Trump to Win a Nobel Peace Prize? Pakistan States Nomination
Pakistan has stated its intention to'formally recommend' U.S. President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, on account of his role in helping India and Pakistan reach a cease-fire after conflict between the two long-time rivals resurged earlier this year.
Previous Nobel Peace Prize recipients include former TIME100 Women of the Year honoree Malala Yousafzai, and previous TIME Person of the Year recipients Martin Luther King Jr. and former President Barack Obama.
'At a moment of heightened regional turbulence, President Trump demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi, which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation, ultimately securing a cease-fire and averting a broader conflict between the two nuclear states that would have had catastrophic consequences for millions of people in the region and beyond,' the Government of Pakistan said in its announcement via social media. 'This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker and his commitment to conflict resolution through dialogue.'
The Pakistani government went on to say that Trump's 'leadership during the 2025 Pakistan-India crisis manifestly showcases the continuation of his legacy of pragmatic diplomacy and effective peace-building.'
Read More: India and Pakistan Cease-Fire Appears to Hold Despite Accusations of Violations
When Trump announced the cease-fire between India and Pakistan on May 10, he said the agreement had been reached after 'a long night of talks mediated by the United States.' He later went on to thank Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio for their efforts.
Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif took to social media to express gratitude to Trump at the time, saying: "We thank President Trump for his leadership and proactive role for peace in the region. Pakistan appreciates the United States for facilitating this outcome, which we have accepted in the interest of regional peace and stability.'
By contrast, the Indian government did not mention U.S. involvement in the mediation talks. "India and Pakistan was worked out directly between the two countries," a statement read.
Pakistan's announcement of its intentions regarding a nomination comes after Trump posted on Truth Social about the Nobel Peace Prize when commenting on his international mediating.
Within that social media post, Trump took credit for 'stopping the war' between India and Pakistan.
'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the war between India and Pakistan. I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the war between Serbia and Kosovo. I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for keeping peace between Egypt and Ethiopia," Trump claimed.
Read More: A New Middle East Is Unfolding Before Our Eyes
Pakistan's announcement also comes as Trump weighs his options on whether the U.S. should embark on military involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict.
Trump has given himself two weeks to decide whether the U.S. will continue supporting Israel from afar or become an active participant in the conflict with Iran.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Botches His Own Name In The Most Awkward Typo You'll Ever See
President Donald Trump on Sunday posted a message on his Truth Social website thanking the B-2 pilots who took part in this weekend's attack on Iran. But the president's message had one key flaw: He misspelled his own name. 'The GREAT B-2 pilots have just landed, safely, in Missouri. Thank you for a job well done!!!' Trump wrote, then signed his message in all caps: 'DONAKD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!' Trump deleted the message and replaced it with a corrected version, but a website that archives his posts shows the typo. Trump has a long and colorful history of typo-ridden social media posts, including the infamous 'covfefe' message of 2017, along with his references to a 'stollen' election, 'Wirch Hunt,' and 'hamberders.' He's bungled his own name before, referring to himself in 2019 as 'Donald Ttump,' and that of his wife, whom he called 'Melanie' Trump in 2018. It's not clear if Trump typed the message himself. A former aide, Madeleine Westerhout, testified during his criminal trial last year that when Trump was on Twitter, he preferred to dictate his messages, down to his trademark use of capitalizations and exclamation points. Footage released last year also showed him dictating and supervising his social media posts. Trump's critics called him out over the awkward typo: This is the man calling for regime change and with his hand on the nuclear codes, marching us into war: DONAKD J. TRUMP. To my Republican colleagues with the power and numbers to stop this, what say you? — Rep. Melanie Stansbury (@Rep_Stansbury) June 22, 2025 If Joe Biden has misspelled his own name in a tweet, Fox would be calling for his removal and running it on a loop 24/7. — Jo (@JoJoFromJerz) June 22, 2025 Hmmm beginning to worry that the guy who cannot even bother to spell check whether he got his own name correct is not doing the most rigorous research before he decides to get us in to a war. — Centrism Fan Acct 🔹 (@Wilson__Valdez) June 22, 2025 New coffeve just dropped — Tamoor Hussain (@tamoorh) June 22, 2025 While thanking the B-2 pilots for their service, Trump misspelled his own name while signing off in a new statement 'DONAKD J. TRUMP.' He can't even spell his own name. — Harry Sisson (@harryjsisson) June 22, 2025 Donakd? — Wu Tang is for the Children (@WUTangKids) June 22, 2025 Bring back covfefe — Karly Kingsley (@karlykingsley) June 22, 2025 Donakd strikes again. — Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) June 22, 2025 Even my phone tries to autocorrect Donakd… And this is the president of the United States. Sad. — Jesus Freakin Congress (@TheJFreakinC) June 22, 2025 The incompetence of this administration is like a renewable energy source—it's inexhaustible. — greg cantwell (@gregmcantwell) June 22, 2025 Hey everyone!! Let's call him DONAKD J. TRUMP. — Lucas Sanders 💙🗳️🌊💪🌈🚺🟧 (@LucasSa56947288) June 22, 2025
Forbes
38 minutes ago
- Forbes
U.S.-Iran Updates: Trump Signals Support For Regime Change In Iran
President Donald Trump on Sunday appeared to signal his support for a regime change in Iran—despite other administration officials insisting that the U.S. had no interest in such a thing— as he claimed the U.S. military strike on three Iranian nuclear facilities resulted in 'monumental damage.' Israeli soldiers inspect the site in Tel Aviv, Israel, struck by a direct missile strike launched ... More from Iran on Sunday. (AP Photo/Bernat Armangue) Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. June 22, 10 p.m. EDT In a post on his Truth Social platform, President Donald Trump claimed Iran's nuclear sites sustained 'Monumental Damage' from the U.S. strikes, citing satellite images. The president added: 'Obliteration is an accurate biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!' 9:30 p.m. EDT Earlier on Sunday, the president raised the prospect of regime change in Iran, despite other officials in his administration insisting that the U.S. was not seeking such a thing. In a post, Trump wrote 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' A short while later, Trump wrote that the B-2 bomber pilots who struck Iran 'have just landed, safely, in Missouri.' June 22, 12 p.m. EDT Iran launched about 40 missiles at targets in Israel, the Associated Press confirmed, injuring 23 people, while the Israeli Air Force struck targets in four cities across Iran, the Israel Defense Forces confirmed in a statement on X, dropping munitions on targets including command centers and missile strikes killed at least seven members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps and two conscripts, The New York Times reported, citing Iranian state-affiliated media. June 22, 10 a.m. EDT Vice President JD Vance told 'Meet the Press' the U.S. was 'not at war with Iran, we're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' adding the U.S. has 'no interest in boots on the ground.' 'I certainly empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East,' Vance said, adding 'I understand the concern, but the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents, and now we have a president that actually knows how to accomplish America's national security objectives,' taking an apparent swipe at former President George W. Bush, whom Trump has blasted for years over his handling of the invasion of Iraq. Vance also responded to criticism from members of Congress who condemned the administration for making the strike without seeking congressional approval, insisting that 'the idea that this was outside of presidential authority, I think any real, serious, legal person would tell you that's not true.' June 22, 8 a.m. EDT 'This mission was not, and has not been about regime change,' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said at a press conference, calling the strike a 'precision operation.' Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Dan Caine announced the mission's codename was 'Operation Midnight Hammer,' which involved strikes with massive ordnance penetrator bombs, Tomahawk missiles and a decoy operation. Caine said the military was unaware of any shots fired at the U.S. bombers on the way into Iran or on the way out after dropping their payloads. June 21, 10 p.m. EDT Trump addressed the nation in a brief speech from the White House, claiming that 'the strikes were a spectacular military success.' He warned Iran against retaliating, saying the U.S. was prepared to strike more targets should that happen. 'There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran,' Trump said. June 21, 7:50 p.m. EDT Trump in a Truth Social post announced the U.S. struck the 'Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan' nuclear sites in Iran, noting 'A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow.' The strike was conducted by seven B2 Spirit bombers that took off from an Air Force base in Missouri overnight, Hegseth and Caine said Sunday. One of those bombers dropped two massive ordnance penetrators on a nuclear facility in Fordo at 2:10 a.m. local time, Caine said—the first of 14 bombs dropped across Iran. Additionally, a submarine launched more than two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles at the nuclear facility in Esfahan around 5 p.m. EDT on Saturday, Caine said. Caine added the operation also involved launching more bombers to the Pacific as a decoy, which he called an 'effort known only to an extremely small number of planners and key leaders.' How Has Iran Responded? Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called the U.S. operation an 'outrageous, grave, and unprecedented violation of the fundamental principles of the charter of the United Nations and international law.' Araghchi condemned Trump for what he called 'abusing our commitment to diplomacy' and 'deceiv[ing] his own voters' after campaigning to end 'forever wars' in the Middle East. The U.N. Security Council scheduled a 3 p.m. EDT emergency meeting at the behest of the Iranian government, the Associated Press reported Sunday morning. Crucial Quote 'American deterrence is back,' Hegseth said. 'We will act swiftly and decisively when our people, our partners or our interests are threatened.' The escalation in the Middle East began on June 13 after Israel launched a surprise campaign of airstrikes at key Iranian nuclear facilities, initially killing at least 78 people. Iran responded by launching volleys of missiles at Israeli targets in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. The two adversaries continued to exchange strikes over the course of the week, but the U.S. initially stayed out of the conflict. On Thursday, Trump abruptly announced he would make a decision about joining Israel's war against the Middle Eastern nation within two weeks, urging Iran to make a deal. The U.S. and Iran had spent weeks attempting to negotiate a new nuclear deal in Oman, but the talks were suspended after the Israeli campaign began. This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
Boston Globe
43 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Will Iran again sip the ‘poison' of a forced peace, or escalate?
At 86, with much of his life's work in ruins around him, he may prefer martyrdom to the surrender that President Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel are demanding of him. Advertisement Iran's first response was defiant. 'The Islamic Republic of Iran is resolved to defend Iran's territory, sovereignty, security and people by all force and means against the United States' criminal aggression,' the foreign ministry said in a statement. Iran has launched a serious barrage of missiles on Israel. It may, as it has warned, attack some of the 40,000 US soldiers in the region. What will be crucial is whether Iran's retaliation is prolonged. If it does enough to convince the Iranian people that it has not capitulated, Khamenei may then decide to enter talks with the United States about a settlement of the war. After all, in January 2020, when Trump ordered the assassination of a key Iranian figure in his first term, General Qassem Soleimani, with a drone strike in Iraq, Iran responded with a punishing wave of missile attacks against US troops in Iraq. It then stopped, fearing a wider war that could threaten the regime. Advertisement Iran has a variety of responses if it chooses, that show both resistance and restraint, said Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa Program at Chatham House, a London-based think tank. Khamenei could approve leaving the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and expelling the nuclear inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency who have been monitoring Iran's nuclear facilities. He could target those US bases in the region that have largely been evacuated and activate the Houthis in Yemen to resume their attacks on American ships in the Red Sea. 'This would be actually a cautious mix of options designed to show that Iran has the ability and the daring to stand up to Trump, but is still trying to avoid full-scale regional escalation,' Vakil said. 'If Khamenei sidesteps strikes on the US, this lays the pathway for diplomacy and will signal to Trump his intention to de-escalate,' she said. Trump, too, by warning Iran of the strikes in advance and limiting them, at least so far, to the three main Iranian nuclear sites, also showed restraint, she said. The US attacks, for instance, spared political targets and military bases. But Khamenei hardly trusts Trump after he unilaterally pulled out of the 2015 nuclear deal that Iran agreed to with the Obama administration and other governments in 2018. Even if there were a new pact agreed upon now, Vakil asked, 'could he trust Trump to provide sanctions relief and ensure Israel is on board?' Iran could do much more, of course. It could try to close the Strait of Hormuz to shipping, a move that could drive up oil prices by blocking oil tankers from leaving or entering the Persian Gulf. It could attack the energy infrastructure of Gulf states, as it did in 2019. It has a sophisticated cyberwarfare program that it could activate. And it could work with Al Qaeda to hit Israeli and US interests in the region and abroad, from bases to embassies. Advertisement Iran will do more, and aggressively, said Ellie Geranmayeh, an Iran specialist at the European Council on Foreign Relations, a think tank. 'Iran knew this was coming and will have prepared a chain of responses,' she said, with an immediate escalation of attacks against Israel. But Trump's efforts to draw a line now will fail, she said. Attacks against the United States 'are now inevitable and will be swift and multilayered,' Geranmayeh said. 'Iran knows it cannot win this war — but wants to ensure that the US and Israel also lose.' A lot will depend on the assessment of the damage done, which is still unclear. It is also unclear where Iran's large stock of highly enriched uranium is. Iran has enough to make up to 10 nuclear warheads with a bit more enrichment, according to the US military. Many analysts assume that Iran has dispersed it, perhaps where IAEA inspectors cannot access it. The IAEA said Sunday that there had been no indication of radioactive leakage, which would be the case if the uranium stockpiles had been hit, said Vali Nasr, a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and author of 'Iran's Grand Strategy: A Political History.' That is one reason the United States and Europe should do all they can to keep Iran in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and the IAEA, he said, so the world does not lose its eyes and ears on Iran's nuclear program. Advertisement For Nasr, the conflict is just beginning, not ending. For Iran, he said, 'it will be live to fight again.' There is 'no one grand gesture after which everything will change,' he added. Most important, he said, 'the larger lesson for Iran is that it needs serious deterrence, and a bomb is the only one that will work.' Iran's missiles and proxies did not protect it, Nasr said. Even if Khamenei dies, the country has been shown to be vulnerable, he said, and nuclear deterrence is the most likely response. Geranmayeh agrees. 'This is the great irony,' she said. 'Although Trump has sought to eliminate the nuclear threat from Iran, he has now made it far more likely that Iran becomes a nuclear state.' And that could mean a future of continued bombing campaigns and Iranian counterstrikes, she said. Still, Geranmayeh believes that diplomacy is the best way out for all parties. After a week of violence in the region, she said, 'there could be a window for Tehran and Washington to come to their senses.' Matthew Kroenig of the Atlantic Council, a think tank, is skeptical. With so much damage to their expensive nuclear program, he said in an email, 'they probably won't rebuild.' Iran has 'spent billions of dollars and decades only to invite sanctions and a devastating war with the most powerful country in the world. Why hit replay on that tape?' Advertisement If Iran does rebuild, he said, the United States 'can hit them again.' This article originally appeared in
