Sentence reduced for driver who caused baby's death outside Withybush Hospital

A WOMAN who caused the death of an eight-month-old baby outside Withybush Hospital has had her sentence reduced following an appeal.
Bridget Curtis, aged 71, was originally sentenced to four years in prison in January for causing the death of Mabli Cariad Hall by dangerous driving. Curtis was also disqualified from driving for eight years.
Bridget Curtis leaves court (Pic: BBC)
The tragic incident took place on June 21, 2023, when Mabli was struck by a white BMW driven by Curtis, who had been at the hospital attending an outpatient appointment with her daughter.
The court heard that Curtis had stopped the vehicle outside the hospital building. While attempting to help her daughter retrieve a handbag from the back of the car, Curtis inadvertently pressed the accelerator while the car was still running and not in park mode, causing the vehicle to accelerate rapidly to a speed of 29mph.
The car following the accident at Withybush General Hospital, Haverfordwest (Pic: Martin Cavaney/Herald)
The car struck Mabli, who was in a pram with her father, Robert Hall, and his brother, Stephen. Mabli was airlifted initially to the University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff before being transferred to Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, where she died from severe traumatic brain injuries four days later.
During the initial sentencing at Swansea Crown Court, Mabli's family expressed profound grief, describing life without her as 'horrendous.' Her mother, Gwen Hall, poignantly spoke of Mabli as 'so bright, so beautiful, so full of love and life.'
Curtis, who had held a clean driving licence for over 50 years and had no previous convictions, appeared via video link from HMP Eastwood Park in Gloucestershire for her appeal. Her barrister, John Dye, argued the incident was the result of a 'lapse of concentration,' describing Curtis as 'absolutely devastated.'
On Tuesday, three judges at the Court of Appeal ruled Curtis' original sentence was 'manifestly excessive,' reducing it to three years, with a seven-and-a-half-year driving ban.
In response, Mabli's family expressed disappointment in the sentence reduction but acknowledged the court's decision to uphold the custodial sentence.
'We still face a life sentence without her,' they said in a statement. 'We again thank everyone who has supported us and helped ensure justice for Mabli Cariad.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Wales Online

12 hours ago

• Wales Online

Drugs runner caught delivering £2,000-worth of cannabis to addresses around Cardiff

Drugs runner caught delivering £2,000-worth of cannabis to addresses around Cardiff Shakr Hamad, 30, was stopped twice by police after they could smell cannabis emanating from his car Shakr Hamad had been sent a list of postcodes by his dealer (Image: South Wales Police ) A drug runner who was found in possession of more than £2,000 worth of cannabis had been sent a list of postcodes by his dealer to deliver to. He was released on bail following his initial arrest but was caught delivering cannabis again almost a year later. Shakr Hamad, 30, was stopped by police driving a Ford Focus in Cardiff on April 10 last year after they could smell cannabis emanating from his car. He also appeared to be under the influence and tested positive for cannabis. ‌ A sentencing hearing at Cardiff Crown Court on Thursday heard a carrier bag was found and when searched it was found to contain eight zip lock bags containing cannabis, worth up to £400 in total. For the latest court reports sign up to our crime newsletter. ‌ Also found in the car was £440 in cash and an iPhone which revealed the defendant had been sent a number of postcodes in quick succession. Prosecutor Sol Hartley said Hamad was working as a drugs runner for an organised crime group who was directed to deliver cannabis to various addresses in Cardiff. The defendant was released on bail but on March 15 this year he was stopped by police in Llansannor Way, Butetown, after he was seen interacting with a man from inside his BMW. Article continues below The vehicle was searched and a black rucksack was found to contain 30 snap bags of cannabis worth up to £1,700, £525 in cash and a knuckleduster. His phone was seized and Hamad was found to be a member of a Whats App group with several other people who were working as drugs runners. During his police interview, the defendant became agitated and began punching himself in the head. ‌ Hamad, of Rhymney Street, Cathays, later pleaded guilty to two counts of possession with intent to supply class B drugs, possession of criminal property, possession of an offensive weapon and driving whilst disqualified. The court heard he has one previous conviction for motoring offences, for which he was disqualified from driving. In mitigation, Harry Baker said his client had made an asylum application to remain in the UK, which had been unsuccessful, but he has since made another application. Article continues below Judge Paul Hobson sentenced Hamad to 18 months imprisonment and disqualified him from driving for 18 months. The judge told the defendant steps may be taken to deport him, but this decision would be made by the Home Office.

Daily Mail​

13 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

SFA hit back at Rangers statement as John Brown TV row takes fresh twist

The SFA have accused Rangers of issuing 'misleading comments' after the Ibrox club criticised the punishment they received for a remark made by former player John Brown on club media channels. Rangers were fined £3,000 following a disciplinary hearing after being charged with breaching rule 38, which states clubs should not allow any criticism of match officials 'calculated to indicate bias or incompetence' or to 'impinge upon his character'. While working as a pundit on Rangers TV, Brown claimed a decision not to award Rangers a goal at Easter Road on the final weekend of the league season was 'corrupt' amid a debate over whether the ball had crossed the line. This week Rangers claimed they had 'flagged numerous examples of similar incidents on club channels' during the hearing and questioned a 'lack of consistency' in the SFA's approach. In response, the governing body pointed out that Motherwell development coach Richard Foster was handed a six-match touchline ban for a similar breach last September after branding the SFA's explanation for a contentiously-awarded Rangers goal against St Johnstone as 'lies' while working as a pundit for the BBC. They also claimed that investigations were undertaken in other cases outlined by Rangers but the potential breaches were not considered serious enough to merit more than warnings. An SFA statement read: 'We note Rangers' response to the determination of a recent independent Judicial Panel Tribunal. In the interests of accuracy, we wish to address some of the misleading comments contained therein. 'The sanction imposed by an independent panel was entirely in keeping with the application of the rules. The most recent and relevant example of a similar breach, the sanction imposed on Richard Foster of Motherwell FC for comments of a similar nature in the media, attests to that. 'Furthermore, to address the comments regarding 'rationale behind differing outcomes', we wish to point to the fact that investigations were undertaken in previous cases outlined and that the compliance officers of the time saw fit to issue a censure by way of warning letter for potential breaches deemed insufficiently serious to be progressed to a notice of complaint. 'This system of proportionality has been adopted since the inception of the Judicial Panel Protocol in 2011. Indeed, such discretion was exercised last season when the compliance officer wrote to (Rangers) to warn of the future conduct of players following matters involving Vaclav Cerny, Dujon Sterling and Mohamed Diomande. 'We also note that Rangers intend to contact the association to seek clarity on the Judicial Panel Protocol and its application. The club is, in fact, already represented on the JPP Working Group. 'We have requested written reasons from the panel chair involved in the tribunal and in the interests of transparency will publish in due course. 'JPP Rule 38 was introduced in response to the referee strike of 2010, when match officials campaigned for greater protection after enduring sustained personal criticism from clubs and fans. Ahead of a new season, we remind clubs of their responsibilities in this regard.'

Graziadaily

16 hours ago

• Graziadaily

Naga Munchetty Workplace Bullying Allegations: Everything To Know

BBC Breakfast presenter Naga Munchetty is facing scrutiny after being accused of inappropriate behaviour and bullying incidents on both BBC Breakfast studio and Radio 5 Live. According to a report in The Sun, Naga has been reprimanded for two allegations in three years – one that she bullied a junior staffer and another that she made a sex jibe off air on Radio 5 Live. These claims have emerged after the BBC announced that Richard Frediani, the editor of Breakfast and News at One, had taken some 'extended leave' amid claims of bullying against him. This came after 'unhappy' employees made a formal complaint against 'tyrannical' Richard, according to The Sun. The BBC has enlisted the help of a consultant to review the culture of its breakfast show. Sources also say that the BBC's HR team have seconded a lawyer from PwC to sort out the ongoing problem. According to deadline, staff have been approached about sharing their experience of working on the programme, according to the industry website Deadline. Naga has been a staple of the BBC breakfast show since 2010 and became part of the presenting lineup in 2014. The exact comment Naga is under fire for hasn't been reported. But according to reports, it was thought to be a crude slang term for a sex act, before directing the question at a colleague. The incident, which happened in 2022, was said to have left the audience stunned. Naga was reprimanded by a senior producer, but no formal action was taken. One source described the incident as 'Crass, inappropriate and wildly unprofessional. The person felt embarrassed.' According to The Sun, Naga was allegedly involved in the bullying of a younger member of staff last year, who was the most junior staffer. She reportedly accused the staffer of stealing without presenting any evidence. The confrontation led to a closed-door exchange, with Naga not issuing an apology after. 'It was humiliating. There was no evidence, no apology. The woman left not long after, completely demoralised,' said a source. Another insider explained the episode as part of a larger issue. 'That wasn't an isolated incident. It really is the tip of the iceberg,' they said. Alice Hall is the Staff Writer at Grazia UK. At Grazia, she writes news and features about pop culture, health, politics and interiors.