Oil Hedges Seeing a Huge Spike on Israel-Iran: Expert

CC-Transcript
00:0072, Brent. What should it be trading at? Knowing the headlines that we know? Actually, you think, given the fact that we haven't lost any supplies. The market is probably, you know, fairly priced, probably a couple of dollars higher would also be fairly justified. Where I do worry about this market is that it's probably become a bit too complacent, that there won't be any supply risks now or supply outages. We're not saying that's definitely going to happen, but we did see some outages, right? We saw Israel take out attack from in South Pars 14 in Iran. That's definitely led to some losses in condensate and LPG. Gas production has also been affected. So it's not nothing. And I do wonder if the market's just completely dismissing the possibility that, you know, there will be any supply outages whatsoever. But you've seen a lot of the volatility today. Yeah, exactly. Falling down from where it was on Friday. So putting the Strait of Hormuz aside, if we do get some strikes and there are outages in the oil and gas market, can the Saudis make up for that? Can the US make up for that? Who makes up for that? Great question. I mean, look, Opec+ is increasing production already at an accelerated pace. You know, they do have spare capacity. Again, that does mean if there's a genuine outage over millions of barrels a day, there is fear in the market. But I would also caution that I think within or back in Middle Eastern oil back, there will be you know, I don't think anybody's going to jump in order to fill that gap because nobody wants the situation to escalate. Everything that's going to be done by other countries in the region is going to be trying to de-escalate. That's right. And nobody wants to be seen to be taking advantage of a situation. But of course, if there is a genuine outage, you know, Opec+, it is adding barrels and I think they will continue to do so to mitigate any of those risks. I'm curious as to what the situation was like for the oil market prior to this. And I know at least certainly here on the U.S. side, looking at the CFTC data, you definitely had a market that basically saw oil prices continuing to drift lower or at least to stay low where they had been. What were the potential upside catalysts? You know, now, of course, you know the military conflict right now between Iran and Israel. I'm glad you asked that question, you know, because last month, literally just about a month ago, we put out a piece that was called The Pain Trade. And this was exactly something we were highlighting, that the market had continued to go short and probably to early in our balances, are calling for a build in Q4 and 2026. But right here, right now, inventories are very tight. China's buying for its SVR and OPEC+, even though production is increasing. Exports happened because Middle Eastern summer burden is high and demand is high. As a result of that. We're not seeing a market that is losing the front. And our point was that you might actually get these shorts having to cover before the market actually weakens in terms of balances. And that's exactly what was playing out. And of course, the geopolitics has made it worse. With regards, though, to some of the disruptions that we had had because of obviously the sanctions that were already in place in Iran. Obviously the issues going on with Ukraine and Russia, which it also had created some potentially, I guess, upward price pressures here. How much is that adding to the concern? I don't think any of the Russia concerns are in the price. Because generally speaking, President Trump has been very reluctant to put any sanctions on Russia, even though, you know, the wider kind of team or the Europeans are kind of asking him to do so. So that's really not in the price. I think what we've seen in the last couple of sessions has been the Middle Eastern conflict. I think your question is almost suggest I would agree with. I think if there were to be sanctions on Russia, you know, the price could go significantly higher because even if there are workarounds, there will always be arounds. You could easily get 2 to 3 million barrels per day off initial disruptions at least. Right. Which is just more complicated when you don't have, say, Venezuela making up oil, for example, as well. If I'm a producer right now and I'm an oil producer and my hedging these levels and does that make me sort of more immune then to if we do go into the forties or the fifties, like President Trump has made clear he wants? Yeah, I absolutely think that one of the reasons why we've seen the short covering the catalyst has been producer hedging. We did that was another thing, but one that, you know, we are going to start seeing producers hedge because again, if the outlook isn't rosy, they will use any rally. And the last couple of days, according Quantum are pointing out this is one of the biggest increases you've seen in hedging, you know, kind of on a kind of day to day basis. And that again means that, you know, hedging the 2026 part of the curve, the curve flattening and anybody who has been short the December 25, December 26 contract, which, you know, we call it accurate day, they're all getting stopped up. It does mean the producers have some protection for next year, especially, like you said, if prices do go into the fifties next year with the bills. But at the same time, you know, the flipside, of course, is that we don't get the bills because, you know, just generally due to sanctions or whatever reasons that fundamentals end up being stronger than expected, then of course they will be underwater. But as of right now, all our balances do point to oversupply for next year. So the producer hedging would be prudent.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

41 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Investors Brace for Market Fallout From U.S. Strike on Iran Nuclear Sites

Investors on Sunday were bracing for a flight to safety after the U.S. struck three Iranian nuclear facilities Saturday evening. "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,' said President Trump in a televised address on Saturday night. A full assessment of the damage is pending, 'but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction,' said General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, on Sunday. Investors were relatively sanguine last week as Israel and Iran exchanged missile strikes and President Trump mulled getting the U.S. involved. The major stock indexes jumped to start the week amid optimism about a diplomatic solution, but slid as the conflict dragged on and finished the week little changed. Some analysts expect a sharp sell-off when markets open on Monday as investors rush to safe havens like Treasurys and gold. "I think the markets are going to be initially alarmed," Mark Spindel, chief investment officer at Potomac River Capital, told Reuters. Cryptocurrencies, which trade 24/7, suggested Monday morning would be a rough one for risk assets. Bitcoin slid more than 2% Sunday morning to trade below $100,000 for the first time since early May, while Ethereum tumbled more than 8%. A panic on Monday could present investors with a buying opportunity, said Wedbush analysts in a note on Sunday. 'This US strike was a matter of when, not if,' they wrote. Iran's nuclear program was, "the biggest threat to the region," so if the attack has decimated that program, 'this ultimately removes an overhang on the market.' American stocks on Monday could follow the lead of Middle East equities, which were rallying on Sunday as investors bet U.S. involvement would hasten an end to the conflict. The Tel Aviv Stock Exchange 35 Index gained 1.5% and the Egyptian EGX 30 rose 2.7%. Still, oil prices are expected to jump when crude futures begin trading on U.S. exchanges Sunday evening. How Iran retaliates—if at all—will likely determine how high prices go. Analysts say surging oil prices would aggravate U.S. inflation, possibly delaying Federal Reserve rate cuts and pressuring stock valuations. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Forbes

43 minutes ago

• Forbes

Can Iran Close Strait Of Hormuz After U.S. Attack On Its Nuclear Sites

The Strait of Hormuz waterway between the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman. It is a very strategically ... More important shipping choke point with Iran to the north and UAE and Oman exclave Musandam to the south. It is the only sea passage from the Persian Gulf to the open ocean. Early on Sunday, the U.S. entered the cauldron of the Israel-Iran conflict with a bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities in support of Israel. The move has again prompted calls within Iran for a retaliation involving a shut down of the Strait of Hormuz, a key maritime artery for oil and gas shipments from the Persian Gulf out to the Gulf of Oman and beyond (see map). Overall, the U.S. dropped 14 'bunker buster' bombs against three nuclear facilities in Iran, namely Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan, according to defense secretary Pete Hegseth. Iran has vowed retaliation, with its parliament approving a closing of the Strait of Hormuz, although the ultimate decision rests with the country's military. Oil prices, already up 20% since last month, are expected to trade higher over the coming days if the conflict escalates and there is disruption in the Strait of Hormuz. Cargo volumes lend relevance to constant market chatter about a retaliatory blockade of the Strait by Iran. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, Iran and to an extent United Arab Emirates' crude roughly equating to 30% of the world's traded oil, as well as oil products, liquefied natural gas cargoes (equal to 20% of the global LNG trade primarily from Qatar) and one-third of the world's liquified petroleum gas shipments, pass through the Strait daily, according to Lloyds List. That's around 30 to 33 million barrels of oil equivalent per day. The figure includes 21 million barrels per day of crude oil and products or a fifth of the world's supply. So, will the Iranians attempt to shut the Strait and can they? The answer is that while they certainly can for a short period, they probably won't. Why It May Not Happen And Won't Last Even If It Does For starters, doing so would invite a near immediate naval and air response from the U.S. with President Donald Trump unlikely to sit back and let it happen. It would leave Iran's own coastline and all its ports vulnerable to a vastly superior American air and naval strike arsenal. Nearby Bahrain is home to the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet. Furthermore, the manoeuvre may not even get off the ground as at least four of the fleet's combined task forces routinely patrol the Persian Gulf and the Strait and their surveillance may take away the element of surprise. Secondly, the move itself would be self defeating for Iran as it would impact the country's own crude oil exports. According to industry data aggregator and research firm Kpler, Iran exports on average 1.65 million bpd of crude oil and gas condensate. Bulk (or 90%) of Iran's sanction-ridden discounted energy exports go to China. Furthermore, more than half of all energy exports passing through the Strait - whether Iranian or not - also head to China, the world's largest importer of hydrocarbons. A potential naval shutdown would be very difficult to maintain under pressure from Beijing, the world's main taker of Iranian crude. A U.S. navy aircraft carrier (left), assigned to the country's 5th Fleet, transits the Strait of ... More Hormuz on November 19, 2019. (File photo: Zachary Pearson / U.S. Navy via Getty Images) Thirdly, such an event, however temporary, has partially lost its potency given that not all regional crude exports would be knocked offline. Key exporters Saudi Arabia and the UAE have pipeline fall backs to pivot to. In the case of the Saudis, 5.1 million bpd can potentially be moved via the East-West pipeline and loaded up from the Red Sea. Although, that is currently susceptible to attacks by Iran-backed Houthi rebel forces in Yemen. The UAE is much better placed. Its Abu Dhabi to Fujairah pipeline – that went onstream in 2012 - has a capacity of 1.5 million bpd. Its end point - the port of Fujairah - is the only one of the seven emirates that make up the UAE with a coastline that's solely on the Gulf of Oman and not on the Persian Gulf that the Iranians are so fond of threatening to cut off. The port, which bypasses the Strait, has the capability to dispatch close to 75% of the UAE's total crude output if needed. However, minor skirmishes and general nuisance in the Strait by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps or Pasdaran cannot be ruled out, including, but not limited to attacks on energy cargoes that aren't for instance destined for Iran's primary client - China. There is also the potential random hijacking of energy cargoes in the Strait, which has precedent. But overall, a full blockade would be hard to set in motion and ever harder to maintain for long. All things considered, Iran has been threatening to shut the Strait of Hormuz for years but has never actually ever attempted to do it or done it. While the region now finds itself in uncharted waters and there's always a first, that fact in itself is quite telling.

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

Five reasons why we may not see anything more than rhetoric from Russia after US attacks Iran

On the surface, at least, Moscow is fuming. Russia's foreign ministry said it "strongly condemns" the US airstrikes on Iran, which it labelled a "dangerous escalation". Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's powerful security council, accused Donald Trump of starting "a new war", and others have called for Moscow to step in. "It's time for us to help Tehran," said Konstantin Malofeyev, a sanctioned Russian businessman who is close to Vladimir Putin. But this was to be expected. Israel-Iran live: 'Incredible success' of US strikes on Iran hailed by Hegseth Iran has been a vital ally in recent years, selling weapons to Russia for its war in Ukraine, and the two nations signed a strategic partnership deal in January. So a robust verbal riposte was predictable. But the response so far feels more show than substance and if things don't escalate further, I doubt we'll see anything more than rhetoric from Russia. There are several reasons why. Firstly, the strategic partnership deal doesn't contain a mutual defence clause. The pact does seek to deepen their defence cooperation, but neither country is obliged to provide military support to the other in the event of an attack. Secondly, if Moscow did want to join the conflict or even supply weapons to Tehran, it would be hard pushed to. Resources are focused on the war in Ukraine. Thirdly, Russia doesn't want to damage its warming relations with the US. Any kind of aid to Iran would likely jeopardise the tentative rapprochement. Fourthly, the Israel-Iran conflict is a helpful distraction from the Kremlin's war against Ukraine. With all eyes on the Middle East, any pressure there was from Washington on Moscow to reach a peace deal seems to have evaporated. Lastly, it's not Vladimir Putin who's spoken out, but the usual attack dogs. Dmitry Medvedev, for example, is a senior figure but his fiery rhetoric is generally considered to be part of a Kremlin comms strategy rather than actual policy expression. Having said all that, though, Russia won't want the situation to escalate any further. Its regional influence took a battering when the Assad regime in Syria was toppled in December, and that influence would practically disappear if another Moscow-friendly regime in Iran were to fall. Read more: So for now, the Kremlin is frantically trying to find a diplomatic solution. Last week, Vladimir Putin held conversations with the leaders of Israel, Iran, America, China and the UAE, and those efforts continue on Monday when he'll meet Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi in Moscow. If the reports are true - that the US forewarned Tehran of the bombings and signalled they'd be a one-off - there's a good chance Moscow had prior knowledge too. Either way, Vladimir Putin's aim here is to play peacemaker, and to turn the situation to his advantage. If he can persuade Mr Araghchi to limit Iran's response to a symbolic one, and to then return to the negotiating table with America, he will have Donald Trump in his debt. The obvious place he'd want that repaid is Ukraine, in the form of withdrawing US support.