Musk's X sues New York to block social media hate speech law
Elon Musk has described himself as a free speech absolutist. (Reuters pic)
NEW YORK : Elon Musk's X Corp sued New York today, challenging the constitutionality of a state law requiring social media companies to disclose how they monitor hate speech, extremism, disinformation, harassment and foreign political interference.
X said the law known as the Stop Hiding Hate Act violated the first amendment and state constitution by subjecting it to lawsuits and heavy fines unless it disclosed 'highly sensitive and controversial speech' that New York may find objectionable.
Deciding what content is acceptable on social media platforms 'engenders considerable debate among reasonable people about where to draw the correct proverbial line', X said.
'This is not a role that the government may play.'
The complaint filed in Manhattan federal court also quoted a letter from two legislators who sponsored the law, which said X and Musk in particular had a 'disturbing record' on content moderation 'that threatens the foundations of our democracy'.
New York attorney-general Letitia James, a Democrat who enforces the state's laws, is the named defendant in X's lawsuit.
Her office did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Musk, the world's richest person and recently a close adviser to Republican president Donald Trump, has described himself as a free speech absolutist.
He did away with the content moderation policy of Twitter, as X was previously known, after he bought the company for US$44 billion in October 2022.
New York's law requires social media companies to disclose steps they take to eliminate hate on their platforms, and to report their progress.
Civil fines could reach US$15,000 per violation per day.
The law was written by state senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal and assemblymember Grace Lee, both Democrats, with help from the Anti-Defamation League.
It was signed in December by governor Kathy Hochul, also a Democrat.
X said New York based its law on a nearly identical 2023 California law whose enforcement was partially blocked by a federal appeals court last September because of free speech concerns.
California agreed in a February settlement with X not to enforce the law's disclosure requirements.
In a joint statement, Hoylman-Sigal and Lee said they were confident a judge would uphold New York's content moderation law.
'The fact that Elon Musk would go to these lengths to avoid disclosing straightforward information to New Yorkers' shows why the law is necessary, the legislators said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘She's wrong': Trump disputes spy chief Gabbard's take on Iran's nuclear programme
WASHINGTON, June 21 — US President Donald Trump said yesterday that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was wrong in suggesting there was no evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon. Trump contested intelligence assessments relayed earlier this year by his spy chief that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon when he spoke with reporters at an airport in Morristown, New Jersey. 'She's wrong,' Trump said. In March, Gabbard testified to Congress that the US intelligence community continued to believe that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon. 'The (intelligence community) continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon,' she said. Yesterday, Gabbard said in a post on the social media platform X that: 'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalise the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.' She said the media has taken her March testimony 'out of context' and was trying to 'manufacture division.' The White House has said Trump would weigh involvement in the Iran–Israel conflict over the next two weeks. On Tuesday, Trump made similar comments to reporters about Gabbard's assessment. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has justified a week of airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military targets by saying Tehran was on the verge of having a warhead. Iran denies developing nuclear weapons, saying its uranium enrichment programme is only for peaceful purposes. In March, Gabbard also described Iran's enriched uranium stockpile as unprecedented for a state without such weapons and said the government was watching the situation closely. She also said Iran had started discussing nuclear weapons in public, 'emboldening nuclear weapons advocates within Iran's decision-making apparatus.' A source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters the March assessment presented by Gabbard has not changed. The source said US spy services judged it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could hit a target of its choice. David Albright, a former UN nuclear inspector, questioned the revised view offered by Gabbard yesterday, estimating it would take Iran at least six months to produce a crude nuclear 'device' that could not be delivered by a missile. To produce a nuclear weapon that could be delivered on target by missile would take Iran at least one to two years, said Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security. Trump has frequently disavowed the findings of US intelligence agencies, which he and his supporters have charged — without providing proof — are part of a 'deep state' cabal of US officials opposed to his presidency. Gabbard, a fierce Trump loyalist, has been among the president's backers who have aired such allegations. The Republican president repeatedly clashed with US spy agencies during his first term, including over an assessment that Moscow worked to sway the 2016 presidential vote in his favour and his acceptance of Russian President Vladimir Putin's denials. — Reuters
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘She's wrong': Trump disputes spy chief Gabbard's take on Iran's nuclear program
WASHINGTON, June 21 — US President Donald Trump said yesterday that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was wrong in suggesting there was no evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon. Trump contested intelligence assessments relayed earlier this year by his spy chief that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon when he spoke with reporters at an airport in Morristown, New Jersey. 'She's wrong,' Trump said. In March, Gabbard testified to Congress that the US intelligence community continued to believe that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon. 'The (intelligence community) continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon,' she said. Yesterday, Gabbard said in a post on the social media platform X that: 'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalise the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.' She said the media has taken her March testimony 'out of context' and was trying to 'manufacture division.' The White House has said Trump would weigh involvement in the Iran–Israel conflict over the next two weeks. On Tuesday, Trump made similar comments to reporters about Gabbard's assessment. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has justified a week of airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military targets by saying Tehran was on the verge of having a warhead. Iran denies developing nuclear weapons, saying its uranium enrichment programme is only for peaceful purposes. In March, Gabbard also described Iran's enriched uranium stockpile as unprecedented for a state without such weapons and said the government was watching the situation closely. She also said Iran had started discussing nuclear weapons in public, 'emboldening nuclear weapons advocates within Iran's decision-making apparatus.' A source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters the March assessment presented by Gabbard has not changed. The source said US spy services judged it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could hit a target of its choice. David Albright, a former UN nuclear inspector, questioned the revised view offered by Gabbard yesterday, estimating it would take Iran at least six months to produce a crude nuclear 'device' that could not be delivered by a missile. To produce a nuclear weapon that could be delivered on target by missile would take Iran at least one to two years, said Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security. Trump has frequently disavowed the findings of US intelligence agencies, which he and his supporters have charged — without providing proof — are part of a 'deep state' cabal of US officials opposed to his presidency. Gabbard, a fierce Trump loyalist, has been among the president's backers who have aired such allegations. The Republican president repeatedly clashed with US spy agencies during his first term, including over an assessment that Moscow worked to sway the 2016 presidential vote in his favour and his acceptance of Russian President Vladimir Putin's denials. — Reuters
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Tariffs, inflation and a shaky job market: US Federal Reserve split on when to cut rates
WASHINGTON, June 21 — The close split at the US Federal Reserve over whether to keep hedging against inflation risks or move forward faster with rate cuts came through yesterday in the first public comments from policymakers following a decision this week to hold borrowing costs steady for now. Rising tariffs are expected to raise inflation over the rest of the year, with a new Federal Reserve monetary policy report yesterday concluding that higher import taxes had already raised inflation for goods even if headline inflation, including services, remains weaker than expected in recent months. But Fed Governor Christopher Waller yesterday said he felt the inflation risk from tariffs was small, and the Fed should cut rates as soon as its next meeting in July, because recent price increases have been moderate while he sees some worrying signs for the job market such as a high unemployment rate among recent college graduates. 'Any tariff inflation ... I don't think is going to be that big and we should just look through it in terms of setting policy,' Waller said on CNBC's Squawk Box. 'The data the last few months has been showing that trend inflation is looking pretty good ... We could do this as early as July.' 'I'm all in favour of saying maybe we should start thinking about cutting the policy rate at the next meeting, because we don't want to wait till the job market tanks before we start cutting the policy rate,' Waller said. In a Reuters interview, Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin took a more tempered view, arguing that with inflation still above the Fed's 2 per cent target after a multi-year battle to contain it, key tariff debates still unresolved, and the unemployment rate at a low 4.2 per cent, there was no urgency to cut rates. 'Nothing is burning on either side such that it suggests there's a rush to act,' Barkin said. 'I'm not in a mood to ignore a spike in inflation were it to come ... We'll have to see if it comes. 'I'm comfortable with where we are ... Core inflation is still over target. Being modestly restrictive is a good way to address that.' San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly had what may be an in-between view, telling CNBC late yesterday a rate cut in the autumn would be 'more appropriate' than a July move unless the labour market falters. While tariffs could give rise to meaningful inflation, she said, there is 'a lot to be said' for the view that businesses will find ways not to pass higher costs on to their customers, tempering any inflation impact. The Fed should not be preemptive and needs to watch where the data goes, she said, but with data in hand showing both inflation and the job market cooling, 'we cannot wait so long that we forget that the fundamentals of the economy are moving in a direction where an interest rate adjustment might be necessary.' The job market is still solid, she said, but 'we're at a point where additional softening could turn into weakening, which I don't want to see, and we can't allow for that to happen because we're waiting for inflation to pop up just around the corner.' The Fed this week held its policy rate steady in the 4.25 to 4.5 per cent range where it has been since December. The Trump administration says the tariffs will ultimately help the US economy, and the president has demanded the Fed slash rates immediately. New Fed economic projections this week, by contrast, anticipate slower growth and higher inflation. Those projections showed policymakers overall still anticipate rate cuts later in the year, a sign they do feel tariffs will raise prices but not in a persistent way. Opinion, however, was closely divided in what Barkin called a 'bimodal' split, with seven policymakers seeing zero cuts needed this year, and eight anchoring the median at two cuts, which aligns with investors' view of quarter-point reductions at the Fed's September and December meetings. Though none of the three identified their specific rate views, their comments sketched their ongoing debate over how seriously and persistently President Donald Trump's efforts to recast global trade will influence the path of prices, jobs and growth in coming months. In a Wednesday press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell cautioned against putting too much weight on any particular outlook at this point, given how volatile the debate around trade has been and how many key decisions remain outstanding. Powell testifies in Congress on Tuesday and Wednesday of next week as part of regular semiannual hearings on monetary policy, which in this case follows a week of insults from Trump and demands to cut rates, and nervous chatter on Wall Street about the president's plans for the Fed when Powell departs next May. Powell on Wednesday seemed content to wait for more data before resuming rate cuts. 'For the time being we are well positioned to wait to learn more about the likely course of the economy before considering any adjustments to our policy stance,' Powell told reporters. — Reuters
