White House calls out Australian eSafety Commissioner for ‘censorship'
The US State Department has taken the unusual step of calling out the Australian government for 'censorship', after an anti-trans activist's posts on X were geo-blocked for being 'offensive'.
Canadian internet personality and anti-trans protester Chris Elston, better known on the internet at 'Billboard Chris', has received support from the White House while he waits for a tribunal judgment after taking the Australian government to court over its demand to have an 'offensive' post removed.
Mr Elston 49, was last year ordered by the Australian eSafety Commissioner to take down a post on X attacking a transgender activist who was hired by the World Health Organisation to draft care guidelines for trans and non-binary people.
X initially refused to take the content down but later geo-blocked it in Australia following a formal removal order from the eSafety Commissioner.
The US Department of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor published a statement on social media on Thursday saying it was 'deeply concerned' by the decision to remove the post.
'The Department of State is deeply concerned about efforts by governments to coerce American tech companies into targeting individuals for censorship,' the statement said.
'Freedom of expression must be protected – online and offline.
'Examples of this conduct are troublingly numerous. EU Commissioner Thierry Breton threatened X for hosting political speech; Türkiye fined Meta for refusing to restrict content about protests; and Australia required X to remove a post criticizing an individual for promoting gender ideology.
'Even when content may be objectionable, censorship undermines democracy, suppresses political opponents, and degrades public safety.
'The United States opposes efforts to undermine freedom of expression. As [US Secretary of State Marco Rubio] said, our diplomacy will continue to place an emphasis on promoting fundamental freedoms.'
The Australian eSafety Commissioner defended the decision to remove the post, arguing that it was 'likely … intended to have an effect of causing serious harm' and constituted 'cyber abuse', and should therefore be removed in accordance with Australia's Online Safety Act.
The eSafety Commissioner issued a 'removal notice' to Mr Elston in April last year, after he re-posted a Daily Mail article headlined 'Kinky secrets of UN trans expert REVEALED: Australian activist plugs bondage, bestiality, nudism, drugs, and tax-funded sex-change ops – so why is he writing health advice for the world body?'.
In the X post, Mr Elston added the comment: 'This woman (yes, she's female) is part of a panel of 20 'experts' hired by the @WHO to draft their policy on caring for 'trans people.'
'People who belong in psychiatric wards are writing the guidelines for people who belong in psychiatric wards.'
The decision from the tribunal is expected to be handed down in the second half of this year.
Mr Elston's bio on X says he is a 'human male who protects his kids from gender ideology. Traveling (sic) the world to stop child transition one conversation at a time'.
Since 2020, Mr Elston has gained a following of more than 500,000 users on X, where he shares videos of him standing with his signs with slogans such as 'children cannot consent to puberty blockers' in cities around the world.
The incident comes as foreign policy experts have described the relationship between the Trump administration and the Australian government as terse, following reports the President will not answer calls from the Prime Minister to negotiate 'Liberation Day' tariffs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
22 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
‘Scarce resources': AUKUS submarine sales at risk from Pentagon review
Washington | The Albanese government is being warned that a Pentagon review risks imperilling Australia's nuclear submarine ambitions if the US administration takes a hardline stance on the threat from China in the coming years. American national security experts familiar with the Trump administration, who spoke with The Australian Financial Review, viewed the most likely outcome of a 30-day review of the AUKUS pact would be a White House push for more investment from Canberra, either in its own defence hardware or for US shipbuilding facilities.
West Australian
34 minutes ago
- West Australian
AARON PATRICK: Donald Trump tries to pull off the deal of epoch, Middle East peace
Around 6pm Friday, Australian east coast time, some half-a-dozen B-2 Spirit bombers took off from Whiteman Air Force base in western Missouri for a mission that could intensify one of history's most intractable conflicts or help resolve it. The bombers' target was not the uranium Iran's Islamist regime has been enriching for potential use in a nuclear weapon, but the facilities, equipment and scientists who survived a week-long aerial blitz by Israel, according to Ran Porat, a former Israeli military intelligence analyst who monitored the early stages of Iran's nuclear program. The six B-2s that dropped a dozen 14-tonne bunker-busting bombs on Iran's heavily fortified Fordo nuclear site and the one that bombed the Natanz enrichment plant have probably set the program back at least a year, Dr Porat reckons. 'That's how it looks now,' he told The Nightly Sunday afternoon. 'The Americans don't know for sure yet. It's too early to access the damage still under the smoke of war.' Soon, perhaps within hours, the American and Israeli intelligence services will learn what damage they have wreaked. In addition to satellite and aircraft photography and atmosphere sensors, they will likely have spies who can see where cameras in the sky can't. Only then will they know if President Donald Trump's high-risk gambit to join the war has achieved its immediate objective of preventing Iran's supreme leader, Ayotallah Ali Khamenei, getting the bomb. Like many Israelis, Dr Porat hopes the survivors of the regime, exhausted, demoralised and afraid, will sue for peace. This is how experts think it could work: the United Nations or another international body supervises the dismantling of what is left of the military nuclear program (Iran has had a civilian nuclear power station since 1967). An implicit or tacit non-aggression pact with the US and Israel includes the removal of economic sanctions, allowing Iran's economy to flourish. Iran stops financing the terrorist groups Hamas and Hezbollah, which are dedicated to the destruction of Israel. As tensions settle across the Middle East, other Arab countries, led by Saudi Arabia, normalise diplomatic relations with Israel, leading to trade and cultural exchanges that help foster, eventually, long-term peace. Here is what some fear will happen: Iran's religious leaders double down on the nuclear program, and use what physical and human resources they have left to cobble together a nuclear bomb. Emboldened with possession of a mass killing machine, Iran rebuilds its terror network. American civilians and military personnel across the Middle East become targets. The region becomes even more dangerous for Americans and their allies as Iran and the US engage in tit-for-tat retaliation over years, perhaps decades. Predicting with certainty what will happen is impossible. But Mr Trump's long and often-erratic public career is that of a deal-maker rather than a warmonger. For this deal — would could be the biggest of his life — Mr Trump is being predictably unpredictable. On Friday morning, Australian time, he give Iran up to two weeks to enter negotiations. US government sources told the New York Times the B-2 bombers flew 37 hours and hit Iran at 9am AEST, Sunday. The timing indicates Mr Trump ordered the attack within 12 hours of saying he had not decided to bomb Iran. 'Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace,' he said in a recorded message, flanked by Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. 'If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier.' Making your actions difficult to anticipate can be an effective negotiating tactic. So too dropping the world's most-powerful non-nuclear weapon from Stealth Bombers. Mr Trump has done both. The world will now take a deep breath and wait for the response from ayatollahs, who have long celebrated the prospect of war with the 'Zionist entity' and the 'Great Satan'. They now have their wish.
7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
World leaders react to US attack on Iran nuclear sites
World leaders are reacting after US forces struck three Iranian nuclear sites. * OFFICE OF AUSTRALIAN PRIME MINISTER ANTHONY ALBANESE 'We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security. We note the US president's statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy.' * ISRAEL PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU 'Congratulations, President Trump. Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history ... History will record that President Trump acted to deny the world's most dangerous regime the world's most dangerous weapons.' * UN SECRETARY-GENERAL ANTONIO GUTERRES 'I am gravely alarmed by the use of force by the United States against Iran today. This is a dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge - and a direct threat to international peace and security. There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control - with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world. I call on member states to de-escalate and to uphold their obligations under the UN Charter and other rules of international law. At this perilous hour, it is critical to avoid a spiral of chaos. There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy. The only hope is peace.' * VENEZUELA FOREIGN MINISTER YVAN GIL 'Venezuela Condemns US Military Aggression Against Iran and Demands an Immediate Cessation of Hostilities. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela firmly and categorically condemns the bombing carried out by the United States military, at the request of the State of Israel, against nuclear facilities in the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan complexes.' * MEXICO FOREIGN MINISTRY 'The ministry urgently calls for diplomatic dialogue for peace between the parties involved in the Middle East conflict. In keeping with our constitutional principles of foreign policy and our country's pacifist conviction, we reiterate our call to de-escalate tensions in the region. The restoration of peaceful coexistence among the states of the region is the highest priority.' * CUBA PRESIDENT MIGUEL DIAZ-CANEL 'We strongly condemn the US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities, which constitutes a dangerous escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. The aggression seriously violates the UN Charter and international law and plunges humanity into a crisis with irreversible consequences.'
