the worsening situation".It noted: "There was no unexpected event or culmination of unexpected events beyond those impacting the sector as a whole. The university was not 'different'."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Nuno Espirito Santo signs new contract but Nottingham Forest appear to make gaffe in statement announcing it
NOTTINGHAM FOREST appeared to make a major gaffe in their announcing of Nuno Espirito Santo's new contract. Forest, surprisingly, announced a new deal for their Portuguese gaffer early on Saturday morning. 3 3 3 The former Porto and Spurs boss has inked a new three-year deal at the City Ground, although you wouldn't have known it if you looked at the Midlands club's website. Eagle-eyed fans spotted that Forest had mistakenly stated that Nuno inked an "x-year deal" in their statement announcing the new contract. A snippet of the club's official statement read: " Nottingham Forest is delighted to announce that Nuno Espírito Santo has signed a new contract with the Club. "The Forest Head Coach has been handed a new x-year deal by owner Evangelos Marinakis ahead of the 2025/26 campaign." Nuno, 51, is over the moon to have extended his stay at the City Ground, which is set to host UEFA Conference League football this coming season. He said: "I am delighted to be able to continue our journey at this fantastic football Club. 'Since we arrived at Forest, we have worked extremely hard to create a special bond between the players, the fans and everyone at the Club, which helped us achieve great things last season. "I would like to thank our owner, Mr. Marinakis, for his constant support and backing. JOIN SUN VEGAS: GET £50 BONUS "It is important to me to share a strong relationship with our ownership and we have thoroughly enjoyed working together ever since I arrived at Forest. 'Now is the time to work harder than ever as we strive for more special memories together.' Marinakis said of the new deal: "Nuno has made a great impact and performed very well during his time with us so far. 'He has demonstrated that he maximises player performance and is an expert at developing players, whilst also embedding our young talent into the first team set-up. 'We enjoy a strong and solid relationship together and, above all, we share the same dream and ambition of writing a new history for Nottingham Forest, competing in the Premier League and in Europe and winning trophies for our great club!' Forest will kick off their Premier League season on Saturday, August 17, away to Brighton. The Tricky Trees will play the first leg of their Conference League play-off on August 21.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
HS2 boss took home £4.5m during ‘appalling mess' of project
The former chief of HS2 took home £4.5 million of taxpayers' money while presiding over an 'appalling mess' of a project that wasted billions. Mark Thurston was at the helm of the disgraced scheme for six and a half years before leaving in September 2023 and then becoming chief executive of Anglian Water. He has been banned by ministers from receiving a bonus at the water company for the last financial year because it was found to have polluted our rivers. While at HS2, Thurston's pay ranged from £585,000 to £676,000 a year including bonuses and other taxable benefits. During his time at the government-owned company he took home £4,449,977. He joined HS2 in 2017, shortly after parliament signed off the building of the project's first phase. He previously worked on the 2012 London Olympics and Crossrail, now the Elizabeth Line, the heavily delayed new railway through central London. Thurston's oversight of HS2 was put under the spotlight this week when his successor's initial findings into the failures of the project were published. Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, told the Commons on Wednesday that the scheme had become an 'appalling mess' after years of mismanagement. She said: 'It gives me no pleasure to deliver news like this. Billions of pounds of taxpayers' money has been wasted by constant scope changes, ineffective contracts and bad management.' Mark Wild, who took over the running of HS2 in December last year, has been carrying out a root and branch review of the scheme in an bid to stem ballooning costs and restore proper oversight. Wild's salary will be declared in accounts published this summer although his base salary is said to be lower than Thurston's. The project was originally due to cost £32.7 billion — in 2011 prices — with the first leg between London and the Midlands opening in late 2026. The pared-back scheme could now cost more than £100 billion. In a letter to Alexander, published on Wednesday, Wild said: 'The position I have inherited in HS2 Ltd is unacceptable; the organisation has failed in its mission to control costs and deliver to schedule.' It was announced that Thurston, 58, was leaving HS2 in July 2023. He said the project was the 'highlight of my career', adding: 'I have agreed with the board that someone else should lead the organisation and programme through what will be another defining period for HS2.' His appointment to Anglian Water, which he joined in July last year, caused much comment, not least because of government criticisms of the financial stewardship of HS2. Responding in November last year, he told The Times: 'If customers want to challenge my appointment, all I can say is that it was a very thorough and comprehensive process. 'The board clearly thought I was a good fit. They have to account for that and only time will tell whether it was a good appointment.' Transport bosses are traditionally the highest paid public servants in the country, with those in the rail industry in particular receiving the biggest remuneration packages. The last time the Cabinet Office reported on senior civil service pay was in 2023 with figures for the previous year. The list was not updated in 2024 by the Conservatives before the election. It revealed that the 45 highest paid staff at HS2 had a combined pay packet of £8.9 million. Of the top 20 best paid, only six still work at the company three years later. It is understood that many senior executives left the company after Rishi Sunak cancelled the northern leg of the project in October 2023. A spokesman for HS2 Ltd said: ' Mark Wild is leading a comprehensive reset of HS2 to ensure the project can be delivered for the lowest reasonable cost. This includes reviewing and simplifying the structure of HS2 Ltd itself — putting more focus on front-line delivery of the railway and bearing down on unnecessary costs. 'This year, we have frozen pay and withheld all bonuses for staff in the highest grades at HS2 Ltd.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Rantzen warns peers not to hamper progress of assisted dying law
Assisted dying campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen has urged members of the House of Lords not to block landmark legislation on the issue. The Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday, but opponents have vowed to continue their resistance in the unelected chamber. The legislation could face a difficult passage through the Lords, with critics poised to table amendments to add further restrictions and safeguards to the Bill. Dame Esther told BBC Radio 4's Today: 'I don't need to teach the House of Lords how to do their job. They know it very well, and they know that laws are produced by the elected chamber. 'Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose. 'So yes, people who are adamantly opposed to this bill, and they have a perfect right to oppose it, will try and stop it going through the Lords, but the Lords themselves, their duty is to make sure that law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons who have voted this through.' Dame Esther, who turns 85 on Sunday and has terminal cancer, acknowledged the legislation would probably not become law in time for her to use it and she would have to 'buzz of to Zurich' to use the Dignitas clinic. Paralympian and crossbench peer Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson told BBC Breakfast: 'We're getting ready for it to come to the Lord's and from my personal point of view, about amending it to make it stronger. 'We've been told it's the strongest Bill in the world, but to be honest, it's not very high bar for other legislation. 'So I do think there are a lot more safeguards that could be put in.' Conservative peer and disability rights campaigner Lord Shinkwin said the narrow Commons majority underlined the need for peers to take a close look at the legislation. He told Today 'I think the House of Lords has a duty to expose and to subject this Bill to forensic scrutiny' but 'I don't think it's a question of blocking it so much as performing our duty as a revising chamber'. He added: 'The margin yesterday was so close that many MPs would appreciate the opportunity to look at this again in respect of safeguards as they relate to those who feel vulnerable, whether that's disabled people or older people.' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who steered the Bill through the Commons, told the PA news agency she hoped peers would not seek to derail the legislation, which could run out of parliamentary time if it is held up in the Lords. She said: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.' A group of 27 Labour MPs who voted against the legislation said: 'We were elected to represent both of those groups and are still deeply concerned about the risks in this Bill of coercion of the old and discrimination against the disabled, people with anorexia and black, Asian and minority ethnic people, who we know do not receive equitable health care. 'As the Bill moves to the House of Lords it must receive the scrutiny that it needs. Not about the principles of assisted dying but its application in this deeply flawed Bill.' Meanwhile, one of the leading opponents of the Bill, Conservative Danny Kruger, said 'these are apocalyptic times'. In a series of tweets on Friday night, the East Wiltshire MP – who is at odds with his mother, Great British Bake Off judge Dame Prue Leith in her support for legalisation – accused assisted dying campaigners of being 'militant anti-Christians' who had failed to 'engage with the detail of the Bill'.
