Russia's Rosatom to explore construction of high-capacity nuclear plant in Uzbekistan
ST. PETERSBURG, Russia, June 20 (Reuters) - Russia's state nuclear corporation Rosatom signed an agreement on Friday with Uzbekistan's atomic energy agency to study the feasibility of building a large-capacity nuclear power plant in the Central Asian country.
Rosatom, which signed the agreement with the Uzbek government at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, already has plans to construct smaller nuclear units in Uzbekistan.
The Russian energy company was also tapped over the weekend by the government of Kazakhstan to lead a consortium to build the first nuclear power plant there.
There are currently no nuclear power plants in any of the five ex-Soviet Central Asian republics, although Uzbekistan and its neighbour Kazakhstan, both uranium producers, have long said their growing economies need them.
The Uzbekistan plant will employ two Russian-designed VVER-1000 reactors, with the possibility to scale up to four.
Last May, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev agreed on a deal for Rosatom to construct smaller-capacity plants with a capacity of 55 megawatts each in Uzbekistan.
On Friday, Rosatom head Alexei Likhachev said Rosatom was discussing building two low-power and two high-power nuclear units in Uzbekistan.
"The small modular nuclear power plant in Uzbekistan is the first export product of modern small power plants on the planet," Likhachev told reporters in St. Petersburg. He said the plants would help Uzbekistan respond to its growing electricity needs.
He also told journalists the firm had approved a preliminary roadmap with Kazakhstan for two units there using Russian-made VVER-1200 reactors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Putin says 'Ukraine is ours' and threatens nuclear strike - showing how he feels about Trump
He may have been speaking at an economic forum, but that didn't stop Vladimir Putin from issuing his most hawkish comments on Ukraine in a very long time. During a Q&A at Russia's flagship investment event in St Petersburg, the Kremlin leader was asked what his end game was in the conflict. He replied: "I have said many times that I consider the Russian and Ukrainian people to be one nation. In this sense, all of Ukraine is ours." The answer received rapturous applause from an auditorium full of fawning politicians and business figures. And there was more. "There is an old rule," he said. "'Where a Russian soldier sets foot, that is ours'." In short, he was saying that he wants the whole lot. The comments came as a surprise because they are in sharp contrast to the Kremlin's recent rhetoric. Ever since Donald Trump began his push for a peace deal, Moscow has adopted a softer tone, more conciliatory - in an apparent attempt to show Washington that it is interested in a settlement. But there was none of that kind of language here. Quite the opposite. The Russian president even, for the first time in months, threatened a nuclear strike on Ukraine. Asked how Moscow would respond if Kyiv used a dirty bomb against Russian forces, he promised "catastrophic" consequences for his enemy. "This would be a colossal mistake on the part of those whom we call neo-Nazis on the territory of today's Ukraine," he said. "It could be their last mistake. "We always respond and respond in kind. Therefore, our response will be very tough." The Kremlin's nuclear sabre-rattling was an almost weekly feature during the last days of the Biden administration, but the sabres stilled when Mr Trump came to power. But now, all of a sudden, he's returned to it. It felt like a very deliberate message from Vladimir Putin that, despite peace talks, Russia has no intention of backing down, neither on the battlefield nor at the negotiating table. I think it shows that Moscow is not too worried about upsetting Donald Trump. The American leader appears to have distanced himself from trying to mediate the conflict, but still seems to be pursuing warmer ties with Moscow.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Ministers could subsidise factory energy bills as sky-high costs could lead to job losses in key seats
PANICKED Ministers could subsidise factory energy bills amid a warning that sky-high costs could lead to job losses in key Labour seats. A multi-billion pound package paid for by taxpayers for manufacturers will help make them more competitive with overseas competitors. 2 The intervention will be a key plank in the government's ten-year industrial strategy unveiled next week as Ministers try to boost the UK's sluggish growth. Industries such as ceramics, steel, glass and chemicals will be eligible for standing charges dropping by some 90 per cent saving hundreds of millions of pounds. But Ministers are also expected to launch a consultation on extending support to areas such as AI databases and manufacturing helping thousands of firms. It comes as a new report says soaring energy costs are putting thousands of jobs at risk triggering a key election issue in battleground seats. Analysis by the Jobs Foundation reveals 21 out of 25 constituencies most reliant on jobs in energy-intensive industries are Labour seats. Several top Ministers including Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Defence Secretary John Healey could be at risk to losing their seats to Reform without action. Current polling reveals that 15 out of the 21 seats would be lost to Nigel Farage's party if an election were held today. The study finds that UK industrial energy prices are some 46 per cent above the average of competitor nations – putting firms here at a major disadvantage. Lord Matthew Elliott, President of the Jobs Foundation, said: 'We must avoid repeating the mistakes of the 1980s, when the unmanaged decline of coal devastated entire communities. 'Today's energy-intensive industries – steel, chemicals, glass, ceramics – are facing a similar fate. National inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal finally ordered by Keir Starmer in another Labour U-turn 'The government must act to lower energy prices in order to protect jobs and secure Britain's industrial future.' The warning shot comes after Manchester United co-owner and entrepreneur Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who founded chemicals giant Ineos, said the high prices were 'squeezing the life out of the sector'. Chancellor Rachel Reeves told a CBI event that making energy more affordable is 'one of the questions that we need to answer'. The government declined to comment.
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
Putin says no need for OPEC+ to intervene in oil market due to Iran-Israel conflict
ST PETERSBURG, Russia, June 20 (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that oil prices had not risen significantly due to the conflict between Iran and Israel, and that there was no need for the OPEC+ group of oil producers to intervene in oil markets. Oil prices have rallied as a week-old air war between Israel and Iran escalated and uncertainty about potential U.S. involvement kept investors on edge, with Brent crude futures touching their highest since late January. Putin said the price of oil now stands at around $75 per barrel, while before the conflict escalated it stood at $65. "Of course, we see that the current situation in the Middle East, the current situation related to the conflict between Iran and Israel, has led to a certain increase in prices. But this increase, in the opinion of our experts, is not significant," Putin told the St Petersburg Economic Forum. Iran is the third largest producer among members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. Hostilities could disrupt its supply of oil and thereby increase prices. Putin also said OPEC and allies including Russia - a group known as OPEC+, which pumps about half of the world's oil - were increasing oil output, but doing so gradually, to ensure balance in the oil market and "comfortable" prices. "We will all see together how the situation unfolds. So far no immediate response is required," he said.
