Canada is not for sale — And neither is Neskantaga First Nation, says chief
Neskantaga First Nation Chief Gary Quisess is only six weeks into his first term, and is facing simultaneous crises in his community and in Thunder Bay. But he left home and travelled to Queen's Park today to call out what he describes as 'genocide' buried in new provincial environmental legislation.
Ontario's proposed Bill 5, the Protect Ontario By Unleashing Our Economy Act, would allow the province to designate 'special economic zones' that would qualify to bypass some environmental regulations and speed up development. It is expected to be in force as early as September, and Premier Doug Ford intends to name the proposed Ring of Fire mineral development as the first such site.
Critics say
the law would gut protections for endangered species, remove environmental protections, and trample Indigenous rights.
'The position is, Canada is not for sale, (well the same goes for) our lands and resources – period,' Quisess told Ricochet Media. 'I hear the premier saying Canada is not for sale, I hear the candidates saying Canada is not for sale. That goes for our lands and resources.'
Neskantaga, located on the Attawapiskat River, 450 kilometres northeast of Thunder Bay, has been among the most vocal First Nations in opposing the proposed Ring of Fire development. As Quisess spoke to the Toronto media on Monday, two-thirds of his community members have already spent nearly a month in Thunder Bay hotels due to a health-related state of emergency whose implications remain uncertain.
Quisess minces no words about the connection between the poor infrastructure and looming mining encroachment.
'Nobody wants to say 'genocide.' This is a genocide, that's how I look at it. You have water issues, now our health, and there's a drug pandemic. The list goes on and on. I live in the third world. I'm not ashamed to admit it.'
Quisess says he has no intention of suing Ford over inadequate consultation for the Ring of Fire, as the premier dared First Nations to do during the spring election campaign.
'I'm just going to tell him to leave. If he doesn't like it here, he can leave.'
Quisess' statements come as 176 of Neskantaga's 300 on-reserve members mark their 29th day living in Thunder Bay hotels. More than half the community has been forced into exile after their health centre flooded, and the resulting state of emergency prompted a wide-scale evacuation.
Unexpected weather leads to evacuation
On April 13, a sudden temperature jump to 12 degrees Celsius caused a rapid snow melt. Water pooled between the diesel tank and the health facility, then the basement flooded for the third consecutive year. As sump pumps failed, the thick smell of fuel hung in the air for 25 metres in every direction around the building. The tank and pipes used to power the centre had been replaced only six months ago.
A worker claimed to have found a fuel filter tipped over, but it's still undetermined whether a diesel spill has occurred or whether airborne spores from mould pose health risks. Air tests have shown acceptable levels of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide, while geotechnical testing and soil samples are expected to take three weeks.
Meanwhile, staff is moving files and equipment into a duplex home that will serve as a temporary health facility, while work crews build accessibility infrastructure.
Some community members are beginning to ask their leaders if a new facility should be built, but Neskantaga Councillor Bradley Moonias anticipates the short-term fix will have to support their needs, at least through the summer. He's surprised to find Indigenous Services Canada had no emergency plan if the health centre failed. 'There should be a plan for our people. We're remote-access. The government should have a plan in place for situations like this,' Moonias says. 'If a health facility is all-of-a-sudden deemed unsafe, there should be a plan in place on how to respond to it quickly. We're all entitled to health care.'
This emergent problem is only the latest in a series of infrastructure failures that impact nearly every aspect of life. Buildings erected in the mid-1990s when the federal government relocated the community are beginning to break down.
Quisess, Moonias and the rest of the new council took office only two weeks before the flood. Within days, the school's boiler broke down, cancelling classes for the last 10 days before the evacuation. Some road infrastructure has been washed away.
Compounding infrastructure problems, Neskantaga is the site of
Canada's longest boil-water advisory
. The experimental process used to construct the water purification plant 30 years ago has never worked, and plans for a new system are now restarting at both the capital planning and technical tables.Chief Quisess says the community moved under duress, and between all of these failed promises and infrastructure, no one has made any offer or promise of any benefit his community might get from mining.
'We were promised we were going to live healthy, that there was going to be clean drinking water. Our old community was demolished. We were forced by the government, if you don't demolish it, you're not going to get new housing,' he says. 'And they come over and do their thing and we get nothing out of it? I don't think that's right.'
Goose hunt to hotel room
Fourteen-year-old Jayla Troutlake was in her tent when the text came through that her family needed to come home from the annual spring migratory goose hunt for the evacuation. She's a self-described 'newbie' as a sharpshooter, but she's passionate about being out on the land at this time of year.Instead, she's now spending her days in her hotel room and a makeshift classroom, where highlights are getting ready for breakfast and dinner.
'It's really sad. We're staying at the hotel and there's not really much to do,' she says. 'I see elders or adults upset and it makes my heart shatter.'
Over that time, three members have gone missing. They include two 12-year-olds who didn't come home overnight and another youth with mental health challenges. All three were eventually found. Neskantaga's youngest councillor, 21-year-old Lashaunda Waswa, moved home in January to run for council because her grandfather's trapline is downriver on the land where Ring of Fire mines are proposed. Her greatest concern is for those members who are in recovery from addiction and have now spent weeks in Thunder Bay, where drugs are much more available than they are back home.
Waswa says that while most people living with complex health conditions and addictions flew out early, many in recovery had initially opted to remain behind, choosing to risk becoming sick or injured in the community over the risk of relapsing in the city. But in the end, a whole plane load chose to join their family members in Thunder Bay.
'When you have an addiction and you recover from that, it's hard to say no when you're offered more substances. Most of the people with addictions have children and most of those children are vulnerable,' she says.
Indigenous Services Canada has made funding available for mental health counsellors and Red Cross workers in both Thunder Bay and Neskantaga. 'It's exhausting but we're managing,' says Neskantaga's nurse in charge, Mark Banyai.As the health centre's flooding and testing continues and a temporary site is assembled, Banyai and his staff of two nurses are already thinking about the needs the 176 evacuated members will have when they return. Concerns like influenza and COVID are top-of-mind, and Banyai hopes the community will be well-resourced for those addictions concerns as well.'When you have somebody who has been clean for a handful of months and you put them in an environment which is full of drugs – because Thunder Bay is just full of drugs, it's ridiculous – put them in that environment and it's hard to control. I do suspect substance abuse will be an issue and when they come back. Bringing in substances may also be an issue.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
2 hours ago
- Associated Press
House of Commons passes One Canadian Economy Act
OTTAWA, ON, June 20, 2025 /CNW/ - Canada's new government has a mandate to build big, build bold, and build now. Today, the Prime Minister, Mark Carney, welcomed the passing in the House of Commons of Bill C-5, One Canadian Economy Act. The legislation will build one strong Canadian economy by: Taken together, these measures will create and connect Canadians to good-paying careers and more prosperity. The Prime Minister shared an update on this work with the premiers of the provinces and territories during their meeting earlier today. The leaders agreed to stay in close contact as they reinforce Canada's strength at home. Indigenous partnership is a critical component of this legislation, and fulsome consultation will be pivotal to the success of future projects. The Government of Canada is committed to respecting the rights of Indigenous Peoples recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 and the rights set out in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. To this end, Prime Minister Carney will be meeting with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis over the coming weeks. Bill C-5 now moves to the Senate for consideration and brings us one step closer to removing federal barriers to free trade by Canada Day. Quotes 'Today's passing of Bill C-5, One Canadian Economy Act, will remove trade barriers, expedite nation-building projects, and unleash economic growth, with Indigenous partnership at the centre of this growth. It's time to build big, build bold, and build now. As Canadians, we can give ourselves more than any foreign nation can ever take away.' — The Rt. Hon. Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada 'The adoption of Bill C-5 by the House of Commons is a crucial step in building one Canadian economy and getting big projects built faster. Thank you to colleagues who supported this legislation – you are helping build a stronger Canada.' — The Hon. Dominic LeBlanc, President of the King's Privy Council for Canada and Minister responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade, Intergovernmental Affairs and One Canadian Economy 'This legislation is about building a stronger, more united Canada. Let's build trust, tear down internal trade barriers, and create one single economy – from coast to coast to coast. Together, we're building a stronger Canada, for everyone.' — The Hon. Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Transport and Internal Trade 'I am pleased to see the One Canadian Economy Act achieve this milestone. This Act means we are no longer asking 'Why build?', but instead 'How do we get it done?'. We are removing barriers, leveraging Canada's resources and talented workers, centring Indigenous consultation and equity, and continuing to fight climate change – all to get building and to become an energy superpower. In the new economy we are building, Canada will be defined by delivery, not delay.' — The Hon. Tim Hodgson, Minister of Energy and Natural Resources 'Indigenous Peoples' voices are at the table where discussions are happening, and decisions are made. This government understands that Indigenous Peoples have the right to determine their future. As the first Indigenous Minister of Indigenous Services, I understand the importance of relationship moving forward – and I am pleased to see the Prime Minister has determined this as a priority and a critical part of the work ahead.' — The Hon. Mandy Gull-Masty, Minister of Indigenous Services Related Product This document is also available at SOURCE Prime Minister's Office
USA Today
5 hours ago
- USA Today
Los Angeles Dodgers ICE protests and boycott threats, explained
The Los Angeles Dodgers are facing a fan revolt in their hometown amid rising tensions due to the Department of Homeland Security's immigration raids and the team's recent actions — and inactions. After previous repeated refusals to comment on the situation in Los Angeles — despite the fact LAFC and Angel City FC soccer clubs have both backed the city's immigrant community — some fans have called for boycotting the Dodgers and plan on protesting the franchise beginning Saturday, June 21. Those calls grew louder following a recent attempt by federal agents to access the stadium. Considering the Dodgers say more than 40 percent of the fan base is Latino, the fallout from a boycott could be felt immediately. Here's how we got here. Federal agents attempt to access Dodger Stadium On Thursday, shortly after the Dodgers finally indicated they would announce plans to assist LA's immigrant community, fans woke up to rumors of federal agents using the parking lots at Dodger Stadium as a staging area. The team released a statement later in the day saying it had refused access to ICE agents and Thursday's game would go on as scheduled. ICE denied a presence at Dodger Stadium, claiming it wasn't there Thursday. Photos and videos show border control agents attempting to access stadium parking lots. As protesters quickly swarmed the area, calls for the Dodgers to speak up or face a protest continued to grow. Who is calling for a Dodgers boycott? The call for action is coming from multiple groups and supporters and is starting to gain steam around the area. Here's more from the Los Angeles Public Press: Buried Under The Blue, an organization that advocates for the Indigenous communities displaced to build Dodger Stadium, have also spoken out and are asking fans to boycott the team. The group, which routinely refers to the Dodgers as the Displacers and advocates for the memory of the original neighborhoods of Palo Verde, La Loma and Bishop (modern-day Chavez Ravine), are now referring to the team as the Deporters and are directing fans to partake in the ActionCali action. Lawyer Michael Alder of Alder Law took to Instagram to call for a boycott of the team, urging fans not to buy tickets, attend or watch games or buy merchandise. 'I know it might seem small,' Alder said, 'but if we stand together we will undoubtedly make a real impact. Fans have also been urged by groups like ActionCali to reach out to the Dodgers to voice their concerns. Is this all because of the ICE raids in Los Angeles? Yes and no. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids across the city have escalated concerns from fans, but the disconnect with the franchise actually began months ago. The Dodgers were noticeably silent back in March when the Department of Defense wiped a webpage dedicated to Jackie Robinson's military service and bravery in breaking MLB's color barrier — then the team celebrated Jackie Robinson Day a few weeks later as if nothing happened. In between those events, the Dodgers chose to visit the White House to celebrate their 2024 World Series title, despite manager Dave Roberts previously saying he would decline such an invite because of President Donald Trump. Most recently, the team asked Nezza not to sing the national anthem in Spanish during the 'No Kings' day protests. She did not comply. Meanwhile, the team allegedly removed a fan holding an anti-ICE sign from a recent game and made another fan remove a sarape scarf before he was allowed to enter Dodger Stadium. The actions here speak much louder than words, though the Dodgers haven't had too many things to say lately. Wait. The Los Angeles Dodgers didn't comment on ICE raids? Well, until Wednesday night — when talks of a boycott began growing louder — the official team position seemingly was to remain silent about what was happening to the city's immigrant community. Per the Los Angeles Times Dylan Hernandez: Don't expect this to change. 'We're not going to comment,' Dodgers executive vice president and chief marketing officer Lon Rosen said. Considering what's happened in the last week, do the Dodgers regret visiting President Trump at the White House earlier this season? 'We're not going to comment on anything,' Rosen said. When the Dodgers announced they accepted Trump's White House invitation, team president Stan Kasten claimed the decision had 'nothing to do with politics.' Kasten sounded as if he was counting on the fans to give the team a pass for visiting an aspiring tyrant, either because their love of the Dodgers overwhelmed their disgust for Trump or because they lacked the intellectual faculties to connect Trump's racist rhetoric to real-life consequences. That sentiment was clearly not shared in the clubhouse. What about the Dodgers players? Kiké Hernández has been one of the lone outspoken voices standing up for immigrants, posting a tribute to his adopted city on Instagram and asking for people to be treated with dignity and respect. "I may not be Born & Raised, but this city adopted me as one of their own," Hernandez wrote. "I am saddened and infuriated by what's happening in our country and our city. Los Angeles and Dodger fans have welcomed me, supported me and shown me nothing but kindness and love. This is my second home. And I cannot stand to see our community being violated, profiled, abused and ripped apart. ALL people deserve to be treated with respect, dignity and human rights." Pitcher Brusdar Graterol previously took a stand on Instagram the same day his teammates visited the White House without him. More players will certainly be forced to answer about the situation after Thursday. Dodgers delay immigrant assistance announcement If anyone thought the presence of federal agents at Dodger Stadium would encourage the team to finally speak out, they were mistaken. In fact, the team delayed their announcement indefinitely following the incident Thursday morning. "Because of the events earlier today, we continue to work with groups that were involved with our programs," team president Stan Kasten said in a Thursday statement. "But we are going to have to delay today's announcement while we firm up some more details. We'll get back to you soon with the timing." Which brings us back to the calls to protest and boycott the Dodgers. The franchise has a long, tenuous relationship with the neighborhood of Chavez Ravine, which is home to Dodger Stadium. When the Brooklyn Dodgers bolted for the West Coast, the area was predominately inhabited by Mexican-American communities, who had to flee their homes, or be forcibly removed, after the city seized the land via eminent domain in the 1950s. The team's relationship with the Latino community only began to repair when Mexican star pitcher Fernando Valenzuela became a must-see sensation for the Dodgers in the 1980s. This is not ancient history by any means. The Dodgers are only a few generations removed from displacing the local immigrant community, which explains why the silence from a franchise that worked for years to restore trust in the neighborhood it took over is suddenly fracturing.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Major projects bill expected to pass before MPs leave for the summer
OTTAWA — If you blink, you might miss it. Prime Minister Mark Carney's controversial major projects bill was set to finish its dash through the House of Commons today — the final day of the sitting before summer — with support from the Conservatives and not-so-quiet grumblings from the other opposition parties. 'Usually, on the last day of sitting before the summer, everyone is smiling, we're in a good mood, we pat ourselves on the backs. But today, I would say that's not really the case,' said Bloc Québécois MP Xavier Barsalou-Duval during a speech on Friday. The final vote on Bill C-5 in the House is set to happen shortly after 5 p.m. before making its way to the Senate for a final adoption expected within a week, on Friday, June 27. The legislation has two parts. The first, which has more support across party lines, aims to eliminate internal trade and labour mobility barriers in Canada. The second part, which would give cabinet sweeping powers to approve natural resource and infrastructure projects deemed in the national interest, has raised considerably more concerns. Indigenous communities, environmental groups, opposition parties and even some Liberal MPs have said they are uncomfortable with the lack of consultation with First Nations, Inuit and Metis people prior to tabling the bill, but also the extent of the powers that would give the government of the day the power to ignore other federal laws for five years. 'Pretending that this unprecedented power grab was ever discussed in the election is a sham, and we can add an 'e' to that. It's a shame,' said Green Party leader Elizabeth May. C-5 was rushed through committee earlier this week. Despite that, opposition parties managed to pass amendments which include exempting a number of laws — such as the Indian Act and the Conflict of Interest Act — from being ignored when considering major projects and publishing a list of national interest projects with timelines and costs. 'These amendments matter,' said Shannon Stubbs, energy and natural resource critic for the Conservatives when describing the changes in the House. 'They bring transparency, accountability, more certainty, more clarity and integrity to a bill that originally had none.' Stubbs said despite those changes, 'major concerns' remain. She cited the need to prevent ministers from removing projects from the national interest list at any time but also add in the bill clear timelines to approve projects to increase certainty for investors. On Friday, opposition parties claimed a small victory. NDP MP Jenny Kwan, with the help of the Bloc's Marilène Gill, argued the Speaker of the House should divide C-5 into two distinct parts so that MPs could vote on the portions on internal trade and major projects separately at third reading. Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia granted their request. 'While they are ultimately designed to strengthen the Canadian economy, they deal with different issues that could very well stand independently from one another,' he explained. The passage of C-5 concludes in a dramatic way a packed four-week spring sitting that saw Carney's government table significant omnibus bills, very fast, but adopt very few. The government tabled C-2, the Strong Borders Act, which seeks to secure the Canada-U.S. border, fight organized crime and fentanyl and boost the fight against financial crimes. It is facing criticism for sweeping new powers that would allow officials to obtain information without a warrant and for restricting the asylum claim process, among others. It also tabled C-4, the Making Life More Affordable for Canadians Act, which includes some of the government's campaign promises on affordability like a middle-class tax cut and removal of the GST on new homes for first-time homebuyers. However, the bill has been criticized as it also seeks to exempt federal political parties from modern privacy laws. Unlike the major projects bill, C-2 and C-4 were not fast-tracked, meaning that they will continue to make their way through the legislative process during the fall sitting. Interestingly, the first legislation to pass all stages in this new Parliament was not a government bill. Last week, MPs unanimously approved C-202, a Bloc bill to protect the supply management system which regulates the price and production of dairy, poultry and eggs, from future trade deals. That same bill was stalled in the Senate in the last legislature and ended up dying on the order paper when the election was called. This time, the Senate approved C-202 on division, and it is now awaiting royal assent. National Post calevesque@ Doug Ford apologizes to Ontario First Nations for his 'passionate' comments 'We have to get that balance right': Liberal MPs express worries about major projects bill Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.
