Review: The vivo V50 Lite is a battery beast that doesn't compromise on style, smarts — or sound
If you're looking for a smartphone that can keep up with you, the V50 Lite is worth checking out.
In South Africa, where many of us rely on our phones for everything, battery life and reliable performance are non-negotiable.
So when I got my hands on the new vivo V50 Lite, I was curious to see if it could keep up with real-life, everyday demands – and it went above and beyond.
Real-world battery power
The first thing I noticed was the sheer endurance of the 6500mAh BlueVolt battery. I went two full days without reaching for the charger – and that's with my usual routine of calls, voice notes, streaming music and videos, scrolling through socials, and navigating Joburg traffic.
And when it eventually needed a top-up? The 90W FlashCharge was a game-changer. From nearly empty to full in under an hour – it's ideal for people with unpredictable schedules or those who forget to charge until the last minute. I even used the phone to charge my earbuds during a power outage in my area, thanks to its reverse charging capabilities.
It's small touches like these that really make a difference here. Plus, vivo backs the battery with a five-year health guarantee — huge savings in the long run.
Performance
From switching between my banking app, TikTok, and Google Maps, to playing graphics-heavy games on the weekend, the V50 Lite never lagged or overheated. Everything felt snappy and responsive — something I've learned not to take for granted in this price range.
Vivo's AI-powered resource management also stood out. It keeps things running smoothly in the background while preserving power. It genuinely felt like the phone was working with me — not against me — whether I was at work, running errands, or relaxing at home.
Sound that fills the room
One of the most unexpectedly awesome features was the Dual Stereo Speaker with 400% Volume and Hi-Res Audio. Whether I was gaming, navigating, or blasting amapiano during a sunset drive, the sound quality was seriously impressive. You get crisp treble, full bass, and a layered audio experience that makes even TikTok videos pop.
And yes, 400% volume is no exaggeration. It's loud enough to fill a room without distortion, perfect for when you're hosting friends, cooking with music, or watching a movie on your phone without needing a Bluetooth speaker.
Despite all that power, it's still slim and stylish
Even with all that under the hood, the phone remains impressively slim and lightweight. At just 7.79mm thin, it slips easily into pockets or handbags. I tested the Titanium Gold model – it looks luxe, polished, and refined.
And yes, I dropped it (more than once). With SGS Five-Star Drop Resistance, Military Grade Certification, and IP65 water and dust resistance, the V50 Lite didn't just survive — it didn't even flinch.
The display? Gorgeous. The camera? Better than expected
The 6.77-inch Ultra Vision AMOLED screen is fantastic for watching YouTube or Netflix, even under direct sunlight. The 120Hz refresh rate made scrolling buttery smooth — perfect for catching up on news or doom-scrolling socials.
While the camera isn't the main selling point here, it's more than capable. The 50MP Sony sensor and AI tools like Photo Enhance and AI Erase 2.0 made it easy to snap decent photos without needing editing apps. Great for quick Instagram posts or family snaps at braais and birthday parties.
Final verdict
After a week of everyday use, I can honestly say the vivo V50 Lite hits the sweet spot for users who need power, speed, great sound, and style without breaking the bank. It's reliable, practical, and surprisingly premium in both feel and function.
If you're looking for a smartphone that can keep up with you, the V50 Lite is worth checking out.
Price and availability
The vivo V50 Lite is available through most major network providers at a recommended retail price of R12 999.
It's also worth mentioning that if you purchase the vivo V50 Lite on or before 6 June 2025, you will automatically receive one free accidental damage repair within 180 days of purchase, plus an additional one-year warranty — no activation required. This added peace of mind reflects vivo's commitment to reliable, long-term support.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Tech-fueled misinformation distorts Iran-Israel fighting
Smoke billows following an explosion in central Tehran. Image: Atta Kenare / AFP AI deepfakes, video game footage passed off as real combat, and chatbot-generated falsehoods -- such tech-enabled misinformation is distorting the Israel-Iran conflict, fueling a war of narratives across social media. The information warfare unfolding alongside ground combat sparked by Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and military leadership underscores a digital crisis in the age of rapidly advancing AI tools that have blurred the lines between truth and fabrication. The surge in wartime misinformation has exposed an urgent need for stronger detection tools, experts say, as major tech platforms have largely weakened safeguards by scaling back content moderation and reducing reliance on human fact-checkers. After Iran struck Israel with barrages of missiles last week, AI-generated videos falsely claimed to show damage inflicted on Tel Aviv and Ben Gurion Airport. The videos were widely shared across Facebook, Instagram and X. Using a reverse image search, AFP's fact-checkers found that the clips were originally posted by a TikTok account that produces AI-generated content. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ There has been a "surge in generative AI misinformation, specifically related to the Iran-Israel conflict," Ken Jon Miyachi, founder of the Austin-based firm BitMindAI, told AFP. "These tools are being leveraged to manipulate public perception, often amplifying divisive or misleading narratives with unprecedented scale and sophistication." 'Photo-realism' GetReal Security, a US company focused on detecting manipulated media including AI deepfakes, also identified a wave of fabricated videos related to the Israel-Iran conflict. The company linked the visually compelling videos -- depicting apocalyptic scenes of war-damaged Israeli aircraft and buildings as well as Iranian missiles mounted on a trailer -- to Google's Veo 3 AI generator, known for hyper-realistic visuals. The Veo watermark is visible at the bottom of an online video posted by the news outlet Tehran Times, which claims to show "the moment an Iranian missile" struck Tel Aviv. "It is no surprise that as generative-AI tools continue to improve in photo-realism, they are being misused to spread misinformation and sow confusion," said Hany Farid, the co-founder of GetReal Security and a professor at the University of California, Berkeley. Farid offered one tip to spot such deepfakes: the Veo 3 videos were normally eight seconds in length or a combination of clips of a similar duration. "This eight-second limit obviously doesn't prove a video is fake, but should be a good reason to give you pause and fact-check before you re-share," he said. The falsehoods are not confined to social media. Disinformation watchdog NewsGuard has identified 51 websites that have advanced more than a dozen false claims -- ranging from AI-generated photos purporting to show mass destruction in Tel Aviv to fabricated reports of Iran capturing Israeli pilots. Sources spreading these false narratives include Iranian military-linked Telegram channels and state media sources affiliated with the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), sanctioned by the US Treasury Department, NewsGuard said. 'Control the narrative' "We're seeing a flood of false claims and ordinary Iranians appear to be the core targeted audience," McKenzie Sadeghi, a researcher with NewsGuard, told AFP. Sadeghi described Iranian citizens as "trapped in a sealed information environment," where state media outlets dominate in a chaotic attempt to "control the narrative." Iran itself claimed to be a victim of tech manipulation, with local media reporting that Israel briefly hacked a state television broadcast, airing footage of women's protests and urging people to take to the streets. Adding to the information chaos were online clips lifted from war-themed video games. AFP's fact-checkers identified one such clip posted on X, which falsely claimed to show an Israeli jet being shot down by Iran. The footage bore striking similarities to the military simulation game Arma 3. Israel's military has rejected Iranian media reports claiming its fighter jets were downed over Iran as "fake news." Chatbots such as xAI's Grok, which online users are increasingly turning to for instant fact-checking, falsely identified some of the manipulated visuals as real, researchers said. "This highlights a broader crisis in today's online information landscape: the erosion of trust in digital content," BitMindAI's Miyachi said. "There is an urgent need for better detection tools, media literacy, and platform accountability to safeguard the integrity of public discourse." AFP
eNCA
3 days ago
- eNCA
Australian trial says tech for social media teen ban can work
SYDNEY - Australia's world-leading ban on under-16s joining social media sites cleared a big hurdle Friday as a trial found digital age checks can work "robustly and effectively". Sites such as Facebook, Instagram, Tiktok and X could face fines of up to Aus$50-million for failing to comply with the legislation, which was passed in November. They have described the law -- which is due to come into effect by the end of this year -- as vague, rushed and "problematic". There has been widespread concern over children's use of online platforms as evidence shows that social media can have negative effects on children's mental and physical health. Digital age verification systems -- which would be critical to the ban -- can work, said the interim findings of an independent Age Assurance Technology Trial, conducted for the government. "These preliminary findings indicate that age assurance can be done in Australia privately, robustly and effectively," it said. There are "no significant technological barriers" to deploying age-checking systems in Australia, said the trial's project director, Tony Allen. "These solutions are technically feasible, can be integrated flexibly into existing services and can support the safety and rights of children online," he said in a statement. In a separate interview with Australia's Nine Network, Allen said preventing children from circumventing age verification tools was a "big challenge", however. "I don't think anything is completely foolproof," he said. There are a "plethora" of approaches to age verification but no single solution to suit all cases, said the trial report, in which 53 organisations took part. Australia's legislation is being closely monitored by other countries, with many weighing whether to implement similar bans. Greece spearheaded a proposal this month for the European Union to limit children's use of online platforms by setting an age of digital adulthood -- barring children from social media without parental consent.
eNCA
4 days ago
- eNCA
Trump extends deadline for TikTok sale by 90 days
President Donald Trump announced Thursday he had given social media platform TikTok another 90 days to find a non-Chinese buyer or be banned in the United States. "I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025)," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, putting off the ban for the third time. A federal law requiring TikTok's sale or ban on national security grounds was due to take effect the day before Trump's January inauguration. The Republican, whose 2024 election campaign relied heavily on social media, has previously said he is fond of the video-sharing app. "I have a little warm spot in my heart for TikTok," Trump said in an NBC News interview in early May. "If it needs an extension, I would be willing to give it an extension." TikTok on Thursday welcomed Trump's decision. "We are grateful for President Trump's leadership and support in ensuring that TikTok continues to be available for more than 170 million American users," said a statement issued by the platform. - Digital Cold War? - Trump said in May that a group of purchasers was ready to pay TikTok owner ByteDance "a lot of money" for the video-clip-sharing sensation's US operations. Trump has repeatedly downplayed risks that TikTok is in danger, saying he remains confident of finding a buyer for the app's US business. The White House had announced Monday that Trump would throw the wildly popular video-sharing app, which has almost two billion global users, another lifeline. During this new grace period the administration will work "to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure," the administration said in a statement. The president is "just not motivated to do anything about TikTok," said independent analyst Rob Enderle. "Unless they get on his bad side, TikTok is probably going to be in pretty good shape." Trump had long supported a ban or divestment, but reversed his position and vowed to defend the platform after coming to believe it helped him win young voters' support in the November election. Motivated by national security fears and a belief in Washington that TikTok is controlled by the Chinese government, the ban took effect on January 19, one day before Trump's inauguration, with ByteDance having made no attempt to find a suitor. TikTok "has become a symbol of the US-China tech rivalry; a flashpoint in the new Cold War for digital control," said Shweta Singh, an assistant professor of information systems at Warwick Business School in Britain. The president announced an initial 75-day delay of the ban upon taking office. A second extension pushed the deadline to June 19. Now the deadline is September 17. - Tariff turmoil - Trump said in April that China would have agreed to a deal on the sale of TikTok if it were not for a dispute over his tariffs on Beijing. ByteDance has confirmed talks with the US government, saying key matters needed to be resolved and that any deal would be "subject to approval under Chinese law." Possible solutions reportedly include seeing existing US investors in ByteDance roll over their stakes into a new independent global TikTok company. Additional US investors, including Oracle and private equity firm Blackstone, would be brought on to reduce ByteDance's share in the new TikTok. Much of TikTok's US activity is already housed on Oracle servers, and the company's chairman, Larry Ellison, is a longtime Trump ally. Uncertainty remains, particularly over what would happen to TikTok's valuable algorithm. "TikTok without its algorithm is like Harry Potter without his wand -- it's simply not as powerful," said Forrester Principal Analyst Kelsey Chickering. Despite the turmoil, TikTok has been continuing with business as usual.
