Baidu says domestic tech will shield AI push from US curbs

Live Events
China's Baidu said on Wednesday U.S. export controls on semiconductors would not significantly impact its AI development, citing access to domestic alternatives.The dominant search engine in China also reported first-quarter revenue that exceeded analysts' expectations, boosted by growing demand for its AI cloud services "Domestically developed chips and increasingly efficient homegrown software will form a strong foundation for long-term innovation in China's AI ecosystem," Baidu Vice President Shen Dou told analysts on a conference call.The comments come as U.S. export restrictions on advanced semiconductors took effect last month, effectively blocking sales of Nvidia's H20 chips designed for the Chinese market.The stance echoes comments from rival Tencent Holdings, whose executives said existing stockpiles of AI chips would shield the company from U.S. export controls.Total revenue in the first quarter rose 3% to 32.45 billion yuan ($4.50 billion), beating analysts' average estimate of 30.9 billion yuan, according to data compiled by LSEG.Revenue at Baidu's online marketing business, which contributes the majority to the company, fell 6% to 17.31 billion yuan. Analysts had estimated 17.39 billion yuan.However its non-online marketing revenue reached 9.4 billion yuan, up 40% year-over-year, mainly driven by its AI cloud business.The company reported profit of 21.59 yuan per American Depositary Share, compared with profit of 14.91 yuan per share a year earlier.Baidu has intensified its focus on AI in recent years to reduce its dependence on advertising revenue from its core search engine business.In early 2023, the company was among the first to launch a chatbot following Microsoft-backed OpenAI's release of ChatGPT in late 2022.Despite this early advantage, Baidu's Ernie large-language model faces fierce competition from Chinese firms such as startup DeepSeek, which shook up the AI landscape earlier this year.In response, Baidu eliminated fees for its premium chatbot services in April and introduced two new AI models in March - the reasoning-focused Ernie X1 and Ernie 4.5. The company upgraded these offerings to "Turbo" versions the following month.Baidu's CEO Robin Li said last month that its cluster comprising 30,000 of its self-developed, third-generation P800 Kunlun chips can support the training of DeepSeek-like models.The company's U.S.-listed shares were down 0.3% in morning trading.($1 = 7.2067 Chinese yuan renminbi)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Economic Times

25 minutes ago

• Economic Times

Meesho completes India flip; PayU breaks even in FY25

Meesho has officially moved its base to India, completing its reverse flip, as per filings seen by ET. This and more in today's ETtech Top 5. Also in the letter: ■ Kamath brothers invest in InCred ■ Smartphone sales go local■ Cheap fashion, full closets Meesho concludes reverse flip process; likely to file DRHP in 2-3 weeks Sanjeev Barnwal and Vidit Aatrey, founders, Meesho Ecommerce marketplace Meesho has completed its reverse flip and shifted its domicile to India, according to filings with the Registrar of Companies reviewed by ET. Driving the news: The SoftBank-backed company secured approval from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on May 27 to proceed with its reverse flip. As part of the move, the company is expected to face a tax liability of $280-300 million in the United States. With this, Meesho joins a growing list of high-profile startups, including Groww, Razorpay, Dream Sports, Zepto and PhonePe, that have redomiciled to India in recent years. Quote, unquote: "Meesho's board met late on has approved the merger and share allotment to investors of the US entity. It is now a fully Indian company," one of the persons said. The company is expected to file its draft IPO prospectus in the next two to three weeks. Tell me more: Meesho filed for NCLT approval of the reverse merger in January. Around the same time, it closed a $550 million funding round, bringing in new investors including Tiger Global, Mars Growth Capital, and Think Investments. Meanwhile, Meesho's ecommerce rival, the Walmart-owned Flipkart, is also preparing to shift its domicile from Singapore to India ahead of a planned 2026 IPO. PayU India revenue rises 12% to Rs 4,300 crore in FY25 PayU India's payments business broke even in the second half of FY25, fuelled by stronger revenue growth from deeper penetration among existing merchants and a sharper focus on value-added services, according to its parent company, Prosus' latest annual report. Revenue growth: The company posted a 12% year-on-year rise in revenue to $498 million (approximately Rs 4,317.6 crore) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025. Total payment volume (TPV) grew 14%, led by increased activity across financial services, government, airlines, and food delivery segments. Regulatory greenlight: Earlier this year, PayU received final approval from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to operate as a payment aggregator, following in-principle clearance over a year prior. To bolster its real-time payments stack, it also acquired a 70% stake in banking tech firm Mindgate Solutions for $68 million. Holding on: The Amsterdam-based investment also stated that it was planning to delay PayU's planned 2025 listing, with its CFO Mico Marais telling Reuters that it would want to 'improve that business.' Prosus surpasses financial targets with $7.4 billion annual earnings Earlier on Monday, Dutch tech investor Prosus also posted a $179 million profit for the year ended March 31, 2025, completing a turnaround from a $118 million loss a year earlier. It reported core headline earnings of $7.4 billion for the whole year, a 47% jump from last year, beating its financial targets on the back of growth in food delivery and ecommerce. Highlight: Prosus said its ecommerce revenue rose 21% to $6.2 billion, driven by AI-led innovation and growth across Latin America, Europe and India. Also Read: Swiggy GOV growth came at cost of profitability: Prosus Sponsor ETtech Top 5 & Morning Dispatch! Why it matters: ETtech Top 5 and Morning Dispatch are must-reads for India's tech and business leaders, including startup founders, investors, policy makers, industry insiders and employees. The opportunity: Reach a highly engaged audience of decision-makers. Boost your brand's visibility among the tech-savvy community. Custom sponsorship options to align with your brand's goals. What's next: Interested? Reach out to us at spotlightpartner@ to explore sponsorship opportunities. Zerodha's Kamath brothers pick Rs 250 crore minority stake in InCred Nithin Kamath and Nikhil Kamath, cofounders, Zerodha Nithin and Nikhil Kamath, cofounders of stockbroking platform Zerodha, have acquired a minority stake in InCred Holdings, the parent company of the non-banking financial firm InCred Financial Services. The deal was executed through a share purchase worth Rs 250 crore. Setting the stage: The investment comes at a crucial juncture for InCred, which is preparing for a potential Rs 4,000-crore initial public offering (IPO). Last week, its wealth management arm, InCred Wealth, expanded into the retail broking segment by acquiring discount broking platform Stocko. Quote, unquote: 'India's credit ecosystem is changing fast—more formal, more digital, and more accessible,' said Nikhil Kamath. 'InCred Group seems to get that. They've built a strong team, a technology-first approach, and a clear view of where the market is headed.' Backstory: In 2022, InCred Finance merged with KKR India Financial Services, creating a consolidated NBFC platform. The company reached unicorn status in December 2023 after raising $60 million in a Series D round led by high-net-worth individuals, valuing it at around $1.04 billion. Smartphone brands shift focus to offline sales in smaller towns Smartphone brands are increasingly moving beyond metro cities, turning to offline retail channels in smaller towns to drive growth. This marks a clear departure from their earlier dependence on ecommerce platforms. Driving sales: Brands are targeting customers in tier-2 and tier-3 cities with easier access to financing, especially as demand for premium handsets picks up in these markets. At the same time, shipments to online retailers declined for the seventh consecutive month in April. Market trackers attribute this drop to online-first brands making a deliberate shift towards physical retail. Changing tack: With online platforms losing momentum, nearly all brands have scaled back volumes through online channels. Even those that built their presence on online platforms are now rebalancing their distribution strategies. Motorola brought down its online shipments to 64% in Q1 2025 from 82% a year ago. OnePlus also reduced its online share to 71%, compared to 85% in the same period. Xiaomi now garners 39% of its volumes from ecommerce, down from 45% in Q1 2024. Slow growth: Industry insiders say brands are increasingly aware that ecommerce penetration in India is plateauing. A large share of the country's smartphone market still depends on local retail stores, where in-person interactions and financing options often play a bigger role in purchasing decisions. Chart-ed: Fast fashion fuels closet overload A recent survey by Statista reveals a shopping trend in which both men and women often purchase clothes that they never especially women, frequently purchase clothing items from fast fashion brands. Among the surveyed countries, the United Kingdom ranks highest, with 29% of female and 17% of male respondents often buying clothes they never wear. India follows closely, with 25% of women and 18% of men reporting the same. Updated On Jun 23, 2025, 07:22 PM IST

Time of India

32 minutes ago

• Time of India

'Sound like you're familiar...': Vivek Ramaswamy counters social media user on H-1B

Vivek Ramaswamy said young people should become tradesmen as AI is taking up white collar jobs. Republican leader Vivek Ramaswamy faced flak for his recent observation on how trades will soon become the most coveted professions as ChatGPT would not be fitting pipes or replacing roof tiles. Social media users asked whether the Ohio Governor candidate would advice the same thing to his children -- to become a welder rather than pursue white collar jobs that run the risk of getting replaced by AI. "The jobs that AI could soon displace are 'white collar' ones, but ChatGPT won't be fitting our pipes or replacing our roof tiles anytime soon. Counterintuitively, that's likely to drive more young people to become welders, electricians & machine operators. 'The trades' may soon become the new professions," Vivek Ramaswamy posted. "Sounds like a good reason to end the H-1B program," one user wrote, reacting to Vivek Ramaswamy's post. H-1B is the program that allows American companies to hire from foreign countries. The H-1B issue has emerged as a contentious issue after the USCIS recently revealed that 120,141 H-1B visa applications have been selected for 2026. US tech workers started demanding the end of the H-1B programs so that Americans do not lose their jobs to their foreign counterparts. In December 2024, Vivek Ramaswamy championed a reform of H-1B programs and argued that US companies need to hire from foreign countries as US culture encourages mediocracy and therefore is not producing top talent. Now, with his argument that Americans are losing white collar jobs to ChatGPT, social media users pointed out that another option to save jobs for Americans is to end the H-1B program. "Sounds like you're familiar with my consistent view that it's a deeply flawed program that needs to be fixed or gutted," Ramaswamy replied to one user. Social media users asked whether by 'fixed' he meant more Indians in the system. When Ramaswamy ran for president, he said he would "gut" the system for H-1B worker visas if he won the White House. The current system is badly broken and it should be based on merit, not lottery, Ramaswamy earlier said.

Business Standard

33 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Global AI gap widens as compute power divides nations, economies

By Adam Satariano and Paul Mozur Graphics by Karl Russell and June Kim Last month, Sam Altman, the chief executive of the artificial intelligence company OpenAI, donned a helmet, work boots and a luminescent high-visibility vest to visit the construction site of the company's new data center project in Texas. Bigger than New York's Central Park, the estimated $60 billion project, which has its own natural gas plant, will be one of the most powerful computing hubs ever created when completed as soon as next year. Around the same time as Altman's visit to Texas, Nicolás Wolovick, a computer science professor at the National University of Córdoba in Argentina, was running what counts as one of his country's most advanced AI computing hubs. It was in a converted room at the university, where wires snaked between aging AI chips and server computers. Artificial intelligence has created a new digital divide, fracturing the world between nations with the computing power for building cutting-edge AI systems and those without. The split is influencing geopolitics and global economics, creating new dependencies and prompting a desperate rush to not be excluded from a technology race that could reorder economies, drive scientific discovery and change the way that people live and work. The biggest beneficiaries by far are the United States, China and the European Union. Those regions host more than half of the world's most powerful data centers, which are used for developing the most complex AI systems, according to data compiled by Oxford University researchers. Only 32 countries, or about 16 percent of nations, have these large facilities filled with microchips and computers, giving them what is known in industry parlance as 'compute power.' The United States and China, which dominate the tech world, have particular influence. American and Chinese companies operate more than 90 percent of the data centers that other companies and institutions use for AI work, according to the Oxford data and other research. In contrast, Africa and South America have almost no AI computing hubs, while India has at least five and Japan at least four, according to the Oxford data. More than 150 countries have nothing. Today's AI data centers dwarf their predecessors, which powered simpler tasks like email and video streaming. Vast, power-hungry and packed with powerful chips, these hubs cost billions to build and require infrastructure that not every country can provide. With ownership concentrated among a few tech giants, the effects of the gap between those with such computing power and those without it are already playing out. The world's most used AI systems, which power chatbots like OpenAI's ChatGPT, are more proficient and accurate in English and Chinese, languages spoken in the countries where the compute power is concentrated. Tech giants with access to the top equipment are using AI to process data, automate tasks and develop new services. Scientific breakthroughs, including drug discovery and gene editing, rely on powerful computers. AI-powered weapons are making their way onto battlefields. Nations with little or no AI compute power are running into limits in scientific work, in the growth of young companies and in talent retention. Some officials have become alarmed by how the need for computing resources has made them beholden to foreign corporations and governments. 'Oil-producing countries have had an oversized influence on international affairs; in an AI-powered near future, compute producers could have something similar since they control access to a critical resource,' said Vili Lehdonvirta, an Oxford professor who conducted the research on AI data centers with his colleagues Zoe Jay Hawkins and Boxi Wu. AI computing power is so precious that the components in data centers, such as microchips, have become a crucial part of foreign and trade policies for China and the United States, which are jockeying for influence in the Persian Gulf, in Southeast Asia and elsewhere. At the same time, some countries are beginning to pour public funds into AI infrastructure, aiming for more control over their technological futures. The Oxford researchers mapped the world's AI data centers, information that companies and governments often keep secret. To create a representative sample, they went through the customer websites of nine of the world's biggest cloud-service providers to see what compute power was available and where their hubs were at the end of last year. The companies were the US firms Amazon, Google and Microsoft; China's Tencent, Alibaba and Huawei; and Europe's Exoscale, Hetzner and OVHcloud. The research does not include every data center worldwide, but the trends were unmistakable. US companies operated 87 AI computing hubs, which can sometimes include multiple data centers, or almost two-thirds of the global total, compared with 39 operated by Chinese firms and six by Europeans, according to the research. Inside the data centers, most of the chips — the foundational components for making calculations — were from the US chipmaker Nvidia. 'We have a computing divide at the heart of the AI revolution,' said Lacina Koné, the director general of Smart Africa, which coordinates digital policy across the continent. He added: 'It's not merely a hardware problem. It's the sovereignty of our digital future.' 'Sometimes I Want to Cry' There has long been a tech gap between rich and developing countries. Over the past decade, cheap smartphones, expanding internet coverage and flourishing app-based businesses led some experts to conclude that the divide was diminishing. Last year, 68 percent of the world's population used the internet, up from 33 percent in 2012, according to the International Telecommunication Union, a United Nations agency. With a computer and knowledge of coding, getting a company off the ground became cheaper and easier. That lifted tech industries across the world, be they mobile payments in Africa or ride hailing in Southeast Asia. But in April, the U.N. warned that the digital gap would widen without action on AI Just 100 companies, mostly in the United States and China, were behind 40 percent of global investment in the technology, the U.N. said. The biggest tech companies, it added, were 'gaining control over the technology's future.' The gap stems partly from a component everyone wants: a microchip known as a graphics processing unit, or GPU. The chips require multibillion-dollar factories to produce. Packed into data centers by the thousands and mostly made by Nvidia, GPUs provide the computing power for creating and delivering cutting-edge AI models. Obtaining these pieces of silicon is difficult. As demand has increased, prices for the chips have soared, and everyone wants to be at the front of the line for orders. Adding to the challenges, these chips then need to be corralled into giant data centers that guzzle up dizzying amounts of power and water. Many wealthy nations have access to the chips in data centers, but other countries are being left behind, according to interviews with more than two dozen tech executives and experts across 20 countries. Renting computing power from faraway data centers is common but can lead to challenges, including high costs, slower connection speeds, compliance with different laws, and vulnerability to the whims of American and Chinese companies. Qhala, a start-up in Kenya, illustrates the issues. The company, founded by a former Google engineer, is building an AI system known as a large language model that is based on African languages. But Qhala has no nearby computing power and rents from data centers outside Africa. Employees cram their work into the morning, when most American programmers are sleeping, so there is less traffic and faster speeds to transfer data across the world. 'Proximity is essential,' said Shikoh Gitau, 44, Qhala's founder. 'If you don't have the resources for compute to process the data and to build your AI models, then you can't go anywhere,' said Kate Kallot, a former Nvidia executive and the founder of Amini, another AI start-up in Kenya. In the United States, by contrast, Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Meta and OpenAI have pledged to spend more than $300 billion this year, much of it on AI infrastructure. The expenditure approaches Canada's national budget. Harvard's Kempner Institute, which focuses on AI, has more computing power than all African-owned facilities on that continent combined, according to one survey of the world's largest supercomputers. Brad Smith, Microsoft's president, said many countries wanted more computing infrastructure as a form of sovereignty. But closing the gap will be difficult, particularly in Africa, where many places do not have reliable electricity, he said. Microsoft, which is building a data center in Kenya with a company in the United Arab Emirates, G42, chooses data center locations based largely on market need, electricity and skilled labor. 'The AI era runs the risk of leaving Africa even further behind,' Smith said. Jay Puri, Nvidia's executive vice president for global business, said the company was also working with various countries to build out their AI offerings. 'It is absolutely a challenge,' he said. Chris Lehane, OpenAI's vice president of global affairs, said the company had started a program to adapt its products for local needs and languages. A risk of the AI divide, he said, is that 'the benefits don't get broadly distributed, they don't get democratized.' Tencent, Alibaba, Huawei, Google, Amazon, Hetzner and OVHcloud declined to comment. The gap has led to brain drains. In Argentina, Dr. Wolovick, 51, the computer science professor, cannot offer much compute power. His top students regularly leave for the United States or Europe, where they can get access to GPUs, he said. 'Sometimes I want to cry, but I don't give up,' he said. 'I keep talking to people and saying: 'I need more GPUs. I need more GPUs.'' The uneven distribution of AI computing power has split the world into two camps: nations that rely on China and those that depend on the United States. The two countries not only control the most data centers but are set to build more than others by far. And they have wielded their tech advantage to exert influence. The Biden and Trump administrations have used trade restrictions to control which countries can buy powerful AI chips, allowing the United States to pick winners. China has used state-backed loans to encourage sales of its companies' networking equipment and data centers. The effects are evident in Southeast Asia and the Middle East. In the 2010s, Chinese companies made inroads into the tech infrastructure of Saudi Arabia and the Emirates, which are key American partners, with official visits and generous financing. The United States sought to use its AI lead to push back. In one deal with the Biden administration, an Emirati company promised to keep out Chinese technology in exchange for access to AI technology from Nvidia and Microsoft. In May, President Trump signed additional deals to give Saudi Arabia and the Emirates even more access to American chips. A similar jostling is taking place in Southeast Asia. Chinese and US companies like Amazon, Alibaba, Nvidia, Google and ByteDance, the owner of TikTok, are building data centers in Singapore and Malaysia to deliver services across Asia. Globally, the United States has the lead, with American companies building 63 A.I computing hubs outside the country's borders, compared with 19 by China, according to the Oxford data. All but three of the data centers operated by Chinese firms outside their home country use chips from Nvidia, despite efforts by China to produce competing chips. Chinese firms were able to buy Nvidia chips before US government restrictions. Even US-friendly countries have been left out of the AI race by trade limits. Last year, William Ruto, Kenya's president, visited Washington for a state dinner hosted by President Joseph R. Biden Jr. Several months later, Kenya was omitted from a list of countries that had open access to needed semiconductors. That has given China an opening, even though experts consider the country's AI chips to be less advanced. In Africa, policymakers are talking with Huawei, which is developing its own AI chips, about converting existing data centers to include Chinese-made chips, said Koné of Smart Africa. 'Africa will strike a deal with whoever can give access to GPUs,' he said. Alarmed by the concentration of AI power, many countries and regions are trying to close the gap. They are providing access to land and cheaper energy, fast-tracking development permits and using public funds and other resources to acquire chips and construct data centers. The goal is to create 'sovereign AI' available to local businesses and institutions. In India, the government is subsidizing compute power and the creation of an AI model proficient in the country's languages. In Africa, governments are discussing collaborating on regional compute hubs. Brazil has pledged $4 billion on AI projects. 'Instead of waiting for AI to come from China, the US, South Korea, Japan, why not have our own?' Brazil's president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, said last year when he proposed the investment plan. Even in Europe, there is growing concern that American companies control most of the data centers. In February, the European Union outlined plans to invest 200 billion euros for AI projects, including new data centers across the 27-nation bloc. Mathias Nobauer, the chief executive of Exoscale, a cloud computing provider in Switzerland, said many European businesses want to reduce their reliance on US tech companies. Such a change will take time and 'doesn't happen overnight,' he said. Still, closing the divide is likely to require help from the United States or China. Cassava, a tech company founded by a Zimbabwean billionaire, Strive Masiyiwa, is scheduled to open one of Africa's most advanced data centers this summer. The plans, three years in the making, culminated in an October meeting in California between Cassava executives and Jensen Huang, Nvidia's chief executive, to buy hundreds of his company's chips. Google is also one of Cassava's investors. The data center is part of a $500 million effort to build five such facilities across Africa. Even so, Cassava expects it to address only 10 percent to 20 percent of the region's demand for AI At least 3,000 start-ups have expressed interest in using the computing systems. 'I don't think Africa can afford to outsource this AI sovereignty to others,' said Hardy Pemhiwa, Cassava's chief executive. 'We absolutely have to focus on and ensure that we don't get left behind.'