Expert Insights: Q&A with FCAI chief executive Tony Weber
Australia's first federally mandated automotive emissions legislation, known as the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), is now upon us.
The NVES officially began on January 1 and there's now less than a month to go before auto brands start accruing financial penalties for exceeding increasingly stringent CO2 limits determined by vehicle type from July 1.
Intended to reduce the CO2 emissions of Australia's new-vehicle market overall by incentivising the uptake of more efficient vehicles, the scheme will also award credits to automakers that sell zero- and low-emissions vehicles, creating somewhat of a carbon trading system for the local auto industry.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Needless to say this has caused significant friction in the industry, between brands that sell only electric vehicles (EVs) such as Tesla and Polestar, which are members of the Electric Vehicle Council (EVC), and brands that do not.
In this exclusive interview with the chief executive of the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI), Tony Weber, the head of the organisation that represents most auto brands in Australia, outlines several problems with the NVES.
These include the potential for higher prices for some new vehicles, which the FCAI says could throttle sales, force owners to keep their existing vehicles for longer and slow the total emissions reduction of the 'carpark' of vehicles currently on our roads.
The NVES is a policy that aims to reduce emissions from Australia's light vehicle fleet by setting emissions targets for new vehicle sales.
Manufacturers that exceed the targets must pay penalties or adjust their model mix to meet future targets.
The FCAI has long advocated for an emissions reduction scheme that is ambitious in scope. The scheme must recognise current and projected consumer demand, as well as the unpredictable nature of future technological breakthroughs. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
The NVES provides the impetus to supply low-emission vehicles to the Australian market. The great unknown is consumer demand for these products.
But the NVES, an extremely ambitious scheme, could result in a lower-than-anticipated uptake of low-emission technologies, which could encourage consumers to hold onto older vehicles for longer.
This could have the opposite effect of increasing emissions rather than achieving the policy objective of reducing emissions, while making new cars more expensive.
The NVES has already led to the withdrawal of certain internal combustion engine (ICE) models. At the same time, several new market entrants have entered the market in 2024 and 2025, lifting the number of EV models to more than 90. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
We expect brands to continue reviewing their product lineups in light of NVES targets and consumer demand.
Brands will consider the most efficient mix of low-emissions technologies, including hybrid, plug-in hybrid (PHEV), and battery electric vehicle (EV) offerings.
Most important is the Australian consumer's ability to continue accessing the vehicle models and powertrains they want at prices they can afford.
It will be up to individual OEMs [automakers] to make decisions on how they manage the cost of compliance across their fleets. This includes adjusting their model mix, purchasing credits, or factoring in the risk of penalties.
Many consumers rely on vehicle segments that lack practical EV options and will hold onto their existing vehicles for longer. The large commercial vehicle, large SUV and small vehicle segments are examples where the range of pure battery-electric or plug-in hybrid versions is still limited.
The model was produced as an indication of the potential impact of the proposed NVES at that time in 2024. It assumed that if 2023 sales were replicated in 2025 and the out years under the proposed government scenario, there was the potential for significant penalties to apply. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Since that model was produced, legislation was changed and passed in May 2024. OEMs are responding to the NVES by increasing the number of zero- and low-emission vehicles in the market.
Given the current level of consumer demand for EVs and their limited availability in a number of vehicle segments, we are concerned about upward price pressures on vehicles as fines accrue under the NVES.
Price is just one element buyers consider when purchasing a vehicle. Buyers correctly examine the total cost of ownership (TCO) when buying a car. The TCO includes purchase price, fuel costs, insurance, maintenance and resale residuals.
As the scheme commences on July 1, 2025, the need for modelling will be offset by sales data, which will provide real-time information about the scheme, including the accrual of credits and fines.
EV ownership costs are predicated on several factors, including fuel costs, purchase price, residual value, insurance costs, and maintenance. Focusing solely on potential savings from fuel costs is misleading.
It's too early to predict how credit trading will impact the market, as the decisions of individual OEMs will ultimately drive it. However, given the current demand for EVs among consumers, it's unlikely that sufficient credits will be generated to offset the accumulated debits over the years of the scheme from 2025 to 2029.
While there's an increasing number of EV models available in Australia, several segments including large SUVs, LCVs and some small vehicles still have limited EV options. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Without suitable models, consumers may hold onto older vehicles longer, delaying overall emissions reductions.
A more balanced transition is necessary to allow technology to catch up, ideally incorporating all forms of zero and low-emission vehicle options.
Recent sales data indicate that consumers are increasingly turning to hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicles as a transitional step toward full battery electric vehicles.
Still, these vehicles are unlikely to meet NVES targets after the initial stages of the scheme.
In general, the FCAI advocates a technology-neutral approach to transport sector decarbonisation, allowing the market to determine the most efficient and effective method of achieving the government's ambitious carbon dioxide reduction goals.
Emissions reduction targets should be approached by engaging all forms of emissions reduction technology. Based on prior analysis by our independent global expert, we expected EVs to account for around 11 per cent of new vehicle sales in 2024.
However, the actual result was around 7.0 per cent. Despite the increased availability of EVs, this level of EV penetration is not likely to meet the NVES targets.
Many Australians remain unconvinced about the suitability of EVs due to range limitations, charging concerns, and concerns about the total cost of ownership. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Australia's public charging network is underdeveloped, particularly in regional areas, creating range anxiety.
In general, EVs remain more expensive than ICE vehicles.
There are few options in key segments like utes, 4WDs and small vehicles.
There is pressure on residual values, which can be a significant concern for private and fleet buyers. This might be a positive for potential buyers of second-hand EVs but an issue for buyers of new cars, which in turn reduces the number of vehicles entering the Australian market.
Increased EV adoption will require significant [electricity grid] upgrades to ensure sustainability.
High interest rates and cost-of-living pressures limit consumer purchasing power.
Inconsistent federal and state policies create uncertainty for manufacturers.
MORE: Australian Government set to make crucial change to emissions regulationsMORE: EV brand urges Australian Government to 'stay the course' on new emissions rules MORE: Customers to wear the cost of new emissions laws
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Most Australians aren't ‘good with money'. It's time that changed
Meanwhile, in the United Kingdom, Mexico, Japan and South Africa, women's literacy on all things money isn't just as good as the gents, it's better. But what was easily the most concerning finding was that among those aged 15 to 24, the score out of five was just 2.9. That, my friends, is a seriously mediocre C-grade. Perhaps 50 years ago, when the choices were between a couple of basic bank products and a superannuation account, these numbers wouldn't have been so concerning. But in a world of countless different types of specialised bank loans, HECS debt, credit cards, buy now pay later schemes, online gambling, cryptocurrency, ETFs, salary negotiations, bonus structures, stock options, and self-managed versus industry or corporate super funds, it's never been more important to ensure that everyone, especially young people, is literate when it comes to money. Though the Australian curriculum does include financial literacy content, the way in which it is being taught and the detail within that vary greatly, leaving much room for improvement. One country leading the way in this field is, believe it or not, the United States. According to the US' Council for Economic Education, as of 2024, 35 of the country's 50 states now require high school students to attend personal finance classes before they graduate. Loading That's more than two-thirds of teenagers across America having a basic understanding of money and finance before they leave home and enter the world of adulthood and employment. The trend is also taking off at American universities, where a growing number of public and private institutions are offering personal finance courses for students as electives. These courses teach the basics, but some go further and cover the principles of investing, taxes, how to understand job offers and salary packages, as well as the psychology of why people make certain financial decisions. As much fun as those 101 literature or psychology electives can be, this seems like a much more useful course to be aiming for an easy A in. Aside from the fact that we live in much more financially complicated times, there are other reasons we need to care about making sure our kids understand money. For starters, research consistently shows that the better financially educated someone is, the more likely they are to make good decisions and better judgements about their money. We also know that the cost of being totally financially illiterate or having a poor understanding of money can have devastating long-term effects. People who are 'bad with money' are consistently shown to have a lower standard of living, and we see the wealth gap widening between the 'haves' and the 'have-nots'. So easily, one high-interest credit card or personal loan can follow someone around for decades and impact their credit scores, their ability to make career or relationship choices, create extra stress, and make it harder to meet their basic needs. And yet, we see it happen every day, often affecting people you'd least expect. Having a solid grasp on finances isn't just about us as individuals, either. Ensuring everyone knows the basics, especially those who are the least financially literate, is actually great for the economy broadly. That's because it allows people to carry less debt, improves their job opportunities and earning potential, and creates new jobs in the process. To quote former assistant RBA governor Keith Hall all the way back in 2008: 'Money spent on financial education would be money very well spent.' And while it's not as if we're doing nothing, we certainly need to be doing so much more. Because the more people who can hold their head high and say they're 'good with money', the better. Victoria Devine is an award-winning retired financial adviser, bestselling author and host of Australia's No.1 finance podcast, She's on the Money. She is also founder and director of Zella Money.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
New route launched as Australians flock back to former Asian favourite
Australians bounced back to international travel with a vengeance following the reopening of borders after the pandemic, but there were a handful of destinations we did not rush back to. One was the United States, thanks to more expensive flights, a strong US dollar and, most recently, the actions of President Donald Trump. Another was Hong Kong, where the decline in visitors began before COVID amid political unrest following China's crackdown on pro-democracy protesters. However, the signs show that Australians are returning to the harbour city. The number of visitors heading there has surged recently – up about 40 per cent year-on-year for the past three months. The number of visitors heading to Australia from Hong Kong has also increased. The number of Hong Kong residents heading here in April rose more than 70 per cent on the same time last year, according to Australian Bureau of Statistics figures. The trends explain why Hong Kong Airlines has decided to launch another route into Australia, which started from Sydney on Saturday. It's the second Australian route for the airline after it resumed Hong Kong-Gold Coast flights in January (it suspended the route in 2018). The Australian government recently reached a new bilateral air agreement with Hong Kong, allowing for increased traffic between the two destinations. The new daily flights will increase capacity by 20 per cent and cement the destination as the third-busiest international route from Sydney, behind Singapore and Auckland.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
New route launched as Australians flock back to former Asian favourite
Australians bounced back to international travel with a vengeance following the reopening of borders after the pandemic, but there were a handful of destinations we did not rush back to. One was the United States, thanks to more expensive flights, a strong US dollar and, most recently, the actions of President Donald Trump. Another was Hong Kong, where the decline in visitors began before COVID amid political unrest following China's crackdown on pro-democracy protesters. However, the signs show that Australians are returning to the harbour city. The number of visitors heading there has surged recently – up about 40 per cent year-on-year for the past three months. The number of visitors heading to Australia from Hong Kong has also increased. The number of Hong Kong residents heading here in April rose more than 70 per cent on the same time last year, according to Australian Bureau of Statistics figures. The trends explain why Hong Kong Airlines has decided to launch another route into Australia, which started from Sydney on Saturday. It's the second Australian route for the airline after it resumed Hong Kong-Gold Coast flights in January (it suspended the route in 2018). The Australian government recently reached a new bilateral air agreement with Hong Kong, allowing for increased traffic between the two destinations. The new daily flights will increase capacity by 20 per cent and cement the destination as the third-busiest international route from Sydney, behind Singapore and Auckland.
