Bail bombshell after teens allegedly storm shopping centre with machetes
Three of four people arrested over a shopping centre brawl in Melbourne were on bail at the time, including two teenagers.
Multiple people were stabbed on Sunday when a brawl broke out between about 10 people, plunging Northland Shopping Centre into lockdown.
WATCH THE VIDEO ABOVE: Two teens charged over machete brawl.
A 15-year-old and a 16-year-old were arrested at the centre.
A 20-year-old allegedly charged over the incident was allegedly already on bail, and has been bailed again.
Video footage of the incident shows one person lunging at several others with a large machete. Video footage of the incident at Northland Shopping Centre shows one person lunging at several others with a large machete. Credit: 7NEWS
The brawl was one of two major incidents across Victoria which have prompted a ban on machete sales in the state.
A woman was shot dead by police on Saturday evening when officers responded to reports of a man wielding a machete in South Melbourne.
As police were arresting the man, a car was driven at one of the officers and police responded by shooting at the car.
The female driver, aged 26, died at the scene.
On Monday morning Premier Jacinta Allan condemned the two events.
'I want to be absolutely clear that here in the state of Victoria community safety comes first and we have seen over the weekend two incidents in both South Melbourne and Northland Shopping Centre that were appalling,' she said.
'My thoughts are with everyone who has been touched by these incidents over the weekend.
'That's why we have been working incredibly hard to bring about Australia's first machete ban.
'These knives are dangerous weapons, they have no place on our streets anywhere.'
The ban on selling the dangerous weapons, which was due to start on September 1, will now be fast-tracked to begin from midday on Wednesday, Allan said.
However, the government has been criticised for banning the sale of machetes but not prohibiting the possession of the weapons.
There will also be a grace period between the ban taking effect and authorities confiscating machetes. Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan has brought forward a statewide machete ban following a violent weekend in Melbourne. Credit: AAP
Machetes are classified as a cutting-edge knife with a blade of more than 20cm.
Kitchen knives are not intended to be included in the interim ban.
The interim ban will expire when machetes are officially classified as a prohibited weapon under new legislation on September 1.
According to the state government, the ban is to 'dry up the supply' of the dangerous weapons before this date.
The premier announced the amendment of the Control of Weapons Act in March, which will prohibit the sale or possession of machetes.
An amnesty will run from September 1 to November 30 to give people time to dispose of their knives.
Secure bins will be set up throughout the state, potentially outside select police stations, where people will be able to dispose of their machetes safely.
Those caught with a prohibited weapon in Victoria could face two years in prison or a fine of more than $47,000.
Some people, including those who work in agriculture, will be able to apply for an exemption following September 1.
However, those entitled to these exemptions will not be able to buy a machete during the interim ban.
'The government acknowledges this will affect some legitimate users — but we are still proceeding with the interim sale ban to put community safety above all,' the state government said.
When asked how it would comply with the immediate ban, Bunnings director of merchandise Cam Rist said it is working with relevant stakeholders to achieve this.
'We comply with all regulatory requirements across Australia to ensure the safe and proper sale of our products.
'We're working with industry and government around reviewing the details of the ban and the products impacted.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
No easy answers to gas network 'death spiral'
Australians are embracing electrification in the name of decarbonisation, healthier homes and cheaper bills but the shift has policymakers under pressure to insulate a shrinking pool of gas users from price shock. Ron Ben-David, a former regulator who holds a professorial fellowship with the Monash Business School, describes the flight from the gas network as a "death spiral". Like a runaway train, once some households start leaving the gas network, the cost of running and maintaining it increases for those who remain, prompting even more to make the switch. And so on, and so on. While a win for electrification and cutting emissions, the death spiral has consequences, not least for renters and others who might struggle to get off gas. Even middle-income households could be challenged to stump up the hefty sums needed to replace gas heaters, ovens and stoves as gas bills continue to rise. Left unchecked, Dr Ben-David said the problem could undermine community support for the net-zero transition. "If we lose consumer support, then we can kiss the transition away," he told AAP. The stranded gas asset issue has not gone unnoticed, with governments, regulators and industry all looking for solutions Consumer and welfare groups have also been active, with Energy Consumers Australia pushing for a rule change to force developers and new customers to pay the full cost of new connections up front to stop the problem becoming even bigger. Dr Ben-David believes there are no easy solutions to what is ultimately a political decision. The debate boils down to "who pays for what", with consumers, investors and taxpayers all in play. The matter is complicated by the unusual nature of gas distribution regulation. As natural monopolies, gas network companies are not allowed to set their prices. Prices must be approved by the Australian Energy Regulator under what is often described as a "regulatory compact" that ensures investor funds are returned to them during the life of the assets. Forcing investors to cop the risk asset of stranding, therefore, allegedly amounts to a broken compact, Dr Ben-David said, making network stranding more complicated than just writing off a dud investment. For gas network companies, "accelerated depreciation" is the answer. That effectively means asking the regulator to account for the shortened life spans of their assets so they can push up customer prices in the near term to hasten the recovery of their investments. Governments could also help absorb some of the shrinking customer base costs but state and federal budgets are already under strain and bailing out gas networks could be politically contentious. Dr Ben-David has put forward another option. Under his proposed model, electricity distribution networks would underwrite the shrinking gas network. There's more to his thinking, but using income generated by electricity distribution companies - and their customers - to underwrite declining gas networks is a key element. It's based on the rationale that electricity networks would continue to expand and have long life spans in a low-carbon economy. While he concedes it is controversial to be adding to electricity prices to pay off gas networks, he argues the other options are just as unappealing. He also put the call out for better ideas, and fast. "The best time to solve a problem is before the problem takes off," he said.
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
No easy answers to gas network 'death spiral'
Australians are embracing electrification in the name of decarbonisation, healthier homes and cheaper bills but the shift has policymakers under pressure to insulate a shrinking pool of gas users from price shock. Ron Ben-David, a former regulator who holds a professorial fellowship with the Monash Business School, describes the flight from the gas network as a "death spiral". Like a runaway train, once some households start leaving the gas network, the cost of running and maintaining it increases for those who remain, prompting even more to make the switch. And so on, and so on. While a win for electrification and cutting emissions, the death spiral has consequences, not least for renters and others who might struggle to get off gas. Even middle-income households could be challenged to stump up the hefty sums needed to replace gas heaters, ovens and stoves as gas bills continue to rise. Left unchecked, Dr Ben-David said the problem could undermine community support for the net-zero transition. "If we lose consumer support, then we can kiss the transition away," he told AAP. The stranded gas asset issue has not gone unnoticed, with governments, regulators and industry all looking for solutions Consumer and welfare groups have also been active, with Energy Consumers Australia pushing for a rule change to force developers and new customers to pay the full cost of new connections up front to stop the problem becoming even bigger. Dr Ben-David believes there are no easy solutions to what is ultimately a political decision. The debate boils down to "who pays for what", with consumers, investors and taxpayers all in play. The matter is complicated by the unusual nature of gas distribution regulation. As natural monopolies, gas network companies are not allowed to set their prices. Prices must be approved by the Australian Energy Regulator under what is often described as a "regulatory compact" that ensures investor funds are returned to them during the life of the assets. Forcing investors to cop the risk asset of stranding, therefore, allegedly amounts to a broken compact, Dr Ben-David said, making network stranding more complicated than just writing off a dud investment. For gas network companies, "accelerated depreciation" is the answer. That effectively means asking the regulator to account for the shortened life spans of their assets so they can push up customer prices in the near term to hasten the recovery of their investments. Governments could also help absorb some of the shrinking customer base costs but state and federal budgets are already under strain and bailing out gas networks could be politically contentious. Dr Ben-David has put forward another option. Under his proposed model, electricity distribution networks would underwrite the shrinking gas network. There's more to his thinking, but using income generated by electricity distribution companies - and their customers - to underwrite declining gas networks is a key element. It's based on the rationale that electricity networks would continue to expand and have long life spans in a low-carbon economy. While he concedes it is controversial to be adding to electricity prices to pay off gas networks, he argues the other options are just as unappealing. He also put the call out for better ideas, and fast. "The best time to solve a problem is before the problem takes off," he said.
Sky News AU
11 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘It's got to stop': Victorian crime statistics reveal ‘rampant' uptick in offences
Sky News contributor Joe Hildebrand comments on Victorian crime statistics. 'As I keep saying, there's absolutely nothing progressive about letting crime run rampant and letting criminals onto the street,' Mr Hildebrand told Sky News host Steve Price. 'This overwhelmingly affects people in the already most socially disadvantaged suburbs, they are the ones to be far more likely victims of crime. 'It's got to stop.'
