Virginia will elect its first female governor this fall. Neither candidate is talking much about it
This fall's gubernatorial race in Virginia will make history no matter who wins: Either Democrat Abigail Spanberger or Republican Winsome Earle-Sears will become the state's first elected female governor.
For now, that seems to be an afterthought.
Spanberger and Earle-Sears, who are each unopposed in Tuesday's primaries ahead of a November matchup, have little apparent appetite to dwell on gender. Both of their campaigns would rather focus on Virginians' concerns about tariffs and federal job cuts, as well as how the next governor can make the state more affordable.
But gender is a factor both candidates will navigate in a country that has elected just 51 female state governors in its history. The race could serve as a model for female candidates of both parties, particularly on the Democratic side after former Vice President Kamala Harris' loss to President Donald Trump eight years after he defeated former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
'There's still stereotypes,' said Mary Sue Terry, a Democratic former state attorney general who unsuccessfully ran for Virginia governor in 1993.
Women 'are perceived as being very diligent and having character, but they're not always perceived as being strong and taking on the big boys, so to speak,' she said.
One recent sweltering afternoon in Norfolk, Spanberger delivered her case: Lowering costs is a challenge she's prepared to face head-on. She was surrounded by local elected officials and a homeowner whose home was recently outfitted with solar panels through a utility funded assistance program. The former congresswoman and CIA officer pledged to keep trying to lower energy costs.
'Virginians are hurting because the bills are just so high and she has a real plan for that,' said Gwendolyn Bailey, the 69-year-old homeowner.
Asked how she felt about two women vying to be the state's next governor, Bailey said she was glad to see people recognize women have voices that deserve to be heard. But she says she's more worried about her neighbors being able to qualify for the same type of efficiency programs she did.
Spanberger spoke to CNN after her event about how gender could factor into the election.
'What I hear from voters is we would be so excited to have you be our first woman governor,' she said with a laugh.
She went on to describe parents who bring their children to events with excitement.
'Certainly, when I'm out campaigning and spending time across Virginia, I know it is on the mind of some Virginians,' she said.
'Ultimately, when I'm elected governor, my focus is going to be on governing. My focus is going to be on delivering on the promises and work that I set out to do when I began my campaign,' she added.
Terry, the former gubernatorial nominee, is an enthusiastic supporter of Spanberger.
'It's not so important to me to elect a woman governor as it is to elect the right woman governor,' she said.
Four years ago, Earle-Sears made history when the retired Marine was elected the state's first female lieutenant governor, 20 years after defeating a longtime Democratic incumbent in a bid for a seat in Virginia's House of Delegates. Her campaign website notes she is the first Black woman to be elected statewide in Virginia.
Earle-Sears has not been as visible on the trail as Spanberger. She spoke to CNN in a phone interview as she was traveling from Norfolk to Portsmouth for unannounced campaign stops.
'People are looking, I think, past the fact of my skin color, even my gender. It means that they want to hear a message,' she said. 'So, I'm not really focused on the historic aspect. It's wonderful. It's good. But what are your policies? How will your policies help my family?'
Core to Earle-Sears' campaign strategy is her record with Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, who drew national attention four years ago by beating Democrat Terry McAuliffe and positioned himself as pro-business and anti-regulation.
Earle-Sears is also attuned to cost of living concerns. In a video posted last week, she stood outside of her own vehicle and pledged to nix the state's 4.15% tax on auto sales.
'If you elect me for governor, we are going to tear up that car tax,' she says in the video before ripping up a piece of paper to symbolize it.
'I haven't stopped campaigning since 2021,' she told CNN, adding that she felt the race was competitive despite Virginia's shift to the left over the last few decades.
Georgetown professor Michele Swers, who studies women in politics, says female candidates have an easier time running for legislature than governor partly due to implicit beliefs rooted in gender.
'The job of a legislator is to be collaborative, and that sort of plays into people's views about women,' Swers said in an interview.
According to the Center for American Women in Politics at Rutgers University, there are currently 12 female governors across the country, eight Democrats and four Republicans. Eighteen states have never elected a woman to the governorship, including Virginia.
Kelly Dittmar, the center's director of research, says gender alone isn't a significant enough motivator for most voters. It's instead outside groups that tend to center identity to drum up interest and donations.
'The women themselves are very unlikely to use their gender solely as they're making history as part of their campaign strategy, because it's not something we've seen move voters in significant ways when it comes to who they're going to vote for or even voter turnout,' said Dittmar.
Being a female candidate doesn't necessarily mean talking about being a woman all the time but there are lived experiences, like being mothers, that will show up in important ways. Their life experiences themselves are gendered and will inevitably factor into their candidacy.
'One is not to overlook the ways in which their gender might be absolutely playing a role in their campaigns and their messaging without them having to explicitly talk about making history,' said Dittmar.
Republican strategist Amanda Iovino noted Democrats are still reeling from a 2024 presidential election loss in which Trump campaigned to men by going on male-dominated podcasts or appearing at mixed-martial arts and other sporting events. Trump often made hypermasculine appeals, talking about toughness and at times questioning Harris' racial identity or making jokes that critics saw as gendered.
'For (Earle-Sears), a Republican primary electorate is also never really looking to vote for a woman for the sake of voting for a woman; they want to see strength and issue positions,' said Iovino, before acknowledging that some voters still haven't fully wrapped their arms around women in executive leadership.
Former Virginia Gov. Douglas Wilder, the first Black person to ever be elected governor in the U.S., says that qualifications, not identity, are key to success in leadership.
While racism and sexism persist, legal barriers in seeking public office do not, argues the now 94-year-old.
'I think if you make your case with the people of Virginia or people anywhere you go, that is the guiding light,' he said. 'People are not interested in your color, your gender or your party. If you make your case, you stand as much chance of getting elected as anyone else.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Frantically Tries to Stop MAGA Civil War Over Iran
Donald Trump is trying to stave off a MAGA civil war over America's involvement in the Middle East that threatens to tear apart his conservative base. After the president abruptly left the G7 in Canada to meet with his national security team in Washington, the White House went into overdrive to assuage 'America First' die-hards who are angered that the U.S. could be dragged into Israel's battle against Iran. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding,' he posted on Truth Social on Tuesday, calling for Iran's 'unconditional surrender." 'He is an easy target, but is safe there - we are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.' As tensions simmered, Vice President J.D. Vance took to social media to talk up the 'remarkable restraint' the president had shown in trying to keep American troops and citizens safe. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared on Fox News to assure people there had been no change in the military's defense posture in the region. On social media, Trump's rapid response team posted video after video to demonstrate that he 'has always been consistent' on Iran. And at the White House, his communications team fired off a press release documenting 15 times that Trump stated Iran 'cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon'. The messaging efforts point to the dilemma Trump faces as he tries to balance his support for Israel with ongoing demands from within his base to avoid another war in the Middle East. Having come to office promising no more 'endless wars,' Trump must now decide whether to help Israel destroy a deeply buried Iranian nuclear enrichment facility at Fordow using a 30,000 pound U.S. bomb known as a 'bunker buster'. But such a move would risk any remaining chance of the nuclear disarmament deal Trump has been pursuing and further divide the very base that got him elected. 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' Trump said on Tuesday. 'Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, but it doesn't compare to American made, conceived and manufactured 'stuff'. Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA.' Others in MAGA, however, are not convinced of America's ongoing role. Carlson, a former Fox News host, entered the fray last week, calling Trump complicit and suggesting that the administration 'drop Israel [and] let them fight their own wars.' This led to Trump suggesting on Monday that he was irrelevant now that he no longer had his own television show, which in turn, led to Trump ally Marjorie Taylor Greene siding with Carlson. 'Tucker Carlson is one of my favorite people. He fiercely loves his wife, children, and our country. Since being fired by the neocon network Fox News, he has more popularity and viewers than ever before,' she said. Turning Point USA leader Charlie Kirk had earlier warned the issue could cause 'a massive schism in MAGA and potentially disrupt our momentum and our insanely successful Presidency.' MAGA activist Jack Posobiec agreed, saying that 'a direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition.' But Vance's lengthy post on X sought to de-escalate tensions. Noting the 'crazy stuff' that was being put out on social media, he said that Trump had been 'amazingly consistent, over 10 years, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.' 'He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment,' Vance added. 'That decision ultimately belongs to the president. And of course, people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy.'
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TACO Trump Punts Decision on Bombing Iran in Wild New Twist
President Donald Trump will decide whether to attack Iran within the next two weeks, and has issued a plea to stave off the backlash in his MAGA base: Trust in Trump. As a MAGA civil war over military intervention threatens to tear his party apart, the president has left the door open to a diplomatic off-ramp. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' he said, in a direct message issued through his White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt. The unexpected twist is reminiscent of the two week window Trump regularly gives Russia to start negotiating a genuine ceasefire with Ukraine. It comes after the president left the nation on edge for days about the possibility that he would help Israel destroy a deeply buried nuclear enrichment facility at Fordow, in northeast Iran, using a 30,000 pound bomb known as a 'bunker buster'. Trump gave numerous mixed messages, insisting the strikes could be imminent and saying it was 'too late' to talk while also insisting that there was scope for negotiations. On Wednesday, he even boasted that 'nobody knows what I'm doing' when it comes to Iran. Tensions escalated this week when he abruptly departed the G7—despite having meetings locked with global allies including Australia and India—to rush to Washington to deal with the issue. For the next three days, he then huddled with his national security advisers to decide whether the U.S. military helps Israel's bombing campaign. But such a move would risk any remaining chance of the nuclear disarmament deal Trump has been pursuing and threatened to tear apart the very base that got him elected. The MAGA civil war over the Iran put conservatives such as pro-Israel war hawks Laura Loomer and Mark Levin on one side, and America First firebrands such as Charlie Kirk, Steve Bannon and Jack Posobiec on the other. 'We can't have another Iraq,' Bannon warned at a breakfast with reporters hosted Wednesday by The Christian Science Monitor. Earlier today, he was spotted at the White House but Leavitt declined to say what he was doing there. The issue also spilled out onto screens this week, with conservative pundit Tucker Carlson—who accused the president of being 'complicit' in the Middle East conflict—skewering Texas Senator Ted Cruz over his support for regime change. Asked what the president would say to those who voted for his 'America First' doctrine and didn't want the nation involved in another foreign war, Leavitt replied: 'Trust in President Trump.' 'President Trump kept America and the world safe in his first term as president, implementing a 'peace through strength' foreign policy agenda,' she said. 'With respect to Iran, nobody should be surprised by the President's position that Iran absolutely cannot obtain a nuclear weapon. He's been absolutely unequivocal about this.' Trump's announcement was immediately mocked online. One critic on social media described it as 'beyond parody' while another joked: 'He's going to announce it during Infrastructure Week when the healthcare plan comes out.' Leavitt was also quizzed about the issue in the briefing room, with one reporter noting that Trump had regularly given Russia two week deadlines on Ukraine, with no outcome. However, she blamed the Biden administration, saying both were complicated global conflicts that the president had inherited.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Boasts ‘Nobody Knows What I'm Doing' as MAGA Civil War Rages
President Donald Trump has boasted that 'nobody knows what I'm doing' when it comes to Iran as a MAGA civil war rages over the prospect of a U.S. military attack. Speaking with reporters for the first time since meeting with his national security council on Tuesday, the president refused to say whether the U.S. is moving closer to helping Israel strike Iranian nuclear facilities. 'You don't seriously think I'm going to answer that question,' Trump said, mockingly. 'Will you strike the Iranian nuclear component, and what time exactly? Sir, sir, would you strike it? Will you please inform us so we can be there and watch? 'I mean, you don't know that I'm going to even do it. You don't know. I may do it; I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Trump's comments come as a MAGA civil war has been brewing for days between pro-Israel war hawks such as Laura Loomer and Mark Levin on one side, and America First firebrands such as Charlie Kirk and Jack Posobiec on the other. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson also entered the fray last week, calling Trump complicit and suggesting that the administration 'drop Israel [and] let them fight their own wars.' Carlson also clashed with Texas Senator Ted Cruz this week, lashing out over Cruz's support for military intervention in Iran despite his apparent lack of knowledge about the country. While a U.S. attack on Iran could have serious consequences for the region, Trump's rhetoric has shifted considerably in recent days, with the president admitting that his patience is wearing thin on finding a diplomatic solution to stop Iran from building its nuclear arsenal. On Wednesday, Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei hit back at the president for his 'absurd rhetoric' after Trump demanded Iran's 'complete surrender' and issued an ominous warning on X: 'The US entering this matter (war) is 100% to its own detriment. The damage will be far greater than any harm that Iran may encounter.' But Trump doubled down on his push for Iran to surrender, telling reporters that Tehran should have negotiated weeks ago. Only now were they rethinking their strategy, he said. 'They even suggested coming to the White House,' he claimed. A U.S. defense official told the Daily Beast it was moving the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group to the Middle East to protect U.S. forces in the region. Vice President JD Vance also posted on X that after showing 'remarkable restraint,' Trump 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment.' As the president weighed options, some Democrats on Capitol Hill called for Congress to act. Senator Tim Kaine introduced a resolution to prevent the U.S. from using military force against Iran without congressional approval while several others backed Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders' bill to prevent the use of funds for military force against Iran without congressional authorization. But Democrats were deeply divided over the response to Iran. Senator John Fetterman, who has often bucked his party to fiercely defend Israel, said he would vote against Kaine's resolution. He told reporters he was a 'hell yes' on the U.S. making preemptive strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities. Senate Majority Leader John Thune rejected that the president would need authorization from Congress to strike Iran. 'I think right now the president's within his authorities,' Thune told reporters on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. 'He obviously has a lot of authorities as Commander in Chief to respond to incidents that happen around the world.' Thune said if it goes on for a period of time, there would be discussions on what the role of Congress should be and whether it needed to take action. 'I think right now, let's hope and pray for the best outcome,' he said. Senate Foreign Committee Chair Jim Risch emphasized on Tuesday 'this is not our war' and praised the president for threading the needle when it came to Iran. While the House is not in session this week, in a rare moment of bipartisanship, Republican Rep. Thomas Massie was joined by Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna to introduce a resolution to prohibit the U.S. from getting involved in the conflict. 'This is not our war,' Massie wrote in a post. 'Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution.'
