Delhi University panel suggests more syllabi tweaks

Delhi University's (DU) standing committee for academic affairs on Thursday recommended replacing Islamic poet-philosopher Muhammad Iqbal with Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, and medieval traveller Ibn Battuta with Mughal prince Dara Shukoh in the History department's eighth semester syllabus.
According to a committee member, the changes were proposed in a general elective paper, 'Life Narrative and History', which includes key political figures. Originally, the course featured Harsha, Battuta, Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Iqbal.
This was the third and final meeting of the committee reviewing seventh and eighth semester syllabi ahead of the first graduating batch under the four-year undergraduate programme. Committee members said the revisions align with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 framework.
Other changes reportedly include dropping the elective paper 'Cultural Transactions between India and the World', and adding Dr BR Ambedkar alongside Karl Marx in the paper 'History of Labour in Colonial and Postcolonial India'.
In political science, 'Hind Swaraj' was suggested as a new reading, while the topic of sexual division of labour and unpaid work may be removed from the paper 'Feminism: Theory and Practice', according to the committee member. The commerce department may see the removal of topics like social media marketing, rural development, and personal financial planning.
Some faculty expressed concern over the scope of these revisions. 'The standing committee is meant to review—not restructure—department syllabi,' said Rajesh Jha, former executive council member. The final decision will rest with the academic council, which meets Saturday.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

2 hours ago

• Time of India

DU Asks Quota UG Aspirants To Provide Sub-Caste Details

New Delhi: Delhi University has asked the applicants under the reserved categories to disclose their sub-caste details during registration on its Common Seat Allocation System (CSAS) portal for undergraduate admissions. In addition to selecting scheduled caste, scheduled tribe or other backward class, aspirants are required to specify their sub-caste, such as dhobi, mochi, nai, mali, kasai or fakir, among others. While the university administration has not clarified the purpose behind this move, it has triggered concerns over the need for such granular caste data during the admission process. Aspirants and faculty members have urged DU to address the concerns and ensure responsible handling of the sensitive data. Several applicants have expressed discomfort at being asked to enter their sub-caste, even after uploading valid caste certificates as required. "I found it strange. The portal already asks for the category and supporting documents. Why ask for sub-caste again? It feels intrusive," said Shivam Mourya, an OBC applicant from UP. DU has already drawn criticism this year for inaccuracies in the mother tongue section of the portal, where languages like Urdu and Bangla were initially missing. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Nhà container vận chuyển 2025 (Xem ngay) Shipping Container Homes Tìm hiểu thêm Undo In addition, Bihari and Muslim were wrongly listed as mother tongues—errors that sparked outrage among aspirants and teachers, who called them "careless" and "insensitive". In a statement issued on X on Saturday, DU said, "The University of Delhi sincerely regrets the inadvertent error in its admission form. We acknowledge your concerns and are committed to addressing them. However, attributing ulterior motives to this entirely unintentional oversight is unwarranted. We request all not to vitiate the university's diverse and harmonious environment." TOI reached out to dean-academics Haneet Gandhi for a response on the rationale behind collecting the sub-caste data, but did not receive a reply. Officials familiar with the admission process said the move could be intended to verify if applicants fall under central govt's reserved category list, which could differ from state-specific lists. However, this has not been confirmed by the university. "Asking candidates to specify their caste is unconstitutional. It is derogatory, too," said Latika Gupta, a faculty member at DU. "Education is a site of social reform through reservations, but institutions end up labelling students for accessing those opportunities. Once a student has a category certificate, nothing else should matter," she said. "With over 1,500 castes in India and significant variation across states, any such list will always be incomplete. If the university is undertaking data collection, it must declare the reasons and make disclosure voluntary," Gupta emphasised. The CSAS portal was introduced in 2022 after DU adopted Central Universities Entrance Test for its admissions. Launched afresh every year, it serves as the primary platform for aspirants to register, fill in their academic and personal details, and select preferred courses and colleges. Once CUET results are declared, seat allocation is done based on eligibility and merit.

NDTV

2 hours ago

• NDTV

"Clerical Error": Delhi University After Muslim Listed Under 'Language' On Admission Form

New Delhi: Delhi University on Saturday clarified that the listing of "Muslim" as a 'mother tongue' and the omission of Urdu from its undergraduate admission form was a "clerical error", after the move triggered widespread criticism from academics and civil society. In a statement, the university said, "The University of Delhi sincerely regrets the inadvertent error in its admission form. We acknowledge your concerns and are committed to addressing them. However, attributing ulterior motives to this entirely unintentional oversight is unwarranted. We request all not to vitiate the University's diverse and harmonious environment." The clarification came after screenshots of the application portal began circulating online, showing "Muslim" in the list of languages under the 'mother tongue' section, while Urdu -- a constitutionally recognised language under the Eighth Schedule -- was missing. The university's admission portal was briefly taken down and restored later. While DU has not yet released a detailed explanation on how the error occurred, officials claimed that the form has since been corrected and Urdu reinstated. However, the issue has sparked strong academic and political pushback, with several teachers' groups calling it more than just a technical oversight. "This is not an innocent mistake," said Abha Dev Habib, former member of DU's Executive Council. "The error reflects deep-seated biases -- conflating religion with language is not just ignorant, it's communal." Faculty members across departments echoed concerns that the incident reflects a "slippage in institutional integrity". Dr Mithuraaj Dhusiya, a member of DU's Executive Council, said, "Mistakes like these damage the university's inclusive image. Urdu is not just a language -- it is an essential part of India's cultural and literary legacy." The issue has also prompted a wider discussion about linguistic representation in higher education institutions. Rudrashish Chakraborty, a professor at Kirori Mal College, said, "The portrayal of 'Muslim' as a language suggests a worrying attempt to misrepresent India's largest minority community. Urdu is a secular language spoken by people of all faiths." Teachers also questioned the language used in the form itself. "The term 'mother tongue' is colloquial. Academic institutions should instead be using 'native language' or 'first language' for clarity," said a professor from DU's English department.

The Hindu

3 hours ago

• The Hindu

DU issues apology over UG admission form error

Delhi University (DU) issued an apology on Saturday regarding an 'inadvertent error' in its undergraduate admission form earlier this week, where names of communities and religions appeared in the language section, drawing criticism from teachers who termed it 'insensitive' and 'embarrassing'. Teachers who were critical of the move pointed out that Urdu had not been included in the UG admissions form, but 'Muslim', 'Hindu', and 'Bihari' were listed under the languages section. DU Registrar Vikas Gupta said that as soon as the issue was brought to the administration's notice, the option on the online portal was disabled. In a statement, DU said, 'The university sincerely regrets the inadvertent error. We acknowledge your concerns and are committed to addressing them. However, attributing ulterior motives to this entirely unintentional oversight is unwarranted. We request all not to vitiate the university's diverse environment.'